john jen is considered by many in china to be the leader of the book. warriors may was some of the united states very soon. the group of 7 should take americans pulse and prescribed medication. china's ambassador to france, you shall, yes, is another proponent, he was recently summoned by the french government for insulting an academic. the diplomat says china is merely defending itself from growing criticism of its policies, including allegations of human rights abuses against weak as sinned. young. it's cracked on, on democracy, actress in hong kong, and the handling of the pandemic investigations into the origins of corbett. 19 analysts say the tough approach is hardening attitude towards china in the west and is a stock contrast to the low profile diplomacy pursued by former leader. dom shall ping celine, this kind of tough it. hi, something, money loss and the contradictions. and it shows a lack of patience and effective tech to face at all. that's left this throughout the time for you guys. if it was you, president, she didn't pay her. china is locked in the global war of public opi

john marshall center for constitutional history and civics. welcome to utah, thank you for joining us this evening. >> thanks for having us. >> jen, tell us about john marshall house, what goes on there? >> i am thrilled to talk to you today about the john marshall house but in order to understand the john marshall house, i'm going to say a bit about virginia for the organization is operated so we've been around 132 years the nations oldest statewide organization so we own and operate a john marshall house, and often these count. i have the opportunity to be the director of operations for all the wonderful historic places but we are also an organization that statewide preservation, there's a lot of places we've worked with john marshall and his family would have interacted with. fornt example, we have been in coordination with the community and advocates to support the creation of a 9-acre memorial park at the bottom and we've also worked to preserve randolph masonic lodge in both sides were included as part of our annual sites program so we have a wonderful restoration team and we've been able to restore john marshall's, and the county and wor

i think an embassy, john, this all by jen. do you trust? pretend and bite and apparently noted, but then the white house burg passenger saki flight walk, bought those comments and said, you know, that was so much going on. i think it was just, you know, a bit confusing. he could have been noting at any of those things, quite frankly. we don't know what's going on. what we do know is that both of them are very glad to have met. and they said that this was crucial to normalizing what a clearly very can relation. what did they say that the sort of criticisms and after that i feel to mr. president, i'd like to thank you for your initiative to meet. i know that you've had a long trip and the heavy workload. there are many issues that have accumulated in us russian relations that require the top level discussion. i hope our meeting will be productive. i said i was always the well, just a little taster of what the 2 leaders thinking going into the summer. i can tell you that the journalist who did get in to the villa they were determined to try an

>> john: thanks, jen. >> sandra: so what is black and white and cannot seem to handle a joke?tion after saying they publish false information. the b openly admits to being a satire website. here's a couple headlines. mexico installs stairs to keep buy didn't out. what gender are you? take the quiz. let's bring in molly hemingway. so how should "the new york times" respond? >> they need to retract their false statements about the babylon b. they need to do a better job of covering things in general. they're under a few different lawsuits for defaming people that are politically not leftist. the babylon bee is a great example of this. they're willing to go after anybody and had fun doing that. but they're a satire site. they're not right wing misinformation. "new york times" has routinely had trouble reporting stories in years, but recently with the russia collusion hoax and smears about brett kavanaugh, suppressing discussion about whether the wuhan lab might have leaked the coronavirus. they need to deal with their own problem of misinformation and it's very damaging what they

jen talked was a little little about the john marshall house what goes on there? >> i am absolutely thrilled today detectable the john marshall house. but in order to really understand the john marshall house and going to tell a little bit about preservation virginia the organization that runs and operates the john marshall house. we've been around for one or 32 years of the nation's oldest preservation organization. we actually own and operate the john marshall house smith court, lighthouse and also stork jamestown. so i have the opportunity to be the director of museum operations for all those wonderful historic places. but, we're also an organization that the statewide preservation and there's a lot of people we've actually worked with that john marshall and his family would have interacted with. for example we been in coordination to support the creation of a memorial park. we also worked to preserve the lodge which is also in richmond. both of those sites were included so also had a wonderful restoration team and we have been able to restore john marshall's c

