john gibner would like to comment. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney like to follow up on the possibility it didn't go to our question supervisor jane kim about how the departments are admonishment but in terms of what the remedies are the contract for the project will exterior the contractor comply with the construction so non-compliance will mean suspension or the contract or - or for potentially departure time a process that follows a hearing so a ranger of options and also non-payment we can suspend payment to the contractor so there are ways to terminate the contract permanently. >> do the agency feel like they've got the capacity i like the ordinance i know our office on a daily process gets e-mails from the public regarding violations to the planning code and they're real violations and follow-up with the departments they don't have the resources to actually enforce against the violator so it becomes a frustration within the law enforce the law and we get kind of or you know non-responses from the department it's not their fault they don't have the resources that's why i'm sensitiv

gibner. >> deputy city attorney john gibner. the board it continue it but you have to keep it open to continue for three months so take the motion to continue the hearing open per a subsequent hearing at the continued date. >> okay. thank you. and supervisor campos. >> to clarify that that in fact the motion is predicated on the understanding that the hearing remains open to a later date. >> okay. with that mr. clerk can you please call the roll on the motion to continue. >> open to april 28, 2015. supervisor breed. >> aye. >> supervisor campos. >> aye. >> supervisor christensen. >> aye. >> supervisor cohen. >> aye. >> supervisor farrell. >> aye. >> supervisor kim. >> aye. >> supervisor mar. >> aye. >> supervisor tang. >> aye. >> supervisor wiener. >> aye. >> supervisor yee. >> aye. >> supervisor avalos. >> aye. >> there are 11 aye's. >> okay the continuance passes unanimously. thank you very much. and we also have our second 3:00 p.m. special order. and mr. clerk can you please call the items item 28, 29, 30. >> 27-30 comprise

. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney you don't have to read them read into the record if any members of the public wants a coop they may have one. >> thank you. >> thank you very much okay. thank you i'd like to take public comment on the item right now item 2 i have a stack of cards i'll call the speakers please line up over here by the podium and have steve melissa chris barker arrest carl hass (calling names) remember you have to minutes to speak thank you. >> thank you four 7, 8, 9 i'm a tenant i'm here because i'm concerned about what was happening in the building i had neighbors that kind of got evicted now i have an architecture firm this wasn't a problem until recently, i think what you were in so doing with the interim controls there is reconstruction in my building very frequently and there removing the lots of where people sleep over the kitchen there's a real estate agent that i actually had had a key and came into my apartment he wanted to rent he is representing a commercial unit next to my neighbors real estate so i'm hoping you can stop business from profiting without

. >> sure john gibner deputy city attorney under the stalling the city must complete whatever level of review required under ceqa before committing the city to a type of that action this particular resolution is not requiring the environmental review it will be completed before the board or so any other city body takes that kind of approval action so you are not committing the city to this project you're only approving the first step of laughing the financing to move forward with the first steps of bond and the environmental review will be before the project comes back to you for approval action. >> a little bit out of sync he's basically saying that's legal if i can translate that i've had a few conversations with the project sponsor about how serious they're in pursuing a project that has 20 percent of affordable housing on site proposal they've insured me they're absolutely complete to 20 percent on site and given little crisis that we're in for housing this is softened any position if this project is we don't know if it will be or what density i'd like to see i want to see as much

. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney the gentleman is correct this ordinance breathes a new 10.8 and refers to that the second item on the agenda modifies section 102 and puts the definition of homeless shelter in under we can by tomorrow morning go through and. >> or so how to think up the first piece to make sure there's the references for 102 i suggest you not make the amendment amendment today but tomorrow >> great. thank you very much mr. gibner is there any additional public comment on item 1 seeing none, public comment is closed so first, i want to thank even that participate in making this project and moving forward happening i had an opportunity to go with mr. duffy and the gentleman to visit the site it seems like an exciting project to me and i hope it after it is mod it defines a permanent home it should be successful i hope it end up being a model for not only san francisco but another places we for too long we've had a disjoined approach to certain populations of homeless people and this seems like a pro tem way for them to bring everything together for certain populati

. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney i'm happy happy to do that i'll recommend you not add that report back to my office into the reds here but we're happy to work with the committee or my member of the board for the policy discussions. >> that's part of the reds and thanks for that and thanks mr. rose and colleagues at this point, i'll suggest we have a motion to take the technical amendments and continue for a week. >> so moved. >> second. >> we'll take that without objection. >> all right. madam clerk call item 5. >> approving the change lease between travel quality services and the city with a minimum guarantee of $1.5 million for the lease and 3, 4 year option for the airport commission. >> okay. thank you ms. one-size-fits-all in her is here from the airport. >> good morning supervisor farrell and others kathy with the san francisco international airport the item seeks for an approval of the currency exchange lease this proposed lease is a result of a competitive lace with the travel company the lease has a 5 year term to 2004 with 3 4 year options to extend travel x operates 3 l

. >> deputy city attorney john gibner, i don't have language saying that but i understand the goal of this amendment is to exclude city employees who are at the director level of departments or deputy director level and we can certainly draft that and prepare it for the clerk following this meeting if the board adopts the amendment. >> great. that will be an additional amendment to this section between on page 5 between line 7 and 12 that we would like to make sure gets included. thank you. those are my, it's an amendment as a whole and includes this language. i believe this is language that was requested by dcy who had concerns about these exclusions. i don't think the exclusion made a lot of sense except we want to make sure there is not a duplications of leadership involved in these departments and contradict and the oversight committee to ensure there is greater participation and the over site body. >>supervisor london breed: supervisors avalos made a motion. is there a second. supervisor yee. there is no other colleagues on the roster. can we take the amendment without objection?

>> deputy city attorney john gibner. no, supervisor tang can't participate in this particular vote, even to forward it to the full board. i think the options are pass until later in the meeting and if supervisor tang returns to the meeting or appoints someone to sit in supervisor breed's chair. >> continue this item to later in the meeting and go on to item no. 14. >> item no. 14 is a motion amending the board of supervisors rules of order by renaming (inaudible) the land use and economic development committee to land use and transportation committee, and reassigning consideration of settlements to the government audit and oversight committee. >> okay, i'm not sure if we have a presentation from president breed's office. we'll give a moment possibly for mr. johnston to step in but i'm familiar with the changes and i am supportive of them. >> thank you. i would say again i am fully supportive of these changes that are being made. i think they are very appropriate and even if there's no presentation i am find with moving f

. >> deputy city attorney john gibner, i don't have language saying that but i understand the goal of this amendment is to exclude city employees who are at the director level of departments or deputy director level and we can certainly draft that and prepare it for the clerk following this meeting if the board adopts the amendment. >> great. that will be an additional amendment to this section between on page 5 between line 7 and 12 that we would like to make sure gets included. thank you. those are my, it's an amendment as a whole and includes this language. i believe this is language that was requested by dcy who had concerns about these exclusions. i don't think the exclusion made a lot

. >> city attorney john gibner. the parties can probably speak to that best. my understanding there is a conference coming up in a month and a half and if there is no a settlement the trial maybe follow three months after that but they could probably speak best to the exact timing. >> okay. supervisor campos. >> so my inclination would be to continue this item and in light of the uncertainty of the schedule perhaps to do that for three months and see where the case is at that point, so that would be my suggestion in terms how we should approach this case. i want to of course give the parties an opportunity to comment on that. >> okay. so supervisor campos you're asking that we continue this item, and until that time a three month time period. do you want to specify a specific date? so it would be -- i don't know if there is a specific date for three months from today, and april that could work mr. clerk. >> april 28. >> april 28. >> okay. >> that would