answer by mentioning that sam nunn and the nuclear threat initiative and this is a group with jessica matthews has been involved. and i've officiated being a member of the board for a long time. and especially the work that has occurred recently in the publication of this nuclear security index, which includes theft and sabotage. now, this is an sshl book for anybody deeply interested in the subject, because it goes through what's happening in all of the countries on earth that have any sort of potential for difficulty. it rates them one by one in terms of the amount of safety that has been obtained. and the amount of danger that is still there, as a matter of fact. and i appreciate this, because it's a situation in which nti has collaborated with the economist magazine and with data which is tremendously important for each student of all of this. plus, at least indicators of how extensive the dilemma is. how many countries are involved. it will often be mentioned in summary of this conference that's coming up, this summit over the weekend, that there were at least 35 countries that had substa

. >> jessica matthews. i wanted to ask sieg since you're in three, three quick related north korea questions. the first is, what do you think they want nukes now for? presumably it's a defensive move against south korea. right? i mean, for -- but i'm asking the question. and/or because they fear apocalypse in some way. but i was puzzled by your saying that what troubles you is that they're building an arsenal they believe in. i don't quite -- i don't know what you meant by that and i -- it seems to me actually sort of a good thing. very often. that's one thing nukes can do. and potentially could in a south asian context, as well. the second is that whatever your answer is, how sure are you? because in my experience, every single negotiator we have had with north korea, special envoy, the longer they spend with them, the less sure they feel like they understand. and i mean, that's a serious comment. and the third question maybe is overtaken by events but at least while we were having this six-party talks i a

answer by mentioning that sam nun and the nuclear threat initiative and this is a group which jessica matthews has been involved and i have appreciated being a member of the board for a long time and especially the work that's occurred recently and the publication of this nuclear security index which includes theft and sabotage. now, this is an essential book for anybody deeply interested in the subject because it goes through really what's happening in all of the countries on earth that have any sort of potential for difficulty. it sort of rates them one by one in terms of the amount of safety obtained and the amount of danger that is there is still there, as a matter of fact. i appreciate this because it's a situation in which nti has collaborated with the economist magazine, with data which is tremendously important for each student of all of this. plus, at least end caters of how extensive the dilemma is, how many countries are involved. often is mentioned in summary of this conference coming up, this conference over the weekend, that there were at least 35 countries that had substantial a

jessica matthews made a great comment yesterday. i've used this in a different set of words. but we are 100% wrong at predicting the future. we can create a grand strategy, as you mentioned, phillip, that has specific goals. but understand that tomorrow something will occur, 9/11 is a great example, that completely changes strategy. we the bush administration came in and secretary rumsfeld became the secretary of defense, he had a vision, truly a strategy, of transforming the department of defense. it was too cumbersome, too expensive, too big, caught in history. 9/11 happened. and it changed his framework for what transformation that ought to be. so as we go forward, i think we need to try to return a little bit to a view of really what should america do around the world. and for me i go back to the four elements of national power that were sort of -- not beat into me, but certainly exposed to me from the time i was a lieutenant until the time i was a four star general. and that is the combination of diplomatic and informational and economic and military elements of national

. >> jessica matthews. since you're in here, three related quick north korea questions.o you think hat they want nukes now for? presumably, it's a defensive move against south korea, right? i mean, i'm asking the question. they fear use way? lypse in some but i was puzzled by your saying that what troubles you is they're building an arsenal they believe in. you 't quite know what meant by that, and it seems to me actually sort of a good thing. very often, it's one thing nukes can do. and potentially could in a well.-asian context as the second is that whatever your answer is, how sure are you? because in my experience, every had withgotiator we've north korea or special envoy, the longer they spent with them, the less sure they feel like they understand. and, i mean, that's a serious comment. and the third question maybe is overtaken by events, but at least while we're having this six party talk, i always wondered why on the question of we ng the korean war, why didn't just say yes. i understand it's a bargaining chip but if it's one they really care about and it's one t

