it's john marshall. [laughter] and they hear the case, they hear the evidence. there's absolutely not a shred of evidence against burr, and marshall throws the case out, and is jefferson hated him for that. burr, of course -- jefferson had a lot of friends everywhere in the south. burr was fearful of his life and fled to europe, lived in europe for, until jefferson's administration came to an end, then came back, and his wife and son were still in this country, and the boy had died shortly before he arrived. and the wife, theodocia, gets on a ship -- she was in the south -- to meet him in new york, and the ship was never heard from ever again. he lived out the rest of his life practicing law in new york quietly, a substantial law practice. but jefferson is responsible for destroying this man's life and costing america a great, a great american hero. so he hated marshall for ruling against him in the united states v. burr. but, again, there was not a shred of evidence, and marshall did the right thing. >> footnote, it was george clinton. roger's the brother, half

i suppose the first question that i would put to you is why john marshall and why now caps indeedjohn marshall did save the nation. i think john marshall probably is most important of the founding fathers after george washington himself. george washington helped to create the nation that john marshall supreme court chief justice the first, the fourth chief justice but the first effective one used the court to defend the nation against potential tyranny by the executive and judicial branches of government. the constitution is a very big government. almost all powers to the house of representatives. the only potter elected directly by the pew will themselves. the senate was a pointed by the various state legislatures at the time. the president was elected by the who themselvesge were appointees of the state legislatures, and the judiciary, the third branch of government was simply a court of appeals, no power to it here appeals and --her uphold or tonight tonight the decisions of the lower court. chief justice marshall stepped in at a time when washington had and the successor founding

better use of the land so we could take it from them. >> i grew up in texas in a town named after john marshall. marshall, texas. no one ever told me what chief justice john marshall said in that 1823 decision you just mentioned in which he refers to indians as hethens and fierce savages and you say this is one of the most important indian rights case ever handed down. >> absolutely. >> because. >> because it defines the property rights of indigenous people in this country and it says upon discovery the european nation or the nation that succeeds to its interest the u.s. and great britain holds superior title and sovereigntry to the land belonging to the indians. it can be taken away by purchase, conquest or any other means. the reason this case is important is it sets the foundation for this radical approach to understanding the basic human rights of indian people to hold and control the lands that they occupy. it gives the u.s. government the right to relocate. stands at the bottom of the ethnic cleansing campaigns in the removal era and it's continued to be cited today by the supreme court.

we have book events on abraham lincoln and george washington and john marshall. we are giving the liberty medal to mulala on the legacy of james madison. on october 27, the opening of the gallery, presided over by justice samuel alito with governor jeb bush. the gallery is being named after president george h.w. bush. so it is going to be an incredible fall season. i hope you will join us. i could not be more excited than to open this amazing panoply o f discussions on the bill of rights with my friend and colleague and one of the most distinct constitutional theorists i america, -- in america richard epstein. richard's new book, "the classical liberal constitution" is the culmination of a career rethinking constitutional interpretation and making him one of the most distinctive constitutional voices of our time. in our discussion this evening, we will discuss how richard offers a powerful alternative to the conventional theories of constitutional interpretation, namely conservative original is -- originalism and progressive living constitutionalism. he calls it

we have the government on john marshall. the freedom medal. on october 27, the of rights the bill gallery. the gallery is being named after george h. bush. it will be an incredible fall season. for all ou will join us of it. i could not be more excited to open this panoply of discussions on the bill of rights. with my friend and colleague, one of the most distinguished constitutional theorist, richard epstein. the "the ew book, classical liberal constitution: for limited n quest government." in our discussion is evening, we'll discuss how richard to the an alternative conventional theories of interpreting the constitution. of the classic liberal constitution. be thrilling to see the power of his ideas. by cannot be better served my friend, ted ruger. he has written about american legal institutions by the supreme court. we will have a great conversation. all right, richard, we had so much to discuss. i will jump right in with one of the most striking of your claims, which you make throughout the book, but in in the conclusion, using the centra

