graham. the uva sophomore was found dead after a months long search. john and sue graham emerged from was potomac high school surrounded by a crowd that love their daughter. >> we were on the same travel team. >> i had class with her in elementary school. service, the memorial her parents, teachers, and friends remembered the british national is caring, determined, intelligent, at times opinionated, and very witty. teacher history highlighted her humor, on display in this youtube video. to explain how a bill becomes american law. this person works with her father. >> she had such an amazing personality. she was humorous, funky, quiet, intelligent. she had so many facets. that is what we heard. hannah was excelling in studies at uva, where she recently made this video for french class. creativity and spunk is what made hannah schein and what they will miss most. >> it is showing respect for her life. i feel like i need to be here. i hope that she rests in peace. played softball and was in the marching band in high school. her former coach spo during the serv

john graham for the national center for policy analysis. dr. sheshemani slide you had 7.3 million the other report said 7.1. the end of first open enrollment is 8.1. where did those 1 million people go that have left the exchanges. second question which is kind of related is the network adequacy, how confident should by that if i sign up for 2015 the network that that nurse, cig that or blue gives me now will be exactly the same all the way through 2015 or will doctors get fired or drop out? thank you. >> well, some of them may die. >> what are you going to do about that, meena? >> i think that the reduction is pretty obvious that any insurance company will have attrition over the year. actually a 90% retention rate is pretty good. also, you know, you have people who get a job, they get employer coverage. you have people who lose a job. they get medicaid. there's just a huge turnover over the course of a year. and i was frankly surprised we had 7.1 million in. that's a very good retention rate. in terms of providers, that's a problem now with e

of the potential 2016 presidential candidates include john bolton, jeb bush, ben causeman, chris christie, holly furina. lind san graham, mike huckabee, john kassig, mitt romney, paul ryan, john thune, scott walker. >> question, is there a front runner? >> well, you started off with tom cotton. i would look for him for 202. he has a lot -- 2020. i would look for him them. he's just won an election. it's his first term in the u.s. senate. and jody urn, let's see. if you look at the trio that's running from the senate, cruz, rubio, and rand paul, they're all going to use the senate floor to advance their candidacies. ted cruz is probably going to go over to the house and do freelancing among conservatives. cruz thinks he can harness the antiwashington sentiment in the country. he's the most disliked member in the u.s. senate by both sides. rand paul is a serious legislator. i think he has the potential of knitting together the republican party. and marco rubio, i don't think he'll run if jeb bush does. he's his protege. >> how old is cotton? >> late 30s, early 40s. >> late 30s, early 40s. i don't know his exact age. he's

john graham for the national center for policy analysis. in dr. seshamani's slide you had 7.3 million and the other report said 7.1 by the end of october. the end of first open enrollment is 8.1. where did those 1 million people go that have left the exchanges? second question which is kind of related is the network adequacy, how confident should i be that if i sign up for 2015, the network, aetna, cigna or blue gives me now that will be exactly the same all the way through 2015 or will doctors get fired or drop out? thank you. >> well, some of them may die. >> what are you going to do about that, meena? i think that the reduction is pretty obvious that any insurance company is going to have attrition over a year. actually a 90% retention rate is pretty good. also, you know, you have people who get a job, they get employer coverage. you have people who lose a job. they get medicaid. there's just a huge turnover over the course of a year. and i was frankly surprised we still have 7.1 million in. of course, there are new people coming on, too. but i

other presidential candidates include john bowlson, jeb bush, [ indiscernible ] , chris christie, paula piorina, lindsay graham, mick huckaby, bobby jindal, john caseic, mike pent, rick perry, rob portman, mitt romney, paul ryan, rick santorum, john thune, scott walker. question, is there a front runner, eleanor? >> we started off with tom cotton. i would look at him for 2020. he has a lot of good credentials, harvard, iraq veteran you, but he won an election and that is his first term in the u.s. senate. joni ernst, let's see how she develops. they're not running in 2016. all the other crew, everyone is dreaming of the white house, and i think if you look at the trio running from the senate, cruz, rubio and rand paul, they're all going to use the senate floor to advance their canned dates. i think ted cruz is go -- candidacies. i think ted cruz will go to the house and do freelancing amongst conservatives. he is the most disliked member of the u.s. senate by his colleagues, by both democrats and republicans. rand paul is a serious legislator. and i think he does have a potential of knitting together the diffe

