and then in january, 2011, jim wallace got the flu.cky break -- no, really. >> and i was laying in bed, and high wife came in. unfortunately, when you work these cases, all you talk about is we are a dedicated cold-case team. you talk about the case you're working on. i'm sure she was tired of hearing about it. she said, why don't you establish a facebook account for carol. i thought, that could accomplish a great deal. >> of course back in 1981 when carol disappeared, facebook creator mark zuckerberg wasn't even born yet. but 30 years later, detective wallace knew social media and its potential to connect to millions around the globe instantly. it could determine once and for all, he thought, whether carol was alive or dead. >> because all of us know from using facebook that it's, number one, a kind of a place where we say "here i am." it's also a place you can find people. >> surely if carol was alive, someone on facebook or twitter would know something. of course, wallace also knew carol would look vastly different 30 years after he

he called a regular partner, a veteran detective jim wallace. >> in almost every case there's somethingyou can do. if nothing else, an opportunity to look at the evidence anew. >> reporter: wallace and lewin began by digging into the love triangle. by re-interviewing mary ann, asking about her relationship with both archie and yanos. and about the events that preceded the murder. >> typically, when these murders occur, behaviors start to fall apart. you see the behavior of the murderer become more and more aggressive and the murder occurs. >> reporter: so to the beginning, which was, of course, the love story or the betrayal, call it what you will. mary ann was frankly a little bored with archie. he loved her unreservedly. she knew that. but passion, excitement, not so much. she was a vibrant woman still and attractive. but 47 and in need of something. and then there he was, yanos. she met him at a local club. he was just 32, 25 years younger than archie. >> he was everything archie wasn't. he satisfied everything that archie couldn't satisfy for her. she told archie she was dating this

many civil rights leaders and others involved with the movement and from the opposition, jim clark, governor wallacehers who were not fond of the march and thought it would disrupt public safety. after this, he issued his decision saying this march would be necessary for african americans to attain the right to vote. that there had been such injustice done especially in selma are those that ruling was issued on march 17, so these folks only had four days to get everything together to make the entire track from selma to montgomery. churchople rather at the to begin the march from selma to montgomery. the came down and took "bloody sunday" route, turned on alabama, and went across the thise, with no sea of blue time. they marched for five days and four nights, staying at different campsites, which were typically lack farms in the counties -- black farms in the counties. they continued to march to the on marchtate capital 25, 1965. mighty walk from selma, alabama. they told us we wouldn't get here, and those who said they would get here only over their dead bodies, all the world today knows that we are

flynn was fired, and it came just a few hours before this meeting that jim comey recounted in that conversation with nicolle wallace where the president cleared the room and asked comey to back off the flynn investigation. and i think it's critical because the key question about the president's activities that day has always been his motive. why is it that he was asking the fbi director to back off the investigation? was he just trying to help someone he thought was really a good guy and not exert any pressure, which is what the president's defenders say? even comey in his congressional testimony said he didn't think the president was trying to end the russia investigation, he was just trying to end this piece with respect to mike flynn. maybe that was the case, but when you look at it in context of this lunch it seems more like the president the day before had taken a step that he quite naively as christie pointed out thought would end the russia investigation. he then has lunch with jared kushner and chris christie. he says you're wrong it's not going to end the investigation. a few hours later, quite clumsily ta

announced by jim morris on monday morale has ordered foreign stuff at the international commission against impunity to leave within twenty four hours but guatemala top court blocked the decision wallace accuses the commission of a stepping its judy's after it sought to investigate him on suspicion of campaign finance violations. the italian government has sent a plane to south america to bring back a left wing activist convicted of murder the results of cooperation between new right wing of ministrations in brazil and italy says ari but tuesday was arrested on saturday night in bolivia off to thirty seven years old in iran in one thousand nine hundred eighty one he escaped from an italian prison where he was awaiting trial for four murders committed as a member of a communist group until last month but to see was living in brazil way successfully resisted previous attempts at extradition he left the bolivia after the election of gyre both who promised to return him to italy or boston are treated at last while his son described the expedition as a little gift a sleaze far right interior minister meant to salvage any gifts which expressed his gratitude. so you got three who i want to t

and jim comey sitting in a room saying, we don't like donald trump's position, we should open an investigation and let it leak out later that he has a russian spy. the fbi did this to henry wallacethe 1940s. they did it to martin luther king and the '60s. after george mcgovern in '72. if they do not like you, they call you a communist or a russian duke and let the propaganda and the press take over. speak to why would liberals, of all people stand by and allow that to happen? wasn't this their fever dream? that some unaccountable cabal of bureaucrats in the state would subvert democracy, why are they saying something about this? >> because they hate donald trump that much, they do not to like the man, they do not like his policies. and they see the only way or the best way to unseat him as using what we call the deep state. >> tucker: what does this mean for future presidents? if kamala harris, pick a candidate gets elected next time or the time after that? can any president really believe that his or her bureaucracy will not try to and the presidency? >> no, that is exactly what the problem is. and what we need here is a robust congressional oversight, which we have not had in