i'm attorney jesse ralph on behalf of respondent nhi hoang. the appellant recites as reasons for contest of respondent's permit, one, harassment, two, illegal eviction notices, three, fraudulent contract, four, lack of notice of violation and five, inconsistency with an executive directive. in fact, even if one harassment to a legal eviction notices and/or three, a fraudulent contract have occurred, all of which respondent denies. those reasons are irrelevant to this proceeding. contrary to appellant's position, respondent has been remained subject to dbi's may 22nd and june 3rd, 2014 notice of violation. appellant is not entitled to any benefit from the referenced executive directive because she has actively interfered with and has knowingly refused dbi's attempts to perform its task 3, quote, perform a site visit and research to verify that there are no code violations including life, safety, and fire code violations. accordingly, dbi did and has not exceeded its authority in issuing the challenged permit. the appellant here has failed to present any evid