john marshall knows that protection from childhood vaccines can weaken over time. do you think it's reasonable to expect that we may be looking in the near future at a new battery of booster shots for adults? >> i think the concept of additional booster shots for adults makes good sense. >> reporter: for whooping cough adults should get the tdap vaccine every ten years. protecting against tetanus, diphtheria and per tusis. if you've never had the chickenpox or vaccine, get it now. two doses at least four weeks apart. for mumps, anyone born after 1957 should consider a booster of the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine. for chickenpox more painful blisters and risk of pneumonia. as for mumps, more severe inflammation that in some cases can lead to infertilate. so while there are individual recommendations and we don't want to broad blanket everything, brian, these are real conversations to be had as adults. what shots might i need to protect myself? >> as a hockey fan i can't believe we're talking about mumps this season. nancy, thank you. as always. >>> we're back i

on top is john marshall and joseph story. they are said to be discussing marbury versus madison.unfortunately the architect said they are not talking about marbury at all. the facts shouldn't interfere with a good story. you have the text and the statute. if the statute conflicts with the text one of the other has to yield. enforcing the judgment, we are deciding a simple case between mar bury and madison. to do so we have to see which text controls and the constitution trumps the statute. there is no judicial review clause in the constitution. there is a provision that the court will decide cases and controversies. h marshall said we have to decide if the statute conflicts with the constitution and we have to decide the constitution you are dealing with writing. not dealing with broader interpretation that you might expect from the political branches. at least on the theory of how law was practiced at the time. you are not imposing your will. talking about the concept of higher law. here we are talking about the underlying tradition that there is a higher law underlying rights.

apologized for his criticism of taney and called him, quote, a worthy successor of chief justice john marshall. as historians newmeyer puts it, quote, had the taney court rested on its laurels in 1856, it would have surely gone down as one of the most popular and effective courts in our historyx in 1857, taney's reputation changed dramatically because of his decision in one case, of course. dred scott versus sanford. in that case, the enslaved missouriian dred scott sued for his freedom after he lad been taken by his master into free territory and having lived there for two years before being brought back to missouri. the court ruled against scott holding that he was still a slave. now an enormous amount of ink is spilled on this case and i do not intend to discuss the constitutional and legal details. but a basic understanding of what taney did and wrote in this case is essential for understanding the rapid decline in his reputation. taney's opinion in dred scott contained two significant points of law. first, taney held that african-americans whether slave or free had not been included in th

apologized for his criticism of taney and called him, quote, a worthy successor of chief justice john marshall. as historians newmeyer puts it, quote, had the taney court rested on its laurels in 1856, it would have surely gone down as one of the most popular and effective courts in our history. in 1857, taney's reputation changed dramatically because of his decision in one case, of course. dred scott versus sanford. in that case, the enslaved missourian dred scott sued for his freedom after he lad been taken by his master into free territory and having lived there for two years before being brought back to missouri. the court ruled against scott holding that he was still a slave. now an enormous amount of ink is spilled on this case and i do not intend to discuss the constitutional and legal details. but a basic understanding of what taney did and wrote in this case is essential for understanding the rapid declinei in his reputation. taney's opinion in dred scott contained two significant points of law. first, taney held that african-americans whether slave or free had not been included in th

supreme court john marshall.re's some point beyond which taxation am akmart loir media members such as clear heeders and msnbc is still one. now they run so far even the most ridiculous people get upset. >> is feeding the homeless a crime? a new law in one florida town says it is. >> two pastors and a 90-year-old were raised for feeding the homeless. >> they passed rules on public food sharing. whennal shap ton gets upset about the nanny state he e-mailed the mayor and told us the man was not arrested. what's your take? >> he has been feeding the homeless in a park for over 35 years. >> yeah, he is a chef. the mayor said he is not trying to outlaw them they are trying to make it safe. if you raise the cost of food you have -- al sharpton brings with us. there's something called a public square. mir chance were saying they have all of these vagrants urinating in front of my store the diners can't eat outdoors. the houn gets to police the public square. >> you can make a much stronger case for regulation in a squar

