. >> john holliday, independent economist. i was thinking that one of the reasons that people that are recipients of redistribution are not always happy because they -- says the did not turn it. i have a moral question. not considering the minimum safety net, but when we get to redistribution and i start voting benefits for myself that are from somebody else, it is not enough that -- different from stealing. i am wondering if there isn't a moral case against that kind of activity. i'm not taking a minimum and a mom, but once it benefits me as a middle-class person. >> is there a moral case against voting for your on benefits or to further your own best? for short. as a matter of fact, this is the reason their is a much more rebellion. that is exactly the reason. people recognize that is improper. the danger that we have in this country is that we are going toward a system where we have more takers the makers. about half of the american more alarmingly according to the tax foundation upwards of 70 percent of americans take more