jim baker as his chief of staff, a really skilled, shrewd political insider, ed meese, a counselor todent, and michael deaver in charge of the media operations. they ran the white house. >> the assassination attempt and aftermath elevated ronald reagan's popularity to a new high. the latest nbc news/associated press poll shows his job rating jumped ten points. >> reagan understood that he was getting this sort of sympathy reaction. everybody was rooting for him all of a sudden because they didn't want him to die. they didn't want to lose a president. so without missing a step, he goes right into what the message is. we've got to get this tax and spending bill passed and we've got to do it now. >> mr. speaker, the president of the united states. >> it was just like the movies. reagan was a true american hero. >> the president looking very jovial, very healthy. >> i was seated in the well of the house there when he was addressing congress. it was magic. everybody was so grateful that his life had been spared. it was a stirring moment. >> if he wants them to stop, they're not going to st

words of advice for the congress or the administration from the him great former secretary of state, jim bakernk we absolutely have to understand that one of the biggest threats facing our country and facing our democracy is the political dysfunction we have today. when i was there 25 years ago with reagan and with bush and ford, we reached across the aisle. thank you for your friendship and your great leadership of our country. james: thank you for yours, david. [applause] ♪ david: do you think that women can run defense companies better than men? [laughter] >> it is a team sport. donald trump sent out a tweet saying your biggest products, the f 35 is too expensive. you are recently voted the 22nd most powerful woman in the world. >> i get a text for my brother saying why was over higher than you? >> could you fix your type lease? david:

i always want to know how somebody in florida, jim baker, somebody got the word to supreme court, come on down here and take over this election. stop the count, and you guys vote. by the way, they voted entirely on partisan lines. five republicans on the court gave the presidency to w. w. gave us the iraq war. it all happened because of the court. >> yeah. i mean -- >> partisan voting. >> there's a lot of anguish among democrats about the likelihood that the court will be pulled to the right and tarnish the court. >> to the republican side, not just the right. >> tarnish the court as essentially. but the truth is the court's reputation has been damaged for a while now. it's not just bush v. gore. citizens united was a case that people thought was unfairly decided. a bunch of 5-4 cases that have come down where it's almost predictable in advance what the decision is going to be. we had an era of bipartisan that the court was immune to -- >> when was that? >> the truth is i'm not really sure because you can go back to the fdr days, but certainly there was an aura and an era where the --

over the weekend i listened to a good podcast by orrin kerr and jim baker, former counsel of the fbi. as i heard him talking, i basically heard him say that the writing was on the wall. and i might suggest that you could even hear lurkings of that writing in the jones oral arguments. for example, when justice scalia exclaimed, "don't we have any legislatures out there that can stop this stuff?" that statement in the context of the argument should have served notice upon doj about what a future case and interpretations of fourth amendment doctrine could bring. indeed, if doj gone to court that morning in jones expecting a friendly pro law enforcement majority that would unequivocally endorse the knowledge of knots, justice scalia's message, though quietly uttered, should have, for all who could interpret its import, echoed the force of hamlet's words of rejection to ophelia -- another expected but disappointed suitor. doj, get thee to a legislature. there are still a great number of areas to legislate in. the path is not certain. perhaps when the time is right, both sides can work cons

jim baker calling when he took over the campaign, said, tell me why we are opposed. inad been asking johnson that question. country is ready for this. we need to catch up. we need to figure out how to do that. i'm very optimistic about that. having been through the long battle to get us to the point of unpaid leave. shortcomings from 200 million cases in 25 years have benefited people. we have learned a lot. let's pick up that evidence. we have an administration that cares about this issue, i applaud. i wish there were broader consensus, but i will take this as a victory. , i'm going toon do my best. hard-working americans, their families. why can't we make progress on this topic? >> we are. the fact that we are here, today , and as rick pointed out, he was opposed. you have to be able to grow and see the needs that emerge. i am optimistic about it. a majority of the people -- we have to be mindful the process, we are not building an audience. our job will be in a sense to design programs and have a healthy dispassionate and i am hopeful that can happen. are you here

