planning department and representing the planning department and planning commission and joined by joe duffy representing the building inspection the completed speaker cards and documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. items acted upon today will appear on the permit holder have 7 minutes inform present their case people affiliated with the parties must be conclude their comments within the 7 minutes and please speak into the end of the microphone to assist the board with the preparation of minutes you're asked not required to submit a business card to board staff they're available on the directly from sfgovtv. thank you for your attention. we'll conduct our swearing in process. if you intend to testify and wish to have the board give your testimony evidentiary weight, please stand and say i do. please note: any of the members may speak without taking mroound and rebroadcast on fridays channel 26 now we'll swear in or affirm all who want to testify mroound if you intend to testify and you wish to - arranged and say i do after you have been sworn in please remain standing do

in the front row is carli short and we'll be joined by joe duffy senior

in the front row is carli short and we'll be joined by joe duffy senior building inspector with the department of building inspection and scott sanchez planning department representing the planning department and the please be advised the ringing of and use of cell phones and other electronic devices are prohibited. out in the hallway. permit holders and others have up to 7 minutes to present their case and 3 minutes for rebuttal. people affiliated with these parties must conclude their comments within 7 minutes, participants not affiliated have up to 3 minutes - no rebuttal. to assist the board in the accurate preparation of the minutes, members of the public are asked, not required to submit a speaker card or business card to the clerk. speaker cards and pens are available on the left side of the podium. mrblgz if you have a question about the schedule, speak to the staff after the meeting or call the board office tomorrow we are located at 1650 mission street, suite 304. this meeting is broadcast live on sfgovtv cable channel 78. dvds are available to purchase directly from sfgovtv. thank y

in the front row is carli short and we'll be joined by joe duffy senior building inspector with the department of building inspection and scott sanchez planning department representing the planning department and the please be advised the ringing of and use of cell phones and other electronic devices are prohibited. out in the hallway. permit holders and others have up to 7 minutes to present their case and 3 minutes for rebuttal. people affiliated with these parties must conclude their comments within 7 minutes, participants not affiliated have up to 3 minutes - no rebuttal. to assist the board in the accurate preparation of the minutes, members of the public are asked, not required to submit a speaker card or business card to the clerk. speaker cards and pens are available on the left side of the podium. mrblgz if you have a question about the schedule, speak to the staff after the meeting or call the board office tomorrow we are located at 1650 mission street, suite 304. this meeting is broadcast live on sfgovtv cable channel 78. dvds are available to purchase directly from sfgovtv. thank y

duffy. >> good evening, commissioners joe duffy from dbi i kind of agree with mr. sanchez in that i haven't seen any drawings or the plans not sure what they're talking about on the ground floor but they're indicating someone is indicating two residential units 665 storefront and basement and then the basement per 817 is an administrative code we use for commercial occupancies they're not saying final until the appellant has filled the basement it is unfortunate that the permit holder is not here to answer questions probably looking at the plans would be beneficial and i'm sure if it came with a visit to the property we may have to do as well just to clear up what it is. >> you know what the status of the permit is at this moment. >> the permit is issued i did not check the history but if the applicant wishes to cancel it with dbi no problem and get a refund it takes a couple of weeks for this to happen we've not received that not that i'm aware of. >> thank you. >> any questions okay any public comment on that item? okay. seeing none commissioners the matter is su

duffy. >> joe duffy dbi it might be easier if i eye the overhead i have a couple of of the photos if i could get the overhead. >> so the first photograph is this is. when they started the excavation enroll that wasn't done properly they ran about it completely the wrong way inexperienced we got contacted pretty soon we were contacted before the permit was issued that was what caused all the problems we issued an emergency shoring permit and i will put up another forga photo this is wha hillside looks like with the shore beams and it is typical of what we see for emergency shoring mr. santos included more work for the winter i totally agree with that, i think that is other permit is going to be required for the shoring because of the changes and the sack review because the hillside because where the site is located is is required i'm glad we'll gotten to that point the one thing concerned about the property let me ill put up the other photos the stabilization work to make sure it is secured because of the season we're anticipating and they're going to have to obviously get the project

