tom winter, barbara mcquade and jim cavanaugh are with me.om winter, they filled in some gaps but not a lot. >> not a lot, chuck. yes. it would be great. i don't understand why questions weren't allowed to be asked or answered there, particularly because it would be great to get more of a sense of the ideology here. unfortunately, we don't yet have the court documents. i believe i heard the attorney general say that it was the wolverine watchmen and announcing the arrest of seven more people. that's typical in these type of cases because sometimes the states have the ability to make charges that the federal authorities can't just because of law and the statutes between the state and federal government. i think it's interesting to note, all these men fit a typical profile that we see which is mid to late 30s, early 40s. the possession of weapons charges and the commission of a felony are important charges because those carry mandatory sentences that are stacked on top of whatever they are convicted with in their initial charges, the violations

cavanaugh was there. amy coney barrett was there. of all of those lawyers, who was the smartest? benjamin: every time, i will answer that jim baker. david: i think that is a politically correct benjamin: they would all agree. david: let's suppose both of you were wrong, suppose it doesn't get resolved in the courts but in the congress. you go through how this gets resolved in the congress? has thethe congress deciding who is the next president? this will arise if there cannot be a clear winner in the electoral college. then we go into a law called the electoral count act of 1887. i believe that there will be at least two substantive sides the come out of that. it is fairly indecipherable and open to many interpretations. so i think that you will see novel litigation should we go to that stage. an active, it is never been stressed. what i'm about to say, i think we had to caviar with the certainty that would come about. the house and the senate would be called upon to play various roles with the judge. probably competing slates of electors that would emerge from the states. that gets into a very arcane theess with the house, first