john burris, famed attorney out of the san francisco jurisdiction. and out of atlanta, raymond giudice, defense attorney. what about it, sue moss? >> oh, they're absolutely coming in. she gave caylee that chloroform drug so she could go out and cut a rug? this is absolutely what they needed to tie up her going on the computer, finding chloroform, and then finding evidence of chloroform close to that body. this is a slam dunk. >> john burris? >> well, some portion of the statements will come in. the parts you just talked about, the chloroform, certainly will come in. other aspects of the statement will come in as well. particularly about statements regarding her knowledge about how the child died. but most of the other stuff probably would not come in because it's just played out character evidence that does not go to the charges themselves. some portion of it will. most of it will not. >> you know, raymond giudice, of course i disagree with john burris. and if i were arguing the case, i would argue that all of these letters go to her frame of mind. s

joining us tonight, famed attorney out of the san francisco jurisdiction, john burris. us, anne bremner, high-profile lawyer out of seattle. and it seems to me that they did not give the story, they were not forthcoming before now because it did not benefit them until now. >> that appears to be the case. and they should have come forward with the information. i keep thinking of that line from benjamin franklin -- >> oh, no. not another quote. >> no, i haven't done it in a long time, nancy. but three people can keep a secret if two of them are dead. and i look at this and i'm thinking, why is this all coming out now? what is all this new information? and frankly, if there's circumstantial evidence out there, what we're really hearing is just a lot of talking amongst all of these folks, all within the family. >> also with us tonight, the attorney for ronald cummings, haleigh's father, terry shoemaker, from st. augustine, florida. also with us, a very special guest, shawn sirgo, attorney for joe overstreet, now implicated, not a formal person of interest, not a suspect, on

so again why it was these investors that i write about -- why wasn't john paulson, paul peligrini, jeffery green, michael burrynd greg litman. there's a myth out there that everybody drank the kool-aid and everybody believed in the housing. my brother counts this data between 2000 and 2003 there were about 1400 mentions of the phrase housing bubble in u.s. publications. over the next three years there were 5500 mentions of the phrase. and there were big stories and prominent stories in other places so it wasn't the case that my investors the ones i write about were the only ones who were skeptical. there were a lot of people who were skeptical. so why was it they that came up with it. one of the reasons is they were -- some of them were a little late to the game and that can help good fortune here is important as well. so there were investors who put on this trade who bought credit default swaps this insurance on subprime mortgages. and they bought it in 2003, 2004 and nothing happened. and their bosses got upset. and they took the trade off or they took the trade off themselves and their investors got upset.