so, this coin has chief justice john marshall on one side and the supreme court on the other, so it seems, appropriate if it comes up marshall madison wins. we will toss the coin. and it does come up marshall, so madison goes first. all right. >> are you ready? question, and this is from the category supreme quotes. which justice wrote that three generations of imbeciles are enough? [inaudible] >> that is correct. that is one point for team madison. >> i don't want to show off. [laughter] >> team jefferson, in which case did justice antonin scalia tell the majority -- call the majority's reasoning "pure applesauce"? thomas: overture felt -- overture felt -- question for team madison. which justice popularized the phrase, "i know it when i see it"? >> potter stewart. thomas: that is correct. do you know what the context was? >> it was of sanity -- obscen ity. janice yellow versus -- >> do you want the r or the x-rated answer? [laughter] thomas: that is a point for team madison. >> next question for team jefferson. >> which justice is credited with coining the phrase "the right to privacy"

so it's a miss over a month after the assassination of john marshall q on demand thank you very much for the finale that has a child with all the latest live in istanbul thank you. let's move on to other news mellen police in california have released more details about the man who shot and killed twelve people including a policeman and sighed a bomb twenty eight year old in law was a former u.s. marine who had minor run ins with the law authorities have not found a motive for the shooting saying he shot at random and brian hall. the borderline bar and grill was packed for its wednesday college country music night when the gunman still in and opened fire there were people saying i'm just hanging out having a good time running you hear that and you just go belly up. it was before eleven face a in the city of thousand docks about sixty kilometers from los angeles he was going to come in the ski mask over his face but on the bottom and then he had a black face my carbine is just this is my. shooting everything from. anything so it was billie sol was. just smoke and we just saw shots taki

. >> host: on john marshall. >> guest: john marshall. and we read every word to each other. it's also very nice to live with an outstanding editor who does not let politics get in the way. >> host: well, dr. safer, that's why we're talking to you today about your forthcoming book, i love you but i hate your politics -- >> guest: or i love you but i hate your politics! [laughter] that's more like it, isn't it? this book has a long prehistory based on my marriage with rick. at our wedding william f. buckley was present. his enforcer, mccarthy's right-hand man, gave a realizing, and the person who walked me down the aisle was one of first people removed from his job by mccarthy. a friend said politics makes strange bedfellows. anyway, so that's been our history. and i've lived as kind of the mascot of the right and national review for many, many years. and it's been a very eye- >> host: you're very liberal. >> guest: yes. yes. i'm a liberal democrat. and, in fact, i think there is -- have we ever voted the same? we both voted for giuliani the first time. and we both believe in

and one of them attends john marshall.therford:"her reaction was that she was shocked by it. i don't know if she felt it in the way that i did but for me it was unacceptable. those images are terrifying and when i see someone riding around in the streets with hoods on, that inflicts fear. so first of all we need to address that, that's a separate subject but i think its an opportunity to discuss what race means." rochester public schools superintendent michael munoz says this is a disturbing instance. he went on to tell me it can also be a chance to engage with students... and learn from this experience. "we're going to use this as an opportunity to ... a teachable moment with our kids and talk to them about this and use it as a way to talk about that topic and use it as a learning experience for students." (grant) it's unclear which two people in the photo currently attend the high school... and what makes the incident worse is that apparently all three teens were army recruits.(pam) but a u-s army recruiter says the thre

sitting facing the court until they call you up to be sworn in, you sit in the seats sat in by john marshals, who is one of the most influential justices of the supreme court. one of the earlier justices. as i was sitting there i was looking at my mom and looking at my entire family, and most of my lifelong friends. they had come from around the world, literally. my entire family had come. from puerto rico, and in that moment i realized that no matter how successful you are, it's really only meaningful if your family and friends come with you.ou if they share your life with you, then that is success. there are a lot of people who work very, very hard and are very, very successful, but they break away from the people whoy really started with them. and i've never done that. success you measure by how much people walk along with you. not by who you leave behind. and i hope i've left very few people, if any behind. peter: i know your mother is with you in miami? >> sonia: she is. she's inside staying cool. >> who supported and inspired your interest in the law? r> sonia: interestingly enough the