we know from a previous earlier supreme court, john marshall says the power to tax is the power to destroy. so there's some point beyond which taxation really can accomplish whatever a government wants. stossel: as i said earlier, members of the media act like control freak's cheerleaders, and i was one once, msnbc is still one. but now maybe the states have gone so far that the most ridiculous people get upset. >> is feeding the homeless a crime? a new law in one florida town says it is. >> two pastors and a 90-year-old volunteer are facing jail time after they were arrested for feeding the homeless. stossel: what? really? yes, ft. lauderdale passed rule on public food sharing. how and where you can give people food. and boy, when al sharpton gets upset about the nanny state, they have gone overboard. we e-mailed the mayor, the 90-year-old man was not arrested. what's your take. >> this is a guy feeding the hoelts homeless in a park for over 35 years. stossel: he's a chef. >> he's been doing it, the mayor's take is that he's not trying to outlaw this, just trying to make it safe. simple e

and then a beautiful new biography of john marshall. i love the fact that the authors are ideologically diverse. substantive. the 223rdr 15, anniversary of the ratification of the bill of rights. thank you. >> thank you so much. c-span live today in philadelphia for a daylong forum on the bill of rights. we just heard from jeffrey rosen, leading the conversations this morning. the hearing from the author of the book, "the great debate: edmund burke, thomas paine, and the birth of right and left." starting shortly, scheduled to start in about five minutes. i would wait for the next conversation to begin it will take a look at the release of the senate report detailing enhanced interrogations techniques. we will watch as much of it as we can before the conversation starts back up here at the constitution center in philadelphia. we want to start with the release of the senate interrogation report and how it was received by u.s. allies and adversaries last week. guest: any ally of the united states like germany or england or france or other

story when daniel webster made his argument in the dartmouth college case, there were tears in john marshal'sit's a good story and somebody tells it at some point in the history of writing up these incidents. and it's too good for people not to repeat. i just need to say it happened. >> i wanted to talk about holmes' view of lincoln.k&uñ when people asked him about lincoln later on, he didn't really putly con in the great man category. and i'm cure yougs as to why you thought that. i don't really know the answer to that question. he did vote for lincoln in 1864. he did in 1860 because he couldn't yet vote in 1860. one might have thought that i think his father, oliver wendell holmes senior did. and it may have something to do with a kind of skepticism with which he emerged from the war about so much of everything. >> well, he comes out of the war with a very strong sense of what a mess, the campaigns were. really, the experience of the potomac would have confirmed that. he sees people randomly shot. he gets randomly shot. he sees people run to their desk because somebody gives them the wrong

so i'm inclined to put this in the same category as when daniel webster made his plea in the john marshall the history of writing up these incidents and it's too good for people not to repeat. that isn't to say it didn't happen. >> so, before we go, i wanted to talk about holmes' views about lincoln. because it seems like that not only was holmes after his wartime experience ambivalent about the war, but he was also ambivalent about lincoln. when people asked him about lincoln later on, he didn't really put lik con even in the great man category. i was curious as to why you thought that. >> i don't really know the answer to that question. i've been curious about it, too. i find it puzzling. he did vote for lincoln in 1864. there's no doubt about that. he didn't in 1860 because he couldn't get vote in 1860. but you're quite right that he never really expressed the kind of reverence for lincoln and admiration for lincoln and profound respect for lincoln's leadership and what lincoln stood for that one might have thought that, i think, his father, oliver wendell holmes sr., did. and it may ha

