john marshall thought it would be one opinion. they would speak for the court. ere should be no dissent. the opinion.write it is remarkable that the early marshall court, almost all of the decisions are written by the chief justice. but when the boarding house down, sooke -- broke did the -- clear there is evidence that the justices were proud of their hometowns. john marshall sent virginia ham to john story and john story reciprocated by sending shellfish caught. along with salted cod. you have to so good, he was not sure virginians would know what to do with it. my question is for both justices starting with justice ginsburg, are there examples of justices today on the court bringing food from their hometowns or back from their travels? >> we had in intrepid hunter on the court to would bring everything back from fish to fowl to wild boar. : justiceotomayor breyer not so long ago decided he needed to introduce his grandchildren to game caught by colleague, pheasant, and presented it at home to his grandchildren but he said they had to be careful because there m

what are the important ingredients of eating for me -- and the first is good conversation and john marshall fills the bill. second, the food. i would have wanted to have harlan with his platter of eeses because-- ch i love good food. storytelling and thurgood marshall, i understand was a justice on the court over told you so i've have been told by some of my colleagues that he has never told a story twice. i would have loved to have been in conversation with him and to hear some of his stories. that would be the perfect dinner table for me. >> the one justice, as much as i admire him, i would not want him as my dinner partner and that the justice brandeis. one of his friends reported that if you are invited to dinner at his home, uep for and after -- you would eat before and after. [laughter] >> i second that. itwe have covered and watch tonight. before i close, i want to ask the panelists, is there anything else you would like to bring up that we have not talk about -- talked about? >> what did we forget? >> i would have to look at my notes. [laughter] we should give claire a round of appl

john marshall invalidating an act of congress -- the real drama is whether it is john marshall versus thomas jefferson. john marshall's opinion -- he goes on and on about law in the jefferson administration in the same way that today's court is being invited to say, well, the obama administration is lawless on immigration, lawless on obamacare, not just the law, but the implementation of the law, and the obama administration is lawless on carbon rules and the epa. this is nothing new. this is a feature of the distinct structural power of a presidency that is a four-year term with this tidal feature and justices who have life tenure. marbury is a drama. fast-forward -- roger tawney. abraham lincoln becomes president by running against roger tawney, by telling everyone who will listen how preposterous dread scott is. the young lawyer from illinois says -- i love this phrase -- i am an astonisher in political history. the tension when lincoln confronts tawney, who wants to invalidate everything lincoln is doing and to declare everything the obama administration -- i'm sorry, the lincoln

speaking of kentucky, this is john marshall harland.very first-year law student can tell you who he was. he was from kentucky. he fought for the union. the war, he had some political aspirations. but kentucky, curiously enough, seemed to sort of go over to the southern side after the war and became a totally democratic state. so harlan didn't get very far , with his political aspirations. he had a partner, a law partner, named benjamin bristow, who is a very well-known. and the two of them were known as sort of solid citizens who were incorruptible. and his partner, benjamin bristow became secretary of , treasury in the grant administration. that, was hen for was sort of mr. clean and grant had all kinds of corruption problems. and he brought in bristow to try to clean the place up. bristow also, interestingly enough, was the nation's first solicitor general. so bristow after about a year , took a look at the situation and decided he needed to get out. he was afraid his reputation would get smeared. why am i telling you about harlan's p

the proceedings were intended to be secret, so the congressional record contains no debate on john marshall's nomination, so we can only imagine what the senator said, but i suspect it went something like this. well, john, abraham, governor, i suppose we should vote now on the president's nomination to the supreme court. why, yes, jonathan, of course. i remember when we wrote it into the constitution that when a vacancy occurs, the president shall appoint a nominee to fill the vacancy, and we senators shall provide our advice and consent. well, yes, john, i recall the day we wrote that. you were in a particularly good mood because your wife betsy had arrived by carriage the night before from new hampshire. oh, yes, abraham, i recall that well. after all, it was only 13 years ago. and the next day we wrote the provisions about the supreme court. i remember very well how specific we were. the president appoints a nominee in the event of a vacancy, and we in the senate do our job by providing advice and consent. so by all means, let's vote. these men, these founding fathers set aside whatever re

