. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney it sounds like what you're asking could we guess maybe two things are you asking can we target these particular neighborhoods or can we set criteria for how neighborhoods are defined that are different from supervisorial districts. >> yes. >> well i'm saying it is the possible to look at what we're sxern significant challenges and target those for this particular legislation and not as a citywide i'm asking in general is that even a possibility. >> i won't want to answer on the fly it raise many of the policy concerns and legal concerns mohcd has been discussing but we can evaluate it not giving you a yes or no right now. >> i want to be clear supervisor cowen has substantive amendments next week this item will will be before land use and possibility to continue this discussion i appreciate the conversation that is happened here today, i do think this is important to move forward but in the process of moving forward to continue our worker on looking at the possibility of making this a better legislation and so again, i want to thank my colleagues fo

you explain to me where we are and if this amendment is necessary. >> as far as explained by the john gibner, deputy city attorney is needed because we only had made the amendment in committee that effected the residential but not residential has not been effected it is a new program with the tsf compared to the tdif. >> you're asking this specifically for commercial. >> commercial for non-residential. >> okay. >> all right. seeing none, no other names on the roster - supervisor wiener >> i think on that particular one so really what the difference it is a few dollars for i don't know how - and tdif. >> i'm assume did he we know mr. ram what the number is of commercial that is the first time i've heard this issue everything was raise in committee how many projects between july 21st and today. >> i do have that in front of me that actually submitted applications on july after july 21st. >> yeah. >> i'm sorry i don't have that list off the top of my head but i assume a small amount of projects. >> as you recall i don't recall dealing with that specific issue raised in committee i believe will

, deputy city attorney. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney just the amendment of the one that supervisor cohen disabled on page 3 is the finding explaining why the ordinance is including the hospitals and that finding is part of duplicated file that is going back to committee we recommend i include the hospital finding in the ordinances you'll be adopting today, we recommend making one final amendment to today's ordinance to include findings that have been all right drafted by supervisor cohen regarding hospital. >> supervisor cohen would you like to make that motion. >> moved and supervisor cowen and seconded by commissioner avalos colleagues, can we take that same house, same call? we'll take that without objection. the amendment passes amazing commissioner avalos would you like to make a motion to send the duplicated file back to committee. >> so moved. >> okay. is there a second seconded by supervisor cowen colleagues without objection we'll take that without objection. the duplicated file specifically will be referred to land use commission. >> and finally madam clerk on the amended

, deputy city attorney. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney just the amendment of the one that supervisor cohen disabled on page 3 is the finding explaining why the ordinance is including the hospitals and that finding is part of duplicated file that is going back to committee we recommend i include the hospital finding in the ordinances you'll be adopting today, we recommend making one final amendment to today's ordinance to include findings that have been all right drafted by supervisor cohen regarding hospital. >> supervisor cohen would you like to make that motion. >> moved and supervisor cowen and seconded by commissioner avalos colleagues, can we take that same house, same call? we'll take that without objection. the amendment passes amazing commissioner avalos would you like to make a motion to send the duplicated file back to committee. >> so moved. >> okay. is there a second seconded by supervisor cowen colleagues without objection we'll take that without objection. the duplicated file specifically will be referred to land use commission. >> and finally madam clerk on the amended

. >> okay john gibner, deputy city attorney during the closed session the committee voted unanimously by 2 to a zero vote to forward i'm sorry to continue item one to the government and oversight meeting of december 3rd and forward item it through 13 to the full board with a positive recommendation with items 8 through 12 for the city reports important can i have a motion not to discuss what happened in closed session. >> so moved. >> no oxygen the additional business to come before this body? >> there's no further business. >> >> if nothing else the meeting is adjourned. >> > i'm derek, i'm hyungry, and ready to eat. these vendors offer a variety of the streets near you. these mobile restaurants are serving up original, creative and unusual combinations. you can grab something simple like a grilled cheese sandwich or something unique like curry. we areher here in the average eight -- upper haight. you will be competing in the quick buy food challenge. an appetizer and if you are the winner you will get the title of the quitck bite "chompion." i am here with matt cohen, from off the g

. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney it sounds like what you're asking could we guess maybe two thingsre you asking can we target these particular neighborhoods or can we set criteria for how neighborhoods are defined that are different from supervisorial districts. >> yes. >> well i'm saying it is the possible to look at what we're sxern significant challenges and target those for this particular legislation and not as a citywide i'm asking in general is that even a possibility. >> i won't want to answer on the fly it raise many of the policy concerns and legal concerns mohcd has been discussing but we can evaluate it not giving you a yes or no right now. >> i want to be clear supervisor cowen has substantive amendments next week this item will will be before land use and possibility to continue this discussion i appreciate the conversation that is happened here today, i do think this is important to move forward but in the process of moving forward to continue our worker on looking at the possibility of making this a better legislation and so again, i want to thank my colleagues for

