the draft 2013 rose offers a potential jifgsz for building in our parks for example, you can build cultural buildings. there are other reasons that are given to build if our parks she who says no means it she who gives reasons wants to be convinced. we need to go back to the 1986 rose building. san francisco shouldn't have to fight and we hope you'll help provide the vision. thank you >> hi, good afternoon. i'm sally i'm the chair of the rose working group. the new draft is better than the earlier visions. i commend the staff. they're still some important provisions that we need. we need open space for open recreation not passive recreation. there should be nor protection for open spaces. second i'd like to talk about the balance. the diversity is non-native plants but we remain concerned for native plants. we need a stronger statement in the rose that it gives native and non-native plants equal weigh and it roars the native habitat with the economic impacts to industry the eco like wind reduction etc., and also on the animals and reptiles that live there. it's mentioned in the policy yet t