. >> john: there you go jen answering questions.nt biden would consider firing dr. fauci. she says no. the white house full scared behind fauci even as more questions are asked about what did he know, when did he know it, whether the money nhi granted to laboratories in the united states and wuhan was used for gain of function research. >> yes, i guess i would say this. i have read reports and e-mails there. is no smoking gun there that indicates that fauci had a reason to believe this came from the laboratories. from the wuhan virology laboratory. i will answer the question even though jen wouldn't. this is highly political. i promise you it's a major talking point from republicans. think when donald trump speaks tomorrow night in north carolina you will see him go after tpaurb.y let's remember anthony fauci has been on the firing lines protecting americans from public health issues since the mid 80s with aides. before we call for his head, he is a devoted public serve apartment for 40 years. maybe we should slow down. >> john: he'

joe manchin's feet but you can't do that with the john lewis voting rights act that would restore the preclearance restrictions that were struck down. as jenctly, all republicans are standing in the way of s-1 and all but lisa murkowski are opposing the john lewis bill. so what is the responsibility of some of the other republicans who watch what happened on january 6 who are continuing to hear the former president question the results of the election, we've got 30% of their base who are believing him and thinking that joe biden is the illegitimate president as these voting restrictions are being passed in states. what is the responsibility these republicans have? >> that is an excellent question. joe manchin is not alone in opposing this. and i don't think that hr-1s would ever going to pass. i don't think it was written to pass. no one should be surprised that it wasn't going to pass. it was 800 pages. it had all sorts of things that were stuffed in it of questionable constitutionality. i do question the democratic strategy of raising expectations about this unpassable piece of legislation as opposed to putting the emphasize on this john

and john trouble is in the weather center. hi, jen. hey there, daria. we enjoyed a bit of a cool down yesterday for father's day. >> we're going to keep that cooler weather around really through the course of your work week to today or warmest of temperatures only peaking in the 80's. really nice change of pace from the triple digits in 90's that we had just a couple of days ago. you look outside right now shows you some clearing skies over san francisco. this is pretty much the same case all across the bay area skies, gradually clearing out even towards the coastline. now after had what had been some patchy fog and low gray earlier on this morning. right now temperatures are mostly back into the 60's san jose double in conquered egypt. 63 currently well berkeley and san francisco hanging out at 57 degrees. more. your forecast. still to come. first, though, a look at our bridges in the bay bridge. well, it has been a mixed

and john trouble is in the weather center. hi, jen. hey there, daria. we've got a nice day ahead of us. we enjoyed a bit of a cool down yesterday for father's day. >> we're going to keep that cooler weather around really through the course of your work week to today or warmest of temperatures only peaking in the 80's. really nice change of pace from the triple digits in 90's that we had just a couple of days ago. you look outside right now shows you some clearing skies over san francisco. this is pretty much the same case all across the bay area skies, gradually clearing out even towards the coastline. now after had what had been some patchy fog and low gray earlier on this morning. right now temperatures are mostly back into the 60's san jose double in conquered egypt. 63 currently well berkeley and san francisco hanging out at 57 degrees. more. your forecast. still to come. first, though, a look at our bridges in the bay bridge. well, it has been a mixed bag this morning. things have improved gradually all morning long after what was a backup that str

. >> come john, i have had to take questions from you, so i know how hard that job is. i think jenblicans should welcome. because you could fill your entire showing clips of democrats calling for a defunding of the police over the last couple of years. and specifically, take the example that your segment just that, where they are a request to cut $17 million in funding for police. in the last covid bill they are referencing, the biden administration gave california $27 billion. it carries a surplus -- of course they could fund to the police department of oakland, but this isn't a budget issue. it is a political issue, which democrats are intent on cutting funding to the police. it is what they have campaigned on, and it is where their party still is. this is not a budget issue, and the money was there for california if they wanted it. >> john: you mentioned a second ago that we could fill up the rest of our show with quotes from democrats saying defund the police. we want fill up the entire show, but we will take a few seconds. listen here. >> i am for defunding the police. police.

