they did in john edwards. so they did continue way after the election and to you know, karen's pointing out this all these facts about the meetings that did occur. we also know the catch and kill concept for trump had been in place, according to michael cohen and others for many years prior to this so again, how do they prove with the fact that karen's pointing gout. that this is different that you can prove this was for the election. well there's a saying that comes to mind in the law, which is if the law is on your side argue the law. facts are on your side argue the facts and if neither is on your side you have a problem, and i think that this is that type of case there is some facts that tend to support the idea that it could have been for the purpose of influencing the election. is that enough to get a beyond a reasonable doubt finding that that's the purpose of this and that's assuming that we get past all of the initial legal issues with the case, so i think just realistically speaking. is this a tough

plus could the failed case against john edwards help trump's defense. the jury foreman, who acquitted edwards joins me live. and all these investigations are set to collide with the primary season. how this impacts the 2024 race for president when we return. do you ever worry will liveve forever. no it's literally never crossed my mind. have we lived to like 135 years of being retired? i don't want to outlive our money and i've been eating all these stupid chia seeds could totally live to be 100 thinking such good care of myself since we started working with empower were able to get all our financial questions answered. so we don't have to worry. so you never never join 17 million people and take control of your financial future to empower what's next start toy to empower .com meet norman. he part jack russell and part tornado. meet the new bissell cross wave hydro steam. it's part vacuum mop steamer and tornado chaser. a new breed of clean dj and 18th birthday party stage dive. but this is not an 18th birthday party. why the scheduling mix up bad client

plus could the failed case against john edwards help trump's defense. the jury foreman, who acquitted edwards joins me live. and all these investigations are set to collide with the primary season . how this impacts the 2024 race for president when we return. we got pregnant with our daughter, and it was then that we kind of realized that we needed a regular babysitter. we started looking online and i found care dot com care dot com. you can find a babysitter or nanny who's just right for you with profiles , reviews and more. my husband and i are just really thankful for care dot com. it's given us a family in a city where we didn't have a family before. find care for all you love care .com circle. first of all, it's a beautiful shape. it's connected. it's consistent community. it's meant to be inclusive circle. we build us dc digital dollar that's actually dollar backed 1 to 1. future money will travel at the speed of the internet for fractions of a penny, and i don't think about it because it'll just be the way we work circles the place where crypto me

john edwards was was federal trump. obviously this is at the in the local level, but it is significant and it was really illuminating to talk to this juror because he was looking at many of the same circumstances and facts when he was the foreman in the john edwards case, and he said that the credibility of the star witness is very important and as we know john edwards was acquitted, and he's and i asked him, i said, well, then, what do you think about michael cohen? because he is the star witness in this case, and he said, i think he didn't want to go there specifically and do any sort of attack on cohen. but he said, i put cohen in the same similar campus. a star witness and john edwards case, which he didn't believe was very strong and ultimately as we know how they voted, so it was illuminating. and of course, there's a lot in this case. we don't know right? a lot of the corroborating evidence and information that's just not out there yet, but it was really illuminating, given the similarities in these cases got jan

so we could have charged him with what we charged john edwards.tf am its missing something no way trump could have won this. on a serious note, jesse. some people i heard on both sides they did this on purpose they wanted to face trump and boost him politically. >> jesse: no. >> listen, man, they want to see this guy hurt. don't ever forget the banality of evil, man. the people we are dealing with now political fight manifested itself but the under lying seed of this is plain good vs. evil. these people want to see trump hurt. china is watching this right now. icing out the u.s. currency. they are watching us tell people we don't know who men and women are. they are watching us sexualize our kids, spy on presidential candidates. try to throw them in jail. the chinese communist party and enemies of the united states are laughing right now as the banality of evil takes over in the united states and dumb, dopey liberals burn this country to the ground while our enemies dance on our graves and thank the lord almighty that they got opponents that were

the the indict the trial of former united states senator john edwards, who was concealed enough, was accused of concealing a train, hush money payments to his mistress at the and a child. it meant she subsequently bourke was. went to trial and resulted in no conviction against the senate or so. you know, that was one reason why people thought that they did not and not bring charges against individual number one in the michael cohen case, which is known to be then president it also could have been the fact that that william barr told the edition of new york that just dropped the which is also been well documented as well. >> michael, we're going to put you on hold here. we do have constitutional law. rory little here with you see law >> professor, what is it that you talk to your students about today following this? >> well, we'll talk about the rule of law will talk about constitutional history. a whole talk about how criminal law works in real courthouses around the country. we'll talk about how this all has unfolded pretty much without a hitch despite all the, you know, celebrity c

