we cross the john laughlin, he's a university lecturer and in history and political philosophy can jump it anytime you want. and i always appreciate, john, let me go to you. yeah, of course you've been following the news as closely as i have been. and with the, the way the, the, the new iteration of what needs to be done is a ceasefire. creating some kind of security arrangement with ukraine a can to the uh, is really model. i mean, a lot of ink is being spelt a little nonsense because at the end of the day, what needs to be considered end of this conflict and what it's relative account for ukraine, which i think everyone knows it will be destroyed. and the european union will be left holding the bag up some kind of run state. it's very unclear of nato can even survive this debacle. un nato is the problem, nate, because of the existence of nato and its objectives caused this conflict to your thoughts. john? yeah, i mean it's pretty clear, isn't it, that there are different factions within the american administration? they're obviously the neo con holtz and, but there also seem to be som

we have john laughlin. he is a university lecture in history and political philosophy and in washington we cross matthew cross and he is director of academic transformation about way state university. i gentleman cross type roles and effect. that means you can jump anytime you want. and i always appreciate, john, let me go to you in paris. i mean, you and i have known each other and you, but on this program, as long as the french president micron has been in office and you and i have pointed out a number of times that entered dig gall trying to fight its way out of him. sometimes he gets de gaulle curious, but i don't take him seriously anymore because even when he says those kind of things the next day says something different, i think that is really emblematic of europe's place in the world today. go ahead, john. yeah, i mean, the big difference between a menu and michael and a charles to go live there are so many of them is that all would never have talked about europe. european autonomy to gold talked a

we cross the john laughlin is a university lecturer and in history and political philosophy. all right, gentlemen, cross stock rules and effect, that means you can jump anytime you want. and i always appreciate, john, let me go to you. yeah, of course you've been following the news as closely as i have been. and with the, the way, the, the, the new iteration of what needs to be done as a ceasefire, creating some kind of security arrangement with ukraine. a can to the, uh, is really model. i mean, a lot of ink is being spelt, a lot of people are talking and it's all nonsense because at the end of the day, what needs to be considered is what's gonna happen at the after the end of this conflict and what its ramifications will be mostly for your up or ukraine, which i think everyone knows it will be destroyed and the, the european union will be a.

we have john laughlin. he is a university lecture in history and political philosophy and in washington we cross matthew crossed and he is director of academic transformation at bowie state university. high gentleman cross sack rose in effect. that means you can jump any time you want. and i always appreciate, john, let me go to you in paris. i mean, you and i have known each other knew, but on this program, as long as the french president mcfarland has been in office and you and i have pointed out a number of times that enter did gall trying to fight its way out of him. sometimes he gets to gall curious, but i don't take him seriously anymore because even when he says those kind of things and.

we cross the john laughlin is a university lecture and in history and political philosophy. all right, gentlemen, cross our rules and effect. that means you can jump anytime you want. and i always appreciate, john, let me go to you. yeah, of course you've been following the news as closely as i have been, and with the, the way the, the, the new iteration of what needs to be done as a ceasefire. creating some kind of security arrangement with ukraine. a can to the, uh, is really model. i mean, a lot of ink is being spelt, a lot of people are talking. and it's all nonsense because at the end of the day, what needs to be considered is what's gonna happen at the after the end of this conflict and what its ramifications will be mostly for your upper ukraine, which i think everyone knows it will be destroyed. and the, the european union will a left or holding the bag up some kind of run state. it's very unclear of nato can even survive this debacle. the nato is the problem, nate, because of the existence of nato and its objectives. cause this conflict, your thoughts, john? yeah, i