i think, jen, you mentioned that the administrative office of the court, headed by john roberts, has asked for 79 new judgeships to be created. i think that's a good start but that has to be the baseline. we need to look, as congressman john said and we have said, case loads have exploded over the last 30 years and what john roberts is proposing here with these 79 quotes -- new judgeships -- is really only a fraction of what's really necessary. you know, during the carter administration, congress expanded the courts by 13. that, actually, is keeping aligned with the increasing caseload since 1990, with the increasing population since 1990. i think we need a much bigger, more robust expansion of the lower courts to really get to this administration of justice. you know, if you don't have your court case heard for years, that has a big impact, not only on criminal justice, but also on civil justice, and i think those are conversations that absolutely have to be happening at the same time as the one we're having right now on the supreme court. >> and there has been, as you said, biparti

i think, jen, you mentioned that the administrative office of the courts, sort of headed by john roberts, asked for 79 new judgeships to be created. that's a good start, but that has to be the baseline. when you do look, as congressman jones said and leah has said, like, it's exploded over the last 30 years. what john roberts is proposing here with the 79 these 79 courts, new judgeships, is only a fraction of what's really necessary. during the carter administration congress expanded the courts by a third. that actually is keeping in line with the increasing caseload since 1990, with increasing population since 1990. i think we need a much bigger, row robust expansion of the lower courts to really get to this administration of justice. you know, if you don't have your court case heard for years that has a big impact not only on criminal justice but also on civil justice. these are conversations that absolutely have to be happening at the same time as the one we're having right now on supreme court reform. >> and there has been, as you said, jen, bipartisan support for expanding the court

know that white house press secretary jen psaki sometimes watches this show and we want to hedge everything. there's vicki kennedy, the widow of the late senator johnn europe, and caroline kennedy, the daughter of jfk. she could be off to australia. remember, she was president barack obama's second ambassador to japan. why does all of this matter? well, you look at the non-career foreign service people that are going end to up getting ambassadorships under president biden, a lot of them aren't the big dollar donors. they are people that have close personal connections to president biden. they are people that have been longtime aides. and they aren't coming from the donor class. so, yes, biden will probably have around 30% of his ambassadors being non-foreign service types, but a lot of them will end up being really close aides, and that just means the big dollar donors who have donated a lot of money to democratic causes throughout their lifetimes may not get to call themselves ambassadors. jonathan? >> hey, jen, we do hope you're watching. hans, walk us through a little bit. you touched upon the process there for this president, but how about the

john ellen, the president of the brookings institution. it is with great pleasure, i welcome you to this event featuring the nato secretary-general, jens stoltenbergi would like to think our partners in organizing this event, german council on foreign relations (dgap) the german council on foreign relations (dgap), and nato. without them this conversation would not have been made possible. today's address with secretary-general jens stoltenberg, and the conversation later with brookings fritz stern chair, constanze stelzenmÜller, fritz stern chair, come at a critical time. the u.s. welcomes a new presidential administration which under president joe biden has ushered in a new era of u.s. foreign policy. indeed, president biden's upcoming appearance at that nato leaders some ice on june 14 -- summit on june 14, will feature a strong and outspoken american commitment to the transatlantic alliance and nato. as a former commander of nato and u.s. forces in afghanistan, i have seen firsthand the important and indeed, the vital imperative of nato as a strategic and international partner. there is little doubt of nato's value as a force multiplier in tha

john harwood. good morning. >> reporter: good morning. >> what do we know about the timing of the new sanctions on russia or what they could possibly include? >> reporter: well, the white house press secretary jenministration before the summit meeting in geneva to now. so just because we have just learned about these sanctions from jake sullivan doesn't mean that vladimir putin is just learning about them or they reflect any kind of a shift. we do know, though, that republicans have been criticizing the administration saying that they were not tough enough on russia and the entire free world has been concerned and highly critical and condemning of the russians over the treatment of nalvani. they're clearly trying to target them, as jake told dana yesterday that as soon as they identify the proper targets, that's when we'll see the sanctions. that's pretty much all we know at the moment. but it was a striking follow on to that meeting in geneva. remember, the president had a couple of goals. one was to try to put the russian relationship on a stable and predictable basis but the other to stand up to putin and draw a contrast with the way president donald trump was subservient to russian in the p

