division should use warning letters, more frequently than it currently does brady will remember jesse minardi, submitted public comment requesting that the division do explicitly that. at the bottom of page four we have set out the policy, or rather the process that we intend to pursue here. staff have already begun to evaluate what other jurisdictions are doing in terms of a streamlined process. we are also initiating internal conversations, consulting with members of a compliance staff who have ideas about how their own programs are, or are not functioning well and which of the provisions of the programs that they oversee might be suitable for streamline resolutions. we've envisioned that we would have a first round of interested persons meetings, which is much more open ended. in which we would solicit from participants what they believe the scope of this revision process to include. we have some ideas of what the scope might be, from the regulated community and others. what aspects they think are ripe for reevaluation. having done that, and having completed the analysis, the internal anal