>> well, you mention john marshall not having any clerks. sort of ties into the your question. i suspect one reason opinions are longer is there are more clerks working on things and you feel this would be a waste if you didn't put it in somewhere. maybe things would be better if we only have one or two clerks. there is a trend of hiring people with outside experience before coming to the court. i know have done some of that. i would say most of my clerks are hired out of an appellate clerkship. i think the jury is still out. i think there are disadvantages from having somebody who has been in practice for a while, not disparaging any of my clerks or any of the others, but i'm trying to figure how to phrase it but in a sense it is because they may get too good at law. we want people who will work hard, look at the issues, find the cases, but we don't want them to necessarily prepare things that are too polished whether it is drafts or memos because as we always proudly say we are the only branch of government where we still do our own work. if you get somebody producing whateve

i was later able to go to the john marshall law school where he served as an adjunct professor of law today. i was also able to learn in illinois that i was different. being from miami, florida it is a melting pot. we are very ill international. in illinois whether there was discrimination and i was able to serve at the john marshall or housing clinic to be able to help those who had been discriminated against and denied housing on the basis of the color of their skin, there their ethnicity, their race, and that was truly something that taught me how to be a leader. going forward after law school, i went and lived in a place called wheaton. it is a god-fearing community of 54,000 residents and i decided to run for the wheaton city council. i went to the door to door and was able to talk to families and let them know my plus fee of government. haven't been government. haven't been the first latina to ever serve on the wheaton city council, a lot of people approach me and said you know what, illinois has another problem. latinos, where the largest minority group in all of illinois becau

i think that have a lot to do with john marshall, just the force of his intellect and his gregarious nature, the first big decision he made was we will all live in the same boarding house and they had a lot of responsibility outside of washington so they did not have a permanent residence. they very much functioned as a group. if you look at the history, it's not because marshall imposes will of the others. there was a lot of exchange. considerediews were and often became part of the unanimous opinion. >> you can see all of chief justice roberts's comments at the fourth judicial conference. that's tonight at 8:00 p.m. eastern here on c-span. ♪ ♪ good morning, it's wednesday, june 1, 2016 and the washington journal is live from the u.s.-mexico border from laredo, texas over the next couple of days to talk about trade and immigration. we will get a perspective from folks on the ground and you get to ask questions as well. will start today with immigration at this location in laredo locally known as bridge one where mexican and american commanders cross back and forth on a daily basis t

tom mar ha marshall was the nephew of john marshall, the great supreme court chief justice. also a highly regarded lawyer, orator, moderate, member of the whig party. so it wouldn't see like slavery against antislavery. so, several days later, probably january 25th, marshall began to -- it was astonishing. this event. crowds filled the gallery of the house long before the noon opening. foreign ministers, attaches people were in the outer space and halls. he called on marshall, who read a resolution to censure adams. his version, though, he raised the stakes considerably, whereas, he asserted, a dissolution of the union necessarily implies the destruction of the constitution, the overthrow of the republican and the violation of the legislator's own oath, the petition adams had presented compelled the members to perjure themselves and involve he crime you've high taken. adams deserved expulsion. censure was an act of mercy. a catastrophic overreach on marshall's part. marshall delivered an indictment, with long preparation of regards for adams and his family and place in hoyt.

youf justice roberts: well, mentioned john marshall not having any clerks. it sort of ties into your earlier question. i suspect one of the reasons that these opinions or longer is that there are more clerks working on things. i suppose it would be a waste if you didn't put this in somewhere. [laughter] so that might be a part of the problem. i sometimes think it would be better if we had two clerks or fewer. but you are right. there is a trend of hiring people with outside experience before coming to the court. i know i've done some of that. i would say most of my clerks are still hired out of the appellate court clerkship. i think the jury is still out. i think there are disadvantages from having somebody who has been in practice for a while. without disparaging any of my clerks by saying that. i'm trying to figure it had a phrase that. in a sense it could be that it is because they get to be too good to law. at law.-- good to find theone cases on this issue and prepare that. don't want something that is a little too polished, whether it's drafts or memos.