he told lindsey graham, john mccain and kelly ayotte that john mccain was the -- that -- this reportes almost entirely on mike morell as a fact witness. they base the entire section of their report on the talking points, on what mike morell says. he has no credibility on this issue. why they would rely on him is beyond me. >> many members of the media point to this say and say this was a republican report. >> it was bipartisan report. >> republican led house inlligence committee. >> that's true. this is a problem because the republicans are now a majority of both chambers and the majority is a mind field as everyone knows. as they try to not shut the government down, placate conservatives on the executive order how to respond to that begin the new year looking like they are governing before presidential politics takes over. they have a new focus on oversight but they are very hesitant about having it become too many investigations, big probes in the spotlight that promise too much and deliver too little. so, republicans are talking about the fact that this report cites no intelligenc

marco rubio put his shock on the line -- >> john mccain, lindsey graham. >> but in the house, they don't, if they got to a conference, it would be a better deal for the republicans if -- >> does this action by the president, which was really jumping on the galloping horse. he changed reality. i'll start with you, matthew. does this make it more likely the republicans will get moving here and bring up a real bill in the house, or less likely because they're angry? >> i hope it's more likely. because in the house and the senate, the leaders of the republican party do want immigration reform. >> where's kevin mccarthy in this thing? i think he's for reform. >> he's definitely for reform. >> he's number two now. >> kevin, as most republicans want additional resources to secure the border, one of the basic problems with this speech is that it, to some extent, doesn't encourage legal immigration. you need to have a policy -- we're a country of immigrants. >> just to be fair, the president said this relief he did that will go into effect today, doesn't make it any safer for somebody jumping the

he doesn't name them, but i'm assuming means john mccain and lindsey graham, folks who are on board with the president's policy. and he says just because you're on board with the policy doesn't mean you should let rule of law go by the wayside. >> and rand paul is also sort of trying to have it two ways because he's saying congress really needs to get involved and authorize this illegal war, but if asked, i would say yes. so he's not saying he wants the war to stop, he just wants a different kind of more formal authorization. congress also in general want it is two ways because they want to be able to criticize the president, but they don't want to have to actually take a stand whether the war should go forward. >> because everyone the authorization you mentioned has been a huge liability for a number of, say, presidential candidates. >> including former secretary of state hillary rodham clinton who lost the nomination to barack obama in 2008 principally because of her vote for the use of force in iraq which then senator -- actually i guess he wasn't even a not, then state senator, oppos

. >> let's get to the possible deal in a moment but your friend john mccain and lindsey graham blasteddent with reports towards a private letter towards the supreme leader of iran. saying it will hurt our alliances with other arab states. >> yes. the coalition we have built with the other arab states is very strong. over 60 nations. we are taking the effort squarely to isil. i will not get into any questions of correspondence -- >> you saw the statement. >> i watch what they say very closely. i admire them both. i listen to them privately and watch them publicly as well. they have hard earned and hard-earned feelings about -- not talked to them but i know how they feel about the irananians. we are try to communicate to them over the course of the last several years. the kind of things we want to make clear to the iranians are that they should not miss understand our clarity of purpose when we have that in the region. we want to make sure they don't think they can get away with trying to threaten our people. we want to make clear what we expect to them in something like the nuclear deal

the -- and we only have 3000, the president can't seem to face down those in congress, john mccain to lindsey grahamis he going to face them down than if he cannot face them down now? i don't believe his words. i think this is going to be the beginning of an unfortunate and tragic reentry of america back into this civil war. >> your response to the fate of the isis leader abu bakr al-baghdadi, iraq if officials claim he was wounded in an airstrike on isis leaders in the anbar matthew, hoh? >> it could possibly happen, but i don't put much stock in that having a great effect on the islamic state. they will just get another leader. look, osama bin laden has been dead for 3.5 years in the administration is citing how dangerous al qaeda still is. in order to justify spying on americans or justify bombing in syria. the precursor to the islamic state, al qaeda in iraq am a witch morphed into the islamic -- which morphed into the killed their leader was in 2006 and here we are in 2014, facing an even stronger, more dangerous, more barbaric force in the islamic state. , you know, i don't think it is going t

