. >> such a good point that -- as you're talking i'm trying to figure out what john boehner's response would have been. about injecting bleach. i mean, you're right. it's trump. he's the problem. more likely to see you on tv than if you went down there. they're not wearing masks anyways. just expand a little bit on this idea of a zombie gop. did they speak out in the same way that the state of washington spoke out? and the makers of lysol spoke out? where are the republican house members who don't want their kids or loved ones injecting bleach to clean their lungs. >> governor hogan is republican and he's spoken up. we had strong bipartisan support. democrats and republicans in support of state and local investments as we go forward in the next bill. support our heroes, healthcare providers. first responders, police, fire, emergency services, people, our teachers, our transit workers, our postal workers who deliver the medicine to many people in our country. our food providers. the list goes on. rather talking about the president's injecting lysol into lungs and he made a big fuss abou

it would've been very difficult with john boehner or the tea party with nothing else along with it. >> remember what we are dealing with. you cannot put a similar scenario to the pandemic we are dealing with right now. in modern history outside of a 9/11. you have more death now affecting more than the entire nation. you just had a third bill we walked through in bipartisanship that got held up for a week. the idea that more things had to be added. remember, you follow this closely. when we did our second bill, even though the language was not correct, republicans moved that bill forward because they did not want to delay that. we moved it forward with an overwhelming vote on the idea that on a handshake we would fix it on monday. we wanted to put the american public first. and we did that and made it happen. and the senate took it up and it het to the president and signed it into law. and now, everyone in the senate voted for it and it overwhelmingly passed in the house. and all we are asking now is no change to the bill but a program that is so successful, more than we ever believed

and that was ted kennedy and john boehner. and it was really a big part of what he want today accomplish as president, of course. it fell far into the background, but we could never make him happy with an education speech draft because he knew too much about it to the granular level of detail. it could go through the staffing process and everything was fine. he would say you don't get it, you don't have it. so one anytime 2004, in the middle of a reelection campaign, a lot going on, i said you know what, he didn't like the last education speech, we have another one to do, let's take the one he didn't use and look at the transcript of what he actually said, and nice that. we took that transcript of the last speech and we cleaned it up and we did some, you know, put in some current local references and current facts and data to freshen it up. and i thought this is what he wanted to say and it was a rare event that he had a speech and he didn't use it. so he took that transcript, make it into a speech, send it back to him, he lov

when you had 60 senators bowling for it, john boehner would not even consider it. host: bring up a lot of issues. i want to let camila dechalus jump in. we have seen since the trump administration came into office, trying to and programs like daca and other immigration policies. when we see him trying to end certain programs, the response by congress was trying to put forward bills to address these concerns, especially when it came to family separation. however, after multiple attempts, congress still has not passed any legislation to address these concerns. is they havely see tried to come to some type of bipartisan compromise. nothing has been passed. last year one thing that was passed is getting protection to recipients from liberia who have been in this country for years, having them a pathway to apply for a green card. that was passed because it was a small provision in the defense authorization bill. when au have seen is bill has come forward, both sides have failed to garner enough support to pass it or get it to the president's desk. this has been a consta

it would've been typical to imagine john boehner and the tea --ty -- indiscernible nothing else writing along with it? >> i don't think it is fair. remember what we are dealing with. you cannot put a similar scenario to the pandemic we are dealing with now outside of 9/11. you have more death now affecting more of the entire nation. you just had a bill, a third bill that we walked through in bipartisanship that got held up for a week in the idea that more things had to be added. remember, you follow this closely. we did our second bill. even though the language is not correct, republicans moved forward because we did not want to delay. we moved forward with all elements of the republican party, an overwhelming vote on the idea that on a handshake we would fix it on monday. we wanted to put the american public first and we did that and made it happen in the senate took it up and went to the president who signed it. now we have a bill, the cares act, every single person in the senate voted for who was there, overwhelmingly passed to the house and all we are asking now is no change to the

thanks indeed will john hendren has been following the story from chicago he says the aerospace john boehner has been losing money already but the pandemic has made his problems even worse. for boeing these numbers were worse even than analysts expected it was hit by a double whammy 1st the company has been trying for a year to get its 737 max plane back up in the air that's its new most lucrative plane in that happen after 2 crashes the killed nearly 350 people is now hoping to get that plane back out mid-year but meanwhile it's losing revenue from that and then along came the coronavirus and the global pandemic just wiped out traffic the c.e.o. of boeing dave calhoun says traffic passenger traffic in commercial airplanes is down 105 percent and that has just walloped the company airbus is down to half a $1000000000.00 in losses the c.e.o. of that company says this is the grave is crisis the aerospace industry has ever seen and it hasn't just hit them southwest airlines posted its 1st loss since 2011 analysts are saying this could hit the aerospace and airline industry for 5 years to come i

that was ted kennedy and john boehner with the legislation that bush signed and that was a big part of what he wanted to accomplish as president. it fell far into the background. but we could never make him happy with an education speech draft because he simply knew too much about it, to a granular detail that speechwriters cannot get. it would go through the staffing process and anything was fine and then it would get to the president. you don't get it. [laughter] >> one time, this was in 2004 in the middle of a reelection campaign, a lot going on. i said to mike and matthew, my colleagues, we have another speech to do, let's take an education speech he didn't use and look at the transcript from what he actually said and use that. so we did commit we took the transcript of the last speech, we cleaned it up, we did, put in some current facts and data and local references to freshen it up. i thought, this is what he wanted to say, and clearly that day it was the rare event he had a speech in front of them and didn't use it. it was education anyone in to do is own thing. so we made that

and that was ted kennedy and john boehner co-authored the legislation that bush signed, and it was really a big part of his, of what he wanted to accomplish. as president, it fell far into the background, but we could never make him happy about the education speech because he understood more about it to the granular writer that speechwriters never get. it would go through the staffing process and be fine and then it would get to the president and he would say, you don't get it! you don't have it. you don't have it right. >> you do a better bush impression -- >> he did. that's good. >> so, one time, it was in 2004, middle of the re-election campaign, a lot going on. and i said to mike and matthew, my colleagues, i said, you know, the president didn't like the last education speech we did. we have another one to do. let's take the one he didn't use and look at the transcript of what he actually said and use that. and so, we did. we took that transcript of that last speech and we just -- we cleaned it up and did some, you know, put in some current, local references and current facts and data

when you had 60 senators bowling for it, john boehner would not even consider it.ost: bring up a lot of issues. i want to let camila dechalus jump in. we have seen since the trump administration came into office, trying to and programs like daca and other immigration policies. when we see him trying to end certain programs, the response by congress was trying to put forward bills to address these concerns, especially when it came to family separation. however, after multiple attempts, congress still has not passed any legislation to address these concerns. is they havely see tried to come to some type of bipartisan compromise. nothing has been passed. last year one thing that was passed is getting protection to recipients from liberia who have been in this country for years, having them a pathway to apply for a green card. that was passed because it was a small provision in the defense authorization bill. when au have seen is bill has come forward, both sides have failed to garner enough support to pass it or get it to the president's desk. this has been a constant