retiring early, so train me up for john boehner retiring at probably a good trade and minds of most conservatives and libertarians. >> how did you feel at the time and how do you feel about it today? >> i was disappointed there's big money plays a big role in politics because it is huge power in washington, d.c. always disappointed in that. but i was member of the house freedom caucus they thought establishment thought if they could take out the camp and others that somehow the the house freedom caucus and jim jour den and mark meadows would go away and that, obviously, didn't happen and they're big player in washington promoting i think what qerntive and libertarians are looking for out of our -- federal government. and they made great progress. >> now congress when was the patriot tool put out how many editions been out for quite a while. >> i think we're in third edition, and that's what so many people in washington forget and not yourself. but others they think that world is there. you know, but every day and most every day in state capitol wrestling with social problems. you kn

the reason i am speaker is because my predecessor john boehner went through all of that. i ended up becoming the consensus person drafted into it. because we went through those torturous kind of matching nations. i see it will have the same expenses. now that they are the majority, is a wider party ideologically speaking, our majority is the same. it's the 21st century where the internet cannot a person to become a celebrity pretty quickly by being entertaining figure. those incentive structures in place for both parties. >> democrats often say that they're the party that actually loves governing the data like to blow things up. as the republican instinct, the freedom caucus, the tea party are more inclined to blow up a government. do you disagree with that? >> i think i do know. i could see that case been made a decade or two ago but it don't think that's necessarily the case. take a look at our session were completed. we will pass over 1000 bills out of the house. you haven't seen a pace like that since the early 1980s. and by the way over 80% of those bills are biparti

who would you have liked to see instead of paul ryan win john boehner stepped down -- when john boehner stepped down? caller: it is hard to say. i like medals. i like the guy that just lost to mccarthy. host: jim jordan. caller: jim jordan. we are talking about conservative guys. that 1995 paul ryan, that was a great guy back then. i promise you this man is no more than a moderate, there is nothing conservative about him. he knows it. -- you can tell he conservatives and the republican party in the back. we are talking about two very different notions of conservatism and this gets at the fault lines in the party and the difference between what it means to be a paul ryan republican and a donald trump republican. paul ryan kind of is a chamber of commerce republican. he is closer to chamber of commerce and big business on immigration. they have a more liberal view than the trump side of the party. --is closer to them on taxes there is a fault line the caller --iculates and i don't know i don't know the paul ryan of today is that different in terms of what he thinks and where his policies

the reason i'm speaker is because my predecessor, john boehner, went through it. became the consensus person kind of drafted into it. we went through the matit and i they'll have the same experiences. those incentive structures are in place for both parties. >> they say democrats often say that they're the party that actually loves governing, though. they don't like to blow things up. as a republican instinct that the freedom caucus and the tea party are more inclined to blow up government. do you disagree? >> i think i do now. i could see the case being made a decade or two ago, but i don't think that's necessarily the case. take a look at the sessions we're completing. we'll have passed over a thousand bills out of the house. that's a record pace. you haven't seen a pace since like that since the early '80s. over 80% of the bills are bipartisan bills. i would same we became a pretty good governing party and, you know, we lost a midterm election. those things happen. but i think we have become a pretty good governing party. they'll have the same growing pa pains

the new knowledge in the house john boehner will need to diffuse it by now days on phone by now on a q. . the hobby friday consequence of his speech if i recall he sees on the move i'm by now you know why they got him a play not convince his film bullshit on his last also mofo play not because you feel. because you're all these who awful playing on this us t.v. . people with that are plenty of people to see ms us you're muslim but you have a new cruisers you see she said you thought you'd take. a plane off. coupling forgit him are you really going it all and sees it they are good at what i. was i thought of the few obvious such a mill. on the no monthly no pharmacy in long. dymov you. do a depressing read the. done . by lot and everything. is going to british again you did what you did to why you did to surveil me that it was. writers who got them there. because him. and i made. a mean response at the missus. he said you. don't see. me. it's a depression and i. mean don't. you . see on it will get this going to this. is not only. so. a good to live. some stories handed down the gener

