. >> john hurley, i teach at catholic university. in all of the presentations i didn't see any indication at all about religion and certainly extremists, fundamentalist, adherence of religion play a big role in this whole problem as it has develop ed does the department have pa

. >> john hurley, i teach at catholic university. in all of the presentations i didn't see any indication at all about religion and certainly

. >> john hurley, i teach at catholic university. in all of the presentations i didn't see any indication at all about religion and certainly extremists, fundamentalist, adherence of religion play a big role in this whole problem as it has develop ed does the department have any particular section of focus into this area whether both domestically and internationally? >> and one more right here. >> i'm mark rockwell with federal computer week. how is the nature of cyber changes the last qhsr? >> let me take those in order. it's interesting. the statement that during the cold war that the public didn't have much of a role in deterrence, in a sense, though, the entire civil defense mechanism in which individuals were taught what to do and what to act was both for a dprsh a prospective perspective but also to create a deterrent effect. so there were efforts to engage the public in civil defense efforts during the cold war. today with the distributed nature of threats and challenges, the pervasiveness of communications technology, every p

john boehner of caving in to the pressure from the right in suing president obama. we will keep taking your thoughts here on the speakers move over the executive order first, joining us on the phone hurley, from thomson reuters to talk about the decision by the court to protect cell phone policy. decide andey sign -- what impact does it have? caller: they ruled on a unanimous vote, police officers need a warrant to search his cell phone when someone has been arrested. this was a big ruling because this issue has never been decided before by them, taking into account the unique nature cell phones in the current age, everyone has one and everyone is carrying one around with them, with this personal information on the phone. this is not the same of other things you may carry around on there are are just so different and should be treated differently. this,t do they say about the police pull you over, they can go through your wallet and they can go through different things if they think there is evidence of a potential crime. they can search you. what is the difference? the court took into account the ubiquitous nature of the cell phone, and the sheer amount of data that is collected on sma