. >> oh, yeah john gibner, deputy city attorney. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney. so it i believe the motion deleted on line three to four page 2 deleted the public advocate from that first photograph. >> i'll need to highlight that. >> i thought you proposed that and wanted to make sure that is leading in sorry. >> you want to propose. >> no. >> okay. great. >> my other questions or comments seeing none, madam clerk call the roll on the amended motion. >> supervisor malia cowen asbestos par supervisor farrell absent supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor peskin supervisor tang absent ask supervisor wiener absent supervisor yee supervisor avalos supervisor breed absent supervisor campos there are 6 i's. >> thank you the motion is approved as amended the motion is approved and for clarification this approval means the following call resolution number it will call number one 60 from committee as well as the housing community charter amendment will schedule a special meeting on july 19th and july 29th and schedule the board of supervisors to sit as a committee on ju

. >> oh, yeah john gibner, deputy city attorney. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney. so it i believe the motion deleted on line three to four page 2 deleted the public advocate from that first photograph. >> i'll need to highlight that. >> i thought you proposed that and wanted to make sure that is leading in sorry. >> you want to

. >> oh, yeah john gibner, deputy city attorney. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney. so it i believe the motion deleted on line three to four page 2 deleted the public advocate from

. >> oh, yeah john gibner, deputy city attorney. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney. so it i believe the motion deleted on line three to four page 2 deleted the public advocate from that first photograph. >> i'll need to highlight that. >> i thought you proposed that and wanted to make sure that is leading in sorry. >> you want to propose. >> no. >> okay. great. >> my other questions or comments seeing none, madam clerk call the roll on the amended motion. >> supervisor malia cowen asbestos par supervisor farrell absent supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor peskin supervisor tang absent ask supervisor wiener absent supervisor yee supervisor avalos supervisor breed absent supervisor campos there are 6 i's. >> thank you the motion is approved as amended the motion is approved and for clarification this approval means the following call resolution number it will call number one 60 from committee as well as the housing community charter amendment will schedule a special meeting on july 19th and july 29th and schedule the board of supervisors to sit as a committee on ju

john gibner >> deputy city attorney john gibner. i'm here today with two colleagues who have more background on this particular case is matthew rothschild is the head of our claims team and virginia how also on our claims team. we are planning to just run through the background mr. back primarily ran through all of that good i'm not sure how much more we can add but certainly, in terms of answering your questions about how we got here in the unlawful detainer and the logistics of the lien, looking backward and looking forward, so i wonder if mr. rothschild can speak on the background and maybe ms. ho on the snapback question that you asked about the lien. >> that's fine. >> thank you. matthew rothchild chief of the claims division for the city attorney's office. and virginia ho is a claims adjuster on the team who worked on the abstract and filing the lien in this matter. happy to answer your questions. >> so, what can we do legally in regards to if the church were to purchase or repurchase. is there anything we can do legally? >> w

. >> oh, yeah john gibner, deputy city attorney. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney. so it i believe the motion deleted on line three to four page 2 deleted the public advocate from that first photograph. >> i'll need to highlight that. >> i thought you proposed that and wanted to make sure that is leading in sorry. >> you want to propose. >> no. >> okay. great. >> my other questions or comments seeing none, madam clerk call the roll on the amended motion. >> supervisor malia cowen asbestos par supervisor farrell absent supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor peskin supervisor tang absent ask supervisor wiener absent supervisor yee supervisor avalos supervisor breed absent supervisor campos there are 6 i's. >> thank you the motion is approved as amended the motion is approved and for clarification this approval means the following call resolution number it will call number one 60 from committee as well as the housing community charter amendment will schedule a special meeting on july 19th and july 29th and schedule the board of supervisors to sit as a committee on ju

