jim carter and his guests may just share

in just a moment, jim carter, who brilliantly portrayed mr.n on downton abbey, will guide us through the most morable moments of this award-winning pbs series enjoyed by millions across the country and around the world.ol together, wewed a compelling cast of characters through sweeping change, love, ambition, heartbreak, and hope. anntnow, the story will ue on the silver screen when the downton abbey feature film comes to theaters this fall. what will happen?

would bill clinton and jim? carter have thrived under these rules? he asks the question.wo valid points, with jimmy carter and bill clinton also had much smaller fields back then. i think the size of the field has made it very hard. >> i think the financial damage you that mention said a real thing we're seeing. we're seeing nine house representatives and senators transfer more than $40 million to their presidential campaign committees. this is something that governors can't do because they don't have federal campaign committees. this is something we saw kristin gillibrand doing. i think that is a valid point. and i think that's something that governor hickenlooper who dropped out brought up as well. >> and i don't know how long he can survive. one of the interesting candidates, outsider candidates andrew yang showing shade. this is in a tweet. eric swalwell and hickenlooper all have other races. it does make you wonder who else could drop out in the days to come. i'm going to out to say yang is unlikely to be the democratic candidate for president. stll not a message in

tom fitton stays with us, sara carter, jim jordan, senator lindsey graham, as we continue with this breaking news development, confirmation of so much that we reported over the last two and a half years. where's it going? we will get to that next. ♪ get to that, next. ♪ ♪ check out bass pro shops and cabela's for the latest equipment and camo during the fall hunting classic sale and event. it's your chance to gear up for the upcoming season at big savings. your adventure starts here. ♪now i'm gonna tell my momma♪ ♪that i'm a traveller ♪i'm gonna follow the sun♪ ♪now i'm gonna tell my momma ♪that i'm a traveller transitions™ light under control™ ♪ >> sean: just breaking, the ohr 302s have now been released. s the contents are damning, now undeniable, irrefutable proof that we have been right all along. america's powerful government bureaucracy was in fact weaponized against the trump campaign. the trump transition and the trump presidency. we continue now with congressman jim jordan and senator lindsey graham. i have a funny feeling, jim, g that in the house, jerry nadler and adam schiff, ada

tom quinn stays with us, sara carter, jim jordan, senator lindsey graham, as we continue with this breaking news development, confirmation of so much that we reported over the last two and a half years. where's it going? we will get to that, next. ♪ asic three-point turn. -[ scoffs ] if you say so. ♪ -i'm sorry? -what teach here isn't telling you is that snapshot rewards safe drivers with discounts on car insurance. -what? ♪ -or maybe he didn't know. ♪ [ chuckles ] i'm done with this class. -you're not even enrolled in this class. -i know. i'm supposed to be in ceramics. do you know -- -room 303. -oh. thank you. -yeah. -good luck, everybody. -oh. thank you. -yeah. my body is truly powerful. i have the power to lower my blood sugar and a1c. because i can still make my own insulin. and trulicity activates my body to release it like it's supposed to. trulicity is for people with type 2 diabetes. it's not insulin. i take it once a week. it starts acting in my body from the first dose. trulicity isn't for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. don't take trulicity if you're allerg

i pulled a half a dozen smart people with former experiences in me, jim, john, ash carter, a load crystallize that at the end. a all of them come back they cannot pursue that in a credible way unless you have an articulated strategy from the top and backing of the top. all the way to thehe top they sd they don't have that. that is the shadow of war and i look forward to my interrogation. [applause] >> thank you jim, the first big question, there is a version of asia or is there more expensive that they want to replace as a world superpower. or do they not know just working it out, what do you think? >> the latter. the emissions have grown over time and i speak a lot to andrew erickson present a good amount because he teaches us at thearll naval war college. he describeses in 1949, action prior to that china laid out these goals in detail of how they were going to approach their power. the first thing, let's solidify the control in china. in solidify control and the environment. watch the history, that's the 50s, strengthen, build the military, go after the first island chain, second, what the

carter was very good at that period of time. >> jim, do you have any thoughts? >> well, events of that time, i think events were propelling us as society to do a better job on refugees. not only was it indochina, december of '79, looked at cable traffic. low and behold the soviet union had invaded afghanistan. three and a half to five million more refugees going to iran and pakistan. about a week later i knew africa chief comes in, he said the somalis invaded eat ee opthiopi. we have a million somalis in the desert. castro starts to empty his institutions and we have mariel. now i am on the new bureau with very little capability and staff, we have the indochina, cambodian holocaust, we've got afghanistan, horn of africa. that was just the first of many, many african crises that would occur. we had to do something. we needed a better way to say who is a refugee. we were bringing all these people in through parole. then they would have designated categories. if you're in a designated category, you're in free. that wasn't adequate. we had to have a new legal mechan

two levels between the two and between the ford, and the reagan and the carter years, the progress worked. yes, disagreement, and jim can testify that it was a system of give and take. it was tortuous process. which continued through the geneva meeting. but what i wanted to mention is two things quickly and then i'll stop. this is of significant importance and one was 1972. liz was the youngest female member of congress at this time, and so we had the longest running member of the house of representatives and so liz came in and joined the subcommittee, and we spent quite a few years on the subcommittee, and as she said over here from 1979 to 1981, and that is when all of this took place. liz came in and we were off to do the refugee act. she needed a systemic and orderly system for handling the bifurcated refugee problem. before that, it wias ad hoc, an sometimes the response to an emergency crisis. she recognized the definition was not the same as the u.n. definition, and she wanted to make sure that the ideology, geography, and none of those things came into play, and that it was a fair and humane process to elimi

