she looked actually at john jerome white. then they brought her back to do the in-person lineup. she picked him out again. then they brought her into court, where she said, yes, i see the man who attacked me in the court today. so from the jury's perspective, well, one two, three, you're out. clearly she remembers very well. but what about those second two identifications? was she remembering the person who attacked her? or was she remembering the photograph she saw a week earlier? when she was brought into court, was she remembering the man who attacked her, or was she remembering the person that she has now seen twice before? we know from research that simply seeing someone's picture on facebook can make it more likely that we will pick them out of an eye witness identification lineup. what this means to me is that we need to handle eye witness memory a lot more likely handle other trace evidence. think about how careful we are with a blood sample. how careful we are to preserve it. how we carefully track the chain of custody. with memory, what do we do? we let people go out in