john mccain, lindsey graham, john kerry.d him no good in the white house is interesting. >> richard haas there's such a disconnect in the foreign policy apparatus between the white house and the pentagon as jim miklaszewski said there's communication between the white house and the preng, it's all one way. >> it's not just the white house and the pentagon. it's the white house and the state department and the white house. i think the national security process isn't working. >> why not? >> it's meant to coordinate. it's not meant to do the day-to-day carrying out of american foreign policy. this nsc is several times too big and too busy doing the jobs of other people around the u.s. government rather than doing its own job. it's interesting the most successful nsc's in american history, they are about one tenth, one ninth the size of this job. they were not taking the places of the pentagon or defense department. >> there was a news story to that point. the president have the hagel dismissal left to go address the national se

. >> albert: your friend john mccain and lindsey graham blasted the president for a private letter toin iran saying that you shouldn't be dealing with him, it's a terrorist regime and it will hurt our alliances with other arab states. >> yeah. well, look, the coalition we've dealt with, the other arab states against i.s.i.l is very strong. over 60 nations. we're taking the effort squarely to i.s.i.l in the ways that we've talked. i'm not going to get into any questions of correspondence -- >> albert: you saw what they said about that. >> i did and i admire them and listen to them privately and watch what they say publicly as well. they have hard earned and hard-learned feelings about that. >> albert: did they talk about this to you, also? >> i haven't talked to them in the last little bit but i know how they feel about the iranians. i will say this, that we have tried to communicate to the iranians over the course of the last several years, and the kind of things that we want to make sure to the iranians are that they ought not misunderstand our clarity of purpose when we have guys in

combine it with the fact you have a new armed services committee chair in the sense of john mccain. lindsey grahamill be empowered. if you said that this president eight months ago mr. president you would be on the verge of deploying several thousand troops to a region in which you promised to end conflict he would find that laughable. it causes more balanced approach. you can't pull all the way out or stay all the way in. it takes a different kind of approach. the president will be prodded by this new republican senate to do things he wasn't inclineded to do but forced to do. >> history will show george w. bush went too far. too excessive. too prepared to use force. barack obama and overcorrect and we're paying a terrible price for it. if he does not change, if he does not do what every other president does, what bill clinton did, what fdr did, what ronald reagan did, what george w. bush did and learn from his past mistakes, if he stays isolated in a bubble, there will be a tremendous price for america to pay and i'm not saying to go invade the middle east. i'm saying to get out of your defensive

. >> i want to read something from back in may, republican senators john mccain, lindsey graham and kellyte released a statement criticizing obama's move to end combat missions and withdraw troops in afghanistan with this quote. this is a short-sighted decision that will make it harder to end the war in afghanistan responsibly. the president came into office wanting to end the wars he inherited, but wars do not end just because politicians say so. does this give credence to the argument that, you know, the u.s. should not set exit dates? >> yeah, it is difficult. and of course, the taliban was paying very close attention to this. and that was a political factor as well. in the recent election in that country. so we have to be careful. we have to help our allies. now, we've guaranteed about $12 billion in continued aid, and of course even after the end of next year, we're going to have an element there to continue to advise and assist and train. i think that's something that's necessary. you know, keep in mind, after world war ii, we're still in germany. we're still in japan. so a smaller

republicans, the new ones that will be coming in in january, they align more closely with the john mccain, lindsey graham policy of the senate. of thee libertarian base policy. since the rise of the islamic state, there has been more of a push away from the isolationist, the libertarian, and toward the idea that the u.s. needs to have a more robust presence. >> brilliant but that is exactly where i wanted to go. phil mattingly, stay with us. republicanme of a yourthyism, but that then just heard mr. mattingly say, maybe not. >> isis has become so reprehensible, so brutal, that even those who were isolationist a little while ago are much more willing to play a role, though reluctant. but not a lot of american troops. >> these republicans represent so many people that happen to fight, or their families thought, or their sons and daughters fought in iraq and afghanistan. >> if you look at some of the candidates that won last night in the u.s. senate, these are free goal in of a strong national defense. if the traditional republican position and it's one that will get a lot of traction in the new congress. b

