this video comment was shared with us by john berg mare, who's legal director for public knowledge. and it raises some interesting questions that lead us directly into the gonzalez versus google case. take, take a listen. didn't have changed a lot since 1996 when congress passed section 230. section 2, there is responsible for a lot of the growth of the internet and quite a bit of what people really like about the internet. and it is in part responsible for what a lot of people don't like about the internet. and it's completely reasonable to think that the law should be changed to meet today's environment. however, the supreme court is really not the correct avenue for that effectively. the plaintiffs in this case are asking the court to rewrite the law and overturn decades of precedent in a way that i think would effectively overturn the law. and it was throughout the baby with the bathwater. julie john said the supreme court is not the correct avenue for that. what do you make about that? that's an interesting case take. it does highlight the fact that this, this, this case does r