look at shares of the pot company backed by john boehner acreage holding.ublic in canada we are joined by the ceo kevin murphy great to have you with us. >> thank you for having me. >> congratulations on the canadian debut what do you plan on doing with the money how you allocate that to give us an idea where you see the growth is it u.s. expansion full legalization, legalization of edibles in a couple of years in canada? is it abroad how are you allocating the money. >> well, u.s. focused. today with 33 states with medical program and ten of which which have a -- an adult use program, we have a lot of work to do here in the united states. today we have 18 states. we look to expand quite quickly to the rest of the states and be a dominant player in the united states. >> you know recently in the past ten days or so there seemed to be a growing belief that things could or would change drastically in the united states in terms of legalization pete sessions is out. jeff sessions out. a couple of states at least partially legalized marijuana for medical and/or e

it is also the case, being elected speaker in january, as john boehner showed us, doesn't mean she will be speaker for the full two years. there is an enormous amount of pent-up ambition among the younger generation of would-be house leaders and their ambitions are not -- they can be checked only for so long. she has been at this for a long time, leader of the house democrats for 15 years, longer than all but one other person, famous sam rayburn, leader of the house caucus for a little bit longer. at some point, she'll have to get off this treadmill. francine kiefer: she recognizes that. she has recognized that and said she would be a bridge speaker or transitional speaker, how long that will last is not clear, whether the full two years until 2020 or whether it will be less than that. it is kind of hard for me to imagine that she would step back in the middle of an election year. so i would think she would go up to 2020, to the next election, i don't know. host: interesting to see what the viewers have to say. i want to invite them into the conversation. voters were asked, who at the p

as john boehner showed us a few years ago, it does not necessarily mean she will he speaker for the full two years. -- be speaker for the full two years. pent-up a lot of ambition among the younger generation of house leaders and would be house leaders. their ambitions are not only going to be checked for so long. she has been leader of the house democrats for 15 years, longer than one other person in american history, the famous sam rayburn leader of the house caucus for longer. at some point, she will have to get off the treadmill. guest: she recognizes that. she has recognized that and says she would be a bridge speaker, or a transitional speaker. how long that will last is not clear, whether it will be the full two years or less. it is difficult for me to imagine that she would step back in the middle of an election year. i would think that she would go up to 2020 two the next election. -- to the next election. host: democrats, (202) 748-8000. republicans, (202) 748-8001. independents, (202) 748-8002. voters were asked at the polling stations their opinion of nancy pelosi. 31% said t

michael steele, you worked for john boehner, you've been through these transitions before.ul as it was for nancy pelosi to give up the gavel to john boehner, it was done gracefully as i recall. >> of course. this is a big transition, it's a momentous part of our democracy, and i think that speaker pelosi obviously is experienced in this job, she's going to have a heck of a time getting to 218 votes from our caucus, but i think most likely she will and she will return to her position as speaker and she is going to have a terribly difficult job managing as phil said the fire breathing elements of her caucus who want nothing more than to burn the white house down with the president in it and the desire to get something done, whether it's on infrastructure or another area an accomplishment that they can go back to their voters in just two years' time. >> in fact, some people -- some of these young new resistance-led members who have been elected, you have all of these women, feel that she knows the ropes. i mean, if she had had joe crowley, for instance, or some other challenge

back then in 2006 mike pence challenged john boehner for minority leader. that vote was 168-27. in 2006. house democrats meanwhile meeting on capitol hill, they are discussing their incoming legislative agenda for the 116th congress. representative elijah cummings of maryland, the incoming chair of the house oversight and government reform committee talked to reporters following the meeting about his role on committee and leadership elections. mr. cummings: good morning, everyone. >> you mind talking about the discussions going on in leadership anti-next speaker and where you stand? mr. cummings: i have been abundantly clear, i support nancy pelosi a million percent. we need somebody who has been battle tested as she has been. i think -- when you think about the victories on the part of the democratic party, a lot of us ran with the number one issue being health care and the fact. -- affordable care act. ladies and gentlemen, there would be no affordable care act if it were not for nancy pelosi. she knows her caucus. i think we need that kind of leadership right now. we do not n

the democrats will go through the similar growing pains of being in the majority, the same way john boehner and yourself for eight years seemed to constantly have this -- mr. ryan: yes, i do. i do. i do. i'm not going to get into speculating floor votes and things like that, but already you can see, the reason i am speaker is because my predecessor, john boehner, went through all of that. the internet can allow a person to become a celebrity petty -- pretty quickly by being an entertaining figure. and those incentive structures are in place for both parties, for anybody. mr. kane: they say -- democrats often say they're the party that actually looked loves governing -- actually loves governing though. they don't like that blow things up, and that's a republican instinct that the tea party are more inclined to blow up government. do you disagree with that? mr. ryan: i think i do now. i could see that case being made a decade or two ago, but i don't think that that's necessarily the case. take a look at our session we're completing. we will have passed over 1000 bills out of the house. you ha