, deputy city attorney. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney. yesterday dhr met and confederacy with the poa about the charter amendment and the poa asked for clarification clarifications about the intent of section the types of complaints from individual members of the public that the public advocate will have authority to investigate and we clarified that it is the not the intent felt board this the public advocate will be investigating allegations of individual police misconduct that police officers scooted of misconduct will be investigated twice once by the poa and we asked to clarify our intent before the vote today. >> okay. just for clarity mr. gibner we don't have to amend anything for the public advocates and the police accountability. >> just a public statement expressing what the language of this ballot measure means don't safety net to make any amendments to clarify. >> okay. great with that, colleagues madam clerk on item number one can you please call the roll. >> commissioner kim h supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor peskin

john gibner >> deputy city attorney john gibner. i'm here today with two colleagues who have more background on this particular case is matthew rothschild is the head of our claims team and virginia how also on our claims team. we are planning to just run through the background mr. back primarily ran through all of that good i'm not sure how much more we can add but certainly, in terms of answering your questions about how we got here in the unlawful detainer and the logistics of the lien, looking backward and looking forward, so i wonder if mr. rothschild can speak on the background and maybe ms. ho on the snapback question that you asked about the lien. >> that's fine. >> thank you. matthew rothchild chief of the claims division for the city attorney's office. and virginia ho is a claims adjuster on the team who worked on the abstract and filing the lien in this matter. happy to answer your questions. >> so, what can we do legally in regards to if the church were to purchase or repurchase. is there anything we can do legally? >> w

john gibner >> deputy city attorney john gibner. i'm here today with two colleagues who have more background on this particular case is matthew rothschild is the head of our claims team and virginia how also on our claims team. we are planning to just run through the background mr. back primarily ran through all of that good i'm not sure how much more we can add but certainly, in terms of answering your questions about how we got here in the unlawful detainer and the logistics of the lien, looking backward and looking forward, so i wonder if mr. rothschild can speak on the background and maybe ms. ho on the snapback question that you asked about the lien. >> that's fine. >> thank you. matthew rothchild chief of the claims division for the city attorney's office. and virginia ho is a claims adjuster on the team who worked on the abstract and filing the lien in this matter. happy to answer your questions. >> so, what can we do legally in regards to if the church were to purchase or repurchase. is there anything we can do legally? >> w

john gibner >> deputy city attorney john gibner. i'm here today with two colleagues who have more background on this particular case is matthew rothschild is the head of our claims team and virginia how also on our claims team. we are planning to just run through the background mr. back primarily ran through all of that good i'm not sure how much more we can add but certainly, in terms of answering your questions about how we got here in the unlawful detainer and the logistics of the lien, looking backward and looking forward, so i wonder if mr. rothschild can speak on the background and maybe ms. ho on the snapback question that you asked about the lien. >> that's fine. >> thank you. matthew rothchild chief of the claims division for the city attorney's office. and virginia ho is a claims adjuster on the team who worked on the abstract and filing the lien in this matter. happy to answer your questions. >> so, what can we do legally in regards to if the church were to purchase or repurchase. is there anything we can do legally? >> w

. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney. for clarity for the committee our office hat has not signed off on the 100 percent proposal that the committee is discussing today we're fourthly u figuring out what did board could do to the ordinance that within the scope and factoring the to thirty day rule the proposal your discussing would effectively allow the residential uses in districts not currently allowed that is beyond the scope of concept of the measure introduced we could, of course, worked with the very important or any of the supervisors after this meeting to see what is possible if the committee is interested in discussing further but for today, the committee could not adopt amendments with 100 percent affordable. >> can i bring up sophie hayward from the mayor's office i'm curious to whether mohcd will consider those areas for promotions in the future. >> sure tuff sophie hayward from the mayor's office of housing and community development as i read this i could be wrong the conditional use requirement i think appli

john gibner >> deputy city attorney john gibner.'m here today with two colleagues who have more background on this particular case is matthew rothschild is the head of our claims team and virginia how also on our claims team. we are planning to just run through the background mr. back primarily ran through all of that good i'm not sure how much more we can add but certainly, in terms of answering your questions about how we got here in the unlawful detainer and the logistics of the lien, looking backward and looking forward, so i wonder if mr. rothschild can speak on the background and maybe ms. ho on the snapback question that you asked about the lien. >> that's fine. >> thank you. matthew rothchild chief of the claims division for the city attorney's office. and virginia ho is a claims adjuster on the team who worked on the abstract and filing the lien in this matter. happy to answer your questions. >> so, what can we do legally in regards to if the church were to purchase or repurchase. is there anything we can do legally? >> wel

. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney. for clarity for the committee our office hat has not signed off on the 100 percent proposal that the committee is discussing today we're fourthly u figuring out what did board could do to the ordinance that within the scope and factoring the to thirty day rule the proposal your discussing would effectively allow the residential uses in districts not currently allowed that is beyond the scope of concept of the measure introduced we could, of course, worked with the very important or any of the supervisors after this meeting to see what is possible if the committee is interested in discussing further but for today, the committee could not adopt amendments with 100 percent affordable. >> can i bring up sophie hayward from the mayor's office i'm curious to whether mohcd will consider those areas for promotions in the future. >> sure tuff sophie hayward from the mayor's office of housing and community development as i read this i could be wrong the conditional use requirement i think appli

. >> oh, yeah john gibner, deputy city attorney. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney. so it i believe the motion deleted on line three to four page 2 deleted the public advocate from that first photograph. >> i'll need to highlight that. >> i thought you proposed that and wanted to make sure that is leading in sorry. >> you want to propose. >> no. >> okay. great. >> my other questions or comments seeing none, madam clerk call the roll on the amended motion. >> supervisor malia cowen asbestos par supervisor farrell absent supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor peskin supervisor tang absent ask supervisor wiener absent supervisor yee supervisor avalos supervisor breed absent supervisor campos there are 6 i's. >> thank you the motion is approved as amended the motion is approved and for clarification this approval means the following call resolution number it will call number one 60 from committee as well as the housing community charter amendment will schedule a special meeting on july 19th and july 29th and schedule the board of supervisors to sit as a committee on ju

. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney. for clarity for the committee our office hat has not signed off on the 100 percent proposal that the committee is discussing today we're fourthly u figuring out what did board could do to the ordinance that within the scope and factoring the to thirty day rule the proposal your discussing would effectively allow the residential uses in districts not currently allowed that is beyond the scope of concept of the measure introduced we could, of course, worked with the very important or any of the supervisors after this meeting to see what is possible if the committee is interested in discussing further but for today, the committee could not adopt amendments with 100 percent affordable. >> can i bring up sophie hayward from the mayor's office i'm curious to whether mohcd will consider those areas for promotions in the future. >> sure tuff sophie hayward from the mayor's office of housing and community development as i read this i could be wrong the conditional use requirement i think appli

john gibner >> deputy city attorney john gibner. i'm here today with two colleagues who have more background on this particular case is matthew rothschild is the head of our claims team and virginia how also on our claims team. we are planning to just run through the background mr. back primarily ran through all of that good i'm not sure how much more we can add but certainly, in terms of answering your questions about how we got here in the unlawful detainer and the logistics of the lien, looking backward and looking forward, so i wonder if mr. rothschild can speak on the background and maybe ms. ho on the snapback question that you asked about the lien. >> that's fine. >> thank you. matthew rothchild chief of the claims division for the city attorney's office. and virginia ho is a claims adjuster on the team who worked on the abstract and filing the lien in this matter. happy to answer your questions. >> so, what can we do legally in regards to if the church were to purchase or repurchase. is there anything we can do legally? >> w

. >> oh, yeah john gibner, deputy city attorney. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney. so it i believe the motion deleted on line three to four page 2 deleted the public advocate from that first photograph. >> i'll need to highlight that. >> i thought you proposed that and wanted to make sure that is leading in sorry. >> you want to propose. >> no. >> okay. great. >> my other questions or comments seeing none, madam clerk call the roll on the amended motion. >> supervisor malia cowen asbestos par supervisor farrell absent supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor peskin supervisor tang absent ask supervisor wiener absent supervisor yee supervisor avalos supervisor breed absent supervisor campos there are 6 i's. >> thank you the motion is approved as amended the motion is approved and for clarification this approval means the following call resolution number it will call number one 60 from committee as well as the housing community charter amendment will schedule a special meeting on july 19th and july 29th and schedule the board of supervisors to sit as a committee on ju