justice brennan and justice -- >> guest: john marshall. >> host: there we go. >> guest: yeah. i have a fascination with the role of the third branch of government. in part because it gets so little scrutiny, and we've allowed the sort of myth of, you know, like i've referred to it as some sort of priesthood that somehow sits in that big marble building that looks like a greek temple, and they periodically, like, thunder bolts from olympus throw down words of wisdom and guidance. and that isn't how it ought to be. they're a branch of government like the other two branches of government, and they need to be held accountable like the other two branches of government in their own way. and so i very much want to better understand who these people who make up that court, what is the nature of their decisions and how does it impact american life. >> host: when you're reading a book like that, if you see something in there you disagree with, what's your reaction? >> guest: well, it depends on what that is. if it's sloppy, if someone gets history wrong, you know, it bothers me that the

and it had a lot to do with john marshall, the force of his intellect and gregarious nature, the first big decision he made when he got to washington, we all live in the same boardinghouse. they had a lot of responsible it is outside washington, they very much functioned as a group, not because marshall imposed his will on others it but it was part of the exchange. other views were considered and became part of the unanimous opinion. >> watch that event with justice roberts on companion network c-span and on c-span2 with congress out this week we are featuring booktv in prime time beginning at 8:00. tonight 2016 pulitzer prize finalists and winners including authors annie jacobson, tj stiles and joe warrick. watch booktv in prime time tonight at 8:00 pm eastern on c-span2. >> c-span washington journal live every day with news and policy issues, on thursday we are live in texas on the us-mexico border to talk about trade issues affecting the region and the country. and discusses the flow and volume of trade across the laredo border. texas congressman henry cuellar joins us to talk about

the big chunks of our history, john marshall there, the idea was not clear that you could dissent.ecause things were unanimous, and i think that had a lot to do with john marshall, just the force of his intellect and gregarious nature. the first big decision he made was that when we get to washington we will all live in the same boarding house. have a lot of responsibilities outside of washington, so they did not have a permanent residence there. and they very much functioned as a group. if you look at some of the history, it is not because marshall imposed his will on the others, but there was a lot of exchange. considered andre became part of the unanimous opinion. >> and you can hear all of that conversation with chief justice roberts at 8:00 p.m. eastern here on c-span. effect,nk today, we in catch up to the 20th century. the invisible half of the congress for the past seven years. we have watched our house colleagues with interest. the television coverage of the numbers of our colleagues in the house. >> as the senate comes out of the dark ages, we create another historic mome

i was later able to go to the john marshall law school where he served as an adjunct professor of law today. i was also able to learn in illinois that i was different. being from miami, florida it is a melting pot. we're very international. in illinois whether there was discrimination and i was able to serve at the john marshall or housing clinic to be able to help those who had been discriminated against and denied ousing on the basis of the color of their skin, their ethnicity, their race, and that was truly something that taught me how to be a leader. going forward after law school, i went and lived in a place called wheaton. it is a god-fearing community of 54,000 residents and i decided to run for the wheaton city council. i went to the door to door and was able to talk to families and let them know my plus fee of government. having been the first latina to ever serve on the wheaton city council, a lot of people approach me and said you know what, illinois has another problem. latinos, where the largest minority group in all of illinois because what, most of us are not getting ou

more than two centuries ago, justice john marshall declared the court, quote has the duty to say what law is. not the right but the duty. not an opinion but a duty. the supreme court has a solemn duty. disabling the court which is so divided at this moment as it has been at other times in our history, by keeping a seek vacant for hundreds of days because that is what it will end up being if we don't get a vote this year, matters not because the uncertainty perpetuates but the way it affects the country. justice scalia said if you have eight justice in the case it raises the possibility that by reason of a tie vote the court will find itself unable to resolve the significant legal issues presented by the case. we have seen it already. just in the past few months. pressing issues that prompted the court the grant review in the first case and most of the case because of the different decisions and circuits now remain unresolved. these the court believe are too important to leave in limbo are left in limbo, suspended in mid-air. a 4-4 court which may be fine in a narrow sense a majority o

and i think that had a lot to do with john marshall, just the way -- the force of his intellect and his gregarious nature, you know, the first big decision he made is when we get to washington we're all going to live in the same boardinghouse. they had a lot of responsibilities outside washington so they didn't have their permanent residence there and they very much functioned as a group. if you look at some of the history, it's not because marshall imposed his will on the others, there was a lot of exchange. the other views were considered and often became part of the unanimous opinion. >> chief justice john roberts folk at the greenbrier resort in west virginia. he also talked about diversity on the court. see his full comments tonight at 8:00 eastern on c-span. >>> "american history tv," on c-span3. saturday night at 10:00 eastern on "real america" -- >> more than 110,000 cubans flee cuba. they come the 140 kilometers to key west, florida, in nearly 2,000 boats. why do they come? why are there so many? >> during the spring through fall of 1980 approximately 125,000 cuban refugees arr