i don't think carlos carbello lost in florida because he voted for paul ryan or john boehner for speaker>> if that is what folks remember what you voted for two years from now you have other problems. >> it is indicative of a much larger political party problem typical typically. >> thanks, chris. >>> a telling 24 hours in the special counsel's russia investigation. we are getting new details about who robert mueller is going after and why he took paul manafort back to court. we'll be right back. our new, hot, fresh breakfast will get you the readiest. holiday inn express. book now for at least 20% off during our annual sale. the annual enrollment period is here. the time to choose your medicare coverage... begins october 15th and ends december 7th. so call unitedhealthcare to learn about... a plan that could give you the benefits you're looking for. it's the aarp medicarecomplete plan insured through unitedhealthcare. what makes it complete? it can combine medicare parts a and b, which is your hospital and doctor coverage... with part d prescription drug coverage, and more, all in one s

i have a question about remembering john boehner and the of catsof -- hearding in the house. one of the prospective speakers, either majority or minority leader, as adept more so than john boehner given all the pragmatism rampant in the new congress? guest: yes, sir. if you were trying to assess nancy pelosi, her ability to hold her caucus together in the past has been impressive. now, the obama administration was new, and the democratic majority were stronger and more ideological verse than now. are thetwo wings liberal progressives and the center-left mainstreamers. 10 years ago, you had the blue dogs. nancy pelosi did an amazing job holding those folks together. unanimity in approving obamacare. in had near unanimity passing legislation to create a carbon tax, which the senate never took, but was a huge thing at the time. she is a good unifier. the democratic caucus does not have in the sense of the freedom caucus people who are willing to throw a wrench into the whole thing and say we will not help you. will such a thing emerge now? i tend to doubt it for the reasons you

it reminds me a lot of what john boehner and the republican party had to deal with after the 2010 mid-term. a lot of republicans came in and raged gwen the old republican machine, and there were a lot of divisions in the republican party and barack obama got re-elected. >> john boehner is now enjoying a nice glass of merlot. >> among other products. >> he is supporting the marijuana lobby is what she means here. >>> and then a deadly outbreak blamed for the death of another child in a rehab center. what parents need to know, next. '! pop that in for a coffee or brew a shot and froth fresh milk for a latte or cappuccino. easy peasy. now she's a barista! we've got the best coffee in the world being made by an under-skilled staff! excellent. it's so frothy. a little piece of heaven. thank you. but how's the coffee? latte for no one!? nelson. sorry? that's for nelson. latte for nelson. that's not what it says here. of every great meal is always the potato?t bite that's why it should always be an idaho potato. only genuine idaho potatoes have the perfect taste and texture to get your meal start

john boehner learned there were a lot of divisions within his own conference to proceed on negotiations with the senate and white house. we want to watch what extent do those divisions emerge within the democratic caucus in the house. i think in general the democratic caucus is more unified than the republican conference under john boehner was. president obama at that point i think used the word shellacking. worddent bush used the thumping. let's hear from president obama. [video clip] >> this is something every president i think needs to go through. the responsibilities of this office are so enormous, and so many people are depending on what we do, and in the rush of trackty sometimes we lose of the ways that we connected with folks that got us here in the first place. -- now, i amhing not recommending for every feature i'm sure there are easier ways to learn these lessons. it this is a growth process. the relationship i have had with the american people is one that built slowly, pete at this incredible high, and during the last two years as we've gone through some very difficult times

hill and i've been lucky to have my lawmakers became the speaker of the house newt gingrich and john boehner did their job with little fanfare and were nice people. some were forgettable. but i tried to do on capitol hill is bring back an approach into view through a longer lens of history instead of the knee-jerk atmosphere of partisan battling. unfortunately, my voice disappeared over two years ago. i would like to turn over to say a few words and as i do i want to say all of us that have worked with us for decades and i can speak for myself and i know a lot of our colleagues learned from you the ropes working to understand the inner workings of congress and how the bill gets passed you talked to me and so many people and we are grateful that you will never lose the place that is inside and i want to invite you up. [applause] i will never, ever give up. [applause] you and i hope that one day my voice is back and i say thank you very much. [applause] another big round of applause. [applause] it's truly amazing. our keynote speaker tonight is from the great state of arizona, republican senat

