you've seen people like joe cirincione and jeffrey lewis and other nuclear experts and weapons experts here on nbc and other news outlets talking about this, trying to explain this accident, the seriousness of this, what kind of test might have gone so wrong that produced this fatal accident. also the scary cageyness and secrecy from the russian government about whether there's a threat here to the civilian populations nearby the site of the accident. i think nobody at this point can say they definitively know for sure, but at least the consensus of the western speculation is that putin's government might have been trying to test the sort of missile that he promised in last year's state of the union address, which he described as a missile that was a nuclear missile, not in the sense that it was armed with a nuclear warhead. it would be a conventional missile, a cruise missile essentially, but it would be powered by a nuclear reactor. so you can imagine instead of a conventional rocket like some sort of conventional jet propulsion system, what putin has been threatening to build, what