. >> john marshall says it has helped his son's self confidence, gabe is back to being his goofy, fun self. >> and you know, alex scott started a movement, holding women stands to raise money to find a cure for childhood cancer. and though she lost her battle, her legacy lives on, in the alex lemonade stand foundation, tonight at clock 30 here on cbs-3 you can find out more about alex's legacy, the research, the cures that have been discovered, the families, who are forever bonded, alex scott a stand for hope airs tonight at 7:30. >> so true, for everybody, no doubt about that. kate joins us now with our forecast, and i'm thinking about going over to the sixers draft party, should i take my umbrella. >> hey now, take it to be on the safe side. tracking showers and storms off to the west now, but moving on in. so maybe duck ago few raindrops. >> hey now. >> party animal. >> party animal, ya, right. >> make sure you're back here for 10:00 o'clock. >> for sure. >> we are tracking these showers and storms to the north and west, it has been pretty quiet day, most of the storm activity miss

john marshall and elbridge gerry -- by the way, we get the more gerrymandering from this individual -- were met with a series of humiliating conditions before negotiations could even begin -- not only would adams have to apologize for things he said but france is going to be given a huge loan and there is going to be a lot of personal bribery involved for their right to meet with him in the american reaction was no way. adams when they told him about it said that unfortunately the piece commission has been unsuccessful. now the republicans feel, why is it unsuccessful? because adams made unreasonable demands -- really, in this case -- you want to know what happened? and then he releases statements and when the american people read just how wrong they had been treated by france, the country went wild with anger, real significant shift in the attitude as you might guess. the famous quote, millions for defense but not one cent for tribute, that was expressed in this crisis -- a burst of patriotism swept through congress. they passed an act for a new army of up to 10,000 men. they also, b

more than two centuries ago john marshall to clear the court '' has the duty, not the right, to say what the law is. not an opinion, a duty they have a solemn duty. disabling the court, which is so clearly ideological divided at this time more than any other time in history, by keeping a seat vacant for hundreds of days is that is what will end up being if we don't get a vote this year, not just the uncertainty in a park -- perpetuates but because of the way of fractures our country. none other than justice scalia wrote to have the justices erases the possibility that by reason of a tie vote the court will find itself unable to resolve the significant legal issues presented by the case. we have seen that already justin the past few months. pressing controversial issues upon the court in the first place in the most of those because of a different decision now they are unresolved this is the court that is too important to leave suspended in midair and of in limbo a full accord may be functioning fine in the narrow sense of those majority cases that can be decided as many deleterious effect

wasn't clear you could because everything was unanimous and i u think that had a lot to do with john marshal just the way the force of his intellect and his nature. the first big decision he made is when we get to washington, we're going to live in the same boarding house. they had a lot of responsibilities outside of washington so they didn't have permanent residence there and they very much functioned as a group. if you look at some of the history, it's not because marshal imposed his will. there was a lot of exchange. other views were considered and often became part of the unanimous opinion. >> chief justice john roberts spoke at the resort in west virginia. he also talked about diversity on the court. see his full comments tonight at 8:00 eastern on c-span. >>> c-span's washington journal, live every day with news and policy issues that impact you. on thursday, we're live in texas on the u.s./mexico border to talk about trade issues affecting the region and the country. san antonio trade reporter discusses the flow and volume of trade across the border. also texas congressman henry join

more than two centuries ago, justice john marshall declared quote the court has the duty, not has the right, has the duty to say what the law is. not an opinion. a duty. the supreme court has a solom -- solemn duty. by keeping a seek vacant for hundreds of days, because that is what it will end up being if we don't get a vote this year, matters bought just because of the uncertainty that it p perpetuates but because of the way the fractures the country. justice scalia says if you have eight justice on the court it raises the possibility that by reason of a tie vote the court will find itself unable to resolve the significant issues presented by the case. we have seen it already. just in the past few months, pressing, controversial issues that prompted the court to grant review in the first place, and most of those cases because of different discussions in different circuits, now remain unresolved. the court believes they are too important to be left in limbo are left in limbo and suspended in mid-air. a 4-4 court may be fine if the majority of cases are able to be decided but it has m