that makes it a much stronger case for that that happened in the john edwards matter. and quickly before you go, jennifer, we know that the next in person hearing on this is scheduled for december. 4th what are the trump team's options are will they have an opportunity to push for even a dismissal of this case? they will. they'll get discovery in about a month, and then it'll be time to brief their motion. so i expect all of this motion practice to happen between now and then, and the judge will rule on them. and then in december, i think it will be time to look to trial. assuming that the case survives motions to dismiss which i expect it will all right, jennifer rogers. thank you very much for all of that. and now over to the capitol, where democrats are steering clear of the indictment altogether, while republicans are vowing to hold the manhattan district attorney alvin bragg accountable cnn, manu raju has been working the halls for us as he always is. so manu, what are you hearing from? democrats who actually have been largely quiet as a result of what we learned

that is how a jury decided not to convict former senator john edwards, who made that claim too. overkill part. dolcho34 counts related to 11 transactions. we understand falsifying business records but what is the proof of this with michael cohen saying it. >> there is no proof, john edwards got money to pay that woman from heir to energizer fortune. donald trump used his own money. the whole argument that it is a federal campaign finance violation is a joke. elizabeth: da bragg said he does not have to spell out what the underlying felony. is watch the media reaction on this. cbs, abc, cnn, saying this case could -- will likely fall apart. >> the indictment does not say what the crimes were. >> let me say, the indictment does not specify, because the law does not so require. first is new york state election law, that makes it a crime to conspire, promote a c candidacy by unlawful means. >> com commentators saying there is not much in here, raising questions about legal theory. >> speaks of someone who strongly does not want donald trump to get the republican president at nominat

underage people who were on it and also adding to that statement from the uk commissioner's office, john edwardschildren's data may been used to track and profile them potentially presenting them with harmful or inappropriate content. now tiktok says it disagrees with the decision although it's understandably pleased the fine is only £12.7 million. it goes on to say that we invest heavily to keep under 13 off the platform and our forwards and strong safety team works around the clock to help keep the platforms safe . we will continue platforms safe. we will continue to review the decision and are understanding next six, but understanding the next six, but this of course comes off the of the being banned from the app being banned from official government in the uk, australia, new zealand canada. the european parliament's in the eu commission . and as i say , eu commission. and as i say, £280 million they made in the in revenue in the last quarter of 2022 and £12 billion overall. last year. so in terms of the fine to revenue ratio, very, very, very indeed. yeah. as you say, i mean tiktok saying re

people forget, john edwards -- voted for the man -- john edwards was charged with very similar crime but he was charged with a very similar crime. and he got off he beat the rap. trump can beat this case if he handles it in an appropriate manner and if i'm a republica governor, that's what i woul say. >> exactly and it's so striking tha that's totally absent. because it's hanging there t be like, we think this i ludicrous and he is going to beat it. >> and there are legal defenses here we've talked about some o them already statute of limitations, as you just mentioned, is a possibl argument there's an issue that if you commit this crime you have t do it with intent to defraud who was he defrauding? it was a private entry in private corporation. he was not of riding anyone, h will argue >> defrauding america is wha -- but -- >> - that's enough is going to be litigated in this case >> i would push back i will do respectfully - i don't really know you al that well elie -- anticipate all these legal - events >> -- >> exactly >> - this case. that's the point to me, that's the point of th

sort of tried to foreshadow they're going to be maybe potentially mirroring a defense akin to john edwardsng that for the very first imtine court and i think that will dramatically shape which direction they go forward, but as we know right now alvin bragg has sort of pointed at a misdemeanor charge of falsifying business records in furtherance of another crime focused on this hush money payment to stormy daniels in 2016, which was ultimately elevated to a felony. but, again, it's a very much wait and see sort of situation right now. >> and jackie, what's the latest you and your colleagues have learned in terms of the thinking and mood inside trump world, the sort of conflicting stories about whether he's excited because he thinks it's a good political opportunity versus, well, he's actually anxious because who wouldn't be being criminally indicted? what's the latest sense there from trump world, and what do you think we're going to hear from him tonight when he returns to mar-a-lago and faces the television cameras >> yeah, john, as you know very well there are always two very different f