and the lives and work of john marshall. >> tonight, mary gray on the ethics raised by internet companieshe academic research on that information. >> it is a great question. somebody uses a computer every day and we have certain expectations when we fire up our computers about who sees what we were doing. , if theoment expectations i have are shifted because i realized it might be another party who sees what i am doing. say if a message pops up and asked if i would like some help making a purchase, there are certain lines we don't know we cross them until it is too late. that is true for researchers and companies. it isn't a clear sense of what is creepy. one person may not have a problem if they see them on a bench and listening to that conversation. you cannot summon tried to have a conversation and will go to great lands to be secluded. they are not just dealing with the cultural context but individual preferences and experiences around privacy. >> tonight at 8:00 eastern on "the communicators," on c-span-2. >> this morning steve clemons talks about the senate report on the cia's enhan

so i'm inclined to put this in the same category as when daniel webster made his plea in the john marshall, there were tears in his eyes. it's a good story and somebody tells it at some point in the history of writing up these incidents and it's too good for people not to repeat. that isn't to say it didn't happen. >> so, before we go, i wanted to talk about holmes' views about lincoln. because it seems like that not only was holmes after his wartime experience ambivalent about the war, but he was also ambivalent about lincoln. when people asked him about lincoln later on, he didn't really put lik con even in the great man category. i was curious as to why you thought that. >> i don't really know the answer to that question. i've been curious about it, too. i find it puzzling. he did vote for lincoln in 1864. there's no doubt about that. he didn't in 1860 because he couldn't get vote in 1860. but you're quite right that he never really expressed the kind of reverence for lincoln and admiration for lincoln and profound respect for lincoln's leadership and what lincoln stood for that one mig

so i'm inclined to put this in the same category as when daniel webster made his plea in the john marshall, there were tears in his eyes. it's a good story and somebody tells it at some point in the history of writing up these incidents and it's too good for people not to repeat. that isn't to say it didn't happen. >> so, before we go, i wanted to talk about holmes' views about lincoln. because it seems like that not only was holmes after his wartime experience ambivalent about the war, but he was also ambivalent about lincoln. when people asked him about lincoln later on, he didn't really put lik con even in the great man category. i was curious as to why you thought that. >> i don't really know the er

i think it was alexander hamilton and then john marshall and finally the supreme court in the '30s that said, while the congress reign supreme in domestic affairs, the president is the sole organ of the nation in dealing with foreign countries. and there is a line of cases that basically says when it comes to external matters, the president is king. but there's a more current line of cases, applied primarily to protect economic interests, domestic economic interests like the property, civil liberties and state's rights. we're beginning with the famous steel seizure cases in the trumen administration. the court has said that the powers of the president are not fixed but fluctuate with the powers and the implementation, the execution of those powers by congress. so that means that when we talk about traditional areas of presidential power, and particularly in the cuban context, it casts a very long shadow and it will influence the debate. and if a case should ever come to the supreme court, that would certainly be something that would have -- would be of central concern. just to recall so

last, i'd like to thank senator cleland for employing john marshall. good to see john here.ally appreciate you and what you do for our veterans and thank you for serving our buried around the globe. i happened to visit one of your places in france, one of your cemeteries in france this year. it was very well kept up. i really appreciate that you take your mission seriously and honor our heroes regardless of where they happened to have their final resting place. >> thank you very much, mr. congressman. >> thank you. i yield back the balance and i want to again thank the chairman and wish him great luck on his future. things. >> thank you very much. i have one more question. i'll open it up to the other members also if they have another one or if they want another five, feel free. only because the first meeting that i had with secretary mcdonald, he sat down and he said something that really got the wheels turning. to address nca and strategic plan moving forward because specifically after these conflicts we're coming out of, are we prepared for the volume that we're going to

last i'd like to thank senator cleland for employing one of my constituents john marshall and i certainly -- it is good to see john here but i really appreciate you and what you do for our veterans and thank you for serving our veterans that happen to be buried around the globe. i happened to visit one of your places in france, one of your cemeteries in france this year. it was very well kept up. i really appreciate that you take your mission seriously and honor our heroes regardless of where they happen to have their final resting place. >> thank you very much, mr. congressman. >> thank you. i yield back the balance and i want to thank the chairman and wish him great luck on his future. i know you've got great things. >> thank you very much. >> we'll miss you as a blocker. >> thanks. only because the first meeting that i had with secretary mcdonald, he sat down and he said something that really got the wheels turning. i know arlington is a kind of strategic plan. i want to address the statement mr. walters about n.c.a. and strategic plan moving forward specifically after these conflicts.