john mentioned that air marshal service, it is an agency. they have gymnasiums and training centers. as soon as john and i starts and you might want cut down those numbers, some of the people's careers are coming to an end. in australia we have very few agencies. we have one agency, a couple defense agencies and that's about it. you can still cover the same territory essentially. it's easier to redeploy resources internally. australia as an ambassador service the same as the air marshal service that is part of the australian police. police officers go on location to do this. and over time the police, they can shift numbers of our marshals quite easily to increase them, lower them, do whatever they want because it's internal deployment so no one's career is that mistake and it allows a lot more flexibility. >> thank you all for your remarks. please join me in thanking our panelists today. [applause] i want to invite those of you who are with us today to join us on the second part of the conference center for lunch and continued discussion. our

said their moral argument is due process which should apply no matter what and they marshal that on their side but john lewis has a lot of credibility on civil rights. talk to us about what it means to have him leading this fight rather than perhaps a more political or even a younger democrat and about what he told you tonight because he said something that jumped out in your interview for folks who may be just joining us talk to that. >> john lewis is an icon throughout the halls of congress and i can tell you that he really is the only member who nobody will say a single bad word about in any capacity even privately. he was at the table with dr. king of the civil rights movement and he came within an inch of losing his life he was beaten so badly and he is somebody who is very gracious and very kind to members on both sides of the aisle and takes his responsibilities as a member seriously but tries to weave in his history with sooicivil righ. so for him to lead this is blunts a lot of the criticism that republicans would be allowed to put forward because he's so respected. i asked him where this stoo

marshall heights. you're looking at new video of the crime scene. this is behind the st. john the baptist church on 53rd and d street. the victim is an adult male. we're working to getting more information. i'm angie goff at the live desk. now back to you. >>> the power is back on to most people, but look at the damage strong storms did to one road this gaithersburg. chuck told us where this was happening. a downed power line scorched the pavement there last night and caused power surges and outages. brink road between goshen and whitt thman was closed for a co hours. >>> today flooding is a concern for the sites on the national mall. this is video from 2006 when a tropical storm dumped inches of rain and flooded several buildings. tonight federal administrators l. meet with park and museum officials to discuss ways to keep buildings along the mall safe if we were to have that kind of rain again. >>> it is developing new evacuation orders in parts of texas. flooding is a major issue again this morning. take a look at this video from houston where they have had to save several

we will have that next. s >>> john berman back live in orlando with art roderick. senior analyst and former director of the marshalse. we are talking about the operations in the u.s. if you see something, say something. that happened here with this shooter. in 2013, coworkers said he was saying strange things and the fbi questioned him twice. in 2014, they questioned him in connection to a man who was the first suicide bomber. again, they saw no obvious connection to the man, but this killer here who killed 50 people behind us, was known to the fbi. so what happened between 2014 and now? >> we heard mr. comey testify to this before. they have approximately 800 open investigations on possible terrorists links. when you widen that out to having five or six known associates, that gets bigger. you say he was on the radar and they interviewed him, but they came up with inconclusive information. when you multiply that group out, you are talking thousands of people. >> because you are allowed free speech in the united states. >> correct. >> when does it go from free speech to active threat? >> that's the key here. when do

marshall. why those individuals? this is about postwar america. there are other people, lyndon johnson and john kennedy, other people in that henry kissinger, dramatic impact on postwar america.cr >> i don't know about you,the id but i do not design covers. >> but i love the idea. they can to me after reading the book. >> a handyman. >> you mentioned roosevelt, thurgood marshall, all the people you mentioned your. >> is because the person who designed the cover read the book, thank goodness. >> that would be a 1st. >> i love the concept.es on they read the book and came up with this idea that there could be in the amount rushmore. so what they did lose cards old you, but i thought thought roosevelt, thurgood marshall, billy graham ronald reagan and you can see this is not about politics but people who were so powerful and making a change in american life that they have in fact created the modern america. that is the idea. >> besides bill bratton the other person who sticks out a little bit is eleanor roosevelt. never held office must you consider the office of -- >> well, un but it has been rep