. >> to our city attorney john gibner. >> deputy city attorney john gibner. the whereas clauses -- if the committee adds those to the pending legislation wouldn't trigger another hearing in committee. adding a resolve clause -- depending whether it's targeted funding towards city college and that is all that was agendized today. if you want to expand the resolution as supervisor yee is proposing and having child care for children would require additional public comment and noticing which is i didn't believe the supervisor was proposing duplicating so that piece of it could be continued. >> question to the city attorney. in our legislation in one of the whereas clauses we did include that in addition to tuition and enrollment fees students face education related costs including room, board or child care cost such as transportation and taxation and supplies up to 3,000 annually so there is language about child care in the original legislation -- i'm sorry, in the original resolution, so this resolve would then trigger a continuance even though we do refer to ch

. >> deputy city attorney john gibner. the parks code section 4 point 10 has a was too long for me to read. the reason we listed the two above and below is just to put it in order that's probably about 40-50 different parks >> okay. love to get the list for rec and park just to look at it it's not that opposition to it. this always like to ensure the greatest flexibility for our residents to enjoy our parks not trash our parks. >> absolutely. just to expand on that these are all some of the parks we all utilize the part of this list. it was something that was only important to a lot of folks. we did thank you. supervisor kim any other questions? with that committed this item, item 42 same house, same call? without objection the passes on first reading >>[gavel]. item 43 >> item 43, >>[reading code] >> colleagues can we take this item same house, same call? without objection adopted unanimously >>[gavel] >> item 44 >> item 44, >>[reading code] >> same house, same call? without resolution is adopted unanimously >>[gavel] be

. >> to our city attorney john gibner. >> deputy city attorney john gibner. the whereas clauses -- if the committee adds those to the pending legislation wouldn't trigger another hearing in committee. adding a resolve clause -- depending whether it's targeted funding towards city college and that is all that was agendized today. if you want to expand the resolution as supervisor yee is proposing and having child care for children would require additional public comment and noticing which is i didn't believe the supervisor was proposing duplicating so that piece of it could be continued. >> question to the city attorney. in our legislation in one of the whereas clauses we did include that in addition to tuition and enrollment fees students face education related costs including room, board or child care cost such as transportation and taxation and supplies up to 3,000 annually so there is language about child care in the original legislation -- i'm sorry, in the original resolution, so this resolve would then trigger a continuance even though we do refer to ch

. >> deputy city attorney john gibner. the parks code section 4 point 10 has a was too long for me to read. the reason we listed the two above and below is just to put it in order that's probably about 40-50 different parks >> okay. love to get the list for rec and park just to look at it it's not that opposition to it. this always like to ensure the greatest flexibility for our residents to enjoy our parks not trash our parks. >> absolutely. just to expand on that these are all some of the parks we all utilize the part of this list. it was something that was only important to a lot of folks. we did thank you. supervisor kim any other questions? with that committed this item, item 42 same house, same call? without objection the passes on first reading >>[gavel]. item 43 >> item 43, >>[reading code] >> colleagues can we take this item same house, same call? without objection adopted unanimously >>[gavel] >> item 44 >> item 44, >>[reading code] >> same house, same call? without resolution is adopted unanimously >>[gavel] be

. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney. for clarity for the committee our office hat has not signed off on the 100 percent proposal that the committee is discussing today we're fourthly u figuring out what did board could do to the ordinance that within the scope and factoring the to thirty day rule the proposal your discussing would effectively allow the residential uses in districts not currently allowed that is beyond the scope of concept of the measure introduced we could, of course, worked with the very important or any of the supervisors after this meeting to see what is possible if the committee is interested in discussing further but for today, the committee could not adopt amendments with 100 percent affordable. >> can i bring up sophie hayward from the mayor's office i'm curious to whether mohcd will consider those areas for promotions in the future. >> sure tuff sophie hayward from the mayor's office of housing and community development as i read this i could be wrong the conditional use requirement i think appli