she is the recipient of the attorney general's john marshall award and the award for fraud prevention. prior to joining the criminal division, she was partner at the law firm where she was cochair of the investigations and white collar practice group. general caldwell received her degree in economics from penn state university and jd from george washington university law center. join me in welcoming the assistant attorney general and thank you for your public service. i am looking forward to her comments as we kickoff the conference. >> good morning and welcome to the criminal division's symposium on cyber crime. before we start i would like to thank georgetown for hosting the conference. it's much better than if we had it at the doj where the food is not as good. thank you for traveling from all over the count skpree in some cases all over the world to contribute their expertise on these important issues that we will be discussing today. we assembled an impressive array from academia, law enforcement and the private sector and privacy groups and aul three branches of government. we l

the clerk: john marshall harlan 2901 -- h.r.2901, an act to strengthen senator paul warner poor the poor act. the presidinis there objection g to the measure? without objection. mr. walsh: i ask unanimous consent the bill be considered read a third time and the senate proceed to vote on passage of the bill. the presiding officer: without objection. hearing no further debate, all those in favor say aye. all those opposed, say nay. the ayes appear to have it. the ayes do have it. the bill is passed. mr. walsh: i ask unanimous consent the motion to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table, with no intervening action or debate. the presiding officer: without objection. mr. walsh: i ask unanimous consent that the committee on judiciary be discharged from further consideration of h.r. 1068, and the senate proceed to its immediate consideration. the presiding officer: the clerk will report. the clerk: h.r. 1068, an act -- to enact title 54 united states code, national park service and related programs as positive law. the presiding officer: is there objection? without objection, th

will close with , looking conversation at the longest-serving chief justice in american history, john marshall. in about an hour we will be back here at the constitution center for the bill of rights festival. in the meantime, we will take a look at former nsa contractor edward snowden. he video conference from russia to a cato institute meeting and he answered questions for about an hour. are bringing -- we want him to be able to be heard as well as to hear us -- obviously we had a year of disclosures that ignited a very fierce debate. for someone who paid such a high price, do you feel satisfied with what hasn't folded, what you have seen? maybe a proposal, getting something past with a presidential directive. are you satisfied with the reaction you have had? >> can everyone hear me? >> hello. >> ok. i am broadly satisfied with what has happened. we have seen an extraordinary change in public awareness. openness and ial would say, innovative spirit in american government. not by choice. know, they decided they would be more transparent in the future because they recognized these policies of

someone else has suggested that he has been compared to john marshall harland. someone else has suggested that he should be counted alongside holmes and marshall as a visionary. court watching is always a tricky business and no one has made that clearer than our second nominee, samuel alito who, in his prize-winning note analyze the behind the scenes negotiations in the early clause cases like maccallum. in that note, he catalogued, and i am quoting him, "a long list of outwardly plausible but that they mistaken interpretations that -- badly mistaken interpretations that resulted from attempts to discern." he understood that outsiders cannot begin to guess at the negotiations and the endless compromises involved in constructing an opinion for the court. if you examine the career of justice thomas, you will find a dedicated to public service. so also, the career of samuel alito from the united states attorney office to the office of legal counsel to the third circuit court of appeals to his current chambers. public service was in his genes. his father, an italian

john kerry. while back in iran hard line supporters are still marshaled to spout antiamerican slogans. >> why should they be sent into the street to say death to america? >> if america showed some good faith not just now, things would be different. >> you call a year of talks good faith? >> yes, i think that's what's happening on the street. is one thing. what's happening at the table in vienna or geneva is another thing. >> exactly. two irans and two visions. lost in an epic struggle to determine the country's future. elizabeth palmer, cbs news tehran. >> still ahead here what it looks like when 2,000 couples are all married at the same time. >> a narrow escape in china. a sinkhole opened up in the middle of an intersection in fujon province. most avoided it but one car got stuck as you see here. the people made it out but the car fell right out. it's believed that shifting sands beneath the roadway opened up the hole. >>> floating christmas tree, not a tree designed to look like a tree. 280 feet tall and uses 3.1 million lights we're told not counting the fireworks. also in brazil today the larges

