thank you very much. >> supervisor fewer: thank you. >> hello, i'm jill fox. i'm here today as a community volunteer as a member of the san francisco coalition for underground utilities. i live and vote in d 10. while i encourage you to fund a master plan, i would like you to consider the specific issue of large new developments. i live a half a mile from the shipyard. the shipyard is fully underground utilities, electric, fiberoptic cable, they advertise it. it looks beautiful. however, these utilities get to the shipyard through the established neighborhoods. all they did to power their fancy new high-tech units was run wires on existing above-ground poles in the old neighborhood, poles that run on both sides of innis avenue and were installed in 1941. there have been fires, explosions, poles have collapsed. it's really not safe. so now there are hundreds of homes and eventually there will be thousands of homes basically running off an extension card past my home. so i have two suggestions: have these larger developers pay for putting the utilities undergrou

jill. welcome back to fox news for this appearance here. emily, can i start with you? what is happening in terms of the court? if you are accused of a financial crime, making you pay money is not really a punishment, right? is that why the prosecutors are saying she has to do some sort of time in prison? >> there are a few things they are arguing. first of all, the probation office is essentially arguing this is just an economic offense. that's what they think. no one was harmed. she didn't derive any gain. prosecutors in response are saying, it doesn't matter. she didn't commit this out of desperation or need. they called her morally clueless and it was a sense of entitlement that she plead guilty to fraud. the judge is going to see what the pro-baying officers are arguing, which is 0 to 4 month, no time in jail, which i have never seen them ever advocate so strongly for a defendant in a simple fraud case as i see here, including levying blame and looking at culpability of the test taking process and the admissions people. >> dana: what do you think is behind that? >>

people watching fox have a completely different view. >> jill, through all this, you saw the doj reactionuiry in order for them to hand over all of that grand jury testimony and information. is that the case? >> it isn't the case and during watergate, the actual official start of impeachment happened after the hearings had already started, and after we had turned over the documents. so i think that what is going on now -- i think it will. what nadler is saying, this is a proceeding, and this argument whether it is a "judicial proceeding" or not is wrong. it is a judicial proceeding. we have an actual kind of case where the rules that have been set and applied, and should count in the court. my only fear in this day and age is with the courts appointed, the judges who have been appointed by this administration, if they are going to thumb their nose at precedent. always wanted to say stare decisis on television and now i just did, but, you know, our system of justice is bound by that. past decisions govern future actions and the decision of the court to give the material, grand jury secret

brian: "fox & friends first" co-host jillian mele has been out, too, in florida. she is north where griff is. she is in vero beach. good morning, jill yawnel. jillian: good morning, we have been seeing those wind gusts that everybody has been talking about. heavy bands of rain throughout the morning. we have also seen some power outages, inte intermittent power outages. we have seen a transformer blow earlier this morning. people will have to deal with water is churning this morning. when high tide comes it will be a much different scene out here. already seeing beach erosion. that pipe you can see in the distance that was pretty much completely covered in sand yesterday. just a little bit sticking out. definitely seeing some effects here of the weather as the morning goes on. now, you know, we want to talk about police right now. because police have such an important job in these situations to try to get people out of their homes when they know they are in danger. watch this. [knocking] all right. do you plan on leaving or? >> i'm staying. >> you are staying? okay. you do understand that the flood levels and everything else through