opposite and unfortunately, a lot of the voices we're hearing from, including senator john mccain and lindsey graham people who always support military action and it's disturbing that republicans somehow seem to find the money for these things when they can't find money for food stamps and unemployment insurance and crises we actually know are happening right here. >> we'll leave it there. sally kohn, anna naff. >> remember, it's a democrat president asking for that money. >> all right, thank you. she always likes to get the last word. >> she's very good at. >> it she just can't help it. >> ana, nice to see you. thank you. >>> still to come, iran's supreme leader lays out a plan for wiping out israel and he does it in a tweet. details straight ahead. do solemnly swear that i will support and defend the constitution of the united states against all enemies foreign and domestic... ♪ ♪ narrator: these are the skater kid: whoa narrator: that got torture tested by teenagers and cried out for help. from the surprised designers. who came to the rescue with a brilliant fix male designer: i love it narrator:

so far the white house will not confirm or deny the letter, but republican senators john mccain and lindsey grahamsting the administration saying, quote: this is the same iranian regime that has been complicit in the rise of isis by pushing a violent sectarian agenda throughout the middle east. the administration needs to understand that this iranian regime cares more about trying to weaken america and push us out of the middle east than cooperating with us, end quote. eric, if this letter is true -- whether the white house will say, obviously, hasn't happened yet, but if it's out there, if there's proof of it -- what does it tell you? >> the administration is flailing about for an additional strategy to fight isis, trying to work with iran on isis. the enemy of our enemy is our friend. that may to some degree be junior league diplomacy, but i don't think it's going to work. the iranians just stoned to death a woman who fought off her rapist. they're not exactly reasonable by western standards. i think the administration makes a dangerous mistake by thinking everyone else is just like us, and they

have been very much for immigration reform, for a path to citizenship like senator lindsey graham, senator john mccain, just moments ago in the hallway downstairs, they were telling us that they are very worried about this because they know the sentiment of republicans in congress and more importantly maybe outside groups who have a lot of influence on rank and file republicans and once the president takes this action, what many call abuse of power, then it will be a lot harder to get republicans who are reluctant to do this to come along for compromise. the question, don, at this point in short-term is how are republicans going to retaliate. i asked that question of the incoming senate majority leader mitch mcconnell yesterday and he said he doesn't like words like retaliate but the fact of the matter is they are talking in meetings from one side of the capitol to the other about how they're going to respond to the president, whether they have any legislative remedies from censor to use the power of the purse to litigation to try to stop the president and all of those together could be somethi

but john mccain and lindsey graham and others, we'll see tensions there on both of those issues. there is a chance for a corporate tax reform. but we have to keep in mind, businesses ideas is dramatically cut the marginal rates and leave all the preferences alone. and any reform that is not revenue neutral is simply not going to happen. whether you can work some deal out will be interesting to watch. i do think there's a real possibility of infrastructure reform. john delaney has a bipartisan bill in the house, actually pretty strongly bipartisan, to create an infrastructure bank funded through 50-year bonds that now basically are almost cost-free. and they have repatriated profits from companies used with an incentive to buy a portion of those. so you don't have a lot of additional government funding irectly. and that could happen. but, again, you're going to see substantial tea party opposition to anything that looks like it's expanding government. and we are going to get a crisis on the highway trust fund again because of the refusal to raise gasoline taxes or to consider any

and it puts other republicans, mitch mcconnell or anybody else, john mccain, lindsey graham, anybodyputs them in a position of having to argue pragmatism to a base that likes conservatism. guys, here's what we'd all like but here's reality. >> in this sort of partisan bickering environment, it just doesn't work. we saw obama try to nominate a very conservative democrat out in georgia for a court and progressives said absolutely not. this is, you know, compromise is just not being had when it comes to these court nominations right now. >> is there any way, because it's funny you pull the statistics about when ruth bader ginsburg was nominated back in '93. there was a whole circus before she got picked in '93 with others, you know, who clinton offered the seat to and everything. but anyway when she finally got picked, the vote was like 96-3. when stephen breyer was put on the court a year later, it was 98-1, something like that. can you ever see us getting back to the day where basically the question for supreme court nominees are basic fitness. are these competent people, good legal m

