my neighbor, jim curran, filed an individual d.r. to emphasize how impacted his particular home is. he has worked together with us, all the neighbors, to coordinate our ask. we have been engaged with the sponsor to work out our differences since september 2, 2016, which was the date of the preapplication meeting. we expressed our concerns to the sponsors and planning immediately, and they have, for the most part, gone unanswered. these concerns were supported, as chris said, twice, by comments issued by the rdat. the first comment, to acknowledge this is a highly visible facade. and then, the second comment, design the height and depth of the building to be compatible with the existing building scale at midblock open space, reduce the top floor massing by setting back upper floor at 20'6" from existing rear wall and sensitively reduce the appearance of all designs. the current design -- okay. so this graphic shows the proposed project. it does correct all the code errors from previous revisions, but as you can see, this does not include significant sculpting and terracing, which we