john: tonight, bernie sanders is delivering an online video address to millions of supporters around the country, a speech he is calling "the political revolution continues." joining us is one of the potential grand marshalsrch to the convention in philadelphia, campaign manager jeff weaver. has it going -- how is it going? jeff: things are going great. john: can you give us a little preview of what senator sanders is likely to say tonight, other than that the little revolution continues? jeff: it is a continuation of what happened on sunday, when he met with some of his more prominent supporters and the surrogates, talking about how we move a progressive agenda forward and transform america. his presidential campaign is and always has been really about how we transform america, and not about him. i started working with him 30 years ago this month, and he was saying the same thing than that he says now, and he will be saying it, god willing, 30 years from now. how we move forward now, to create the kind of progressive change we need, is really the challenge, and that's what he will talk about tonight. john: understanding of that, car there tangible steps he will lay out -- are there tangible steps he will

john sheladi died in austin, texas. a field marshal for the naacp. he was not black. rosa parks went to jail. irginia doore and her husband, along with mr. nicks who was president of the naacp posted her bail. mr. nicks was african-american. the doores were not. so it's important for those of us who have benefited from the goodness, the goodwill of others to pave that debt we owe , this is an opportunity to make another installment on the debt that we owe as a result of others standing up for us. were not alone, and the lgbtq community should not be alone and is not alone. so tonight we invite members to come to the floor and to preface your statements with, you are not alone, and to let people know that you stand with the community in this time of great sadness, of great sadness but also speak of some of the good things that have occurred. we can talk of how the supreme court has made a significant difference, not only for this time by for all time for people, because the constitution of the united ates was not written for democrats or republicans. it wasn't written

john. >> all right. drew griffin, thank you so much, and cnn analyst art roderick, and cnn drirector of the marshal services, and cnn criminal attorney mark o'meara and our former assistant director of homeland security juliette kayyem. and so let me start with you, juliette. and we are learning so much about the killer, and so much from high school and middle school and so many discipline problems and speaking to the fbi in 2013 and yet, it is not seeming like there is any new information or new information of a direct link water error group or isis other than consuming a lot of the terror propaganda, and is that surprising to you at this point, and what, of what value is all of this information about his past? >> well, i know it is not surprising at all. pretty early on, it is clear that he was isis-inspired in part. i mean, there is a lot going on with him. but not isis directed and that he was a passive recipient of what he viewed as what isis would have wanted him to do. isis now is more than happy to take credit for anyone who does something like this in particular someone who has a successful attack

marshall. i grew up in a teddy roosevelt household in my second wife is a writer so i am really the father of eight. john impressive achievement on its own. i want to ask you about economics just because you talk about being conservative on economics, not wanting to spend a lot of government money and low taxes. when you look at hillary clinton's platform and what she advocates, which of those, which concerns you more? there are a lot of republicans that fine trump as problematic as a democratic platform. >> i do not have a sense of the spending level of mr. trump's proposals. i think they are all over the place. , and i thought wednesday forbes ran for president and got into the flat tax pretty deeply, i think you could run a generous federal government relatively on a 19% flat tax and if you really ch your billn you could run on a 15% flat tax. gary johnson is more attracted to the idea of a consumption tax , and we will talk it through, but that seems a little regressive. they tax reform, guess. john: one of the places where they are in agreement, neither one of them is a full free trader at this poin

john. >> kimberly, good evening to you. it wasn't the biggest crowd of donald trump's campaign but it was as big as the fire marshall wanted to allow in this area. 3,000 people on the tarmac here at the redding airport. the municipal airport where it was 102 degrees in the shade. on the podium, the stage where donald trump was speaking, it was probably more like 115 or 120. but he spoke for merely an hour. some of it with the assist of a portable airconditioning unit that is built into his podium. and he thanked the people for coming out in heat like today saying he was honored that they would come out and support him. essentially, today, wrapping up the primary schedule, at least in terms of campaigning. one more set of primaries. that will be on tuesday, five left to go. including california. and the former speaker of the house was correct. this campaign on both sides looks like it's going to be intensely personal because donald trump reacting today to the hillary clinton foreign policy speech that she gave in san diego yesterday, which really read more like a screen against donald trump saying she is unfit to be preside