. >> pentagon spokesman rear admiral john kirby and republican senator lindsey graham sharply disagreeinger the president's decision to send more troops to help the iraqi army to fight isis. we're back now with the panel. before we get to that, peter, what are your sources telling you about this u.s. air strike against isis leaders in the mosul area of northern iraq in the last 24 hours? and what about the possibility that's being mentioned they actually hit the leader of isis, al baghdadi? >> it's a very intriguing possibility. they had leaders were going to be gathering and they took advantage of it while we could. we should be cautious in suggesting that anybody specific has been knocked off at this point. we've seen again in again in the 13 years since 9/11 that reports of the demise of this terrorist leader or that militant leader proved to be unfounded. i think -- i remember during the original iraq war, we killed a guy chemical ali, cousin of saddam hussein, we killed him five or six times. we did finally -- >> it is encouraging they had this intelligence where some of the leaders

leading republican senators lindsey graham, kelly ayotte and john mccain vowed to press on, however,ing: hardliners in iran may also be emboldened, reflecting the views expressed by iran's supreme leader ayatollah khamenei, a year ago. >> ( translated ): we insist that there should be no withdrawal from the rights of the iranian nation, even one step. >> warner: secretary kerry said talks can't go on forever, but insisted it would be foolhardy not to pursue them further. >> we won't sit at table forever absent progress. given how far we have come over the last year and few days, this isn't the time to get up and walk away. >> warner: experts from both sides are expected to resume meeting next month. >> ifill: finally tonight, the second of two field reports from alaska on the impact of climate change and warmer temperatures. science correspondent miles o'brien reports from the 49th state on how those changes are affecting greenhouse gas levels, and the consequences for the local ecosystem. >> reporter: to get to the root of global warming in the arctic, scientists need to pull out so

there are some who would like to deal, people like john mccain eventually or lindsey graham in the senate. mccain was talking to reporters before the end of the week last week and he said, a, he doesn't think that anything would happen he sayster, and b, whatever happens has to start in the house. at senate has taken its shot this. if you're looking for the house to start, good luck for that. that's where the division is strongest. host: people have been looking at past president and the use of -- past presidents and the use of executive orders. holmesme -- eleanor norton tweeted out that people forget that the emancipation proclamation was an executive order. guest: it is technically not white the same. every president in the last half-century, republican and democrat, has done something in this space. under president george h w bush, he legalized 1.5 million illegal immigrants or at least allowed 1.5 million additional immigrants to come in absent explicit congressional approval. what's happening here is different in scope him a larger, and -- scope, larger, and different in political i

to work on immigration, but it will poison the well when you have people like lindsey graham, marco rubio and johnain authors of the bipartisan agreement in the senate on immigration sending him a letter saying really think about it and this will have consequences. it's a difficult place. >> let me go to dana bash on capitol hill. you cover all of these men and women in the united states senate and house of representatives. set the scene what we're about to hear right now from mitch mcconnell. >> you know, mitch mcconnell is an interesting character. he is somebody who is going to be introduced much more to the american people than they ever have seen him before. to those of us who cover him in congress, we have seen the way he operates for some time and it will probably be illustrated in this press conference. he's known as somebody who is one of the most, if not the most, strategic politicians in washington. i think democrats and republicans alike will say that. he's somebody who plans so many steps ahead and for this being the majority leaders he's been planning for for years. he thought possib

