joe mathieu knows the distance across central park says much about the democratic party. e, it is nagler -- nadler and meloni. what does it symbolize to mr. schumer and the future of the democratic party? >> he endorsed jerry nadler. look, this is why politics can be a dirty business. these two were allies, elected together in 1992. they were part of the senior leadership in the house. this would be like if you were competing against jon ferro on some other network, looking back on the days in which you cosa -- you cohosted "surveillance," and -- tom: joe, you are describing friday. what is the difference between nadler and meloni? joe: you have seen the ad. you can send a man to do a woman's job, and she has reminded people of her work as the first woman to share the powerful oversight committee. reproductive rights as an issue. jerry nadler will say, if you get rid of me you are not going to have a jewish member of the delegation in an incredibly important part of the country here. the new york times endorsed him. i think we see where this is going to go, to see two incu

that is with joe mathieu. with the factor of probable cause, it is black that. what did we actually learn from this document? >> that's a lot of stuff we want to read. the justice department doesn't want any of this to be unsealed to protect. names of witnesses, and law enforcement officials. those who have not been charged -- this allows us to see a topline summary, it will, what wrong to this investigation. what was in the 100 pages from those boxes of documents that were recovered in the year. check this out. 67 documents marked as confidential. 92 marked a secret did 20 marked as top-secret, and some include markings that indicate they have intelligence from or in eavesdropping. the affidavit reads that there is probable cause to recognize national defense information, and it remains at the emesis which opted the search at we have 30 seconds here. walk us through the reaction from the resident. >> he spending time on the website, and a lot of posts before and since then. >> nothing mentioned nuclear. a total public relations subterfuge from the fbi, and the

joe manchin -- joe mathieu gives us a brief. it is a rambling essay comparing mr.imes gone with mr. garland. do you presume anything we will see from the attorney general will be through the courts this time and not rational hearings? joe: that is a great question. what we saw yesterday would lead us to believe that is the case. but we may not find what they were looking for for some time. the two questions we have are what were they looking for, what did they find and what that might result in in terms of terminal charges, investigations or otherwise. we can answer the second question without answering the first. this is a months long operation that was going on and a violation of the presidential records act. but we have seen the national archives go back through material through the administration but we have never seen a search warrant executed on a scale we saw yesterday. it got us wondering what exactly merrick garland new and who approved it because they had to see what they were looking for on the presumption it was on the premises. everyone is asking, what

joe mathieu joins us now. it's an interesting moment in the u.s. relationship on the heels of nancy pelosi's trip to taiwan. what do you expect to be the chinese response? joe: they have quite a lot to say about the u.s. recently following the speaker's trip to taiwan. china does not see this as something that increases competition. i think it's seen as a threat, knowing that companies like intel and samsung have already committed to building ship foundries -- chip factories in the u.s. and that will continue according to gina raimondo, knowing that china was offering quite a bit of money in incentives to keep that technology in their country. this is just the beginning it will take a lot of time for this money to get out. and those factories to be built. guy: let's turn our attention to mar-a-lago which was rated by the fbi. it seems to suggest that this will play well before -- that this will not play well for president trump. how will it play out over the longer term? joe: there is so much we don't know about this. reports have emerged this morn

. >> i'm joe mathieu in for david westin.ent of justice says -- has a potentially damaging charge against the former president as americans woke up this morning to this image that may say more about the case than any piece of information we have seen yet. of these five sets of papers on the floor at mar-a-lago marked classified, including cover sheets that read top-secret fbi, one including a marking that means it was intelligence gathered by secret human resources. trump himself responding this morning from his true social

here is joe mathieu. everything going ok in the house? can we expect this to happen today? got off and running around 9:00 this morning. the rules for debate have been set and we could have a vote at some point mid-to-late afternoon. 3:00 to 4:00, unless things accelerate. it is difficult to predict timing in the house. they will not be many lawmakers around. this will be a massive proxy exercise on a friday in august getting the house of representatives or the democrats back in town is not as easy as you might think. over 100 lawmakers asked for the opportunity to have other lawmakers vote on their behalf. they will be exercising their right today. if this gets done, that is the final touch on this 18 month escapade that will end up back at pennsylvania avenue and a chance for the president to sign the bill. guy: what kind of an afternoon d think -- do you think donald trump will have? it could be a busy afternoon. joe: that vote could come inside potentially with the release of a warrant. the president -- former president issued a statement on truth social that made big n

joe mathieu, david sachs does a phenomenal summary as we stagger with china and taiwan over 30 years. and he says there has been a rhetorical shift in washington starting with president trump. it is not a servitude, but he looks at it with pompeo and trump. his biden and speaker pelosi simply following on from the work that trump and pompeo laid? >> they probably don't like that wording but it is essentially the reality. this is largely the same relationship here. what deliberate language coming from the white house yesterday. a lot different than what we heard from joe biden two weeks ago. that caller opens with those remarks. the president said the military doesn't think it is a good idea right now. if he hadn't said that, this would be a very good conversation. everyone is looking back to 1997 and newt gingrich. 25 years since a speaker about house touched down in taiwan. but beijing is looking at '91 when the beijing police chased nancy pelosi and some other lawmakers out of tiananmen square when she unfurled a pro-democracy banner. there are questions about whether she will make

doesn't before the songwriters became the winners, and then beatle jones with joe dassin adriano celentano mireille mathieueative rivals of the songwriters were george harrison gloria gainer. henry monchini sang his song moon river then the whole world and unknown to the world pesniary immediately warned us that if they don’t clap you , continue to surprise further, of course. we realized that we had a chance or an accident, hot, quail. so the hall exploded and now all these people who are the leaders of all these firms they stood up and we clapped them. as they say further to the fullest, what they could. we were unique. for an ensemble of 27 invitations, starting from all over europe, it was polygraph then the studio invited us, israel spain italy right away. they say, get on the bus, and we will immediately take you away, but what about the ministry of culture, like the ideological department of the central committee of the party. can soviet artists perform abroad without a pre-approved program, and how can a western producer explain it? why do musicians refuse such profitable proposals, sitgaris, the o