duffy. >> joe duffy dbi it might be easier if i eye the overhead i have a couple of of the photos if i could get the overhead. >> so the first photograph is this is. when they started the excavation enroll that wasn't done properly they ran about it completely the wrong way inexperienced we got contacted pretty soon we were contacted before the permit was issued that was what caused all the problems we issued an emergency shoring permit and i will put up another forga photo this is wha hillside looks like with the shore beams and it is typical of what we see for emergency shoring mr. santos included more work for the winter i totally agree with that, i think that is other permit is going to be required for the shoring because of the changes and the sack review because the hillside because where the site is located is is required i'm glad we'll gotten to that point the one thing concerned about the property let me ill put up the other photos the stabilization work to make sure it is secured because of the season we're anticipating and they're going to have to obviously get the project

sanchez the zoning administrator who represents the planning department and planning commission and joe duffy representing the department of electronic devices are prohibited. out in the hallway. permit holders and others have up to 7 minutes to present their case and 3 minutes for rebuttal. people affiliated with these parties must conclude their comments within 7 minutes, participants not affiliated have up to 3 minutes - no rebuttal. to assist the board in the accurate preparation of the minutes, members of the public are asked, not required to submit a speaker card or business card to the clerk. speaker cards and pens are available on the left side of the podium. if you have a question about the schedule, speak to the staff after the meeting or call the board office tomorrow we are located at 1650 mission street, suite 304. this meeting is broadcast live on sfgovtv cable channel 78. dvds are available to purchase directly from sfgovtv. thank you for your attention. we'll conduct our swearing in process. if you intend to testify and wish to have the board give your testimony evidentiary we

. >> good evening, commissioners, joe duffy, dbi the building permit application was filed on the 3rd of july and approved and issued on the 21st of july. it did go through our intake, it went through building plan check, mechanical plan klek and we also routed it to planning, as you know. the building was reflected as a legal two unit two family dwelling. the description was to demolish kifrp enand in law unit and legalize a half bath. it appears the permit was properly issued. mr. sanchez, i heard him say there is some pending rules coming up i think about future notifications from dbi on single family and two unit buildings whenever the units are being removed, so that may take care of this in the future. that's not in yet. i haven't, it hasn't appeared anywhere in front of me where it has been brought in yet but i do know there is a lot of talk about it as dbi i'm available for any questions. >> thank you. you know, if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck it might be a duck so i look at a separate water meter, i look at a separate pg&e meter and that would mean to me for th

. >> good evening, commissioners, joe duffy, dbi the building permit application was filed on the 3rd of july and approved and issued on the 21st of july. it did go through our intake, it went through building plan check, mechanical plan klek and we also routed it to planning, as you know. the building was reflected as a legal two unit two family dwelling. the description was to demolish kifrp enand in law unit and legalize a half bath. it appears the permit was properly issued. mr. sanchez, i heard him say there is some pending rules coming up i think about future notifications from dbi on single family and two unit buildings whenever the units are being removed, so that may take care of this in the future. that's not in yet. i haven't, it hasn't appeared anywhere in front of me where it has been brought in yet but i do know there is a lot of talk about it as dbi i'm available for any questions. >> thank you. you know, if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck it might be a duck so i look at a separate water meter, i look at a separate pg&e meter and that would mean to me for th

. >> good evening, commissioners, joe duffy, dbi the building permit application was filed on the 3rd of july and approved and issued on the 21st of july. it did go through our intake, it went through building plan check, mechanical plan klek and we also routed it to planning, as you know. the building was reflected as a legal two unit two family dwelling. the description was to demolish kifrp enand in law unit and legalize a half bath. it appears the permit was properly issued. mr. sanchez, i heard him say there is some pending rules coming up i think about future notifications from dbi on single family and two unit buildings whenever the units are being removed, so that may take care of this in the future. that's not in yet. i haven't, it hasn't appeared anywhere in front of me where it has been brought in yet but i do know there is a lot of talk about it as dbi i'm available for any questions. >> thank you. you know, if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck it might be a duck so i look at a separate water meter, i look at a separate pg&e meter and that would mean to me for th