john boehner's desk. it's something that lindsey graham and others voted for. he can take that and pass it.that's probably not going to happen. that's the reality of it. mitch mcconnell thoos thread the needle within his chamber come january that he'll be leading and running and he'll have a problem and it's called ted cruz and marko rubio and other wannabes. if i'm in the republican party which i'm not, i used to be, i would do everything i can to increase latino turnout and black turnout, et cetera, et cetera. no one will probably agree with me on this, i'm willing to bet. >> yeah. you have been saying the republican party needs to rebrand. how do you do that and what steps do you think they need to take now? >> you know, i've been a huge advocate of rebranding and one of the things -- i've even criticized the rnc on rebanding. i notice the rnc has put out a good ground game. i feel like obama has dropped the ball on the hispanic and latino vote. i feel like he let them down. this is the republicans' chance to do something and pick um the ball and go with reform. this is our chance. wheth

don't remember except the what he said, but in fact, 40 republican senators including john mccain and lindsey graham, approved of this but it is still not happening. i would also say that president obama should not >> securing the border, if these people are in the country now, do we need to change the policy? they are going to be working in the system. what would you do with these people who are ready to deport thousands? >> i never thought we should deport 11 million people. we should say no to amnesty. my opponent says he is against amnesty. he will say that he did not say that. >> thank you. regarding foreign policy, the u.s. invasion of afghanistan and iraq, was it justified? yes or no. your preferred response to the new threat? >> in terms of afghanistan, yes. we needed to do something to get the muslim extremists there and make sure they did not have the safe havens to attack again. in terms of iraq, it is now being suggested that we were not as thoughtful as we should have been going in there. we have lost thousands of lives and have had tens of thousands of people critically injured. we hav

certainly the lindsey grahams of the world and the john mccains of the world have a different view of how this fight against isil should be prosecuted. and in this process moving forward they'll certainly get an opportunity to voice their opinion on this. you know john mccain is on record saying that airstrikes can mitigate, but it can't stop isil. is the president setting up an scenario where john mccain and other members of the republican caucus feel this way will have to make an argument for more u.s. ground forces on the ground for iraq and syria. >> i think its possible that the president is setting that rhetorical trap. i'm not sure that the republicans are shy expressing that view. john boehner, the speaker of the house, said that the u.s. military needs to have a more forward aggressive posture. including boots on the ground. i think you need to separate the tactical and strategic questions from the simple authorization question that the president is putting on the table. the white house and the president said he didn't need it. now he tells us he wants it. i think there is go

the es, i'm talking about critics of obama like john mccain, lindsey graham, and republican to say that obama is not doing enough. do for the would you situation? a story that ou to was in the "washington journal" the wall s an op-ed in street journal, saying only about half of iraq's operational unit were capable of benefiting from the advice of us military trainers. more than $25 billion to beef up iraq security forces. president obama seeks $1.6 billion to help rebuild those forces. the obama team recognizes the importance of balance of political power in iraq, which why it was important for the us to press for a more inclusive government in baghdad before getting directly involved with airstrikes. help ersonal aiming to iraq's security forces -- iraq and afghanistan these days, combat versus noncombat troops is often a distinction without a difference. up at 9:15 coming am, we'll talk about not only policy in iraq, but this latest analyst currently an and international policy will join us. that discussion will take place at 9:15 am. until then, we are getting your this hts on not on

but john mccain and lindsey graham and others, we'll see tensions there on both of those issues. there is a chance for a corporate tax reform. but we have to keep in mind, businesses ideas is dramatically cut the marginal rates and leave all the preferences alone. and any reform that is not revenue neutral is simply not going to happen. whether you can work some deal out will be interesting to watch. i do think there's a real possibility of infrastructure reform. john delaney has a bipartisan bill in the house, actually pretty strongly bipartisan, to create an infrastructure bank funded through 50-year bonds that now basically are almost cost-free. and they have repatriated profits from companies used with an incentive to buy a portion of those. so you don't have a lot of additional government funding directly. and that could happen. but, again, you're going to see substantial tea party opposition to anything that looks like it's expanding government. and we are going to get a crisis on the highway trust fund again because of the refusal to raise gasoline taxes or to consider any