. >> oh, yeah john gibner, deputy city attorney. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney. so it i believe the motion deleted on line three to four page 2 deleted the public advocate from that first photograph. >> i'll need to highlight that. >> i thought you proposed that and wanted to make sure that is leading in sorry. >> you want to propose. >> no. >> okay. great. >> my other questions or comments seeing none, madam clerk call the roll on the amended motion. >> supervisor malia cowen asbestos par supervisor farrell absent supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor peskin supervisor tang absent ask supervisor wiener absent supervisor yee supervisor avalos supervisor breed absent supervisor campos there are 6 i's. >> thank you the motion is approved as amended the motion is approved and for clarification this approval means the following call resolution number it will call number one 60 from committee as well as the housing community charter amendment will schedule a special meeting on july 19th and july 29th and schedule the board of supervisors to sit as a committee on ju

. >> deputy city attorney john gibner. the parks code section 4 point 10 has a was too long for me to read. the reason we listed the two above and below is just to put it in order that's probably about 40-50 different parks >> okay. love to get the list for rec and park just to look at it it's not that opposition to it. this always like to ensure the greatest flexibility for our residents to enjoy our parks not trash our parks. >> absolutely. just to expand on that these are all some of the parks we all utilize the part of this list. it was something that was only important to a lot of folks. we did thank you. supervisor kim any other questions? with that committed this item, item 42 same house, same call? without objection the passes on first reading >>[gavel]. item 43 >> item 43, >>[reading code] >> colleagues can we take this item same house, same call? without objection adopted unanimously >>[gavel] >> item 44 >> item 44, >>[reading code] >> same house, same call? without resolution is adopted unanimously >>[gavel] be

. >> sure john gibner, deputy city attorney. section 1.257 on page 21 of the docume , reflected amendment on the documents i have okay giving the public advocate appointment authority and then line - >> line 22 i apologize. >> on page 26 a new urban codified section 2 which says two things first that if the other charter amendment creating the police accountability passes in november than the amendments to section 417 will fall away and the occ related ordinances. >> so supervisor campos would like to make a motion to amend based on the amendments submitted. >> can i ask a question of the district attorney is it better to amend first and duplicate and then mainstream or duplicate. >> the key once you amend you have to hold the committee as a whole with the amendment it based on your. >> if for some reason we have tight timelines but to proceed with the original version so that's why i wanted to duplicate first and amend it. >> okay. and i don't know if it is appropriate for me to speak from here to get clarifying information oka

. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney. i can't speak to the timing but i can explain why the mayor's office this go to the committee report for tomorrow this is an ordinance two reading before the board it passes and the mayor's signs if this was on a regular schedule and went to next tuesday board meeting for tdr or first reading the board will not approve the sex offenders until cement 6 the idea it get it finally approved on next week. >> my question if he were to request does it have to be agendized it is less than twenty-four hours. >> my understanding tomorrows agenda includes this is as a committee recorded in anticipation this committee might send it out if you don't the board will not consider that but today it can consider it tomorrow. >> thank you. i read through the materials and certainly understand the desire to do this quickly before other implies assess the fibers so i'll be supportive of sending this forward as quickly as possible at this time in budget analyst report so public comment on item 14 seeing no

. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney. so we've not prepared supervisor peskin the amendments that supervisor peskin read into the record i understand the goal here on going both items the amendments that supervisor farrell will read in in a few minutes to make the items identical the most of amendments that supervisor cohen's just read are in supervisor farrell's version which we have as i understand and to the board today depending on the outcome i eagerly await if the supervisor peskin version is the version that the board can you please tell us i'll ask the advertising in my office to prepare i'm not sure whether we can get that done because of other staffing needs and other things by tomorrow in order to get it to include if on next weeks agenda you can pass his ordinance on first reading and you may be able to pass the ordinance on second reading but possible that ordinance will not be back until august 2nd i want to make you aware of that before the board. >> thank you commissioner peskin any followup comments. >> s

>> deputy city attorney john gibner. i wasn't advising the board at the time the minor standing essentially is what supervisor yee said. the charter amendment was designed to take power from the board of supervisors and give it to the mta with some independent authority and exclusive powers. and to give the board minimal ability to meddle with the budget. >> all right. so supervisor yee you're looking to empower the board to metal? is that which are looking to do, buddy? >> maybe my words would be a little too bit different but, yes >>[laughing] >> all right. i'm all for meddling. >> part of me is responding to my constituents and saying, well what even a do about it. why do you change it. so, this is one way to look at it. certainly, i don't think the relationship to myself and mr. ruskin would change. i was availability to over he's been very good about responding when i do ask for a meeting. >> i agree. director ruskin is incredibly responsive and so was dylan on his staff. one more question about the sfmta is budget.

