because there are, they were growing increasingly unhappy with jo dorsey and his handling of all these candles, you know, around twitter. there's been a lot of controversy. a lot of people, of course defending twitter. a lot of people well being on the other side of the fence on the other side of the barricade. but one thing a so far, oh, well, one thing that we are seeing so far that there are no indications that twitter will abandon their policy of, you know, giving some people the spotlight and taking the spotlight from others and doing it at their own will even though the company hasn't always been like this, i mean compare the statement of frog or wall that twitter is not about the 1st amendment, and that it will not be hampden or hindered by it. with something that former twitter seo, for example, on decker castillo, said it to one of our core values is respect and defend the users voice. and we're the free speech wing of the free speech party. we believe our purpose is to serve the public conversation and that does take a status, sir. i'm freedom of expression and defending free

well, we'll discuss the situation with law professor allen dorsey wits. he thinks jo biden's interference in the case has ultimately influenced the media narrative. you can't just call somebody a white supremacist without any evidence. that is both a matter of opinion, but it's also based on facts. and if there's nothing in his background to support that he's a white supremacist. that would be defamation. so i think god, joe biden, the candidate made a serious mistake by intruding into the case and letting his opinion be heard whether a year later, it still has an influence. it's probably an indirect influence on establishing the media narrative, if the sure on the other foot, if this were a black lives matter protester who had shot electrically in self defense, then the hard last and the racial left would be very much in favor of the defending the same people or condemning him would be praising. so it's all hypocrisy. it's all about partisan choosing sides. it has nothing to do with truth. it has nothing to do with evidence. it has nothing to do with honesty, it's al

jo biden's administration. basically you turn on collect dorsey and refusal to take those issues seriously in the 1st years of administration. but let's go one step further. what is democracy? but the respect for the rule of law, domestic and abroad, the u. s. continues to be engage in a systematic violation of international law or sanctions. regime is illegal. we mentioned cuba, but the same thing extends around the world. those are unilateral coercive measures within the world are legal and condemned on the global stage. how can we be a reasonable manager, let alone promoter tomorrow? if we are sitting at our high chair at the security council, refusing to respect even those basic tenets, so i'm not saying we shouldn't stand up for democracy, right? i'm saying let's sit down and have a really clear and honest conversation about what the u. s. relationships, democracy is at home and abroad, and it's really these start there and then we can towards the commitments of other countries who are also in attendance. i appreciate it perspective, but i got to throughout something here that i'm really responding to, which is, you kn