same crime lock. rerr—pv rre wev john edwards up. and by the way . rrer-s— john edwards up.ant to sort of move beyond him because they feel me— beyond him because they feel we r— beyond him because they feel like if there _ beyond him because they feel like if there was— beyond him because they feel like if there was a rerun, they weme— like if there was a rerun, they weme rese— like if there was a rerun, they would lose again,— like if there was a rerun, they would lose again, i think it's msr— would lose again, i think it's msr r— would lose again, i think it's pesr r meer— would lose again, i think it's just i mean,-theyl would lose again, i think it's just i mean, they call just i mean, it's what they call mump— just i mean, it's what they call trump derangement syndrome, but the—surrounding. trump derangement syndrome, but the that surrounding trump derangement syndrome, but the that they surrounding trump derangement syndrome, but the that they just unding trump derangement syndrome, but the that they just want|g trump derangement syndrome, but the that they just want

same crime lock. rohh—hy hhe voy john edwards up. and by the way . hhoh-e— john edwards up.rh — they they want to sort of move beyond him because they feel hhe— beyond him because they feel he h— beyond him because they feel like if there _ beyond him because they feel like if there was— beyond him because they feel like if there was a rerun, they vouho— like if there was a rerun, they vouho hoee— like if there was a rerun, they would lose again,— like if there was a rerun, they would lose again, i think it's hueh— would lose again, i think it's hueh h— would lose again, i think it's huer r rheoh— would lose again, i think it's just i mean,-theyl would lose again, i think it's just i mean, they call just i mean, it's what they call humo— just i mean, it's what they call trump derangement syndrome, but the—surrounding. trump derangement syndrome, but the that surrounding trump derangement syndrome, but the that they surrounding trump derangement syndrome, but the that they just unding trump derangement syndrome, but the that they just wantig trump derangement syndrome, but th

that may well be, but when john edwards used up to $1 million in campaign funds, and he decided thatre. so, this is not a crime which they can bootstrap, but this is a political motivated action, lest we would not have these things going on dating back to rick perry and even before. a final question, i wonder if you would agree with the former attorney general william barr, you are saying yesterday that if he was in the legal team he would not put donald trump in the dock, in the stand, he was simply unreliable. do you agree with that thought, if you were there involved in his criminal defence? i do not know all of the ins and outs of the factual matters in this regard. this entire case rests on michael cohen who disgraced the legal system because he is an attorney exposing and has been for months, the private statements of his own client. in 35 years i have never considered doing something like this. i want to be very clear to the audience. i don't care where you are when way or another in donald trump in this discussion, that is an individual, four years from now he will not be par

also, historically, we've seen something similar in the democratic primary process with john edwards. and you know, that case, ultimately just one we're getting dismissed and most people remember it now, but it was also, you know, kind of moving funds around and a campaign finance violation that was in questionnaire and just go back to the, the charges. so the $34.00 felony counts of linked to falsifying business records for an international just can you tell us what the, you know, the level of those kind of charges is and whether they come with potentially prison sentences if, if someone is found guilty. so again, i haven't seen all the details here and so i have to speculate, but the analysis that i've seen is that, you know, the maximum would be somewhere around 40 years and that you would get senates and likely for these kinds of crimes could be dismissed and put down to misdemeanor. that's if you're found guilty. and also for, you know, the charges of falsifying records. it doesn't necessarily require jell, time with it. so it's just, it's loaded with so much here and there's so

you know, there was a similar charge for john edwards.rds go to jail, but these things are up to juries, not to public opinion it doesn't mean that public opinion doesn't matter there was a lot of consternation and democrats were fretting this stormy daniels is not the best case to move forward with. first, as if it would be appropriate for prosecutors to coordinate on these matters, of course it's not. but i don't think that's true. last week there was polling that 60% of people polled said they supported the indictment there's new polling this week that suggests that number may go even higher. sketchy behavior with a woman that donald trump does to protect himself politically, americans hear that and say that checks out regardless of party affiliation that adds to the burden. there's just too much with this guy. >>> coming up, more on the new fight over an abortion pill that could be heading to the supreme court. staaaaacccceeeyyy! i'm the sizzle in this promposal. and tonight, sparks are gonna fly. kyle? and while romeo over here is tr

