jim fisher says the fbi and the u.s. attorney took the easy way out and never really solved the case. >> bill rothstein died about a year after the crime and he died with, in my opinion, all the secrets, all the answers. to that extent, well, nobody literally dies laughing. he went to his grave knowing that he had outfoxed everyone. >> neither the u.s. attorney's office nor the fbi would comment to cnn about fisher's assertions. and yet there is someone who is alive, who kenneth barnes says was at rothstein's house the day of the robbery but was never charged in the crime. he is the convicted sex offender granted immunity in exchange for testimony he was never asked to give. next -- brian well's family is really wanting to know about you, sir. please. could this man hold the answers that would finally solve the case? and some difficult ones. but, through it all, we've persevered, supporting some of the biggest ideas in modern history. so why should our anniversary matter to you? because for 200 years, we've been helping

. >> jim fisher, a former criminologist studied the case from the beginning. >> so you had 50 people running around random investigating les, with very little coordination, no one seemed to be in charge. >> from the outset, he believes the fbi, the local police, all to the law enforcement agencies involved were on the wrong track. this was not, he says, a bank robbery. >> you believe brian wells was murdered? >> well, he was murdered and it was a first-degree murder. this was an intentnal, premeditated homicide. more over, it was extremely cruel in the way the crime was executed. >> narrator: not just the crime, the bomb was a crude -- home made lock, in all made into a bizarre puzzle wrapped around the neck of the victim. and whatever this was, a bank robbery, a violent murder, the case was about to take another, bizarre, almost unreal twist. >> there's a frozen body in a freezer in the garage. >> a second body, this one hidden in a freezer, and a new suspect telling an even stranger tale. >> what came in first, the body or the freezer? >> the body came in, i put it on a cart -- >>

jim fisher says the fbi and the u.s. attorney took the easy way out and never really solved the case. >> bill rothstein died about a year after the crime and he died with in my opinion all the secrets, all the answers. and to that extent nobody literally dies laughing. he went to his grave knowing that he had got everyone. >> neither the u.s. attorney's office nor the fbi would comment to cnn about the assertion. yet there is someone who is aalive who kenneth barns says was at rothstein's house the day of the robbery but was never charged in the crime. he is the convicted sex offender granted immunity in exchange for a testimony he was never asked to give. next -- >> brian wells' family is wanting to know about you. >> could this man hold the answers that would finally solve the case? it took a mighty machine, and plain old ingenuity to go where no fifth grader had gone before. ♪ and she flew and she flew, into the sky and beyond. my name is annie and i'm the girl who dreamed she could fly. powered by intel core processo

that was stanley fisher there with the chairman. >> let's get to chicago. jim row with chicago. >> slightly disappointing. this is the weird number. when it comes 15 minutes before an event you have to be silly to trade on this and then have the chairman say something in 15 minutes that could send the market in your face. this is the reported number but it won'ting really picked apart and decided how it fits into the equation until next week after we digest the chairman's remarks. this is a slightly weaker than expected number. >> thank you very much. not the last data point we'll get today. wall street and the world focused on what is going to come out of jackson hole in a few moments. joining us with their thoughts, dan green house is chief global strategist with bitg and some of the headlines being written suggest the market's up because they believe bernanke will say something big. do you agree? >> no. we were talking off air, i didn't hear if he said it on air. i think i am going to subscribe to the argument the idea that wedeman would be on the verge of r

jim your thoughts on this, is that the big banks should be broken up. >> yeah, i support my colleague, richard fisherer colleague, tom hanig who argued these banks are too b big, i'm not against bigness per se but they have an impolicity insurance and that has really been costly during this crisis, i think he'd be better off with smaller firms and my metric for smaller is if they're small enough you feel comfortable letting them fail, you're at the right size. >> harrison brings up it wasn't the big banks necessarily. i take that back, citigroup needed help. his point is that some of these big banks also helped out, you looked to somebody like a jpmorgan to help take care of some of the other banks that really got into trouble. >> i think that's true as you just want an industry where you feel there's plenty of competition, you feel like there's not an implicit guarantee coming from the taxpayers and you know, because you have big corporations, you'd have to have big banks. i don't think so. those corporations have access to capital markets all by themselves. they don't really need to go through bank