gallow went viral all hell broke loose his jill stein crushing the u.s. wall in russia in december twenty fifth thing she gets into the russian propaganda t.v. and sat at the table with mike flynn and putin keep in mind there was absolutely no reason for her to be there except to become a russian pole they're not the only ones who've been accused of colluding or working with russia anyone who doesn't toe the bipartisan anti russian line is obviously on the kremlin payroll now senator rand paul one of the strongest libertarian voices of the republican party is also under suspicion let's be honest minor parties are a nuisance to the two establishment parties that make up the two wobbly the fewer parties the better right no one old dilute votes but here's the question without minor party guests who. i've been scapegoated maybe i should just be one party safely protected from brushing involvement but there's only one surefire way and that's to have no elections at all samir khan r t washington d.c. . that's a wrap up of today's top headlines for now thanks fo

jill stein is here. people want to bs house. but you got this!tgage by quicken loans makes the complex simple. understand the details and get approved in as few as eight minutes. by america's largest mortgage lender. ...to give you the protein you need with less of the sugar you don't. i'll take that. [cheers] 30 grams of protein and 1 gram of sugar. new ensure max protein. in two great flavors. ♪now i'm gonna tell my momma ♪that i'm a traveller ♪i'm gonna follow the sun♪ ♪now i'm gonna tell my momma ♪that i'm a traveller transitions™ light under control™ chicken! that's right, chicken?! candace-- new chicken creations from starkist. buffalo style chicken in a pouch-- bold choice, charlie! just tear, eat... mmmmm. and go! try all of my chicken creations! chicken! are you one sneeze away from being voted out of the carpool? try zyrtec®. it's starts working hard at hour one. and works twice as hard when you take it again the next day. stick with zyrtec® and muddle no more®. with tripadvisor, finding your perfect hotel at the lowest price... is as e

i will ask another famously accused green party spoiler jill stein what she thinks.oes the media help or hurt president trump by covering his rallies? this debate persisted ever since we elected donald trump. this week came an interest crop-offer, however, from an unlikely source, "new york times" columnist thomas freidman, and this set off a new fire storm. keep up the blanket coverage of trump, it hurts him. freedman says "it appears to be the toxic lying and bullying and unpresidential behavior that trump exhibits most in his rally and tweets which we so incessantly cover, that's turning off those trump will need. bring on the coverage. the reaction like places of fox news was -- isn't this what everyone said leading up to the 2016 election? >> what a great idea, remember what happened the last time the media covered every tweet and rally and every word of donald trump and every wink and nudge cough became part of the media's snark-nado? they elected donald trump, the bozos. is it a no win situation or if you are the president, no lose? i want to know what you thi

the libertarian johnson, 2 and jill stein, 1. they are defending the current system and moved to dismiss the lawsuit. i asked the former san francisco mayor what he thinks of the prop portionnal plan. >> well i think it would be a good idea. as a matter of fact the electoral college ought to be a abolished. we should elect people to public office at the highest level by a majority vote process. >> amendments are incredibly difficult to get passed one way around that would be to -- >> if you would start di vying up accord to go the percentage of votes the president won. how would that affected clinton versus trump. >> if you run the numbers across all 50 states, clinton would have narrowly but she would have won. for example in 2017 going to ton ald and visa versa texas. so you gain and give up. >> but you also have to give whatever the percentage to some nothing candidate that showed up. suddenly we're not talking -- talking about somebody who earned 50% of the total vote but someone with a majority of all the votes. >> so you go

from frazzled reasons but it shouldn't be that voting for jill stein is ineffective over donald trumph it was in many of the swing states that ultimately determined the results. if we had a system each statement said we're going to be right choice voting so you vote for your first choice and your second choice and even your third choice, then you could vote for jill stein and mitchell ,igned as an win, then the vote your second vote would be allocated to whoever you voted for, so if you vote jill stein in the hillary clinton, although jill science and donald trump would be better than hillary clinton, the point is there is no reason we should force people to cohere into these very crude categories of republicans and democrats when there are so many more interesting and diverse views from the left to the right that we ought to be encouraging in our political process not suppressing. of thehe editors promised her what her an editorial about your effort and here's what they said. as of the founders greater the electoral college because it provided one last an important check against the

about republicans getting elected because of a third-party, he conveniently brought up ralph nader, jill stein, he conveniently forgot about democrats getting elected because of candidates like ross perot or ron paul. another issue brought up was having the states decide individually about how they were going to run their state as far as electoral votes. if we had had that option hundred years ago, the civil war might not of took place. correction for the lady: about 60,000 people died in the civil war, she forgot zero, it was 600,000. host: the topic of foreign aid being discussed with the trump administration and the office of management and budget struck to the state department and the u.s. agency for international development earlier this month ofprovide a balance sheet foreign aid projects that are not been funded unless commerce intervenes, the money may be returned to the u.s. treasury and the end of the fiscal year on september 30, a scramble is on to allocate the money before the administration announces he expected change, which would freeze billions of dollars left in the story as i