this case with john edwards fell apart in a huge way and he gathered a million dollars from different donors to get money to pay his hush money from different people and they couldn't nail him with that. >> greg: he is not trump, he doesn't create derangement. judge, will there be a gag order and will the former president respect it? >> jeanine: i think it is a sad day when i watch the president both get on the plane and then deplane in new york city. i couldn't help but say to myself, this is the president of the united states who is being forced by a prosecutor who said he would get him to go to the manhattan criminal court to be booked and mugged and fingerprinted and brought in for arraignment by a judge and forced to say whether he pleads guilty temperature is stunning to me, i spent my whole career doing this. i think it is a sad day for the country. having said that, i suspect the judge will definitely issue a gag order. the question is, however, whether or not gag order in this particular case will be constitutional because you also have a former president, running for preside

kennedy: and john edwards, i thought we have a cultural agreement.'t want them eclipsing our politics, because we don't talk enough about policy when that happens, alexalexander, juan and hannah thank you. >> thank you. kennedy: twisting and shouting. there is other news out there u.s. government demands russia release an american "wall street journal" reporter. who has been accused of spying. what will it take to persuade russia to let him go, california republican congressman on the right side of justice darrell issa will join me in moments. ♪ i have type 2 diabetes, ♪ ♪ but i manage it well. ♪ ♪ it's a little pill with a big story to tell. ♪ ♪ i take once-daily jardiance, ♪ ♪ at each day's staaart. ♪ ♪ as time went on it was easy to seee ♪ ♪ i'm lowering my a1c. ♪ jardiance works 24/7 in your body to flush out some sugar! and for adults with type 2 diabetes and known heart disease, jardiance can lower the risk of cardiovascular death, too. jardiance may cause serious side effects including ketoacidosis that may be fatal, dehydration, that can lead

live now to the uk's information commissioner, john edwards. law that if you provide any - conclusion. it is part of uk law| that if you provide any services online to children under the age of 13 you must get parental consent or that we found that in 2020, tiktok had around 1 million, up to 1.5 million children under the age of 13 on the platform, and they had taken no steps to obtain parental consent. tell me the sort of risks and dangers that that exposes them to. if they are allowed to sign up, and this is contrary to tiktok�*s own terms and conditions, they are not supposed to offer membership to kids under 13, they will have their own reasons but we know that when you sign up, you can be targeted for advertising, you can profiled, your data contributes an algorithm which feeds content, and it could be content not appropriate for your age and that can get more and more extreme so all in all, can be quite harmfulfor people who extreme so all in all, can be quite harmful for people who are not old to properly appreciate this and to make appr

the most similar case i am aware of is the john edwards case. that was a while ago.get. a conviction. is not the same but a little similar. it makes it so much easier for people to say it is a political witchhunt. it is not a clear crime that we have visual evidence of. amna: we know most republicans, even before is indictment, most republicans said they wanted him to be president again. does this make him stronger? does it make it tougher for president biden's reelection campaign? karen: in the short-term, this will help donald trump, primarily because the republican base is going to rally around him. but beyond that, nobody can predict. if this case does fall apart in court, that helps trump enormously. the fact is, for people to hear ov and over again about hush money to a porn star, in the long run is pretty corrosive. amna: i went back and read president ford's remarks when he delivered the pardon for president nixon. the country had been through controversy and a divisive debate. he said in a trial, ugly passions would again be aroused in our people would be po

large sense that i think that they are going to have a huge issue prov ing, and you've seen the john edwards case. that's the direct comparison here. that case was significantly stronger and had very similar facts in some ways but they couldn't get a conviction on that and that's because of that very issue with the intentment liz: so, you know, we talked about charge stacking last friday. we've been reporting on that, what this case is also about, guy. again, a lot of reasonable doubt 34 counts of falsifying business records with intent to defraud covering up, but again, let me backup. the hush money payments booked as legal expenses. nowhere in the 34 counts does alvin bragg say that was done with intent to influence a federal election, and 34, by the way, is a lot. certainly for state charges. it's unusual for federal charges to have that many, and the feds often take pride in over- charging, guy, but it's really curious that each of those 34 counts he doesn't spell out what the intent to defraud was about. >> so, liz, quantity never equals quality, and that's what i'm shocked, frankly, ab

