otherwise, it is pointed to by jihadis, it is used as a recruiting tool. that's very different from saying, israel is a strategic drag. >> i think that discursively, if you sit down and parse what they're saying, at base, at root, that is essentially the message. far from being an enormous asset, if israel continues to act in a way that antagonizes opinion all over the muslim world, all over the arab world, and in other parts of the world, to tell you the truth. you go other places and say, why is the united states supporting this crazy policy, then it becomes a liability instead of an asset. >> yeah, but at that point, if you accept that analysis, at that point, you ask yourself, what can the administration do to move the peace process along in a direction that serves both israelis and palestinians well? and what the administration has been doing, i think, serves the opposite interests. it basically sends a signal to israel that this administration is not reliable, there's no longer a kind of hug-me-close mentality, which has, in fact, moved israel to, fo