. >> john baner de los repuiblicanos dice que lo importante es genberar empleos, no la reforma migratoria ustedes, sigan peleando. >> lo importante es conseguir una salida ciudadanía. >> si usted se comunica con sus representantes, hágales saber que se necesita una reforma migratoria. >> en la bahía se llevó a cabo una reunión comunitaria, vamos con más información. >> a pesar que es probable que se concrete una reforma migratoria, todavía no hay nada para que no caigan en fraudes. >> todavía se debtae la aprobación de una posible reforma migratoria, en san josé la alerta no se hizo esperar. >> hay personas que aprovechan este momento para abyusar de la comunidad inmigrante, pero aún no hay reforma migratoria. >> qué se uede hacer?. >> ponerse al día en los impuestos. >> además tener una buena conducta. >> es imporetante que cada persona conozca su istorial criminal,cualquier delito que no se conozca podría provocar un problema. >> además comprobantes de vivir en estados unidos. >> compronabntes de cuentas, archivos médicos y otros. >> y además hablar inglés. >> también se puede seguir ap

we have a leadership in the form of john baner the senior republican obviously republicans in the majorityhere. who has asked some very pointed questions about what the goal is and to follow up to any military action. he has also said that the president needs to consult with congress, but he has not specifically asked for the president to come to congress for prior authorization before any perspective military action. however, a number of core conservatives within his own party sort of the traditional isolation's wing, say the president will be breaking the law if he doesn't do so, he will be violating the constitution. on the other side, the extreme other size of the political spectrum, are many liberal democrat whose say the president needs to do the same thing. while, at the same time, those in the leadership on the democratic side say the president has the authority, and even some senior republicans have the authority to go forward. two bottom line on that score is congress is not scheduled to return until september 9th, and the president is not expected to call congress back into sess

i guess it is worth noting that the speaker of the house, john baner although he has come up with a list of very important questions he would like the president to answer, he did stop short of saying that he too wanted the president to actually go to congress and get approval. to get authorization. >> right. again, i think it is difficult to sort out how much of this they want to make sure that the president acknowledges or whether they will push for formal authorization. that has p happened since world war ii. the war powered enacted in the 1973. during the nixon administration. so this is a question with a long history. a long history of give and dare. be very interesting to see how it plays out. in the context of syria. >> and of course what we are waiting on is waiting to hear a statement from secretary of state john kerry. there's that look and feel. of course you have forces that have been deployed. you have people being called up. so the wheels are in motion, now the president can decide not to, but he has put themselves in a situation where they can exec cute an attack. i also th

at the very least what speaker john boehner is saying, we just learned that speaker baner and the president head a phone call for the first time about syria. a few days ago. but in the last little while got a call from the president, an update. but boehner is still demanding that the president come forward, address the american people, explain the potential mission here and actually lay out what intelligence the u.s. has to back up its claims against syria. >> if you look at the iraq wmd problem, which the brits are very concerned about. how sure is the white house about the evidence they have against syria? >> whole series of tough questions for the white house at their daily briefing today, whether or not there are 110% certain the syrian government has been in complete control of the chemical weapons stockpile, whether or not the rebels could have gotten their hands on any chemical weapons. reports out today suggesting, among mid-level officials in the obama administration, anonymously saying they're not sure the syrian government has had full custody of those chemical weapons so josh wa

he says that speaker john boehner needs to call back house members right now to discuss any syria action. the president, we're told, just called speaker baner to discuss concerns in this letter and the legal justification for any potential military action. now to the guy who authored the letter. very good to have you. >> thank you, neil. it's an important topic. >> neil: the key republican house leadership, including speaker boehner, have not signed this letter. what am toy read into that? >> ite knock surprised and certainly not offended. the speaker has ratcheted up his requirement or expectation of the president. he has not yet come forth with a definitive request for statutory authorization, and i think that's a clear difference and something i hope the speaker really insists on. we are the 140 members you mentioned, including 21 of my democratic colleagues, which i'm very encouraged by. it's a bipartisan effort. it's not person to the president. it's a constitutional 101, that is absent the united states being under attack or about to be under attack, in the situation like we face in syria, a real moral dilemma of strategic national se

a spokesman for house speaker john boehner told me a short time ago, the speaker has not ruled out congress coming back early, but i'm reminded it would require both banerder harry reid to bring congress back early. >> last month the chairman of the joints chief of staff warned any intervention in syria carries a very big risk. general mart din dempsey wrote in a letter, quote, once we take action we should be prepared for what comes next. deeper involvement is hard to avoid. that's a feeling many current and former military officers echoed when they spoke to the "washington post" newspaper. with us now, bill cowen, a fox news analyst. the criticism i there's no end game so why begin the game? >> i almost believe the president may be wondering the same thing in his statement he said he is still considering whether he is going to do something, and i think what he meant was, whether he is going to do something or not doing in, and general dempsey, who i don't always agree with, is absolutely right. i don't think we in the u.s. have to worry about repercussions. the israelis have to worry. the iranians have been very outspoken about attacking israel. the s