. >> and that's coming out this fall, john marshall. >> and we read every word to each other. it's also very nice to live with an outstandingeditor who does not let politics get in the way . >> doctor safer, that's why we're talking to you about your forthcoming book i love you but i hate your politics. >> i love you but i hateyour politics . this has a long history based on my marriage with rick at our wedding. william f buckley was present and his enforcer at the mccarthys, the person who walked me down the aisle was one of the 1st people we moved from his job as a professor and politics makes strange bedfellows. anyway, that's been our history and i wish i lived as a mascot of the right for the national reviewfor many years and it's been very eye-opening . i think we both voted for giuliani the 1st time . >> .. >> you know, the first year or so, there weren't issues on how we're going to deal with this. at that point, 20% of people are married across party lines. now it is 9%. so we were already in the time when, you know, my father was a republican. my mother was a democra

john marshall. >> guest: we read every word to each other. it's also very nice to live with an outstanding editor who does not let politics get in the way. >> host: that's why we're talking to you today about your book, "i love you, but i hate your politics." >> guest: well, "i love you, but i hate your politics" is more like it. this book has a long prehistory based on a marriage with rick. at our wedding was enough buckley was present. -- william f. buckley was present. the person who walked me then dn i'll was one of the first people who moved from his job as professor by mccarthy forces in new york. a friend of our said at the time politics takes strange bedfellows. anyway, so that's in our history. i've lived as kind of the mascot of the right and national work queue for many, many years. it's been a very eye-opening -- trim what you are very liberal. >> guest: yes, a liberal democrat. i think there -- if we upload the same? with both voted for giuliani first time. we both believe in the death penalty for over cell phone use, but other t

and john marshal, who we all know here in virginia, the great chief justice -- john marshal compared milton like a candle before the sun at noon day. and marshal drew a lot of his opinions, actually, from hamilton's arguments and reasoning. so it is a man -- his mind is truly remarkable. his ambition is almost as great as his mind. his desire for fame, what i call secular remortality. those of you who heard me talk about washington know how ambitious i believe washington was for secular immortality. critics see that hamilton is a would be napoleon, that he craves power. and he certainly does. but what he does, he takes this brilliance, ambition, merges it with productive work in a way that basically is unmatched. his afternoon rival, thomas jefferson expressed the fact that hamilton really is a colossus, without numbers, he is a host within himself. think how washington would feel to find this combination of talent and a capacity for productive work. he's so overwhelmed by problems. this is like a god send. washington wanted people as he put it himself who can think for me as well as

, the chf justice, john marshall has made his decision. now let him enforce it. indicating that it was up to the court since then made a wrong decision, they had the responsibility to try to enforce it. abraham lincoln was one president who had a great deal of concern about the role of the supreme court. he, particularly when the court ruled as it did with the justice haney and the dred scott decision and of the decisions they made in some other cases, he said the candid citizen must confess that the policy of the government upon vital questions affecting the whole people is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the supreme court. the instant there they are made an ordinary litigation between parties in personal actions, people will cease to be their own rulers. having to that extent practically resigned their government into the hands of it eminent tribunal, the supreme court. that's some of the red rick, you might say, that went on by various president concerning the supreme court. more recently the supreme court itself has struck back

john marshall is the chief justice. marshall was worried. jefferson is president. he is worried that if he tells jefferson that he's got to do this, that jefferson and the republican democrats, as they were called, might do something to harm the judiciary. marshall wanted to protect the court. but on the other hand, he didn't want to make the federalists mad because they might be back in power again soon, too. he figured out a way to split the hairs. marshall said there are three questions before us. first, he said did marberry have a right to the commission? he said yes, he did. he said if his right had been violated, did the law provide a remedy? he said yes. third question. if so, was the proper remedy a writ of mandamus from the supreme court? that's what he brought, a writ of mandamus to madison, carry this out. to that, he said no. and what he said was, he said if you read it -- one thing robert byrd said to me one time -- and he was citing harry truman. he said anytime you read the constitution, put it down and read it sometime later and you'll find somethin

eat and lists the reductions that my hands were going through all that to chill john marshall search simply because he was criticizing. me simply because he was criticizing his foreign policy in the region although this has been on the leading narrative all the last few weeks. and intimate of truth which is and we see in the wish although i cannot find a belief i am one hundred percent but i strongly think that actually john mark karr should she was a cio not because he was criticizing me but simply because he knew too much what i wanted to see that's a very good point because you know he's been betrayed in western media some kind of dissident but he was really in many ways the ultimate insider is well here jonathan one of the interesting things that we've seen here is that we have had a number of senators lindsey graham for example come out and say the most. demeaning things you could possibly say about a person and then we have the cia coming out with its high confidence message i hate that phrase but that they believe that the trail of the go goes all the way back to the crown pri

