on the ninth day someone said there's going to be a headline, john garfield still dead. >> and who willg that show t brando family? >> yeah. mikko brando. >> he made you wear michael jackson's hat during an interview. >> he put it on during one interview. it was too small for me. >> that had to be a little bit weird. >> and -- >> it's not a jewish thing. >> yeah. yeah. not exactly the -- >> we owned the building where they do the dancing. >> but you don't do the dance. >> no. >> it's an interesting story. i'm wondering when i watch you if you care. >> i care. this is the rule -- 52 years of doing this and you have to do this too because you're responsible for the show. once that light goes on, i'm there 100%. i'm doing the best i can. now, i may rather want to do something else, but once that light goes on, we have an excellent staff, good producers, they keep the show humming. my job -- >> you do for sure. >> you don't throw it away. >> when heidi and spencer show up on your set, do you know before hand who these people are, do you bother yourself with that kind of minutiminutia, do ke

. >> larry: a famous story in new york, john garfield, great actor, terrific actor, died in unusual circumstances. he was found in dead with another woman. he was married. said there were stories like this every day in the press. wiley summer kim came up with t story, the next story will be, garfield's still dead. are we coming to that? is jackson still dead? how long does this go? >> that's a good question. initially i think it's going to go heavy until the toxicology results come back. if there is inside is cause of death you're going to have a who other whoever the doctor is who gets charged. that will have a life of its own. it could go a long, long way. it's a good question. >> larry: do you know when we get the toxicology report? >> according to the coroner we talked to yesterday, looking at two weeks for the final report. >> larry: is that definitive? sometimes t not definitive, right? >> absolutely. it may not be definitive when you're talking about diprivan, a drug that doctors say leaves the system very quickly. >> larry: thanks, ted. back again at the end of the program. you're looking

. >> larry: there's a famous story, john garfield, terrific actor, died in unusual circumstances. he was found in bed with another woman, he was married. so there were stories like this every day in the press. until one day someone came up with a story that the next story will be garfield's still dead. are we coming to that? is jackson still dead -- i mean, how long does this go? >> well, that's a good question. initially, i think it's going to go pretty heavy until the toxicology results come back. and then if there is homicide is cause of death, you'll have a whole another, whoever the doctor is that gets charged, that will have a life of its own. it could go a long way. but it's a good question. >> larry: do you know when we get the toxicology report? >> according to the coroner, they're still looking at two weeks for the final report. >> and is that definitive. >> it may not be definitive, especially when you're talking about diprivan, a drug that leaves the system very quickly. >> larry: you're looking right now at jesse jackson. he's at michael's memorial in gary, indiana. t

john has a historical. >> well, professor amar made reference to garfield and arthur. i believe that today is the anniversary of the shooting of, you have to check on that, it's either july 1 or july 2, 1881 of garfield in union station. and it's just a historical note. >> jim mann. >> thanks very much. i'm in a little different position. i'm a journalist and author. and in a funny position because the main problem that can cause me to write about presidential succession is addressed by the very issuance of this report, and in that sense is taken care of as i will later explain. and yet i'm also here to warn about some of the solutions that the report comes up with, which i think have some problems. i'll say, you know, as a journalist and author, the issue of succession comes up year in and year out in funny ways. this is not just with a cabinet member who is absent from the state of the union address. and the one that brought it home to me, just over 10 years ago, i was a correspondent interested in asia about to go with president clinton on a trip to asia at the end

garfield cabinet. so this possibility of a shift of one political party to another is in crisis from martin sheen to john goodman, for those of you who are west wing fans, is a real one. is a considerable policy concern. there are other policy considerations about the case of temporary disability, can a congressional leader easily step in just for a brief period. when that brief period will require resignation from the speakership and from the house of representatives. so those are some, many policy considerations i think that counsel in favor of removing congressional leaders from the line of succession. i just wanted to highlight a couple of constitutional considerations that reinforce those policy considerations. james madison thought that putting congressional leaders in the line of succession was unconstitutional. maybe you don't think he was right, you know, although he was james madison. but even if there's any doubt whatsoever in your mind about the correctness of james madison's proposition, i think just the mere existence of doubt, strong doubt, reasonable doubt, the fact that there are many th

john has a historical. >> well, professor amar made reference to garfield and arthur. i believe that today is the anniversary of the shooting of, you have to check on that, it's either july 1 or july 2, 1881 of garfield in union station. and it's just a historical note. >> jim mann. >> thanks very much. i'm in a little different position. i'm a journalist and author. and in a funny position because the main problem that can cause me to write about presidential succession is addressed by the very issuance of this report, and in that sense is taken care of as i will later explain. and yet i'm also here to warn about some of the solutions that the report comes up with, which i think have some problems. i'll say, you know, as a journalist and author, the issue of succession comes up year in and year out in funny ways. this is not just with a cabinet member who is absent from the state of the union address. and the one that brought it home to me, just over 10 years ago, i was a correspondent interested in asia about to go with president clinton on a trip to asia at the end

garfield cabinet. so this possibility of a shift of one political party to another is in crisis from martin sheen to johnman, for those of you who are west wing fans, is a real one. is a considerable policy concern. there are other policy considerations about the case of temporary disability, can a congressional leader easily step in just for a brief period. when that brief period will require resignation from the speakership and from the house of representatives. so those are some, many policy considerations i think that counsel in favor of removing congressional leaders from the line of succession. i just wanted to highlight a couple of constitutional considerations that reinforce those policy considerations. james madison thought that putting congressional leaders in the line of succession was unconstitutional. maybe you don't think he was right, you know, although he was james madison. but even if there's any doubt whatsoever in your mind about the correctness of james madison's proposition, i think just the mere existence of doubt, strong doubt, reasonable doubt, the fact that there are many thought