. >> good evening commissioner joe duffy dbi just one thing on the brief i've read from the appellant she wasn't aware of the notice of violation and the sick amended notice was caused because of the first calling the notice of violations are available at dbi for mop to see you can you can look it up on line and there's a notice if you come down to the department of. >> sorry. >> i wanted to respond to that item i read in the brief we do make them available to anyone that wants them. >> any public comment on this item? seeing none, then commissioners. >> different. >> the excuse me. the rehearing requester has not provided any you knew information i'm not prepared to have a rehearing. >> any other comment questions. >> move to deny it on the basis no new information has been provided. >> mr. pacheco call the roll please. >> there's a motion on the floor tb commissioner fung to deny this rehearing request commissioner president lazarus commissioner honda commissioner wilson thank you vote is 4 to zero this is denied and a notice of decision a shall be released. >> moving on to hayes va

. >> commissioners joe duffy dbi the permit under appeal was for the rear edition to committed two new interior stared and electrical permit work filed in march of 2014 and issued by deploying on december 23rd a side permit the cost was six-hundred $6,000 on the permit so for and it is a site permit we want to anticipate the amounted to be issued with the structural work i don't have too much more to add if you guys have questions i'll be happy to answer any questions and some stuff on the seismic work if preapplication notes or letters i don't bring that here i heard it was researched not sure that will help you with anything either. >> can i see a show of hands how many people plan to speak on public comment ms. michael's remove that from the side and if the people can line up on that side the room that will help move the speaking faster if you haven't filled out a speaker card that helps us in the preparation of our minutes you'll have two minutes to speak and commissioner president lazarus because of the hour and the length of the - >> okay. so please begin. >> hi, good evening. i'

>> good evening, commissioners joe duffy dbi i don't have too much to add on this question our noticef violation gives people the option to legalize or remove that's what this one g did to legalize or revert back to the use i don't see my plans to show you how it could beleaguer listed maybe there's some part could be legal and the photographs show you some space in there but we do give people the option i choose to remove it maybe it can beleaguer listed i don't have enough information we only give out the codes and let people to design to meet the code the grandfathering maybe something we can use but dbi can't do that it has to meet code maybe a way to legalize if. >> can you i'm sorry are you finished refresh our memory on the nov it was for an unpermitted bathroom or because the clarence's were not appropriate and the notice of violation was for a final inspection for the rear deck that is still to be dealt with we give them the permit to remove the deck under a separate permit and. >> second bathroom was constructed without the benefits of a permit and permits failed to produce

>> commissioners, joe duffy, dbi again i don't have too much to add, i probably apologize for not having a more detailed cost of fee, i didn't think the fees were going to come into this tonight. i know there were fees paid for staff time and there was a correction notice issued at the time, i don't have the amount of that. i heard that 1.6 million dollar -- i'm not sure if that's the permit valuation fees on permit valuation or 1.6 million dollars in fees, i just simply don't have that information with me. i do have the valuation that was on issued permits which i typically bring with me to the hear ltion i don't usually take the fees for every single permit, that's something i don't have with me and i'm not sure how important that is, i wanted to state that and just in some of the comments i mean, everyone at dbi took this seriously we don't have this happen. this type of thing does not happen and we don't want it to happen again and for -- i know people are saying there's this going on and that going on i was there at the time and dbi and i saw the concern and the work that went into

>> commissioners, joe duffy dbi again the building permit under appeal is a permit for a revision to permit application 20111063 to document change to procedure and scope of construction due to damage to existing structure. that permit followed the incident that you heard about on december 2013 i believe it was december 18, the department issued a notice of violation, the shoring supporting the existing structure has failed causing downhill displacement of the existing building it is detached from the shoring, a substantial hazard exists, necessarily mitigation work is understood way. there was a permit issued for emergency stabilization of the structure, when mitigation work approved under the permit is complete under the direction of engineer of record, stop any work as far as demolition and preserve all elements of the structure and shoring on-site, so as you know, the permits issued to comply with the failure on the shoring, the department was involved in this, we got called out and we were out there a lot obviously and involved with the engineer of record. our engineering team a

>> commissioner, joe duffy dbi, the building permit under appeal was filed on november 12th, 2014 and through intake at dbi, i was routed to the planning department, approved by the current planning on the 12th of november the following went through building plan check on the 13th of november mechanical plan check and got issued on the 13th of november it's a form 8 over the current permit to remove illegal kitchen and bedroom on third bedroom, convert to rom pus room and storage. there are no active complaints on the property so it was not to comply with the notice of violation, i think you heard that earlier. but it looks like it was properly approved by dbi for what we do in these cases someone came in said they had an illegal kitchen, showed that on the plans and it was reflected as a single family dwelling on the permit, so the department approved the permit. i'm available for any questions. >> mr. duffy did you check the 3r on this? >> the only thing i did was i checked the city of cesar's property profile and that's showing a single family dwelling it says one storey, and 1215