strong and more as trojans and the reverse way so we thought that this was really a problem for jim rose on the long term consuming g.m.o. in the long term or having this pesticide little. terming the temperature because it's a major push the side of the world. there are some of the poetry's in the us that should start to check in topics that glyphosate content when customers are. making me do you want to change the law so. you know they got it will people you see more and more and it will come accumulating in them on the my task was to. develop a new method to take life they say because life as it was considered safe. for many many many years. for that reason only to develop a method to test for it in food because it would say there's no reason to test for that but the war health organization may come out and say it's now a possible carcinogen and with that i had to come up with a way that you can close attention the entire life and say. at this point i mean there's. there's no scientific proof that it absolutely does harm you there's no definitive proof that is a carcinogen but it's a

strong and more as trojans and the reverse way so we thought that this wasn't really a problem for jim rose on the long term consuming gemma's in the long term or having this pesticide in the long term in the temperature because it's a major pesticide of the world. there are some of our trees in us that have started checking products like life to save content when customers ask. why do we do it more like you so. you know they get it will people using more and more and it will come by cumulative. task soon. develop the. tech wipe the slate because life as it was considered safe. for many years. for that reason no one didn't develop a method to test for in food because if it's safe there's no reason to test for. but the war health organization they come out and say it's now a possible carcinogen and with that i had to come up with a way that you could potentially detect life and say. at this point i mean there's . there's no scientific proof that it absolutely does harm you there's no definitive proof that is a carcinogen but blood will say it's a possible it's a potential so it's not to say

less strong and more estrogen the reverse way so we thought that this wasn't really a problem for jim rose on the long term consuming g.m.o. in the long term or having this prestige side in the long term in the top water because it's a major pesticide of the world. there are some of our trees in the u.s. that have started checking topics like life to save content. it is us. maybe we do get modified. so. you know they get. people using more and more and this is how much immolating the body might have was. developing that the. life was saved because life it was considered safe. for many many many years. for that reason alone that he developed a method to test for it in food because it was safe there's no need for that but the war health organization may come back and say it's not always possible carcinogen and with that i had to come up with a way that close attention i live with. at this point i mean there's. there's no scientific proof that it absolutely does harm you there's no definitive proof that is a carcinogen and but a lot of them say it's possible the potential so as not to say tha

you from the age five ors inned into the intelligence world and rose the pinnacle of the ic. what does jim clapper think in ault tiff universe he might have done. what are those regrets of not pursued? >> at one point i throughout i wanted to be a doctor. i soon got over that. but when i reached the point you have to make serious decisions. i i was a high school senior, i knew i wanted to follow in my father's footsteps and be what he was for 28 years, signals intelligence officer. i learned enough peripherally to appreciate its importance and his commitment and dedication, most especially i learned a lot from him about how to treat people in an intelligence enterprise and i tried to carry those lessons for the whole time i served and in whatever capacity. >> maybe a doctor. that didn't happen of the was there any point across these many, many decades of service, you tried to retire a few times. that was in the book. was there any point this is my opportunity to leave and do something different? >> the most miserable year of my life was my first tour in southeast asia. i went to vietnam ea

mueller, it was a week, week and like ten days after the president fired jim comey which rod rosenstein had signed off and recommended. rose e rosenstein was a member in good standing of the president's administration. he provided cover for this very controversial act. the idea ten days later he turned around and was suddenly out to get the president makes no sense. i think what happened is he did what any good prosecutor would do. there are two things. he did what any new prosecutor would do. he saw the memos come out, comey's memos of obstruction of justice. he needed to do something to clean up his own reputation after signing offer the memo. he appointed jim comey -- >> bob mueller a. bob mueller. it had nothing to do with getting out after the president. it had to do with disturbing facts that came to light. >> what do you make of the idea of the sort of public musings about presidential interview with bob mueller that jay and rudy aren't there yet? >> they seem to -- we've heard this from the legal team for months now, we're a week away from making a decision, week away from making a decision and it continues to drag

jim comey. and the president has made a good run at sessions actually. he's attacked him from the rose garden. he's tweeted at him. he's got whatever her name is, jeannie -- i always get that wrong. >> judge jeannine. >> but not the kind of effort to discredit him that they put into discrediting comey. this strikes me as potentially far more dangerous. >> i think there are so many things -- this is a great piece. mike schmidt has broken a lot of stories over the years. this piece when i saw it, there are six things that are interesting to me. i would say that one of them is -- and i know harry lit man will talk about this. we talked about it on television last niechlt. it's fascinating in the sense there is an argument in jim comey's firing the white house said he was fired for misconduct, he did various things wrong. there are democrats who think he did things wrong in 2016. rod rosenstein wrote the memo. you can make the case, president president can, jim comey was fired for some other reason than to stop the russia investigation even though he has said things to indicate the opposite. the w

gave a speech in the rose garden in the transition period where he mocked the idea that the russians could overthrow and overturn an election. he thought it was hysterical. so jim, you should debate the person who appointed you, barack obama. laura, the biggest open question this, what people like jim clapper and john brennan and the f.b.i. director, former director james comey are running from what was the genesis moment of the campaign? what is point zero? nobody can explain that. i notice you cited anthony mccarthy doing great work. he brought this up in another article he wrote. why are they referencing late spring for the initial meeting with the whole thing was discuss and not a specific date? all the people met for an important meeting about russian collusion in the election? nobody can remember the date? it seems strange, doesn't it? the reason is they viewed the carter page and the george papadopoulos appointment as the trump foreign policy advisers as opportunities to spy, not threats to our republic. >> laura: yeah. byron wrote a great piece on that. "wall street journal" picked up on it today. danielle, dan mentioned president obama. we found an int

rose mcgowan in an effort to discredit her. and this is one of those threads that they are pulling on now tying to this firm and tieing it to -- >> jim i need to go to the white house and the briefing with sarah sand sanders. >> the new york "post" said that cia acting director gina haspel has headed four cia stapgss being stakes across the globe. and held several top roles in the division responsible for covert operations and post-9/11 was senior level supervisor in counterterrorism. the "post" further note that had her integrity and political impartially are up challenged and deserves quick confirmation. the bottom line, act director haspel has an unparalleled understanding of the cia and is the right person to lead it during these dangerous times. lastly and on a slightly lighter note, i would like to congratulation katherine and alex, two members of the white house press corps or their engagement over the weekend. i don't know if they even showed up today, but that is okay. definitely would have given them a question, but since i don't see them, kevin we'll go with you. >> thank you, sarah. a couple questions. first on gina haspe