that there was the don't recall election which then to southie a savage men and the killing of john marshall cheap easy to live in israel basically people like not on yahoo constantly said yes what's happened was not nice but at the same time easel and the huge what they call stability and security in the middle east that requires their continuous position all through. been been silent so if you can assert their position well for american foreign policy with these pretty specific fun thinks at least to then it doesn't make sense to maintain an. in order to constitute a need to brush up against against you know as. well you know all i could say actually no i can say let me go to jonathan here right now the over the last fifteen years or so the more the west and its proxies in the in the region try to isolate around the more powerful rand i really don't understand there's no learning curve these people don't learn here jonathan one of the most tragic things i think for me and i made it a point on this program to continue discussing what's going on in yemen it took leak the murder of shogi to a

statements of interest regarding 1st amendment free speech rights at public colleges and speaker, the john marshall harlan the second professor of law, nadine strossen. for three decades, professor strassen has been an advocate and collar of the civil rights and liberties guaranteed by the constitution, including the free speech right. in 1991, professor strassen became the first woman and yuck -- and youngest person to be named president of the american civil liberties union and made thousands of public presentations on constitutional law at hundreds of college and university campuses across america and the globe. and she's also made innumerable television and radio appearances. professor strassen's accolades are many, including to name just a few, being named one of the 100 most influential lawyers in america by the "national law journal," being included among america's 200 most influential women by "vanity fair" and being listed among the 350 women who change the world by "working woman" magazine. she's also been awarded the media institute's freedom of speech award. the free speech coalition's

amendment and other facets of constitutional law under the too large of today's keynote speaker, the john marshall harlan the second professor of law at new york law school, nadine strossen. for nearly three decades, progress or strossen has been a preeminent advocate and scholar of the civil rights and liberties guaranteed by the constitution including the free speech rights enshrined by the first amendment. in 1991, professor strossen and became the first woman and youngest person to be named president of the american civil liberties union. since then, she has made thousands of public presentations on issues of constitutional law at hundreds of college and university campuses across america and the globe. and she is also made innumerable television and radio appearances. professor strassman's accolades are many including to name just the 100ing named one of most influential lawyers in america by the national law journal, being included among the americas 200 most influential women by vanity fair, and being listed among the 350 women who changed the world by working women magazine. she has also b

john marshall answers. gonzaga with thewalkoff championship win.heir penance, two hail marys, ten ourrs fat and they will win. they will keep watching this all week long. early thanksgiv.g for th >> you know it. good stuff. >>> thanks for joinius. >>> thanks for joinius. we hope we'l james: this is jane. she's a busy consultant with an active lifestyle. after donating her jakidney to maurice,y donor. and kidney donatiodn't normal actcost jane a penny.few days.i i'm james brown. meet my friends jane and maurice. jane didn't know maurice, she just wand d to help someone in nd you can too. to learn more about kidney donation vi kt the gw ron and joy paney center at gwkidney.org or call 1-833-kidney3. >>> breakingews night, a gunman fire at a e at ire at a hospital in chicago multiple people shot in the aack including a police officer. a massive response underway right now. d.he hospital being evac we're there live. >>> a war of words thetween president trume u.s. commander of the raid that killed ama bin laden. the president blaming the decorated navy

under john marshall, the supreme court had interpreted the reach of these powers. even marshall often referred to the government as one of limited authority. southerners took a narrower view of federal powers of those in the north, even the latter shared this conceptual framework. if true, the government in washington had no powers to wage a war against the secession of states. the union would collapse. while the obvious answer was to amend the constitution, this was impractical with 11 states in secession. to support the prosecution of the war, northern legal writers developed what the abolitionist scholar called the -- of the constitution. he and others argued that the southern emphasis on the negative constraints in the constitution hid the positive commandments for the government to act effectively. to preserve itself and to preserve the union. fisher, and other legal writer explained, that the president and the congress had andpower to act -- situations. they also had the discretion to choose the most effective means to go so -- to do so. presuming -- even if

i am with john marshall.he founders made at the job of the judiciary to interpret the constitution and to read the law. now they are activist judges -- >> leland: when you say that you are with roberts, you are with roberts that you don't like the president talking about it or you are with him that the supreme court has the right to interpret the law? >> i think i am with him when he is setting precedents and sending a message at a moment when we have both the left and the right calling on judges to fall in line. he is telling every lower-level judge that their job is to interpret the law and to not get involved in all of the parts that is taking over the rest of the country. let's remember, roberts has pushed back, but in 2010, one president obama snubs the supreme court during the state of the union, it was roberts who said that that was very troubling. >> leland: to that point, chuck grassley here, chief justice john roberts rebuked him for a comment that he made about a judges decision on asylum. i don't