senator john edwards of north carolina back in 2000 back in the mid 2, thousands by 2011, 2012.t for hush money payments made to essentially his mistress at the time and not to come forward during the 2008 presidential campaign that department justice charge him. they went to trial and they could not convict him. so that's getting that is really an open question right now. i think for all parties as to whether or not how that whether or not the federal election law really fits in this particular case. is it? and ted gave a federal disclosure laws, or is it just a settlement, right? so that's what that's what that discussion is going to be about. so, michael, i mean, these liaisons really >> are as old as time itself, right? it doesn't seem to raise that many eyebrows at this point. but let's hearken back to when this was a crucial issue. so it seems like bragg is trying to tie it all together and to bring it around to an election consideration because back then it it didn't matter to people. particularly when it. >> sure, sure, it actually does matter now and no one can underest

no other politicians like john edwards, tom delay and rick perry attempted to turn their mug shot intoore of a pleasing headshot, smiling with perfectly coifed hair suit and tie. then there are the mug shots that go on to become celebrated. martin luther king, rosa parks. john lewis. jane fonda, a badge of defiance. the world waits now for tuesday's historical moment, a moment that would only be punctuated by this unparalleled mug shot. sunlen serfaty, cnn washington we'll be right back. asking the right question can greatly impact your future. are you qualified to do this? especially when it comes to your finances? are you a certified financial planner, cfp professional professionals are committed to acting in your best interest. that's why it's got to be a cft. if you have moderate to severe crohn's disease, tyrese is the first and only l 23 inhibitor that can deliver clinical remission and endoscopic improvement, serious allergic reactions and an increased risk of infections or a lower ability to fight the may occur. tell your doctor if you have an infection or symptoms had a vaccin

he was struck trying to protect his life, something similar we heard, and not successfully from john edwards, another politician who got caught in the middle of an affair, they also have argued or do argue that the statute of limitations have passed. talk about the defense, agency we wait for donald trump, the defendant, to come down that hallway. >> everyone is right that it's tawdry, there's no question about that, but is that a viable legal defense? the answer is no trump is saying this is all political. but remember with the justice department in 2018 that investigated this very set of facts and indicted someone over a felony, michael cohen, trump's former lawyer, and the trump aides, not the justice department, said this was a felony, and it was money that had no legitimate purpose and it was donald trump that orchestrated the michael cohen payments and that directed him to do it that was not the michael cohen justice department, it was the trump justice department that made that determination. so, when you hear this about being political and the like, i think it's important to remember

no other politicians like john edwards, tom delay and rick perry attempted to turn their mug shot into more of a pleasing headshot, smiling with perfectly coifed hair suit and tie. then there are the mug shots that go on to become celebrated. martin luther king, rosa parks. john lewis. jane fonda, a badge of defiance. the world waits now for tuesday's historical moment, a moment that would only be punctuated by this unparalleled mug shot. sunlen serfaty, cnn washington we'll be right back. 1500 purchase allowance on a 2023 cadillac xt five and six visit your local cadillac dealer today. identical twins. bethany and stephani both struggled with cpap for their sleep apnea , but stephan got inspired and implanted device thatorks reason to keep struggling,o inspire, learn more and more important safety information and inspire sleep .com struggle with occasional nerve aches in your hands or feet, trying to revive nerve relief from the world's number one selling nerve care company contains alpha lippobank acid to relieve occasional nerve aches, weakness and discomfort, survive nerve relief.

it tried -- democratic presidential candidate john edwards, a stronger case, a hush money went to a woman, in that case they had a child. the jury rejected those claims. a good reason why the department of justice may not have proceeded. but still, if the second crime here, the thing that makes it a felony in the first-degree is a federal election charge, we have a very significant threshold question that will face the court. that has never been done to our knowledge in any case in history. it not only speaks to selective prosecution, it suggests exclusive prosecution to just donald trump. and so -- >> gillian: quick follow-up, jonathan, sorry to interrupt, coming up against the end of the hour and make sure i get some clarity from you on this. you talk about this has never happened in history, we know that former political candidates, presidential candidates, including hillary clinton have paid financial penalties for campaign finance violations. is embedded in the charges, again we have not seen them yet but early reports about them, can we now assume safely that bragg is making, and th

