well, john cole haines is a professor at the why did the university delaware law school and he explained how the prosecution will have to prove that trump acted with criminal intent. that isn't, that's, that's a great question. so even if you can prove the acts, you also have to show. ready that the president had the state of mind where he was, he knew that what he was doing was in violation of law. and that can be sometimes more difficult than proving the acts. but in this case, it's not simply that he was exercising his 1st amendment right to say these things . but that he was actually doing things. and this is what the prosecution will have to prove that he was doing things that he knew to be in furtherance of, you know, a false statement that the new or, you know, got new and that the statements were false. and that he intended to subvert the election, and you have to do that by a circumstantial evidence. you know, almost always, it's very difficult to get it to someone's brain. so you're using the cumulative acts to prove what you need to prove in this case. and i think they've got