over the weekend, i listened to with jim baker, former general counsel of the fbi. as i heard him talking, i basically heard him say, the writing was on the wall. i might suggest that you could even hear markings of that writing in the jones oral arguments. scaliample, when justice explained, don't we have any legislatures out there that can top this stuff? that statement in the context of the argument should have served notice upon doj about what a future case and interpretations of fourth amendment doctrine , if doj had gone to court that morning in jones expecting a pro-law enforcement majority that would endorse the knowledge of not, justice scalia's message echoed the force of hamlets words of rejection to ofelia, another expectant but disappointed suitor. thee to a legislature. -- there still enough are still great many areas to legislate in. perhaps when the time is right both sides can work constructively. isould suggest that privacy not all about law enforcement access standards. minimization, notice, transparency reports, those are all parts of privacy pro

over the weekend, i listened to a good podcast with jim baker, former general counsel of the fbi.as i heard him talking, i basically heard him say, the writing was on the wall. i might suggest that you could s of that lurking' writing in the jones oral arguments. for example, when justice scalia exclaimed, don't we have any legislatures out there that can stop this stuff? that statement should have served notice upon doj about what a future case and interpretations of fourth amendment doctrine could bring. indeed, if doj had gone to court that morning in jones expecting a friendly pro-law enforcement majority that would unequivocably endorse the knowledge of not, justice scalia's message should have for all those that could interpret it important echoed the force of hamlet's words of rejection to ofelia, another expectant but disappointed suitor. doj, get thee to a legislature. there are still great many areas to legislate in. perhaps when the time is right both sides can work constructively. i would respectfully suggest that privacy is not all about law enforcement access standar

i remember jim baker calling when he took over the campaign in august 1982 and said to him again while we post to family medical leave. [laughing] i've been asking john sununu that question for the last eight years. so in the sense that country is way great for this. they are redoing it at the state level. we need to catch up. they shouldn't take another nine years to come around to this. the debate, when you fear how to do that and since the makes the most sense has the least burden on people and can be programmatically done without treating you agencies and departments to do so. i'm optimistic about that. having been to the long battle to get us to the point of an unpaid leave program, and with all the shortcomings in it, as i said some 200 million cases in 25 years have benefited people. we've learned a lot. let's pick up that evidence, have new debate. we have an administration that cares about this issue on families, i applaud. i wish there were broader consensus on these other questions but i will take this as a victory. now we just need to build on it. >> this question is from j

over the weekend, i listened to a good podcast that ben conducted with orrin kerr and jim baker who is the former general counsel of the fbi, and as i heard him talking, i basically heard him say that, you know, the writing was on the wall, and i might suggest that you could even hear lurkings of that writing in the jones oral arguments. for example, when justice scalia exclaimed, don't we have any legislatures out there that can stop this stuff? that statement in the context of the argument should have served notice upon d.o.j. about what a future case and interpretations of fourth amendment doctrine could bring. indeed, if doj had gone to court that morning in jones expecting a friendly pro-law enforcement majority, that would unequivocally endorse the knowledge of knots, just scalia's message, though quietly uttered, should have for all who could interpret its import echoed the force of hamlet's words of rejection to ophelia. doj, get thee to a legislature. there are still a great number of areas to legislate in. the path is not certain. perhaps when the time is right, both sides co

this is an e-mail you wrote to lisa page, bill precept, jim baker and cc'd andy mccabe, buzzfeed's about to publish the dossier. are you familiar with this e-mail in. >> i am. >> all right. says this, comparing now the set is only identical to what mccain had, presence cease, it has differences from what was given to us by corn and simpson. you write all that? >> congressman, let me answer it in this way. first, if i could address the chairman, over the break i was authorized by the general counsel -- >> hang on ath second. i just want my time stopped, if -- are you addressing me or the chairman? [inaudible conversations] >> this is all going to come together in a an answer. >> is there a question you wanted to direct -- >> no, i wanted to answer your question from earlier based on something i've been told by the fbi. >> i think i'm aware of the what the fbi told you, but right now the gentleman from ohio controls the time. >> you wrote this. that was the question. >> so -- >> do you see the -- [inaudible conversations] ou>> congressman, here's the -- >> doro you see the front -- the fro