in 2008, it was senator john edwards of north carolina, democrat, who arranged payments to investorso keep her quiet as he saw the democratic nomination for president. three years later, he was charged with federal campaign violations, accused of hiding the affair in using money from donors that should have been reported to the federal election commission. after a six-week trial, north carolina journey acquitted edwards of one count and failing to come up with the verdict on five others, leading the justice department to drop the matter. while there are some key differences between the edwards and trump cases, legal experts say the fail federal prosecution in north carolina offers a note of caution for manhattan district attorney alvin bragg as he prepares to try trump on a case that appears to stem from the daniels payment. on the democrats line in maryland. caller: good morning. the man has been indicted, entrench a look at this logically. let it play out. it is important for the rule of law to be exercised. the truth will come out, that is what happens. i would suggest all people

in 2008, it was senator john edwards of north carolina, democrat, who arranged payments to investorso keep her quiet as he saw the democratic nomination for president. three years later, he was charged with federal campaign violations, accused of hiding the affair in using money from donors that should have been reported to the federal election commission. after a six-week trial, north carolina journey acquitted edwards of one count and failing to come up with the verdict on five others, leading the justice department to drop the matter. while there are some key differences between the edwards and trump cases, legal experts say the fail federal prosecution in north carolina offers a note of caution for manhattan district attorney alvin bragg as he prepares to try trump on a case that appears to stem from the daniels payment. on the democrats line in maryland. caller: good morning. the man has been indicted, entrench a look at this logically. let it play out. it is important for the rule of law to be exercised. the truth will come out, that is what happens. i would suggest all people

john edwards argument, right in this case, right? what about the jessica's? trump has talked about the judge. what about the judge? in this case? we know the judge here, juan russian, by the way, let me just point out. this is called new york supreme court. little bit confusing. that's what they call the trial level court here in new york. the judge is a former prosecutor. he was with the hes office. same office is prosecuting this case and the a g s office. let me say nothing unusual or inappropriate about that many judges are former prosecutors. he's been on the bench since 2006 best known before this because he presided over the case against allen weisberg, who pled guilty and the trial of the trump organization. trump's lawyers, by the way, may object to this because the way this judge got put on this case is prosecutor said. it's related to these cases so he should get it as opposed to just going into the wheel for random assignment. watch for trump's lawyers to chat challenge that and say. this should not be related to that we should get a randomly assi

sharon confronted louisiana governor john bill edwards, on a video called i wanted to actually review would reconsider to stop the construction of offer most appliances from family decide. james, carrie, we're always back look at new data and if there's new data to look at us or we will, he didn't, he didn't know what to state. so that just popped into his iep. if he get more data, how much more data do it, do you need? he need, i'll blow. in my opinion, i feel like i don't care how much test we do. they're gonna still the not effect that his condition has caused us to be sick. best ma, fealand. i hope i'm wrong when decisions are made about plastics. not a question of data. and is there a magic bullet piece of information that is a research to prove? it's a question of power too often, both resources and entire communities are deemed as disposable. plastic production has increased almost continuously since 1950, from 1800000 tons globally to 465000000 tons in 2018. if current plastic production trends continue by 2050 annual plastic production will be 26000000000 tons. that's 4 times

the one precedent we can turn to is the john edwards case.e was the former vice presidential nominee and he ran for president twice. after he lost the second time, he was indicted in federal court for similar charges for an affair that he had with a woman who became a campaign staffer. it was a hung jury on four or five of those counts. one of them he was acquitted on. a lot of trump backers suggest this is a tough case to prove. trump might just say he was trying to keep this from melania trump and his family. it seems now that is right for them to use that a defense. >> thanks very much. on your screen, we have a room where the manhattan district attorney is expected to begin speaking shortly. they are putting up graphics, flowcharts. they are doing what attorneys will do, which is explained the case so that the media can report on it accurately. they have a little flowchart explaining how the hush money worked, catching kill scheme to influence the 2016 election. they are putting in graphic form some of what is in the indictment, some of w

not like john edwards or hillary clinton's campaign issues. this was from personal funds for it to be a violation of federal campaign law, it has to be made irrespective of the campaign if it was made irrespective of the campaign, there is no fec violation. >> let me ask you about that i understand the argument. you're saying, look, this can't be essentially a campaign contribution because he wanted to make the story go away for his own reason, maybe so melania doesn't find out maybe something like that. if that's the case, if this is on the up and up why did he pay michael cohen back in installments pursuant to a retainer for legal services that prosecutors say did not exist? >> michael cohen invoiced him in installments he upped it from 130 to plus $140,000 >> yeah. but with the knowledge of the trump organization and the cfo if it is all up and up, why doesn't he just write a check and be done with it? >> he did write a check. he wrote several checks. that's how payments are made it was a massive amount of money for a lawyer, especially a l

