so, why john hersey. he was not born and bred as a ba new yorker. he came from the organization, but what makes him trust that he could get this story? >> he couldn't have been less from -- he was writing for times magazine and they hated each other, like voluptuous leg, publicly hated each other. reporting for the times in 1939, he was grooming him to be [inaudible] >> sorry to interrupt, but he had a very timely vibe. of that type. [inaudible] >> he was also from -- when you read the dispatch is that he wrote, they are a far cry from what he was writing before for the new yorker later on. >> as somebody who cares only about literary style, i think that's a hugely important question. >> you run with it. >> he had written one hugely significant piece, in historical terms, for the new yorker for that in the pacific, right? >> that's how hersey did come to the new yorker. he actually breaks up with louis because he is far too chauvinistic, patriotically chauvinistic for him and he says thanks but no thanks. he is a freelancer in 1945, but 1944 he had