that is been true since thomas jefferson and john marshall. for political leaders to respect the good faith of judges and not reduce what they say to partisanship over the president who appointed them. i think that is what the chief justice was trying to say, that regardless of who appointed you, you have to trust in the good faith of the independent judiciary. by the way, it was good advice to the president himself, because the next time he needs a ruling from the supreme court, he is going to want to be able to say that was an independent ruling made by people made in good faith and not by a bunch of trump judges like neil gorsuch and brett kavanaugh. so quite apart from making a mistake, i think the chief and his own way was desperately trying to prevent the president from making any further mistakes. but obviously, it didn't work. >> i think the problem in what he is saying is not the problem is that we should want to have the ideal of an independent judiciary but anyone paying attention knows we don't have that situation. we have somethin

under john marshall, the supreme court had blunt interpreted the reach of these delegated powers but even marshall often referred to the government as one of limited authority. while southerners took a never view of federal powers than did those in the north, even the letter shared this conceptual framework. if true, then the government in washington had no powers to wait -- waging war against the secession of states in the union would collapse. the obvious answer was to amend the constitution. this route was impractical with the 11 states in secession. to support lincoln's prosecution of the war, northern legal writers developed what the abolitionist legal scholar, timothy gerard ford, the adequacy of the constitution. harar and others argued that the negative in -- constraints on the constitution had the positive commandments for the government to act effectively, to preserve itself and to preserve the union. another legal writer explained the president and congress have the power to react to concrete situations. such as the rebel and they also had the discretion to choose the most

marbury versus madison, 1803, chief justice john marshall's opinion that says the courts have the last word on whether federal and other laws are constitutional. can a -- the supreme court overturn the work of the other branches of government? it is the foundational opinion of american constitutional law. it is not controversial. it is not something that ruth bader ginsburg and antonin scalia disagreed about. it is a bedrock of american constitutional law. and that anyone questions its validity or correctness shows that person is out of the mainstream. number two. the notion that only judges who have a biblical understanding of law and the constitution are appropriate is not only contrary to how the constitution itself defines no establishment of religion, it is also contrary to how all judges express -- the need to keep the courts insulated from political and religious and other kinds of pressure. so that the marbury versus madison stuff, the religious stuff, is way outside the mainstream of american legal thought. >> you know, you would think that the white house, dana, would do some

john marshall, the chief justice, has made his decision. now let him enforce it. indicating that it was up to the court since they had made a wrong decision. they had the responsibility to try to enforce it. well, abraham lincoln was one president who had a great deal of concern about the role of the supreme court. he, particularly when the court ruled as it did under justice caney in the justice decision and other decisions, he said the candidate must confess that vital questions faeaffecting th whole people are to be ir irrevocably fixed by their own actions. the people will cease to be their own rulers. that practically resigned the government into the hands of that tribunal. that was some of the rhetoric, you might say, that went on between various presidents concerning the supreme court. more recently, the supreme court itself has struck back to enlarge its power. from the first days of our republic until more recently, the idea of the conduct of war was left to the president of the united states and the executive branch. after all, the voice of our constitut

uttered those famous words that have been repeated many times that has been attributed to him, and john marshall made his decision, so let him enforce it, indicating it was up to the court that they had made a wrong decision and they have the responsibility to enforce it. abraham lincoln was one president who had a great deal of concern about the role of the supreme court. particularly, when the court ruled as it did in the dred scott decision and other decisions they made in other cases, and said the candid citizen must confess that the policy of the government upon vital questions, affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the supreme court, the inches is that they are made in ordinary litigation between parties and personal action, people would have ceased to be their own rulers having to that extent practically resigned their government into the hands of that imminent tribunal, the supreme court. that is some of that rhetoric you might say that when owned by various presidents concerning the supreme court. more recently, the supreme court itself has struck back t

john marshall insisted that the justices live in the same boarding house. he was one of the largest importers of madeira. they would discuss the cases over dinner and everybody loved him. my predecessor was very pleasant and very direct and very fair. i think those are very important trade for a chief justice to have. as a chief justice, you hold the reins of power. if you taught on it too tightly, you will find out they are not attached to anything. got to appreciate that in figuring out a style of leadership that works. stein: i mentioned earlier that justice kennedy wanted a couple of cases. let's talk about the workload of the court. in the past year, the 2017 term, when you clicked for justice rehnquist 35 years ago, the court decided as many cases every year. what is the court deciding so few cases -- why is the court deciding so few cases? do you have some colleagues that want to take more cases? justice roberts: yes, we have the capacity to do it. we can. you are hearing for cases a day. i thought the quality of the work deteriorated when getting cl

