lewin called a regular partner, veteran detective jim wallace. >> in almost every case there's somebody you look at the evidence anew and if you see anything that was missed. >> so wallace and lewin began by digging into that love triangle, by re-interviewing mary ann, asking about her relationship with both archie and janos, and about the events that preceded the murder. >> typically, when these murders occur, behaviors start slowly kind of fall apart and you see the behavior of the murderer become more and more aggressive and then the murder occurs been. >> and so to the beginning, which was, of course, the love story, or the betrayal, call it what you will. mary ann, as lewin and wallace discovered, was frankly, a little bored with archie. he loved her, unreservedly, and she knew that, but passion? excitement? not so much. and she was a vibrant woman, still attractive, but 47, and in need of something. and then there he was, janos. she met him at a local club. he was just 32, 25 years younger than state old archie. >> he was everything archie wasn't and satisfied everything archie co

morning richard land with the southern baptist convention the religious and liberty commission and jim wallaceh us. we are talking about religion and politics and i want to put on the table the "washington times" newt gingrich and nick -- rick santorum. i want to begin by pointing out that in the iowa caucuses the evangelical vote is a significant part of that 20% of the republican electorate and expected to go to the caucuses on january 3. >> guest: about 60% they say of the voters are evangelicals and as last time they seem to be somewhat divided. in 2008 they split their vote among four or five candidates and it looks like this time some of them are going to vote for gingrich and some of them are going to vote for santorum and some of them are going to vote for bachmann is some of them are going to vote for perry. some of them are going to vote for romney. >> host: to these endorsements make a difference? >> guest: i think it depends on who is endorsing. richard and i are friends and i've been wanting to call you about this. i'm trying to understand how family values, evangelicals in iowa,

i do not want jim wallace's interpretation of the bible, or richard land, the two guests on at the same time yesterday. i do not want them turning their theological beliefs into public policy. we need to look at freedom of the press, equal treatment under the law. these are principles, values, and they do not derive from any one theological position. they are held by the great bulk of americans, and that is what politicians should turn to to make decisions. host: from andrew, omaha, nebraska. "what is mr. lynn's position on the pair indications that take place before each session of congress?" guest: i think the senate chaplain has an assistant, a big office. so many people here locally around capitol hill would be happy to volunteer for that job, and in fact then they would not have to have a paid chaplain in the first place. in fact, long ago when newt gingrich took over as house speaker, bob livingston was the second or third in charge of the republicans, and he briefly considered doing away with the paid chaplaincy. mr. gingrich said that time said that would make us look nonreligio

i do not want jim wallace's interpretation of the bible, or richard land, the two guests on at the same time yesterday. i do not want them turning their theological beliefs into public policy. we need to look at freedom of the press, equal treatment under the law. these are principles, values, and they do not derive from any one theological position. they are held by the great bulk of americans, and that is what politicians should turn to to make decisions. host: from andrew, omaha, nebraska. "what is mr. lynn's position on the pair indications that take place before each session of congress?" guest: i think the senate chaplain has an assistant, a big office. so many people here locally around capitol hill would be happy to volunteer for that job, and in fact then they would not have to have a paid chaplain in the first place. in fact, long ago when newt gingrich took over as house speaker, bob livingston was the second or third in charge of the republicans, and he briefly considered doing away with the paid chaplaincy. mr. gingrich said that time said that would make us look nonreligio

and jim wallace of sojourn there.captioning performed by national captioning institute] "washington journal" here on c- span. >> then visit the congressional cemetery. the university of colorado. american prosperity in the '50s and '60s. they date back to the carter administration. monday highlights of coverage of the senate anniversary. experience american history television every weekend. >> surely after they rejected it, president obama spoke with reporters at the white house. >> good afternoon, everybody. it is no secret that there has not been an abundance of partisanship in washington this year. what happened on saturday was a big deal. the entire senate, including all of the republicans, voted to prevent 160 million working americans from receiving a tax increase on january 1. the entire senate voted to make sure nearly 2.5 million americans were out there looking for a job, they will lose their unemployment insurance in the first two months of next year. just about everybody, democrats and republicans, committ

our next stop will be about the opposition that's gathering with george wallace and also the republicans. listen to jimork. >> hello. how are you? >> we are great. what is your question? >> let me first say how much i am enjoying the program. i appreciate it. my question really deals with the first draft lottery, which i believe was either in 1967 or 1968. i do have great recollection of being eligible for that. i had a very low number which upset everyone in my family. what was hubert humphrey's position relative to the whole concept of the lottery? what did he do in that issue? >> i do not know if i ever heard hubert humphrey say anything about the lottery. i do know later on he worked to raise the voting age because he thought it was unfair people were being drafted at 18 and could not vote until they were 21. later on his life he had different ideas. he probably felt the draft itself was probably not such a good idea. at the time i do not know if he said anything about it. >> the summer of 1968 and the country is in disarray. the assassination of both king and kennedy. on the republican side, richa

jim crowe is dead, and i'm fixing it. you watch a football game at ole miss, there are black players. in those days nobody played, same thing with george wallacet's over with. he just did it. that's bracing to think about, a president says i'll bring the troops next time. he did it. this one guy did it. he backed up dr. king when he got arrested in 1960. king was the hero, of course, kennedy played a big role in that. >> i think a lot of people today look at jack kennedy's record and feel like it's somewhat eclipsed, because the media of the time didn't cover the warts. today every wart is covered ad nauseam on cable television. >> i'm not saying he wasn't flawed. >> it's hard to be a hero today. do you think he could have been a hero today and still have the double life he had, unfaithful to his wife, sort of a father in the back room, and some really pretty tough hardball politics. >> the old man was a right winger. once you save your crew in world war ii, and you're a hero, and you did protect the men in your unit and did risk your life, people cut you some slack. kathleen is staying with us. when we return, she's been all over the world an

wallace. then on saturday senator and congressman from south dakota george mcgovern followed by billionaire businessman ross perot. the contenders every night at 10:00 eastern on a c-span2. >> meteorologist jim in the future with over 3,000 weather records broken this year alone. share his experiences with 25 years of covering severe weather including hurricanes katrina and the rain for the weather channel. he spoke at the national press club for about an hour. >> good afternoon and look into the national press club. i'm broadcast on nine journalists. the 104th president of the national press club. we are the world's leading professional organization for journalists committed to our profession's future where programming events such as this as well as while working to foster a free press worldwide. for more impression about the national press club we invite you to visit our website. donating to programs offered to the public. you can find information on the website as well. so i would like to thank our speaker for the hearing here today as well as all of you for attending. our head table includes guess at the table as well as working journalists or club members. this is the -- let's say, the