to me, it's a sign of leadership, starting with president carter, right on down through the senior ranks, jim, doris. they just didn't give up. normally you'd just simply have them walk away from this problem, move on to something else. it was trench warfare, watershed moment that led to not just one quick decision, but including a national security memorandum, 1983, which is a very hard thing to get through the government. an incredibly fete really, which i think both doris and jim would say set a better tone for the way the refugee act was interpreted after that. you didn't have the kind of wholesale disregard for the applicant that was seen at that time. one of the last instructions was you will sit down when you interview the applicant rather than standing above him and glowering at him, which is what the i.n.s. officers was doing. every one of these things had to be corrected. so i don't know where to leave it. maybe one for the carter center, one for hias, one for somebody else, the record of these cables that were required to bring them back on board. it was no mean feat to do that. i

i pulled half a dozen smart people with experience, jim clapper, michael hayden, john scarlett former head of m.i. six, ash carter etc. and we customized at the end because there is a way forward and some of these are ways that are already being pursued at all of them come back to the fact you can't pursue that in a credible way without an articulated strategy at the top and that is what they say that they don't yet have today. that is the shadow war. i look forward to my interrogation. [laughter] >> the first big question do they have a version of the munro doctrine or they want to replace this is the superpower or do they not know as working out, what do you think? >> the latter. their ambitions have grown over time and i speak a lot he's too hot itaught us that the naval wr college he describes how in 1949 come actually prior, china laid out these goals and detailed a flowchart of how they were going to approach power. first was let's solidified control in china and then solidify control on tibet. strengthen, build a military comic about the second island chaichain but they referred to s the near cds and then

community politicizing a secret court and jim comey signed those warrants knowing there was not complete information included about george papadopoulos and carter page, that may be the true area where he has to be held to account. >> bill: let me take you back to april of last year, here is james comey quickly on abc defending himself. >> i gave that unclassified memo to my friend and asked him to give it to a reporter. that is appropriate. >> bill: so many thought this was not the end of it, do you think this charge was oversold? >> i never believed this was the strongest case we could make against jim comey but i think this behavior of his is certainly not blessed. you had the obama appointed inspector general, the field it was so concerning, even though that prosecution didn't occur, it doesn't mean it's good conduct and it's indicative of a broader dynamic under jim comey's leadership and that is the fbi believed their role wasn't to investigate crimes and make decisions. it was to shape public opinion through the press. that's why you continue to see andrew mccabe who was jim comey's deputy face potential criminal penalties as a result of

carter got on however, there's lower appointments including two circuit court judges 12 elevated the supreme court. jim breyer injustice can grow. >> go to scott and how the happen. >> there is a theory that buchanan wanted the decision topic. what he deafly wanted he was going to solve slavery. i don't know that he had a particular solution but it was a case winding around and use a former slave had gone up to minnesota and he comes back in the master guys and he said he is free because he was living in the territories that were not supposed to have slavery. at any case the court case comes and he's a chief justice, all these guys are related. anyway but there's a split side, not conservative and liberal as today but southern and northern. i am buchanan apparently had a discussion with him before he took office and said what are we going to do about this and he says nobody is going to buy into that. if you can convince somebody to change his mind. buchanan, did anybody go to dickinson college? you responsible for the civil war. there's a third supreme court justice that went to dickinson intentions on

carter page was a fraud, i believe. the counter intelligence investigation is something that we need to look at really closely. >> dana: jim, can you help me understand from a process standpoint, seems like there's these investigations at once. help us clarify. you mentioned jim durham. he's the u.s. attorney that is tasked with looking at this particular thing or are there other investigations happening at once? >> we don't know 100%. durham is looking at how all of this got started. that absolutely includes the carter page fisa application process. remember the context and the timing of this, right? mr. steele had been fired as an informant for leaking to the media before all of these meetings that we see the 302s about. the 302s are the fbi still getting information from an informant. not as part of the mueller investigation but something else. it's huge questions, very fair questions about why the fisa court didn't get a full disclosure at some point about this dossier and why the fbi was still culling information from a guy that says he hates trump and wants to see him lose at all costs. >> dana: michael, does that se

jim comey. as we all know by now, comey signed off on the very first fisa application against donald trump and his campaign associate carter page and we also now know he signed two other fisa applications, all based, the bulk of information, the bought and paid for phony russian dossier, bought and paid for by hillary clinton. he swore three times that the evidence in those applications were true, accurate, and verified. in reality, in truth, none of it was any of the above. none of it was true, none of it was verified and comey was lying. now, the first fisa request relied on hillary's bought and paid for dirty dossier, russian dossier, that wasn't true. neither was the second or third warrant. it was all based on the phony dossier. none of it accurate, none of it verifiable. it was all unverifiable garbage. comey knew the intel was b.s. he was warned specifically on multiple occasions by multiple people in multiple sources. no serious attempt was ever made to verify the dossier's claims that he signed off on three times. comey used it in a way in order to secure a backdoor into all things trump campaign and then transiti