no long thereafter, a no long thereafter, a no long thereafter, a federal marshal taking his demand the release of this john merriman. he was turned around at the fort's dates by union soldiers under the orders of the commander officer cease he took hi orders from the president, so really here at ft. mchenry in the early days of the civil ware was a constitutional crisis, the time where at least one representative of the judicial and executive branches came at loggerheads with one another. these were swift decisive measures that the administration tube to secure baltimore. by securing baltimore for the union cause, it helped keep the state of maryland from seceding from the union. that resulted in maryland staying loyal to the union cause as well. so ft. mchenry was important union fort during the american civil war years. id also like to take you into a cell where very few visitors go where you can see where lincoln violated the constitution again, ironically to help a confederate soldiers. so the cells we're about to walk past, this was solitary confinement during the american civil war suspected spies we

john. >> reporter: hi, sharrie. i talked to the fire marshal a short time ago.mation from a scheduled autopsy in this case. the family says the victims were a couple who were married for more than 60 years. a family in pain, coming to grips with the fact that during the joyous holiday season they must make plans to bury a mother and a father. >> we had great parents. the most lovely person. >> reporter: retired factory worker 87-year-old pedro morales and his wife 88 year old miriam vega perished in this fire that ripped through their home in reading last night. neighbor anna dell cruise heard screams for help from the couple's daughter who looked after the elderly parents. [speaking foreign language] >> the interpreter: she was saying my mother, my father, they're suffocating. help me. >> reporter: she says firefighters responded quickly but the blaze was intense. family members say a son an daughter of the couple tried to enter the burning building but were stopped. [speaking foreign language] >> the interpret

marshal although he's a civilian. secretary of cabinet now because sir john french was ready to go home. let's face it.nuously panicked. he was going south of paris. he was looking for whichever harbor he could get to quickest. so i think kitschner's resolve was absolutely critical. now, on the british, since you should know, i'm obviously from canada, and we just have nothing but triumphalism of the bef. i mean my god the french did nothing, the russians did nothing, but the bef stopped the schlieffen plan. i read a marvelous book by seoul tyng, t-y-n-g, british colonel, the battle of the marne, before all the documents were out, and you will hardly hear of the book because he was totally ostracized in england by writing a about the bef. hague, a cabinetry member is 16Ñ absolutely hesitant about exploiting the gap. british fliers are constantly reporting there's nobody ahead of you. sir john french said it's a trap, it's a trap, it's a trap. we see dust up there. well the dust are the supply lines of kluck's army, which is racing up to the orc to fight maunoury six army. there is a gap but the british

marshal taking his orders came to ft. mchenry to demand the release of this john merryman. and he was turned away at the fort's gates by union soldiers under the orders of the commanding officer of ft. mchenry saying he took his orders from the president and the president ordered that merryman stay detained. so really here at ft. mchenry in those early days of the civil war was a constitutional crisis. a time where at least one representative of the judicial branch and the executive branch came at one another. these were swift, decisive measures that the union, the lincoln administration took to secure baltimore for the union cause. by securing baltimore for the union cause, it helped keep the state of maryland from seceding from the union. and that resulted in maryland staying to the union cause, as well. ft. mchenry was an important union. very few visitors go where we can also see where lincoln violated the constitution again. and ironically, to help a confederate soldier. the cells we're about to walk past, this was solitary confinement during the american civil war, su