they will be opposed by richard burr, the chair of the intelligence committee, john mccain and lindsay graham and others. we will see tensions there on both of those issues. there's a chance for corporate tax reform. but we have to keep in mind that business's idea of corporate tax reform is cut marginal rates and leave preferences alone. any reform that is not revenue neutral is simply not going to happen. whether you can work some deal out will be interesting to watch. i do think there's a real possibility of infrastructure reform. john da laelaney has a bill in house. have profits from companies used with an incentive to buy a portion. so you don't have a lot of government funding directly. that could happen if there's a desire to make something happen. again, you will see substantial tea party opposition to anything that looks like it's expanding government. we are going to get a crisis in the highway trust fund again because of the refusal to race gasoline taxes or consider any other revenue source unless you can do something innovative like that. on the bigger issues, forget about it. w

john mccain the former republican candidates by a his side lindsey graham not exactly viewed as a liberal state but a conservative one. marco rubio of florida were immigrants to this country and to jeff lake a conservative republican by every measure. that was the theme. chairman of the immigration and subcommittee from the state of new york i joined him as someone has been involved with these issues bobbin and says the head of the caucus of cuban refugees and michael bennett of colorado who sits down literally four months sometimes angry sometimes cooperative but we wrote a 200 page bill to rewrite the bills to fix the system then may tuck it to committee and patrick leahy open hearings for any amendment that anyone wished then re brought it to the floor had the opportunity to be offered to even strengthen the border security section of the bill. that net result was brought to a vote an incredible day because on june 27 we pass on the floor comprehensive immigration reform by 68 / 3240 republicans joined the democrats and a bipartisan effort to fix the immigration system. it was a proud

but i think you're going do see people like john mccain and lindsay graham.me further authorization or a clearer authorization. now whether that will go to the whole caucus, i don't know what mitch mcconnell's position is on this. but i do think it's something that we, we need to undertake and we need to take some responsibility. to the larger question, of strategy, you know that's, that's the real, that's the real puzzle. i've been working on these issues on intelligence and armed services for a couple of years. they're terribly complex. but the bottom line is we're not going to be able to kill our way out of this problem. we have to figure out what it is that's motivating young people in britain and america and france and certainly throughout the middle east to go and give up their lives to become suicide bombers. in this cause. this is an underlying worldwide problem that we've got to figure out strategically beyond simply drones and air strikes. >> dropping bombs is the easy part of the solution new york city question about that. and to be clear for the r

john delaney as the winner of the sixth congressional district race. election officials counted absentee ballots from five counties. >> coming up next, the hannah graham counts, >> new at 11:00, search and rescue teams spent five weeks scouring charlottesville before the remain s of hannah graham was found. two task force canine officers who helped on that search have a unique specialty. you won't believe what they can do. dr. katie nelson explains. >> they are certified water recovery dogs with virginia task force 1's urban search and rescue team. they travel world with their handlers. >> we don't look for high-profile cases. it is where we end up. >> just last month -- >> we were involved with the hannah graham case. it was mostly wooded areas and open fields. sometimes a little pond. >> they are in high demand. they are trained to find human remains underwater. >> only eight dogs in virginia share that advanced skill which requires years of training. they don't actually get in the water. it is all about odor detection from the surface. >> the body, even when dead, is giving off gases and dead skin cells and that's what is coming up through the wate

senators john mccain and lindsey graham blasted the president calling this sort of back channel routeyou think of it? >> it's not outrageous. presidents use back channels all the time. look, you don't have to trust iran to understand that the united states and iran do have a common interest in trying to defeat isis, and i thought senator mccain and senator graham want to do everything possible to defeat isis. now, we're not cooperating with the iranians militarily. we don't trust them enough for that. we're engaged in these negotiations to try to prevent them from obtaining a nuclear weapon, which is in our interests, which is in the interests of the world, in the interest of our allies in that region, so the president's working very hard to try and prevent iran from getting a nuclear weapon and trying to negotiate a deal to do that. and this is obviously part of the kfgs, again, because in this instance, iran and the united states have a shared interest in defeating isis. >> congressman chris van hollen, best of luck in the next month. we'll see what congress can accomplish. thank yo