government person or politician to pledge allegiance to the cult national security advisor john boehner and receive hundred eighty thousand dollars in speaking fees from them oh my god i can't decide what's worse are wrong policy or an event where john bolton is the entertainment. well the if you're into regime change it would not be. your beard right up there you go both full and angele on me openly declare that mari and rashad be the widow of the cult's founder should be the new leader of iran but it's never politics all night long with them ok let's watch this part of. this is the traditional i have too much show the money then. the beautiful. oh. ok now he's improvising a little bit you feel extra time because they killed the speaker who was supposed to go into this place. ready. for us to supporting a bloodthirsty called the tortures its members and will kill anyone that you asked them to and that's what makes them a perfect un us proxy for overthrowing the iranian government yes indeed but no sex you're never going to get on netflix that way. what is shame we could have had a seri

who would you have liked to see instead of paul ryan win john boehner stepped down -- when john boehnerpped down? caller: it is hard to say. i like medals. i like the guy that just lost to mccarthy. host: jim jordan. caller: jim jordan. we are talking about conservative guys. that 1995 paul ryan, that was a great guy back then. i promise you this man is no more than a moderate, there is nothing conservative about him. he knows it. -- you can tell he conservatives and the republican party in the back. we are talking about two very different notions of conservatism and this gets at the fault lines in the party and the difference between what it means to be a paul ryan republican and a donald trump republican. paul ryan kind of is a chamber of commerce republican. he is closer to chamber of commerce and big business on immigration. they have a more liberal view than the trump side of the party. --is closer to them on taxes there is a fault line the caller --iculates and i don't know i don't know the paul ryan of today is that different in terms of what he thinks and where his policies are

two of my local lawmakers became speaker of the house, newt gingrich and john boehner.ost of the members i covered did their jobs with little fanfare. many were generally nice people, some were forgettable. [laughter] dana: wait for it. then, a handful of my local lawmakers ended up in prison. [laughter] dana: what i tried to do on capitol hill was bring a fact approach and view the actions of congress through a longer lens of history instead of a knee-jerk atmosphere of partisan battling. voiceunately, my disappeared over two years ago and my doctors still have no answer on how to fix it. i will still walk the halls, interview lawmakers as best i can, and report the news from capitol hill, going on the radio with my computer-generated jamie dupree 2.0 voice. i want to turn it over to jamie who will try to say a few words. as i do, i want to say that all of us who have worked with you for decades, and i can speak for myself and a lot of our colleagues here learned from you the ropes on what it is like to be a really hard-working, shoe leather reporter, just the facts, w

when it comes to mind for you john boehner is we've talked before just also. questions the visual design industry right now. from your income.

steve: john boehner said, "it is the party of donald trump." is it? senator corker: well, i am not running for reelection, but people who are tell me that out on the trail, when you are out running, no one cares about issues anymore on the republican side. they want to know one thing, do you support the president? and i think you saw it with mark sanford's race, a guy who is very much of the ilk i just laid out, he was defeated by someone who claimed total allegiance to the president. so we are going through a period of time where the politics of the republican side is very personality based. and again, is this transitional or when this personality is no longer president, will the party migrate back to its standard foundations? we will see. steve: i would like to ask you about some of our allies, france, germany, great britain and canada. what is the state of relations between our allies and with nato in particular? senator corker: they are very perplexed. and the relationship is poor. by the way, with heavy heart on their side, meaning -- i just had

would bend to say it's a brilliant i should say then you know the minister boy didn't write it john boehner has said juries amaze deal was dead in awards that message just before being appointed to security being dangerous this article a bit more on the fact that there's no people skills perhaps. movement but the point i'm making is that go back five ten years that conversation with john penrose would have taken place in strangers' bar over a pint and the be no record of it it's written down and i'll and there's a record of it it's very embarrassing so you know my view is tory m.p.'s are spending too much time on whatsapp and not actually out in the real world are they really even with their own cult leagues and the becoming detached from reality well let's go on to find out what really is happening in brussels when to raise a maze there vosh that some european official or other saying in he is saying that his tweets i think worrying new reports of bad and cambridge analytic has influence on the brakes breath referendum we did a mobile style investigation in europe and steps to save goddaug