jessica matthews made a great comment yesterday. i've used this in a different set of words.re 100% wrong at predicting the future. we can create a grand strategy, as you mentioned, phillip, that has specific goals. but understand that tomorrow something will occur, 9/11 is a great example, that completely changes strategy. we the bush administration came in and secretary rumsfeld became the secretary of defense, he had a vision, truly a strategy, of transforming the department of defense. it was too cumbersome, too expensive, too big, caught in history. 9/11 happened. and it changed his framework for what transformation that ought to be. so as we go forward, i think we need to try to return a little bit to a view of really what should america do around the world. and for me i go back to the four elements of national power that were sort of -- not beat into me, but certainly exposed to me from the time i was a lieutenant until the time i was a four star general. and that is the combination of diplomatic and informational and economic and military elements of national power re

jessica matthews has been involved. i remember the board. especially the board that has occurred recently. the index includes theft and sabotage. this is an essential book for anyone deeply interested in the subject. it goes through what is happening in all of the countries on earth. potential.ny it rates them one by one in terms of the amount of safety that has been attained and the amount of danger. i appreciate this. nti hasuation in which cooperated with the economist magazine. data which instrument is the important. plus, at least indicators of how extensive it is. how many countries are involved. it will also be measured in that there were at least 35 countries that had substantial amounts of nuclear material a while back. up.t of them have given it 24 still remain. the u.s. and russia have the most. ofertheless, 1800 tons nuclear material is out there. in one form or another. much of it is not safeguarded as it ought to be. and finally if you terrorists who don't need a kiloton. they only a few ounces. the question is how it going to

matthew modine. >>> kate hudson and jessica alba snapped shots at the weekend wedding. katie perry attended with boyfriend orlando bloom and cameron diaz was there too with benji madden. and her coat is still fueling speculation about a baby bump. >>> and the royals, middleton fashion is taking the spotlight. check out kate's spotlight look. kate wore this cream dress to a war meeorial where she experienced a slightly, awkward windy moment. she wore a pink and green dress on the cricket field. and she paired it chunky wedges and today she wore a black and white crop top with an elaborate skirt. will and kate left the kids at home for their seven-day t >> she's so classy. >> i loved that dress and i wanted to get it forrmy wife until i the price tag, sorry, we're not royalty. >>> there's a lot love on display these days, gwen stefani and blake shelton changed their profile pics twitter. >>> hugh jackman posted this pic of his wife on their >> you were starting to sing jack and diane, weren't you? >>> meantime, the mtv movie awards ar celebrating their 25th anniversary. d

matthew modine. >>> kate hudson and jessica alba saturday's lavish i dos bet stylist to the stars and fashion icon. katie perry attended with boyfriend orlando bloom and cameron diaz was there too with benji and big coat is still fueling speculation about baby >>> from aspen to europe. >>> and the royals, middleton fashion is taking the spotlight. kate wore this cream dress to a war memorial where she experienced a slightly, well, awkward windy maryland moment. she wore a pink and green dress on the cricket field. and this was pretty bowled bold. and she paired it with chunky wedges and today she wore a black and white crop top with an elaborate skirt. the ensemble an elaborate $11 will and kate left the kids at home for their seven-day tour. >> she's so classy. >> i loved that dress and i wanted to get it for my wife until i saw the price tag, sorry, we're not royalty. >> she's got 22 events to go to, 22 outfits, can you imagine? >>> there's a lot of love on display these days, gwen stefani and blake shelton changed their profile pics on twitter. swapping throw back pics of each other. that's some

jessica matthews made a great comment yesterday. i have used this in a different set of words. we are 100% wrong at predicting the future. we can create a grand strategy, as you mentioned, philip, that has specific goals but understand that tomorrow something with occur. nine/11 is a great example. the complete restraint -- changes strategy. when the bush administration came in, he had a vision, truly of transforming the department of defense. too cumbersome, too big. it was caught in history. then nine/11 happened and it changed his framework for what transformation might already be. so, as we go forward we need to try to return a little bit to a view of what america should do around the world. for me, i go back to the four elements of national power that were sort of -- not beaten into me, but sort of exposed to me from the time i was a lieutenant to the time i was a four-star general. the combination of diplomatic, informational, economic and military elements of national power, really allowing you to achieve a strategy, grand or practical. i think we have gone away from tha