. >> sure john gibner, deputy city attorney. section 1.257 on page 21 of the docume , reflected amendment on the documents i have okay giving the public advocate appointment authority and then line - >> line 22 i apologize. >> on page 26 a new urban codified section 2 which says two things first that if the other charter amendment creating the police accountability passes in november than the amendments to section 417 will fall away and the occ related ordinances. >> so supervisor campos would like to make a motion to amend based on the amendments submitted. >> can i ask a question of the district attorney is it better to amend first and duplicate and then mainstream or duplicate. >> the key once you amend you have to hold the committee as a whole with the amendment it based on your. >> if for some reason we have tight timelines but to proceed with the original version so that's why i wanted to duplicate first and amend it. >> okay. and i don't know if it is appropriate for me to speak from here to get clarifying information oka

pretty consistent with what we have on the books already all deferred to the deputy city attorney john gibner who can advise what we can place this particular amendment inside a measure. if i'm not mistaken, chair tang, the language that removed the special election component. is that correct? >> as i read it, yes >> good. because i was going to say we adjust that language line 19, 8-13. that election would occur at the next regular scheduled election. not and not post a costly special election. then, i also would like to make amendment to move out the entire section related to the office of citizen complaint for the public advocate better moving section 8 got 107 pete's 13 line 16-25. also pete's 14 through page 60. i also want to remove the section regarding funding to occ. >> i believe in terms of funding it has been changed already so it is just a staffing recommendations. is that what you are referring to? >> i'm specifically referring to [inaudible] 13-from you i just get a copy of the legislation that i will double check that. >> thank you why don't i have a supervisor campos >> i like

pretty consistent with what we have on the books already all deferred to the deputy city attorney john gibner who can advise what we can place this particular amendment inside a measure. if i'm not mistaken, chair tang, the language that removed the special election component. is that correct? >> as i read it, yes >> good. because i was going to say we adjust that language line 19, 8-13. that election would occur at the next regular scheduled election. not and not post a costly special election. then, i also would like to make amendment to move out the entire section related to the office of citizen complaint for the public advocate better moving section 8 got 107 pete's 13 line 16-25. also pete's 14 through page 60. i also want to remove the section regarding funding to occ. >> i believe in terms of funding it has been changed already so it is just a staffing recommendations. is that what you are referring to? >> i'm specifically referring to [inaudible] 13-from you i just get a copy of the legislation that i will double check that. >> thank you why don't i have a supervisor campos >> i like

. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney. i can't speak to the timing but i can explain why the mayor's office this go to the committee report for tomorrow this is an ordinance two reading before the board it passes and the mayor's signs if this was on a regular schedule and went to next tuesday board meeting for tdr or first reading the board will not approve the sex offenders until cement 6 the idea it get it finally approved on next week. >> my question if he were to request does it have to be agendized it is less than twenty-four hours. >> my understanding tomorrows agenda includes this is as a committee recorded in anticipation this committee might send it out if you don't the board will not consider that but today it can consider it tomorrow. >> thank you. i read through the materials and certainly understand the desire to do this quickly before other implies assess the fibers so i'll be supportive of sending this forward as quickly as possible at this time in budget analyst report so public comment on item 14 seeing no

. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney. i can't speak to the timing but i can explain why the mayor's office this go to the committee report for tomorrow this is an ordinance two reading before the board it passes and the mayor's signs if this was on a regular schedule and went to next tuesday board meeting for tdr or first reading the board will not approve the sex offenders until cement 6 the idea it get it finally approved on next week. >> my question if he were to request does it have to be agendized it is less than twenty-four hours. >> my understanding tomorrows agenda includes this is as a committee recorded in anticipation this committee might send it out if you don't the board will not consider that but today it can consider it tomorrow. >> thank you. i read through the materials and certainly understand the desire to do this quickly before other implies assess the fibers so i'll be supportive of sending this forward as quickly as possible at this time in budget analyst report so public comment on item 14 seeing no