as you well know, he comes in the blue uniform of a field marshal, even though he is a secretary in the cabinet now, because sir john lrq home. let's face it. he continuously panicked. he was going south of paris. he was looking for whichever harbor he could get to quickest. and so i think i&xpqkitchener' resolve was absolutely critical. now on the british, since you should know i'm obviously from canada, and we just have nothing but triumphalism of the bef. i mean, my god, the french did nothing. the rkujju did nothing. but the bef stopped the germans. but also i read a marvelous book by sewell tyng, published 1935, british colonel, the battle of the marne. before all the documents were out. and you will hardly hear of the book because he was totally ostra sized in england by writing about the bef. hague, a calvariman, is absolutely hesitant about exploiting the gap. british flyers are constantly reporting, there's nobody ahead of you. sir john french and hay said, it's a trap, it's a trap, it's a trap. we see dust up there. well, the dust are the supply lines of kluk's army, which is racing up to the ork to fight

marshall. i certainly good to see john b here, but i really appreciate you and what youçffy dobaquy for our veteransened to. places in france one of your cemeteries in france this [÷&gpyear.gwhx it was very well kept up. i r;f!eÑ appreciates0g that you take your missiong&sjdbç seriously and honor our heroes regardless of wc@qr"átk happen#ex:=b ut their final resting place. >> thank you very ip&kmuch, mr. congresh>k8 >> i yield back thes i want to thank the chairman and wish him great luck on his future.talçd(i know you've got >> thank you very much. >> we'll miss you as a a >> thanks. >> i have oneaxéma]÷ more question. Äf:" hopeopen it up to the other members if they have another one or five feel f 5 only because the firstÑcrgfbk meeting that i hadgld with secretarykklñ múm down and he said something thatldÑ really got theêb?z wheels turning. and i know strategic plan. i want to address really,,a walters, about kch6nca and strategic plan moving forward9s!>s specifically after these conflicts were coming outvfç ofh9s. -- are we prepared to have and what3hjy studies, plans d75&/have to be able to dea

investigation continues this evening aiding the fire marshal's office we're told are investigators with the reading police department. live in reading, john rawlins channel6 "action news." monica. >> thank you john. >>> new information on a breaking story from glenolden delaware county for you right now. chopper 6 hd over a crash involving three vehicles moments ago here in the 100 block of south chester pike. now, witnesses are telling us police tried to stop a vehicle and then that the driver took off and was somehow involved in the accident. those witnesses say the driver who fled from police has died at the scene. we are still gathering more information on this breaking story for you at this hour. >>> officials say the south jersey police officer who hit and killed a 10-year-old boy last night was responding to an urgent call. matthew mccloskey and two friends were walking to a sleep overin franklin township when it happened. they were walking with two adults. families say matthew started to cross the street as others saw a fast approaching vehicle. they called for matt to come back but it was too late. the witness says the cruiser's

it really involved these two guys kind of marshalling their forces here. house speaker john, but perhaps more significantly, president obama working the telephone with lawmakers, something he generally doesn't seem to like to do. but he was trying to convince them to hold their noses and vote for this. apparently -- based on what we heard on the house floor, had limited effectiveness. >> i'm enormously disappointed that the white house feels that the only way they can get a bill is to go along with this. why in the last minute as you head out the door and a spending bill must be passed are you making it a priority to do wall street's bidding? who do you work for? wall street or the american people? this fight isn't about conservatives or liberals. it's not about democrats or republicans. it's about money and it's about power right here in washington. >> many democrats on the left upset about a couple of provisions in this spending package. one would allow banks to make riskier investments. the other would lift donor limits to political parties. some republicans, on the other

dana marshall with transnational strategy group. thank you, john.bassador, my question is back to energy but not so much the nuclear but the gas side. prior ukrainian governments sought the importation of liquified natural gas requiring transit through the turkish straits. i wonder if, in light of the new government there, the presumptive cancellation of south stream and shall we call it fragile though concluded agreement between russia, ukraine with the e.u. brokerage just in the last few weeks, how does this fit together? is the ukrainian government likely to be interested once again in that option? might they mount a diplomatic effort in ankara? and is turkey perhaps more or less likely to accept that given all the other factors? >> a couple of different questions there. i will fall back on my remark about the hazards of the ukraine predictions right now. but i will certainly say that for this government diversification of gas supplies is a strategic priority, a strategic priority that the united states supports. over the short term, the best way