they exposed john edwards, and the fact that pecker was taking a hands off on donald trump, but was in league with him, was seen as an enormous advantage so i just imagine that, notice, it's not that david pecker is a guy who most people would consider a white knight figure in american society. on the other hand, he's not a convicted liar >> let me just read from the indictment, to bring it back to what john is tacking about, because i think some of the narrative does take us back in time to schemes that haven't been talked about. we haven't talked about the doorman story, for example let me read this from the indictment >> the statement of facts. >> we have woman number one, suppressing her account one month before the election other november 7th, news broke the defendant had been caught on tape saying the host of "access hollywood" i start kissing women, i don't even wait and you can do anything, grab them by the genitals, you can do anything the evidence shows that the defendant and his campaign staff are concerned that the tape could harm his viability and reduce his standing with

john edwards, who was a presidential candidate. he had to retire so well.e trying to convince victor zhozevich. he is quite clear, but someone thinks differently. let's alexander yurievich well , first of all, a beautiful story. to introduce you to andrey vladimirovich trump, who paid the prostitutes incorrectly. that is, you want to say that i always cry correctly or what? i want what's behind us from the very beginning, it seems they don't like us. that is, it has been felt for a long time. story. devotion, told by viktor joseph is not correct, initially. the first time there, trump was not fired ; he did not have a director. second. have we forgotten how the elections were held in the twentieth year, or we pretend that we are aquarium fish. well, that is, now that all this is a plus for him now? if so, how is it in essence yes? the first is a demonstration, i think, more definitively, the degradation of the american political elite. even worse than in our perestroika, that is, not the first time the story with the chinese ball. trump story, the american

have gotten to know each other a little bit first in an effort to combat human trafficking that john bel edwardsrought us and our spouses together on and then i called him for help. after a flooding, we needed more more helicopters with hoist to save people during the flooding, and he sent them. at a moment's notice, and then he lost one of those pilots. he could hear the pain and in his voice. just like i think people can and in mine it hurts that i lost a friend. i'm sure it hurts marianne a whole lot more that she lost her husband. or their daughters that they lost. um, a father. in this in terms of loss. i'm a close friend. but i really want to be there for the families. and the kids. i can see that. going back to governor lee. one thing that he did. after was he signed an executive order to strengthen background checks, is calling on lawmakers in his state to pass essentially the equivalent of a red flag law. do you see yourself taking a similar step here following what happened? just a few steps away. i haven't read his executive order yet, but in the past i've been very clear that i belie

but beby merchant john edward taylor, who made most of his money out of slaveryut of sl.actually it's worse who made most of his money out of sl.actually the it's worse who made most of his money out of sl.actually the guardian e than actually the guardian supported the south civil supported the south in the civil war. guardian attacked war. the guardian attacked abraham lincoln the abraham lincoln for the abolition. guardian abolition. so the guardian should destroyed should be, i suppose, destroyed . so you're saying we should defund the guardian? certainly we need to decolonise it. we need to destroy evil. copy no, of course, i don't believe that. but you know, it is. it is. it does feel a bit condi and doesn't it. i don't mean look this fabulous thing. this entire movement is the people who try to or institutions try to to hold or institutions try to hold. they've always got a dodgy past, of course you're going to be really, really really woke if you know in the past you weren't very nice to black people. yeah, well, that's a breeding point. i remember seeing

now, the difference between what john edwards did comes up a lot and what trump is accused of now.he had an affair. he will not admit it. at some point, edwards admitted more or less responsibility for his actions. it is like clinton before, earlier with the lewinsky figure. trump psychopathic. -- trump is psychopathic and he will not admit or take response ability for his actions. host: let's go to new orleans, louisiana. don is on the independent line. caller: good morning on this palm sunday. and begin a holy week, if you will. the issue of gun violence, the correlation risen in the past, people call it video games, call of duty. before there were videogames, there were boardgames that promoted racial intolerance, violence towards african-americans, antisemitic games. we have to look at the history of boardgames. for instance, the creators of scrabble and monopoly, they had a game called ghetto-opoly that was derogative toward black people. they had a game called the channel of n-words. all these racist games created in new york city, most were created in new york city by compan

