she does not believe it was recored, wever. >> that was jody fleischer reporting.d reach out to the atf. they had no comment because of pending litigation. >> we did speak to one long time criminal defense attorney who called theevelations a bombshell because it could weaken the prosecution'scase. >> that's how guilty people go free. it's unfortunate. i'm not saying wint is guilty or not guilty. h ifs going to be found not guilty or acquitted, this is the reason why. >> tune in next tuesday as we take a deep dive into this cason the eve of the trial. we'll examine the evidence against daron wint. the clues left behind and the lingering questions for a panel of experts. was someone else involved? and what was the motive? join us tuesday night at 6:30 forxcsive reporting in nsion murde inside the investigation. >>> we turn to doug now with a holiday weekend weather forecast. we've got rain upon us right now? >> did you bring the umbrella? >> i did actually. >> good. i was expecting you to say no. you're the most prepared woman i'y met in life. we have showers outside

yea jodi fleischer looks at what action the chief is taking now. >> they're responding to the active shooter -- >> at least ten shots heard. >> it floored me. >> reporter: the ann arundel county police chief knew it could happen in his community. what he didt know was just how many people werefraid this man might do it. >> command, the suspect in custody. >> reporter: jarrod ramos now charged with murdering five newspaper employeesnside of their office at the capital gazette, five years earlier this police report documented why an anne arundel detective did not eabelieve he was a t ter employees th >> i trusted and still trust his judgment. >> reporter: the newspaper had callednv police totigate months of threatening language in his twitter feed but ultimately decided not to pursue charges. the detective noted ramos had not attempted to enter theap capitaler building or sent direct threatening correspondence. >> i would be curious, how many peopleis in world did they interview that knew him, whether it be his parents, friends, family, neighbors -- >> reporter: matt doughtery would ru

. >> investigativer repor jodie fleischer is live in the newsroom with what's already in the works andhe one change the district wants that still isn't done deal. jodie? >> erika, the one thing we kept hearing over a over is why didn't the district just send everybody a techs alert? it's how most of us get our infoeation now. istrict does have that capability. the short answer is the july water situation didn't meet the federalrements to use that alert system. the i-team has learned d.c. will now push to change that. the fcc doesn't allow us to pla. the so but you probably remember hearing it blaring on your cellphone back in april with a test of the district's wireless emergency alert system. it can contact every cellphone within a certain area to warn of an emergency. but it was not used in jy when the district needed to quickly tell tens of thousands of people noto use their tap water without boiling it first. >> because we didn't know and because there was a potential danger, i would have thought that maybe thart a system with a text would have been better. >> councmember mary chas

couldn't have intervened before the shooting when ramos has made so many threats through the year jody fleischerth us ts morning. jody you said you talked to att localney who said he lived in fear of ramos for years. but maryland law left authorities powerful in this case. >> one of the things and he really wants to push to get this law changed in the coming session, the law defines electronic communication as being sent from someone to someone, he felt like if you post a threat onluine, that leaves a gap as to whether something mighte threatening, en you post something on twitter, you're not posting it fr somebody to s for all the public to see. >> so that's a balance between wh is free speech or threaua >> nobody ay says this is a threat. it's kind ofbjtive. it's kind of when you look at obscenity, you know i when you see it. legislators need to take alo ha at the law and define it as to whether the victim feels threatened or whether certain language is ed, not all speech is protected speech, hate speech is not protected speech, threateningpeech is not protected speech, you just have to figure