if it's a bad deal we're talking about the senate lindsay graham talked about in the opening about not being satisfied. i predict john that you'll see that republican senate probably go after more sanctions. if there's no deal i think it's almost better in a way because at least no one's pretending that we're making progress. everybody goes back to the drawing board. but with that said again you have a new senate coming in republican senate who is probably going to push for more sanctions. any way you look at it, if they don't provide the technical data to those who need it and come to some sort of agreement right now. >> what kind of intelligence goes into monitoring nuclear development in iran? >> actually a question i can't get into all the techniques we use, i'm aware of them but let me say that physical pr proximiy is very critical. because often john there is profiles. a building has a profile, a certain thing has a certain way of doing it. we've looked at this in north korea for example. that is one of the ways that iaea was able to determine that something was violated. those things take a certain rate at a c

>> and those are some very strong words from senator lindsay graham today talking about the house intel report on again gas si, john that is a republican senator dumping on a republican house committee report. >> why? >> because he know what is pat and doug and i have known, congressman mike rogers, the chairman of the house intelligence committee, who all along has been poo-pooing the benghazi thing. his wife was the ceo of aegis, a private security firm that had a $10 billion security contract with the state department in benghazi. >> how does that happen, pat? >> it happens because of all of washington is totally corrupt. this is one kmampbl of how of relatives are done and how contracts are done. washington is so corrupt the american people can't believe it. it's like mitch mcconnell, he's owned by the chamber of congress. he's threatening on the budget to pass a continuing resolution until next september. >> but it's 23409d just one party. >> but it's both parties are both so deep, the fact that we're hoping there other agreement, the other problem is the rogers story, which has been public before and not emph

there are some who would like to deal, people like john mccain eventually or lindsey graham in the senate. mccain was talking to reporters before the end of the week last week and he said, a, he doesn't think that anything would happen he sayster, and b, whatever happens has to start in the house. at senate has taken its shot this. if you're looking for the house to start, good luck for that. that's where the division is strongest. host: people have been looking at past president and the use of -- past presidents and the use of executive orders. holmesme -- eleanor norton tweeted out that people forget that the emancipation proclamation was an executive order. guest: it is technically not white the same. every president in the last half-century, republican and democrat, has done something in this space. under president george h w bush, he legalized 1.5 million illegal immigrants or at least allowed 1.5 million additional immigrants to come in absent explicit congressional approval. what's happening here is different in scope him a larger, and -- scope, larger, and different in political i

talk -- it's a fairy tale for rachel to spin this -- >> you just admitted that lindsay graham and john the senate. >> and marco rubio left them hanging. don't spin it this way, rachel. it's a fairy tale. >> no one is going to disagree on what happened. i think america is really concerned about what's next, what's next for americans trying to come up with a more permanent solution if members of both sides are calling this a broken immigration system that america has. i think, we're going to have to have you back again. and next time we talk, we are going to have to talk about what is happening next. i think that's what people really want to hear as they look into the crystal ball. thank s to both of you appreciae it. >> thanks. >>> up next, the remarkable story of a mother who traveled to a war zone to rescue her daughter from isis. i lost my sight in afghanistan, but it doesn't hold me back. i go through periods where it's hard to sleep at night, and stay awake during the day. non-24 is a circadian rhythm disorder that affects up to 70% of people who are totally blind. talk to your doc

john boehner was so different. >> yeah. >> because, jose, when -- let's look at the fact that even lindsey graham, a republican senator, he criticized the president for considering executive action on immigration, but he said something else very interesting too. i want to play that, jose. >> my belief is, this is a dangerous miscalculation by the president. at the end of the day, the republican party would benefit from getting immigration off the table. it would be hard for me to see how we could win the presidency in 2016, if we're blamed for blocking immigration reform. >> now he says republicans would get blamed for not acting on immigration reform. and check this out. exit polls from tuesday found 57% of americans support a path way to citizenship. jose, if republicans don't act now, how badly will it hurt them in 2016? >> well, i like to look at the past to maybe read tea leaves about the future. you'll remember when mitt romney ran for president against president obama, his immigration policy was that all of the 11 or 12 million people that are living here without documents, the solution on immigration would be they