2016 greenport presidential candidate jill stein.er entire platform was there's no difference between clinton and trump. as soon as the election is over, she said, oh, no, we can't let trump win, we've me money for a recount and i'll save you from him. she collected $7.3 million. talk about the green party -- ( audience reacts ) sometimes you get so blinded by revenge that you don't realize you're playing yourself. my high school principal told me to stop acting up in class, so i stopped showing up entirely. i never graduated. take that, mr. samuelson! >> trevor: didn't that produce some inadvertent negative ramifications? >> i don't even understand the words you just said. ( laughter ) trevor, i'm deeply concerned about how people are getting taken advantage of, which is why i've decided to help resisters resist getting scammed. i've set up a fundraising side, cash for kosta.com, and i'm going to use the money people give me to stop all these drifters once for all, because if i can just raise $100,000, i will be able to increase my

the one sitting there is a jill stein. i mean, there are democrats will tell you stein may have cost them a lot about industry states, wisconsin, michigan and pennsylvania. i don't know how many she got but it may have had a factor. beyond that we know about flynn, we know about manafort's can we know about the nra. we know about the center for the national interest. we know they try to hack into the republican national committee and various senators to attack democratic national eating clinton campaign and then attacked 20-30 state election. that's since 2016. what they're doing it is not a matter of public record but it's clear they're doing it because intelligence communis, and said it's going to be, this is going on already. and as part of the cyber activities they've attacked the american electric grid is if ts is all a matter of public record. i'm not making it a step. it's not personal. what's really at stake is the integrity of the democratic process in the united states and abroad. plain and simple. what are the ob

politics, and of course the green party has had its presidential candidate, cynthia mckinney and jill stein twice, so we have been way ahead of the curve on these issues. as long as people continue to vote democrat or republican and limit themselves to that, then it is going to restrict third-party access. and of course the media plays into this as well. i notice you have independents -- you don't have green party as a third option for your calling, as an example. certainly when iran, the media did not give me the attention. i did not have the money that the democrats and republicans had. i had a position to get on the ballot originally, which the democrats and republicans do not have to do in their elections. stackedas the deck is against third-party candidates, it will be difficult for people to get into congress, and i feel like that is essential for the tie-breaking changes that we need. host: scott, thank you for your participation. interesting points. issue, therennial decision of our two-party system. the court reasoned that happens in the united states is you get 50% plus one, and y

people talked about lingering effects of bernie sanders and his team undermining hillary clinton or jill stein drying votes away, people talked about persistent racism or sexism in the electorate or media coverage and people said there was something about the mood of the electorate, just something weird and they can't pin it down. it wasn't a normal election. tabulating all this, for the most part people didn't offer just one explanation, most offered two or three. campaign activity was the most popular explanation people offered, the mood of the electorate was a little less common but there were a lot of answers offered. what i'm interested in tracking is how people go about settling what this narrative was. marjorie hershey's work talked about a lot of explanations, got winnowed down to a handful of them. and these narratives were wrong. i can debunk all of them. in some ways they are right. this is a very close election. and maybe james comey letters, could you move 80,000 votes. it is not completely crazy. whether they are wrong or right isn't the focus of what i'm talking about like which

many accused he and green party candidate jill stein of playing spoilers in a race decided by slim marginsa handful of swing states. with the mid-term less than three months awhat johnson served two terms as governor. he was nominated by the party this month after the previous libertarian candidate withdrew. johnson is running against democratic senator martin hein rick and nick rich. does he have a shot despite his henri? could a libertarian win a senate race this year, suggesting johnson has already surpassed rich as the choice of both republican and independents. governor, great to have you back, fiscally conservative and essentially cool. yeah, thank you. here's the point, right, already fiscal conservatives in walk. there are socially cool representatives in walk. but there's nobody who is both. is that your void? >> well, what's at stack here is oeshlly being the swing vote in the senate. so if you've howeverer ever heard me talking about running for the u.s. senate. i said, no way, it's about bellying up to the trough. the last thing we feed is more spending in washington. deficit t

people talked about bernie sanders undermining hillary clinton or jill stein drawing votes away from the democrats. people talked about persistence racism or sexism within the electorate or within the media coverage and people talked about, some people think there was something about the mood of the electorate, it was just something weird. it wasn't a normal election, there was something unusual going on. relating all this for the most part, people didn't offer just one explanation, most people offered at least two or three. campaign activity was by far the most popular explanation people offered. the mood of the electorate, racism and other things were a little less common but there were a lot of different answers offered here. what i'm interested in tracking is figuring out how people go about settling on what the narrative was. in marjorie hershey's words, she talked about how there's initially a lot of explanation right after an election and eventually they get winners down to a handful and i'm curious. i would note that as a settle on a narrative, in some ways all these narrativ

they know it's a lifetime achievement we would make the very same case on behalf of jill stein or chomskythe left or anyone else the establishment was trying to silence. the left wing aclu spent about 100 years representing radical extremists who views they hated and they did it to make that point free speech is for everybody, even the crazies. that's the very definition of free speech. in a free country, everyone can be heard in totalitarian societies only the powerful can be heard. the left used to understand that. but they don't anymore. what changed? why are the most powerful companies in the world suddenly so threatened by an independent radio show host in texas that they are willing to lose business in order to make him shut up. and joe's hardly their only target. every day the big tension companies censor someone else whose political opinions they disagree with you sigh it all the time. last summer the ceo of google a billionaire by the way flew home from family vacation just to fire a low level programmer called james day more. what did day moore do? his crime was writing a privat