, deputy city attorney. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney just the amendment of the one that supervisorcohen disabled on page 3 is the finding explaining why the ordinance is including the hospitals and that finding is part of duplicated file that is going back to committee we recommend i include the hospital finding in the ordinances you'll be adopting today, we recommend making one final amendment to today's ordinance to include findings that have been all right drafted by supervisor cohen regarding hospital. >> supervisor cohen would you like to make that motion. >> moved and supervisor cowen and seconded by commissioner avalos colleagues, can we take that same house, same call? we'll take that without objection. the amendment passes amazing commissioner avalos would you like to make a motion to send the duplicated file back to committee. >> so moved. >> okay. is there a second seconded by supervisor cowen colleagues without objection we'll take that without objection. the duplicated file specifically will be referred to land use commission. >> and finally madam clerk on the amended

. >> seeing none, the motion fails and on the o m i our deputy city attorney john gibner, deputy city attorney can you provide us with an explanation avenue what you're suggesting regarding o m i evictions. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney speaking with supervisor tang on the does the substituteed is the changing to the tenants displacement and findings the sections of the ordinance overseeing facts is the number of evictions citywide and increasing into 2010 to 2014 housing is dmrrg unaffordable to the majority of san franciscans so displacement through evictions leads to san franciscans not in the city and one the public purposes of the tenants preference is to enable residents to stay in the city if possible we'll recommend that the board add in those finding as part of the proposed amendment. >> okay. before we move on this we need language i need language before i make a decision about this. >> i'm happy to read the language in the initial substitute ordinance. >> just to be clear does that mean this will not count as the first reading or have to go back to committee? >> the

, deputy city attorney. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney just the amendment of the one that supervisor cohen disabled on page 3 is the finding explaining why the ordinance is including the hospitals and that finding is part of duplicated file that is going back to committee we recommend i include the hospital finding in the ordinances you'll be adopting today, we recommend making one final amendment to today's ordinance to include findings that have been all right drafted by supervisor cohen regarding hospital. >> supervisor cohen would you like to make that motion. >> moved and supervisor cowen and seconded by commissioner avalos colleagues, can we take that same house, same call? we'll take that without objection. the amendment passes amazing commissioner avalos would you like to make a motion to send the duplicated file back to committee. >> so moved. >> okay. is there a second seconded by supervisor cowen colleagues without objection we'll take that without objection. the duplicated file specifically will be referred to land use commission. >> and finally madam clerk on the amended

. >> wait i want clarity i missed - >> deputy city attorney john gibner, deputy city attorney please explain why the second amendment was maids on item 27 and not 228. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney so the first amendment is not an amendment for legislation only a change to the extremity agreement at the end of the hearing we'll provide the clerk with an agreement what all the changes reflected in that the second item in the document that supervisor yee handed out the 5 m sud amendment is actually on amendment to the ordinance on item 27 reflecting the same content. >> okay. thank you for clarification madam clerk, please call the roll. >> commissioner avalos supervisor breed supervisor campos supervisor christensen supervisor cowen supervisor farrell supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor tang supervisor wiener supervisee

, deputy city attorney. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney just the amendment of the one that supervisor cohen disabled on page 3 is the finding explaining why the ordinance is including the hospitals and that finding is part of duplicated file that is going back to committee we recommend i include the hospital finding in the ordinances you'll be adopting today, we recommend making one final amendment to today's ordinance to include findings that have been all right drafted by supervisor cohen regarding hospital. >> supervisor cohen would you like to make that motion. >> moved and supervisor cowen and seconded by commissioner avalos colleagues, can we take that same house, same call? we'll take that without objection. the amendment passes amazing commissioner avalos would you like to make a motion to send the duplicated file back to committee. >> so moved. >> okay. is there a second seconded by supervisor cowen colleagues without objection we'll take that without objection. the duplicated file specifically will be referred to land use commission. >> and finally madam clerk on the amended

. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney. >> yeah. i think. >> covered it during our openly comments and mr. guys the planning commission about the pamphlet to the suds don't have to read into the record but describe them as you worry about. >> i'd like to make the amendments into the cladding zoning map and codifying many of the points that are negotiated up until today and assuring that aspects the development are codified within the zoning map and planning code. >> okay. >> i'll see if there is any comments nope. >> do you have another amendment and those are all my amendments we know that dme has an additional amendment. >> thank you, madam chair i have an amendment sdwrbd to the development agreements agenda item 5 it is really 4 and it is an amendment has to do with with street widths we've had issues in the past that board approved major projects with certainty have the dimensions and down the road city department comes back a insists on a chronic a can say cascading effect that causes challenges and in an ad hoc way the depart

. >> seeing none, the motion fails and on the o m i our deputy city attorney john gibner, deputy city attorney can you provide us with an explanation avenue what you're suggesting regarding o m i evictions. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney speaking with supervisor tang on the does the substituteed is the changing to the tenants displacement and findings the sections of the ordinance overseeing facts is the number of evictions citywide and increasing into 2010 to 2014 housing is dmrrg unaffordable to the majority of san franciscans so displacement through evictions leads to san franciscans not in the city and one the public purposes of the tenants preference is to enable residents to stay in the city if possible we'll recommend that the board add in those finding as part of the proposed amendment. >> okay. before we move on this we need language i need language before i make a decision about this. >> i'm happy to read the language in the initial substitute ordinance. >> just to be clear does that mean this will not count as the first reading or have to go back to committee? >> the

. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney so going into the last wednesday the ordinance had a months paragraph active day not going into effect until months later an amendment made on wednesday extend it back to 6 months the entire amendment not practitioner all until the six months period supervisor mar wants to keep that an additional contemplate once the ordinance becomes app operative the vice president can't issue penalties and supervisor mar is proposing today to eliminate the second six months. >> okay. i appreciate that. >> so supervisor mar a total of 3 amendments. >> okay supervisor avalos what would be your presence to do roll diddling. >> yeah. >> i don't want to support the 20 they recalled. >> okay. so colleagues from my prospective just as we've talked about this ordinance i'm getting up to speed in committee i know it's a committee report to be heard tomorrow i would say i'll be confront into this discussions as i've talked with people i; right have no doubt there's been a lot of feedback and the final strokes you have merit to continue to work on that from a labor side and ame

. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney it sounds like what you're asking could we guess maybe two things you asking can we target these particular neighborhoods or can we set criteria for how neighborhoods are defined that are different from supervisorial districts. >> yes. >> well i'm saying it is the possible to look at what we're sxern significant challenges and target those for this particular legislation and not as a citywide i'm asking in general is that even a possibility. >> i won't want to answer on the fly it raise many of the policy concerns and legal concerns mohcd has been discussing but we can evaluate it not giving you a yes or no right now. >> i want to be clear supervisor cowen has substantive amendments next week this item will will be before land use and possibility to continue this discussion i appreciate the conversation that is happened here today, i do think this is important to move forward but in the process of moving forward to continue our worker on looking at the possibility of making this a better legislation and so again, i want to thank my colleagues for su

. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney it sounds like what you're asking could we guess maybe two things you asking can we target these particular neighborhoods or can we set criteria for how neighborhoods are defined that are different from supervisorial districts. >> yes. >> well i'm saying it is the possible to look at what we're sxern significant challenges and target those for this particular legislation and not as a citywide i'm asking in general is that even a possibility. >> i won't want to answer on the fly it raise many of the policy concerns and legal concerns mohcd has been discussing but we can evaluate it not giving you a yes or no right now. >> i want to be clear supervisor cowen has substantive amendments next week this item will will be before land use and possibility to continue this discussion i appreciate the conversation that is happened here today, i do think this is important to move forward but in the process of moving forward to continue our worker on looking at the possibility of making this a better legislation and so again, i want to thank my colleagues for su

. >> okay john gibner, deputy city attorney during the closed session the committee voted unanimouslyy 2 to a zero vote to forward i'm sorry to continue item one to the government and oversight meeting of december 3rd and forward item it through 13 to the full board with a positive recommendation with items 8 through 12 for the city reports important can i have a motion not to discuss what happened in closed session. >> so moved. >> no oxygen the additional business to come before this body? >> there's no further business. >> >> if nothing else the meeting is adjourned. >> > >> i'm warren corn field and we are doing a series called stay safe, we are going to talk about staying in your home after an earthquake and taking care of your pet's needs. ♪ >> here we are at the spur urban ken center and we are in this little house that was built to show what it is like in san francisco after an earthquake. we are very pleased to have with us today, pat brown from the department of animal care and control and her friend oreo. >> hi. >> lauren. >> could you tell us what it would take after an ea