him to the wall and said you must fund the wall completely and ryan will do for mccarthy what john boehner did, to clean the stables, cut a deal with democrats and spend $1 trillion and get it done so for the next year mccarthy doesn't have to worry about the same fight again and doesn't have to do any heavy lifting at least for a while. shannon: you mentioned seth moulton. we have a tweet from him. he has been in congress but is talking about the new members and others, leadership asking the members to make a choice, break your campaign promise, stand up to a status quo that will punish you. we've been fielding lots of calls from incumbents, new leadership to protect new members. any chance nancy pelosi has a real challenge? >> and experienced democratic strategists, everybody wants somebody new. the democratic leadership team wants somebody new. seth moulton would like it to be him. unfortunately for him, the democratic cau is too establishment and there are people who think she's too liberal. shannon: good to see you, we will be right back. ♪ the best are back. applebee's bigger, bolder

caller: i have a question about remembering john boehner and how he handled the herding of cats in theouse. see particularly one or the other of their perspective speakers, either minority or adept moreader, as so than john boehner, given all the pragmatism ramp it -- rampant in the new congress? guest: i would say if you were trying to assess mrs. pelosi, her ability to hold her caucus together has been in the past pretty impressive. and theyears ago now obama administration was new and the democratic majority was stronger and more ideologically diverse than it is now, now the two wings are there really liberal progressives and the centerleft mainstreamers. 10 years ago there was a third wing, the so-called blue dogs, some of whom were more fiscally conservative than liberal republicans. mrs. pelosi did a pretty amazing job holding those folks together. she had an inordinate us near your memory -- enormous near to create a carbon tax. she is a good unifier. it is also the case that the democratic caucus does not have in the sense of the freedom caucus, people willing to throw a wrench

craig: michael, you are with john boehner when the republicans took the house in 2010, you had about 63 new members. i think nancy pelosi will end up with 28, 30. any advice for the incoming speaker? members, in many cases, more to the left of her, what advice would you give me to pelosi? i would empower the freshman class, give them responsibility in terms of governing and investigations. i think there are limits to what you can accomplish with a majority in one half of one third of the federal government, which is what democrats have. opportunity is there to begin setting the agenda for the 2020 elections by showing what can succeed legislatively, finding areas of common ground with republicans on things like infrastructure, and conducting responsible and intelligent oversight of the many issues that have arisen at the justice department and trump administration. craig: there you go, some advice for speaker pelosi. thank you to fred hochberg and michael steele. that's get a check on markets with emma chandra. we are looking at risk off for u.s. equities, a slump across the board. a

john boehner didn't like the use of the term right wing and the talk of veterans.t to be fairly on point. >> yeah. the report was very precient. it suggested they were all right wing extremists. that was not the intent of the report. the report was designed to set forth a threat to the united states, and unfortunately we've seen the threat come to pass. >> and we keep seeing reports of the numbers of hate crimes and the incidents and we're reporting on them all too frequently. but fundamentally there's two issues. one is the enforcement and prosecution of hate crimes. but by that point, it's too late. what's going on and what's been going on that really has caused this rise? is it economic? is it social? what in your opinion is driving this rise in home grown terrorism and extremist hate crimes? >> you know, i don't think we really understand it. you know, and we've gone through periods in our history before where we've had a lot of right wing extremists or domestic terrorists i sancidents we went through a period in the early 90s in the mid 90s we had the oklahoma

rapidly mobilize against the democratic president, and so you have a whole new wave of energy, and john boehnernd the house republicans won ten more seats in 2010 than i won in 1994. mark: 63 seats, you got 54 seats. >> yeah, and boehner did it with a very straightforward simple campaign, where are the jobs, and it worked. people came together and said that's the right question. so we were back in charge of the house again. and i think people today have no idea how unusual this is. we held the house for two two-year terms between 1930 and 1994, of 64 years, we held the house four years. we now had the house a vast majority of the time since 1994. and along comes trump, and i'm with you, i tell people i'm not sure he's a conservative but he's the most effective anti-liberal in my lifetime. and whether it's deregulation or conservative judges or cutting taxes or standing up for an american foreign policy based on american values, every time you turn around, he is instinctively saying things which drive the left crazy, and he's doing it, i think, because of the notion of common sense, and the thin

as we saw with john boehner and the republicans, members get restless.ots don't vote for speakers. if there is enough anxiety out there, it can impact members. pelosi can get this done. if democrats want her gone, somebody has to step up and raise money and affect legislation and create the power base that can rival her and actually take her out. nobody has done the work. there's a lot of complaining. >> no one is running to take her spot. >> you don't -- >> the not nancy. >> you don't take her out without doing the work. they need somebody to do the work. that is the key. who tries to create the power base? >> david drucker, thank you. >>> president trump telling advisers he may visit troops in the combat zone for the first time in his presidency. that according to "the washington post." the president has not made a visit to iraq or afghanistan. >> the president doesn't want to associate himself with wars he views as failures. he cites the long flights and security risks. a senior official says the president believes people want to kill him. the preside