marshals the evidence to form your case. whatever it is. you just fine evidence to fit it, you ignore the evidence that does not fit it. john: believe believe in ghosts and global warming but aliens? about a third of americans believe in ufo's. do you think there are aliens? um, yes. >> aliens, yes. >> absolutely. >> yes. >> yes, i do. >> 100%. john: i mean kpwharbg is that about what isthat about? >> aliens are like, gods or something bigger than us, people think that everything happens for a reason, that way things unfold in life are designed there is manage out there that kind of tries to make sense of the whole universe, makes sense directs and controls things, aliens are a version of that. there is somebody out there that knows about us, and is watching us that thing. john: i look at numbers, they are appalling to me. 42% ghost, 36% ufos, astrology, witches, reincarcarnation, it ms me wonder why do people become democrat or republicans? >> it is a tribal believe, you gravitate toward the world view that is best for you, then you find evidence to fit it. john: what your parents believe or friends believe, how does check

marshal although he's a civilian. secretary of cabinet now because sir john french was ready to go home. let's face it. he continuously panicked. he was going south of paris. he was looking for whichever harbor he could get to quickest. so i think kitschner's resolve was absolutely critical. now, on the british, since you should know, i'm obviously from canada, and we just have nothing but triumphalism of the bef. i mean my god the french did nothing, the russians did nothing, but the bef stopped the schliefen plan. i read a marvelous book by seoul tyng, t-y-n-g, british colonel, the battle of the marne, before all the documents were out, and you will hardly hear of the book because he was totally ostracized in england by writing a about the bef. hague, a cabinetry member is absolutely hesitant about exploiting the gap. british fliers are constantly reporting there's nobody ahead of you. sir john french said it's a trap, it's a trap, it's a trap. we see dust up there. well the dust are the supply lines of kluck's army, which is racing up to the orc to fight maunoury six army. there is a gap but the bri

john boehner has in common with president obama. mom jeans. [ laughter ] they both wear them. you know, if we could get those two to take a trip to marshallsogether, maybe we could make some progress. winter storm cato, as the weather channel has christened it, is causing a number of flight delays. more than 1,000 flight cancellations today in the united states. whether that is good or bad news depends on how much you like your family. a lot of people have to fight with their parents via skype this year. here in l.a., in spite of the perfect weather we had, we had the worst traffic in the country today. traffic in l.a. is so bad, people are on the 405 tonight headed to next year's thanksgiving dinner. [ laughter ] and of course, some people are skipping thanksgiving to wait in line to shop. people are already camped out for black friday. some people have been there for a week. the people i feel worse for are the 97-year-old walmart greeters. it doesn't seem like they should be the first line of defense against these door buster crowds. i'm always shocked by the number of people who do this, who wait in line for days. 20 years ago, maybe, b

up the next morning by the marshals my so-called incarceration lasts 120 120 days and the judge says time served. >> you have been patient. >> very patient, since 1963 when john kennedy was assassinated. just trying to get to the bottom. i hope you i hope you don't cut me off. am i still on the air? >> we are listening. go ahead. be quick. >> thank you for mentioning oliver north. all the way from john kennedy's assassination i i don't know if you have seen the new photos of george bush senior and dealey plaza on the day kennedy was assassinated, through watergate when george bush senior asked nixon to resign through iran contra when george bush senior. >> ronald where are you going with all of this? go ahead and wrapup. >> i want to compliment john dean for having the guts to say any of this because so many people have been killed their books about how many people have killed. >> a lot going on there. we are goin lose i would be amazed but their were hundreds of people. >>host: how do conspiracy theories connecting dots that may or may not have been a part how does that begin? >>guest: some of the most aggressive conspiracy theories are pushed what i call co