. >> john: i will ask you about the consequences and a second, but first a summit with vladimir putin june 16th. jennse. >> this will certainly be a topic of discussion harboring criminal entities that are intending to do harm and doing harm to the infrastructure of the united states is not acceptable and we will not stand by that and we will not take options off the table. >> john: we will not take options to the table. what are the options be at this point? >> i think the president should be very clear to putin if these continue, once we do the attributes, which means finding out the source of the tag, that we will hit back. and we will respond with cyber offensive attack. that we are very capable of doing as a nation. only until we have that threat to putin and the russian criminal organization will this bad behavior stop. otherwise, it will continue. and i don't understand president biden awarding putin with this meeting. rewarding him, waving the national security interest to let him complete the pipeline while at the same time shutting down the keystone pipeline in the united states. now attac

jen psaki about that on friday. let's listen to the exchange. >> can you imagine any circumstance where president biederman would never fire out m? >> johnuld be fired at the white house has no intention of doing that. >> i'm reflecting on what i heard from so many people across the state of arkansas last week. they've lost confidence in tony fauci because of his repeated evasions and miss directions and politicized advice. that's very clear going back to the earliest days of this pandemic when, for instance, he did in fact contrary to his protestations now, this got out of hand with the fact that this virus could have originated in n the wuhan labs. we know that this is by far the likely origin for the virus and dr. fauci appears to focus more on protecting his agency which was funding research on those labs and protecting his friends among the chinese scientists working in those labs then trying to get the truth for the american people. that's why so many arkansans have lost confidence in him and it's time for them to go. >> sandra: so do you think there's enough momentum behind your push with other lawmakers to somehow enact change an

john mcginn might get on the scoresheet as well. confident, to — one to scotland. as well. confident, to - one to scotland-— as well. confident, to - one to scotland. , . , ., .., scotland. jent— up this morning but i am feeling confident now.— up this morning but i am feeling confident now. how much would it mean to you _ confident now. how much would it mean to you to — confident now. how much would it mean to you to get _ confident now. how much would it mean to you to get through? - confident now. how much would it mean to you to get through? it. confident now. how much would it i mean to you to get through? it would be phenomenal. _ mean to you to get through? it would be phenomenal, we've _ mean to you to get through? it would be phenomenal, we've not _ mean to you to get through? it would be phenomenal, we've not been i mean to you to get through? it would be phenomenal, we've not been in i mean to you to get through? it would be phenomenal, we've not been in al be phenomenal, we've not been in a tournament— be phenomenal, we've not been in a tournament for 23 years, we've never not tournament for 23 years, we've never got out _ tournament for 23 years, we've never go

john kirby whether or not sec. lloyd austin was going to go up the hill to ask some members -- to assuage some members concerns. both he and jend previously that if it is necessary they will be happy to brief members of congress. it definitely is concern about whether or not, you know, members of congress are being properly consulted, whether article two has become too expensive, but each administration continues to use examples of their predecessors. so far there has not been a legal challenge. host: tennessee, republican line. caller: hello? host: you are on, go ahead. caller: yeah, i am watching this on 700 club. why can't republicans do more to get them democrats from destroying our states, our country? host: caller, what are you talking about? caller: talking about, i'm not hip on all of this, but i am a republican and i can't stand what is going on. now it is the u.s. military policy and i can't believe how democrats, you know, just carrying -- just tearing up america. and the people that just let them do whatever they do, you know? and i don't understand, you know? host: we will go to bob, bob in michigan. caller: i wou