john kerry had boat loads of dough, no one cared about that. only if you're a republican. >> that's true. you can get good clothes cheap. this tie, marshall's >> fashion bug? >> don't knock it until you tried it, joe. >> all right. >> great to see you. >> good to see you. "why are you checking your credit score?" "you don't want to live with mom and dad forever, do you?" "i'm making smoothies!" "how do i check my credit score?" "credit karma. don't worry, it's free." "credit karma. give yourself some credit." >>> don't you think it's interesting they're always reporting on the women fashion, how much that costs? ever hear anything about president obama's suits, how much they cost, trump's suits, how much they cost? mind your own business. right? although $12,500, i mean, what was in that thing? was it made out of gold? i'm going to google. thanks for watching, i'm megyn kelly. this is "the kelly file." >>> tonight -- >> donald trump is temperamentally unfit to be president and commander in chief. >> the last thing we need is hillary clinton in the white house. >> donald trump is here to preview a general election matchup with hillary clinto

john kerry had boat loads of dough, no one cared about that. only if you're a republican. >> that's true. you can get good clothes cheap. this tie, marshall'sngs. great. >> fashion bug? >> don't knock it until you tried it joe. >> all right. >> great to see you. >> good to see you. >> don't go away. we'll be right back. ♪ ♪ (whispers rocket) i'm billy, and i quit smoking with chantix. i had a lot of doubts going in. i was a smoker. hands down, it was that's who i was. after one week of chantix, i knew i could quit. along with support chantix (varenicline) is proven to help people quit smoking. chantix definitely helped reduce my urge to smoke. some people had changes in behavior thinking or mood, hostility, agitation, depressed mood and suicidal thoughts or actions while taking or after stopping chantix. some had seizures while taking chantix. if you have any of these stop chantix and call your doctor right away. tell your doctor about any history of mental health problems, which could get worse or of seizures. don't take chantix if you've had a serious allergic or skin reaction to it. if you have these, stop chantix and call your doctor ri

john adams, a laywer went on to serve as president of the united states. we are the nation of abram ham lincoln, a lawyer who defended accused killers. then, went on to serve as period thurgood marshall supreme court of the united states. we are the ruth bader beginsberg, went on to serve in the supreme court of the united states. that is who we are. we will not allow a small, incure thin-skinned wannabe to detroit the rule of law in the united states of america. you bet. you bet. we are ready for this fight. because, it is time to fight again. as it has for the elizabeth as it has for the elizabeth >>> the strength of attack. let's play hardball. good evening. i'm chris matthews in this big day of american politics. president obama bugled charge and played a respectful taps to honor the sanders campaign. he seized command of the democratic party's calendar for action endorsing hillary clinton as his presidential successor. he left no room for further intraparty bickering. his endorsement came this afternoon in a video. let's watch it. >> i know how hard this job can be. that's why i know hillary will be so good at it. in fact, i don't think there's been someone so qualified to hold

marshall. why those four individuals? obviously, this is about post-war america, the people who had the most impact. but there are other people, lyndon johnson or john kennedy or other people who had -- henry kissinger -- who had dramatic impact on post-war america. why are these four on your cover? >> well, i don't know about you, craig shirley, but i do not design covers. [laughter] >> but -- >> but i love the idea, which the idea is they came to me after reading the book and the book taking so -- >> actually, i do. >> you design your covers? >> i have a big hand in them. >> not me. >> but in the book you mentioned eleanor roosevelt, daniel patrick moynihan, martin luther -- all the people you mentioned here are -- >> i think that's because the person who designed the cover read the book, thank goodness. [laughter] >> that'd be a first. >> okay, all right. well, i love the concept, that they read the book and they came up with this idea that there could be a new mount rushmore, right? and who would be the figures on the new mount rushmore. what they did, as craig as just told you, they put up eleanor roosevelt, thu good marshall, billy graham and

john adams, a laywer went on to serve as president of the united states. we are the nation of abram ham lincoln, a lawyer who defended accused killers. then, went on to serve as period thurgood marshallthe united states. we are the ruth bader beginsberg, went on to serve in the supreme court of the united states. that is who we are. we will not allow a small, incure thin-skinned wannabe to detroit the rule of law in the united states of america. you bet. you bet. we are ready for this fight. because, it is time to fight again. as it has for the elizabeth warren tore into donald trump at that event in washington, d.c. as you see, vice president joe biden is about to follow her at the lectern. he's being introduced by ron klain, long-time seese onadviser and associate. both speeches justrs