427
427
Jun 23, 2013
06/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 427
favorite 0
quote 0
, not jim thompson but until big bill thompson became mayor. gives republicans we have to give them equal time as far as being corrupted but typically the democrats have control of chicago. so by the time al capone guided at the time of probation, the system was already in place of organized crushing, organized criminal activity, organized by his activity, gambling, narcotics, prostitution but if you wanted to run, you had to pay the city in order to run. and carter harrison, senior and junior because we are two generations of mayor harrison, have both well-respected. everybody let the district run. it was known as segregated vice. phaseout is able to keep the fisa my neighborhood, the rest of the city would be pure. plus the boys need of a place have a good time. right? chicago was a port of this particular period in history. it was the gateway to the west. st. louis played a role with that, too. but the votes from new york and erie canal sailed through the great lakes down to chicago, and from your people went out to conquer the west of chica
, not jim thompson but until big bill thompson became mayor. gives republicans we have to give them equal time as far as being corrupted but typically the democrats have control of chicago. so by the time al capone guided at the time of probation, the system was already in place of organized crushing, organized criminal activity, organized by his activity, gambling, narcotics, prostitution but if you wanted to run, you had to pay the city in order to run. and carter harrison, senior and junior...
387
387
Jun 9, 2013
06/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 387
favorite 0
quote 0
that was the center of the money used to feel the democratic all the way through big jim thompson until tell thompson became mayor. so we have to give them equal time as far as being corrupt, but typically democrats have controlled chicago. by the time i'll capone got here, the system is dirty and place of organized corruption, organized criminal activity, organize face activity, gambling, narcotics, prostitution. if you wanted to run come you had to pay the city and mayor harrison, carter harrison, senior and junior as the two generations above respect it and everybody let the levee district run. it was not a segregated place. they thought if they were able to keep device in my neighborhood, the rest of the city would be pure. plus the boys need to have a place. chicago was a port at this period in history, the gateway to the west. st. louis played a role there, too, but from new york in the erie canal sailed through the great lakes down to chicago and people went out to conquer the west of chicago. city fathers thought it was only our duty to get the pioneers their last night in civil
that was the center of the money used to feel the democratic all the way through big jim thompson until tell thompson became mayor. so we have to give them equal time as far as being corrupt, but typically democrats have controlled chicago. by the time i'll capone got here, the system is dirty and place of organized corruption, organized criminal activity, organize face activity, gambling, narcotics, prostitution. if you wanted to run come you had to pay the city and mayor harrison, carter...
85
85
Jun 12, 2013
06/13
by
CNBC
tv
eye 85
favorite 0
quote 0
jim, i want to say this, worked at bloomberg for ten years, a competitor of thompson reuters and haveyears. i'm not the litmus test. never heard about this. thompson reuters acting like, yeah, it's out there. everybody knows that's the case. what's your reaction? >> you've got to be kidding me. you really think you can get away with. this one of the things that eamon said it's not illegal. you know what, having done a lot of work with prosecution, you know what? what's legal or illegal is up po to the prosecutor not up to thompson reuters, not up to us. the prosecutor doesn't like this, he brings the case. prosecutor bring that case. >> should it be made illegal, jared bernstein? >> i don't think it is illegal, and i doubt it should be made illegal, but i think it's wrong. i think it's unfair, and i think eamon is doing some dogged and very important intrepid work here. my litmus test was about what you guys just did. i was about to ask brian and then jim cramer, have you ever heard about this, because i haven't, and i'd be darned surprise federal anybody else has, so there's somethin
jim, i want to say this, worked at bloomberg for ten years, a competitor of thompson reuters and haveyears. i'm not the litmus test. never heard about this. thompson reuters acting like, yeah, it's out there. everybody knows that's the case. what's your reaction? >> you've got to be kidding me. you really think you can get away with. this one of the things that eamon said it's not illegal. you know what, having done a lot of work with prosecution, you know what? what's legal or illegal is...
145
145
Jun 28, 2013
06/13
by
CNBC
tv
eye 145
favorite 0
quote 1
thompson reuters is paying for the manufacturing number in advance. >> all right. i think that this is a big story. >> yeah. you have a problem with this, jim, i do. and the government does, too, because the spirit of the government is fair and full disclosure and this is not. if i were the lawyer for thompson reuters i would be saying, look, we make a lot of money on this, and we don't want the s.e.c. to be the enemy, because it can hurt us in a competitive situation. they are going to reverse this. they are going to reverse the way they do this. >> and with that in mind, we will go the rick santelli to see if the number is just as weak as we think. >> 51.6 coincidentally, it seems to be. >> i dwhaesz we all kind of used to it. jerry next to me, every number, it must be good or bad and he is no soothsayer. we do see that the market is moving a bit here as it should, but i should say that moved with the e.d., and this is an important level. keep in mind it was not that many months ago that it was actually the april read that was under 50 and that is the first time since september of '09 under 50. so, yeah, we go from 58.7 to 51.6, and that
thompson reuters is paying for the manufacturing number in advance. >> all right. i think that this is a big story. >> yeah. you have a problem with this, jim, i do. and the government does, too, because the spirit of the government is fair and full disclosure and this is not. if i were the lawyer for thompson reuters i would be saying, look, we make a lot of money on this, and we don't want the s.e.c. to be the enemy, because it can hurt us in a competitive situation. they are...