my focus has been on the use of that. >> hi, this question might have been more appropriate for jim garvinnd i didn't get a chance to ask him. >> and jim gives a much more engaging answer but i'll try. go ahead. >> we saw the movie last night about the rovers and how, you know, the life span is indefinite and how much they've accomplished. there's been a lot of talk about the problems with the msl and how that's going. have they considered, you know, instead of spending all this money developing a new probe, to answer questions at one site, spending an equivalent amount of money and sending out a bunch of rovers that we knowow to build to a bunch of different sites and answer a lot of questions? >> i know that a lot of scientists and many of those working and engineers who are working on the mars exploration rover tm feel exactly that. why didn't we just build more of them and go to different places? part of the answer is bound up in the philosophy of developing more and more technology that can take us upo the point of leading to mars sample return and building more vehicles and always bu