lingering effects of bernie sanders and his team undermining hillary clinton going into the fall or jill stein draws votes away from hillary clinton that otherwise would have gone the democrat's way. and people talked about persistent racism or sexism in the electorate or media coverage and some people just said there was something about the mood of the electorate. there was just something weird. and they have a hard time pinning it down, but said, it wasn't a normal election, there was something unusual going on. that tabulating all of this, you know, for the most part, people didn't offer just one explanation. most people offered at least two or three. campaign activity and messaging and the candidate traits were by far the most popular explanations people offered. you know, the mood of the electorate, racism, sexism and other things were a little less common, but, again, there were a lot of different answers offered here. now, what i'm interested in tracking is figuring out how people go about settling on what this narrative was, if they can come up with one explanation. in margery hershey'

no one's been more critical of jill stein and her voters than me but it doesn't really matter why america thinks this is important. >> but is the message broader than that? it might not even be to the green party, but the democratic party. those who are pushing very far to the left, or to the middle, let's all get on the same page. let's get a united force let's have one foe instead of fracturing our party. the democrats could be having that conversation going forward. >> right. they did something different in this race, he was not really talking about president trump. i know a lot of democrats in the country want to say, he's the foe, let's run against president trump. he didn't really do that, he stuck to issues. so that might be the way to go forward. which is let's not talk about president trump. there's enough out there, we hear that all the time. i just want to go back to the money for a minute. they poured a lot -- he didn't raise the money, the republican. >> he being whom? >> balderson didn't raise a ton of money as we just said. national republicans sent money there. this isn't

flynn the photograph of about the woman sitting there is just on -- jill stein. democrats will tell you that just dino kos are a lot of votes, but it may have had a factor. that flynn, we know manafort, the nra. we know they try to hack into the republican national committee and various senators. they've attacked democrats and the clinton campaign, as we know , and 30 state election commission's. doing now is not a matter of public record, but it is clear they are doing it, because the intelligence committee has said it is coming out. and as part of cyber activities, they have attacked the american electric grid. i am not making any of this up. is, what is really at stake is the integrity of the democratic process and abroad. plain and simple. what are the objectives? allegiance. ,hey have hated hillary clinton whatever that you think of her, they clearly hated her and thought trump would be much more pro-russia. they are clearly disappointed, but that is the motive. and why they offered to collude with the trump administration, as we know. they want to corrupt a

left that included narratives r that either african-americans should not vote, , should vote for jill stein which is not a wasted vote, and during the primary there was support for candidate sanders. >> quickly, ms. rosenberger, you recently published report policy blueprint. you describe an event on may 21 of 2016 where two groups were protesting in houston, texas, and one was called the heart of texas that oppose the purported islamic vacation of texas. other side the united muslims of america who were rallying to purportedly save islamic knowledge and these protests were confrontational. can youam tell me, at the time r law enforcement of the t protesters aware of who had manufactured the conflict? >> no. i understand is theyfa were notr the one thing we do know is fortunate with law enforcement was present at the demonstrations and, therefore, was able to keep them separate one of the things that we believe may have been part of the intent of organizing simultaneous rallies same-day same place, opposite side of the streets was probably to attempt to provoke violence. >> quickly if we ca

on the left, that included narratives that either african-americans should vote for del jill stein and during the primary there was support for candidate centers. >> you recently published a blueprint for countering authoritarian interference in democracy. eat you described an event where two groups were protesting in houston, texas. one was called the heart of texas that opposed the purported islamic locations of texas. on the other side come the muslims of america. at the time, where law enforcement of th or the protesters aware of who manufacture the conflict? >> law enforcement was present at the demonstrations and was able to keep them separate, but one of the things that may have been part of the intent of organizing simultaneous rallies on opposite sides of the street was an attempt to prevent violence. >> quickly if we can follow up in any writing with the committee, i would be interested in knowing what your recommendations are for how we can inform law enforcement because obviously this is a matter about public safety and also officer safety, as we know many of these disrupti

minor party voters and accusing libertarian party candidate gary johnson and green party candidate jill steinof electing trop and they added a whole new layer to their accusations bruce a phobia r t was central to this accused of undermining democracy u.s. intel communities exact words for hosting a debate between johnson and stein and showing americans that they had other choices besides the two establishment candidates are horrible crime apparently and then when an old photo of jill stein sitting next to blatter we're putting out an r.t.a. gallow went viral all hell broke loose. trashing the us will still time trashing the us wall in russia in december twenty fifth thing she attended a russian propaganda t.v. and sat at the table with mike flynn and putin keep in mind there was absolutely no reason for her to be there except to become a russian pole they're not the only ones who've been accused of colluding or working with russia anyone who doesn't toe the bipartisan anti russia line is obviously on the kremlin's payroll now senator rand paul one of the strongest libertarian voices of the r