some pretty stringent testing of its own list of modern russian designed military hardware that john amis helped develop is nothing to mess with and includes fighter jets like the made twenty nine which is being delivered in a massive contract with india's navy. this suit thirty variation developed for the chinese air force india s four hundred triumph any aircraft system stu more on pilot excitement lies ahead for sokol. future unpiloted aircraft we plan to reach an entirely new technological level which will on the one hand and i was to significantly raise the aircraft's haleigh and. be providing a new generation of equipment to that allows new hardware and programming solutions . the so-called zine bureau is planning to carve out a nice in the already crowded russian drone market will build an unpopulated multi-purpose aircraft weighing in at about one hundred kilograms so far it's all blueprints behind closed doors but given their pass excess the picture looks good going forward in the soviet union kodak moments were brought to you by passing away their film for petrochemicals right h

amy. >> john, hi. so one of the things that came up for me is the imagined communities from the book in which it sort of national -- sorry to go academic on you, but the idea of national collective responsive is in part created by print culture so that thinking of ourselves as americans happens because we read newspapers that call us that, and so i'm wondering how decentralized underground papers helped create a national sense of the movement, the 60s, and then if the common denominators went beyond rock n roll, drugs, and so on and then particularly what relevance that collective we-ness might have had and left opposed to be a separatist and whatnot. >> i'm talking about the structure of most underground newspapers. there's exceptions. there's some run by individuals in a hire ark yal way. but there's two organizations. one playing a big role in the book and they had journalists covering events and cement out news pacts from where they were located and some in new york and massachusetts and sent these

and amy that was one of the founders of first place for youth and is now of the john burton foundation. i tried to do my background on this one. the need for a transitional housing was well expressed today. it received far less attention than it should have. it takes action to do anything in this field. it is very difficult to get refinancing together, the developer is together, to put everything in place an order for it to happen. this is a miniscule attempt, but it is the only thing we have got going in front of us at the moment. it is not going to take care of the problem, but it will be one shot and hopefully in addition to everything else, it will raise public consciousness in that regard. i will not support the compromise. the loss of nine units is untenable to me. i know that the mayor's office of housing did say that they will try to make up the funds. makeup of the funds is my problem. that means of those funds will not go to of the support of housing. that is exactly what it means. those funds don't come out of thin air. i can't do it. this is a supportive and affordable type

-cio and john sweeney and iran in one thousand nine hundred five and got elected at that time. amy goodman and i can note it. and a.f.l.-cio meeting about eight or nine years ago in chicago i think it was the annual meeting and i don't recall but it was just months after the change to when split it happened and there was a lot of wailing and gnashing of teeth at the time about you know what's the future of labor going to be when you look back at that split. what are your thoughts on the state of labor in the united states really well when you look at the split it was still tragic that the split occur because even even the the things that they said they wanted to all of them could have been done with all of us together the good news is a split caused us all to look at each other and we changed a lot i mean this is a stronger because we changed a lot now most several of the unions have come back into the if a c.e.o. and so we were in the other ones were working very very closely together so we're probably more united right now that we've been in the long time even before the split an

john harwood, thanks so much. good to talk to you. >> you bet. >> here's amy. >>> the deal is welcome news to all federal employees and especially our men and women in uniform who would not have been paid in the event of a government shutdown. nbc's ron mott is at ft. bragg, north carolina. >> reporter: amy, good morning. you can almost hear a collective sigh of relief in the air here. a lot of military members waking up happy to hear that a deal was struck. a lot of folks we spoke to yesterday said it would be a hardship for their families if those paychecks that they're expecting next friday were not delivered next week. a lot of folks say that they just don't make enough money in the military to meet the basic needs and then have savings left over for a rainy-day fund. that didn't happen. the government shutdown is not going to happen. these folks are obviously very happy. above and beyond the fear and the concerns about meeting their bills, a lot of folks had some stinging criticisms for politicians in washington that they allowed this conversation to reach such a fevered pitch this week about military members

significant difference in the approach to the existing law as discussed by amy gottlieb and ted alden and especially lucas guttentag and john sand wig. mr. sand wick -- sandwig. everything comes back to you and you're the enforcement agency. >> [inaudible]. >> i believe i heard you say that we are targeting populations that pose a security threat. there's a big difference between that way of phrasing and amy's and lucas's phrasing of individual, individual, individual, that's what they said over and over again. and i think it, i think it has to do with whether an individual who is picked up is then subject to an evaluation to determine whether that individual is a security threat, rather than the other way around. i'm not saying it's profiling but i think it is a different approach, and i'm having a little trouble expressing this. but i thought i heard a difference that makes a, that, would be reflected on the street. and, i think, maybe congressional instruction of what, what is intended here might, you know, might be useful. clearly, we want people who pose a security threat and that's that's what i will try to take back.

gilda radney, john candy, john belushi and all of these people came out of there. i was there with amynts and we'd watch them. it was the most fun job. >> was it competitive? with all the people was it, i'm funnier than you are? did that enter into the conversation? >> it was a cult of improv where all people cared about was doing improv all the time. we used to travel around the country and do shows for the second city touring company. we'd get $75 a show and we were like, yes! >> what years? >> this is 1995 to 1997. >> you thought you'd made it? >> oh, i was in show business. ten people in a dirty van would drive around. sometimes we'd drive two, three days to get to the $75 gig and drive back. we didn't care. >> in the book there are personal and professional stories. you write, what 19-year-old boy doesn't want a wide-hipped sarcastic greek girl with short hair that's permed on top? uneasy times? >> it was just, you know, i went to the university of virginia which is a great school. at uva, i'm dominican there. everyone is so blonde and blue eyed. i would get crushes on these hands