and in this era of supreme polarization, howard baker stands to me as one of john kennedy's profiles encourage. >> wait, wait for a microphone. even jim free will wait one second for a microphone . >> the great fire follow line, why should we give back the canal? after all we sold it free. and howard baker said mister president, you only get one of these. that's right, he wanted him on soul and i'vealready gone to the well once . >> jim free quick point, congressional liaison we have a great dan tate lead our team and dan being a united statessenator and staff are longer than a lot of senators , howard baker was a good republican, went on to serve to be chief of staff to ronald reagan and i think to that er comes back profiles encourage. he got in his car, from the capital building through the oval office . he said you're right, i want to help . >> think about the idea of putting the country first and think about both parties, just thought i'd say that. in the back, let me get you a few more questions. it's a very pushy panel. >> there is no question that corner, everybody was surprised to see what a successful legislative record he h

baker's and we're usaa members for life. usaa. get your insurance quote today. >> ♪ >> ♪ >> sean: yesterday ohio congressman jim jordan announced hefor speaker of the house. earlier, i sat down with the congressman to ask him why he is running and what agenda he's going to push. take a look. joining us, ohio congressman jim jordan who announce head is running to be the next speaker of the house. welcome for a rare studio appearance. we are 101 days outside of the mid-term elections. i am calling at this time most important mid-term in our lifetime. >> yes. they want to impeach the president if they win. we have to win. >> sean: explain. >> if the democrats get in office they will go after president trump. they went so far left with the social democratic agenda they have. it's critical. here's what is at stake. think about the last year and a half. regulations were due. taxes lower. unemployment lowest in 20 years. economy is humming. gorsuch on the court and embassy back in jerusalem. out of the crazy iran deal and the hostages back from north korea. and i'm forgetting a few things. what is amazing about that list as well is congr

jim kelly, who lost his eight-year-old son to a fatal nervous system disease in 2005 in an emotional acceptance speech after receiving the jimmie v award for perseverance at last night's espy awards. bakereld earns the honor of the best male college athlete. eagles quarterback nick foles won the award for best championship performance after leading the philadelphia eagles to the first superbowl title. in a powerful conclusion to the ceremony, the hundreds of survivors of larry nassar's sexual abuse were given the arthur ashe courage award. aly raisman accepted the award on behalf of the 141 nassar survivors who stood on the stage with her. not a dry eye in the room last night. an amazing espy awards. turning to major legal baseball where star infielder manny ma chauld owe chaud machado is headed to san francisco. he is in the final year of his contract, making him somewhat of a rental for the dodgers, who currently sit in first place atop the west. another major trade with the nba between spurs and raptors. san antonio sends leonard and green for de rozen and poetl in a first round pick in the draft. >> it puts things in perspective when you see all of larry nas wrar's victims standing

baker's and we're usaa members for life. usaa. get your insurance quote today. >>> let's get down to the new york stock exchange. jimgative things to worry about, jim? that was your latest -- >> oh, absolutely. i mean, look i'm worried about tariffs. i'm worried about krcommodity pricing. i'm worried about italy -- no, actually, i kind of like things but i do know tariffs are tomorrow and i got to tell you, joe, i was on the conference calls that i missed while i was away analysts keep saying it's got to end. it's horrible. but the companies won't roll over and play dead i don't know what to say joe? what is it with these people being optimistic what happened to these business people >> i don't know. that's a good point. >> they don't watch. they don't read. they just work that's the problem >> there's good worrying and bad worrying we like walls of worry, but then when it gets -- i don't know -- when it starts influencing your behavior, maybe it is not -- that's not the positive -- >> look, there is good worry we want to be skeptical. taum at all times because the market's had a big move. tech stocks while i was aw