. >> good evening, board members, i'm joe al ford, i represent the permit holder, kevin read is also president here today, i will try to be brief. as this board is well aware, there's no jurisdiction here. i understand the appellant would like to challenge all mcd's at any level in any proceeding. i suppose due process allows him to do that no matter how frivolous these appeals may be, in particular here, the appellant is seeking to drive up the cost associated with constructing a well managed medical cannabis dispensary, he's driving up those costs by filing what is a frivolous appeal for purposes of these proceedings. his arguments are all directed to the use of this facility, that was already determined in a different proceeding back in february, on february 16th of 2012, the planning commission approved the use permit or at least prelim nailer approved the use permit, the appellant is seeking to challenge that determination but this isn't the appropriate method of doing that. there was an appeals process that he could have employed connection with that approval, that process wasn