. >> seeing none, the motion fails and on the o m i our deputy city attorney john gibner, deputy city attorney can you provide us with an explanation avenue what you're suggesting regarding o m i evictions. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney speaking with supervisor tang on the does the substituteed is the changing to the tenants displacement and findings the sections of the ordinance overseeing facts is the number of evictions citywide and increasing into 2010 to 2014 housing is dmrrg unaffordable to the majority of san franciscans so displacement through evictions leads to san franciscans not in the city and one the public purposes of the tenants preference is to enable residents to stay in the city if possible we'll recommend that the board add in those finding as part of the proposed amendment. >> okay. before we move on this we need language i need language before i make a decision about this. >> i'm happy to read the language in the initial substitute ordinance. >> just to be clear does that mean this will not count as the first reading or have to go back to committee? >> the

. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney. >> yeah.hink. >> covered it during our openly comments and mr. guys the planning commission about the pamphlet to the suds don't have to read into the record but describe them as you worry about. >> i'd like to make the amendments into the cladding zoning map and codifying many of the points that are negotiated up until today and assuring that aspects the development are codified within the zoning map and planning code. >> okay. >> i'll see if there is any comments nope. >> do you have another amendment and those are all my amendments we know that dme has an additional amendment. >> thank you, madam chair i have an amendment sdwrbd to the development agreements agenda item 5 it is really 4 and it is an amendment has to do with with street widths we've had issues in the past that board approved major projects with certainty have the dimensions and down the road city department comes back a insists on a chronic a can say cascading effect that causes challenges and in an ad hoc way the department

. >> wait i want clarity i missed - >> deputy city attorney john gibner, deputy city attorney pleasein why the second amendment was maids on item 27 and not 228. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney so the first amendment is not an amendment for legislation only a change to the extremity agreement at the end of the hearing we'll provide the clerk with an agreement what all the changes reflected in that the second item in the document that supervisor yee handed out the 5 m sud amendment is actually on amendment to the ordinance on item 27 reflecting the same content. >> okay. thank you for clarification madam clerk, please call the roll. >> commissioner avalos supervisor breed supervisor campos supervisor christensen supervisor cowen supervisor farrell supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor tang supervisor wiener supervisor yee there are 11 i's. >> okay. the amendment passes unanimously supervisor kim. >> thank you i had alluded to 4 other amendments in any earlier comments just to restate them for the public and my colleagues the first amendment is to increase from three hundred th

. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney. >> yeah.nk. >> covered it during our openly comments and mr. guys the planning commission about the pamphlet to the suds don't have to read into the record but describe them as you worry about. >> i'd like to make the amendments into the cladding zoning map and codifying many of the points that are negotiated up until today and assuring that aspects the development are codified within the zoning map and planning code. >> okay. >> i'll see if there is any comments nope. >> do you have another amendment and those are all my amendments we know that dme has an additional amendment. >> thank you, madam chair i have an amendment sdwrbd to the development agreements agenda item 5 it is really 4 and it is an amendment has to do with with street widths we've had issues in the past that board approved major projects with certainty have the dimensions and down the road city department comes back a insists on a chronic a can say cascading effect that causes challenges and in an ad hoc way the department s

. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney. >> yeah.nk. >> covered it during our openly comments and mr. guys the planning commission about the pamphlet to the suds don't have to read into the record but describe them as you worry about. >> i'd like to make the amendments into the cladding zoning map and codifying many of the points that are negotiated up until today and assuring that aspects the development are codified within the zoning map and planning code. >> okay. >> i'll see if there is any comments nope. >> do you have another amendment and those are all my amendments we know that dme has an additional amendment. >> thank you, madam chair i have an amendment sdwrbd to the development agreements agenda item 5 it is really 4 and it is an amendment has to do with with street widths we've had issues in the past that board approved major projects with certainty have the dimensions and down the road city department comes back a insists on a chronic a can say cascading effect that causes challenges and in an ad hoc way the department s

. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney. >> yeah.nk. >> covered it during our openly comments and mr. guys the planning commission about the pamphlet to the suds don't have to read into the record but describe them as you worry about. >> i'd like to make the amendments into the cladding zoning map and codifying many of the points that are negotiated up until today and assuring that aspects the development are codified within the zoning map and planning code. >> okay. >> i'll see if there is any comments nope. >> do you have another amendment and those are all my amendments we know that dme has an additional amendment. >> thank you, madam chair i have an amendment sdwrbd to the development agreements agenda item 5 it is really 4 and it is an amendment has to do with with street widths we've had issues in the past that board approved major projects with certainty have the dimensions and down the road city department comes back a insists on a chronic a can say cascading effect that causes challenges and in an ad hoc way the department s