but because founded because the guardian was founded by edward taylor, by merchant john edward taylory, it's worse of slavery, he and it's worse than guardian than actually the guardian supported civil supported the south in the civil war. guardian attacked war. the guardian attacked abraham the abraham lincoln for the abolition. guardian abolition. so the guardian should suppose, destroyed should be, i suppose, destroyed . so you're saying we should defund the guardian? certainly we need to decolonise it. we need to destroy evil. copy no, of course, i don't believe that. but you know, it is. it is. it does feel a bit condi and doesn't it. i don't mean look this fabulous thing. this entire movement is the people who try to or institutions try to to hold or institutions try to hold. they've always got a dodgy past, of course you're going to be really, really really woke if you know in the past you weren't very nice to black people. yeah, well, that's a breeding point. i remember seeing someone talk about online comment about this online comment is unfortunate, the unfortunate, but they

now, the difference between what john edwards did comes up a lot and what trump is accused of now.he had an affair. he will not admit it. at some point, edwards admitted more or less responsibility for his actions. it is like clinton before, earlier with the lewinsky figure. trump psychopathic. -- trump is psychopathic and he will not admit or take response ability for his actions. host: let's go to new orleans, louisiana. don is on the independent line. caller: good morning on this palm sunday. and begin a holy week, if you will. the issue of gun violence, the correlation risen in the past, people call it video games, call of duty. before there were videogames, there were boardgames that promoted racial intolerance, violence towards african-americans, antisemitic games. we have to look at the history of boardgames. for instance, the creators of scrabble and monopoly, they had a game called ghetto-opoly that was derogative toward black people. they had a game called the channel of n-words. all these racist games created in new york city, most were created in new york city by compan

republican lisa markovski, she arrived in ukraine on a visit together with fellow democrats mark edward kelly and johnson, the politician met with president zelensky, who informed them of the situation at the front and the needs of the army with this list they will return to washington to promote aid to ukraine, the senators also read the report on the use of american weapons commitments of the united states is an investment, an investment in the democracy of the free world, being here today, i had the opportunity to better understand the level of accountability and transparency, and every official with whom we met laid out on the table the reports that we provided as the united states, what the coalition partners did, where is this aid , where is it going and how it contributes to joint industrial efforts, we spent several hours here meeting with the president and his team, the state leadership, we received brief information from their point of view about what is the situation on the front lines, what weapons and weapons systems are necessary to achieve success, we want to support as much as possible

thank you, edward. johnabits of people who do have jobs and just how much time they spend actually working. lydia hu reporting for fox business. are people working less while they are at work or working more? >> hey, john, you know, this new research shows that people are working less. the average u.s. work week shedding about half an hour over the past three years. this is it according to economists from the university of maryland, and they say this research now sheds new light on the broad shift in people's attitudes toward work. the pullback, they say, comes mostly from people working long hours before the pandemic, especially higher educated, white collar workers likely not paid hourly, and some speculate the recent advancements in technology may make the reduction permanent. >> there are certainly longer term trends that i think do suggest that the work week is likely to decrease. you can think about the role that automation is playing and helping people do their jobs a little more efficiently. >> now,

nba it's been so far this year. >> you're right. >> thank you so much vaughn hillyard, john kasich and donna edwardsrmy, that's what prosecutors call five members of the proud boys involved in the january 6th riot in court we're awaiting a federal jury's decision the jury is deliberating on their role in the capitol attack the latest coming from the courtroom on "andrea mitchell reports" right here on msnbc reliable 5g network. (seth) and it's only $35 a line. (cecily) not that you're bragging. (vo) with verizon unlimited for $35 a line, your family now gets disney+, hulu, and espn+. all three included. verizon ♪ gillette presents... the gillettelabs with exfoliating bar. the bar in the handle removes unseen dirt and debris that gets in the way of the blades. for effortless shaving in one efficient stroke. all with a lifetime warranty. and if you want to keep the beard, use king c. gillette. a lineup of products designed to cleanse, soften, trim, and style- for your best beard. gillette. the best a man can get. i have moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. now, there's skyrizi. with skyrizi 3 out of 4