who do we have, john boehner to grow i !d, the party brose chad kroger, also "watters world" big roback fan! >> greg: kennedy? >> kennedy: die guy fieri, good person, took a ton of free meals and plenty of sites for all the firefighters working around the clock from many states in order to combat the fire up north where he was in the two big fires. >> greg: jed? >> jedidah: broken a world record 5,039-pound 110-foot long heap of nachos. think of the deliciousness, 900 pounds of tortilla chips, 450 pounds of salsa, 2200 pounds of delicious cheese. >> jesse: what do you call cheese that is not yours? >> greg: nacho cheese. set your dvrs, never miss an episode of "the five." "special report" is up next. what's up, bret? >> bret: nacho cheese. the death toll skyrockets as the wildfires continue to burn. a democrat comes from behind to win in arizona. president trump lodge is a pointed twitter counter assault against french president macron, telling him to make france great again. this is "special report" ." good evening, i'm bre

areas of contention between president trump and a democrat controlled house as there were between john boehner and president obama. do you think there's areas of policymaking where they could find common ground things like drug pricing like infrastructure spending >> in theory, yes. i think it's a good start that the president congratulated knonancy pelosi who could be th new speaker of the house america's infrastructure is crumbling, does need money, and it got stuck during gridlock previously that's not impossible. but on an awful lot of other things it won't be easy. this is a president who has been polarizing, critical to democrats, and there are lots of democrats, especially committee chairs now in the house who will be holding hearings into what his administration has been up to donald trump has already said if you start investigating me, then you can kiss good-bye to any idea of bipartisan ship. >> do you think that will have an impact on this america first policy that president trump has introduced, in the sense that he will have to be more diverted on whatever is happening domesticall

that's how john boehner won the speakership in his last run. a bunch of democrats were away so it lowered the thresholds and he won another term before he resigned. pelosi left no possibility open that she might not become the speaker. it's a very, very commanding performance for her in the hallways talking about her speakership. tim ryan there are people like tim ryan who say we have the vote against her. we are 50 days away. this is a lifetime in politics away. >> on the republican side where there was that vote held with the republican conference. in terms of that idea the president was putting out there of mccarthy make some kind of a deal with jim jordan. is there anything that jordan gets for making this campaign and getting about three, four dozen votes today. >> reporter: sounds like we have a selection of problem children for kevin mccarthy. the free caucus will find itself in such diminished power compared to the power they were held before. that block could dictate how things happen. the dynamics will be completely different. jim jor

consider the vote for former house speaker john boehner in january 2015. commandeered 2016 votes. 25 lawmakers discast a ballot. they were absent attending the funeral of mario cuomo. the house was smaller. those members missed opening day and had not been sworn in. so boehner did need 2018. the speaker doesn't have to be a member. 54 people have served as speaker. there's never been a civilian speaker. secretary of state colon powell and former attorney general and jeff sessions have received votes. >> here's what usually happens. the first act of the house when the new congress starts on january 3 is to pick a speaker. the democrats nominate a candidate and the republicans nominate a candidate. the entire house votes. the majority party wins. what happens if no one scores an outright majority? the house has to vote and vote until they finally elect someone. the speaker vote has not gone to a second ballot since 1923. frederic gillette won on the ninth ballot after three days. that was nothing. in 1856, the house consumed two months and burned through 133

and when republicans would lose, we lost the majority in '06, dennis hastert step ad side, john boehnere. there tends to be some consequences when there's a perceived to be a failure in an election. when nancy pelosi and the democrats in 2012 and 2014, they may be attained the same leader. a lot of drafts were frustrated by that. >> this is from dan pfeiffer, a former obama adviser. he says i'm very something to the desire for a new generation of leaders. the main argument against pelosi seems to be the republicans like to attack her in campaign ads. >> dan pfeiffer has a point. hillary had a similar point. i agree with congressman debt that there is some restlessness on the democratic side. democrats need to ask themselves this, which model has worked better for republicans, sticking with mitch mcconnell nondescript inside player an elitist maybe who has marched the republican agenda through the senate, got kavanaugh over the hump without raising his voice, breaking a sweat, got the 2017 trump tax cut through without breaking a sweat, do they want that model which is what will pelosi f