john marshall insisted that the justices live in the same boarding house. he was one of the largest importers of madeira in north america. they would discuss the cases over dinner and everybody loved him. my predecessor was very pleasant and very direct and very fair. i think those are very important traits for a chief justice to have. as a chief justice, you hold the reins of power. if you tug on them too tightly, you will find out they are not attached to anything. you do have to kind of appreciate that and the style of leadership that works. prof. stein: you mentioned -- i mentioned earlier that justice kennedy wanted a couple of cases. one of the first 14th amendment cases cited. let's talk about the workload of the court. in the past year, the 2017 term, the court decided about 75 cases, give or take. that is typical of the last few years. when you clerked for justice rehnquist 35 years ago, the court decided about twice as many cases every year. why is the court deciding so few cases these days, and obviously justices decide which case to take, but do

and i was sitting facing the court until they call you up to be sworn in, you sit in the seats john marshalone of the most influential justices of the supreme court or the earliest justices, at any rate as i was sitting there, i was looking at my mom and i was looking at my entire family and most of my life-long friends. they had come from around the world literally, my entire family had come from puerto rico and in that moment, i realized that no matter how successful you are, it's really only meaningful if your family and friends come with you. if they share your life with you, then that is success. there are a lot of people who work very, very hard and who are very, very successful but they sort of break away from the people who really started with them and i've never done that. success you measure by how much people walk along with you, not by who you leave behind and i hope i've blessed very few people if any. >> well, i know that your mother is down here in miami. >> she is, she's the smart one, she's inside staying cool, it's a little hot out here. [laughter] >> another question from

if you look back at chief justice john marshall, years and years ago, that was the last time that wechief justice go in public. >> rick: we appreciate your time. happy things giving to you. we do expect to hear more from the president and the next few minutes, perhaps, when he visits the coast guard station. >> arthel: meanwhile, the president is warning that the u.s. would have a lot to lose if we broke ties with saudi arabia. should they be held accountable? for the murder of washington columnist jamaal khashoggi. >> rick: went the president paying tribute to our military. his message to the troops is coming up next. >> mr. president, i know you cannot see us right now, but you have 150 airmen in this room, i would love to say happy thanksgiving to you. what do you say to the president? >> happy thanksgiving! you see c. you see me. you see c. but if you saw me before cosentyx... ♪ i was covered. it was awful. but i didn't give up. i kept fighting. i got clear skin with cosentyx. 3 years and counting. clear skin can last. see if cosentyx could make a difference for you. cosentyx is

are joining me now here in the studio is john tesh now he is director of the german marshall fund of the united states here in berlin a familiar face to our viewers john it's good to have you here at the big table i mean this is a momentous evening these results coming in. how important would you say that this midterm election is for europe i mean the the interest that we've seen in europe looking at these midterms is quite enormous i mean midterms traditionally have been a bit of an obscure oddity of the american political system to most europeans and now they've become the obsession over here and the reason of course the strum just as you said earlier on the program he was the decisive factor in bringing people out to vote on both sides of the of the aisle it's the same here people want to know whether this trump thing and america is for real whether the americans are actually serious about trump and the midterm is the next best thing to an indication you know it's interesting that this trump thing we know that german media have invested a lot of resources to cover this midterm elec

security inspector general slammed the air marshal service and said its contribution to aviation transportation security is questionable. ohio state professor johnudies the efficiencies of security measures, says the nearly $1 billion agency is almost worthless. >> federal air marshals don't pass muster in terms of cost/benefit analysis. they deliver five or ten cents of benefit for every dollar that is spent on them. >> reporter: the revelation that 200 cases where agents made mistakes is yet another strike against the federal air marshal program. >> so drew griffon joins me now. and drew, it's not often you hear someone saying a law enforcement agency is worthless. i'm sure the taste doesn't think you should just dissolve the air marshals program, right? >> the taste sentd us a false statement pushing back on the idea you should just get rid of the air marshal. we still have no evidence this group has taken part in stopping any terrorist activity, and did call the group's contribution to safety questionable, which is one of the reasons some call for disbandment. but these reports cover 12 years representing less than 1% of the rurk force durin

john deane, as well. and he served as marshall's secretary to general staff in the beginning of the war and in 1943, he was sent over to russia to serve as the senior military commander for ambassador harman. by the way, when i visited general deane's widow, i got some great pictures to put in the book and this is a classic. this is his first day at west point in 1938. and you can just imagine what he's being put through right here. next slide. jack deane's graduation, 1942. class of 1942, by the way, had almost 20% death rate during the war. i think it was 19.7 or something. but one in five cadets in the class of 1942, the first class to graduate, when we were in the second world war, didn't make it to the end. so there was, you know, there was a luck factor, as well. handsome guy there, isn't he? next slide. general deane is on the right there, as a lieutenant colonel he's a battalion commander less than three years from his graduation date at west point so he's gone from second lieutenant to lieutenant colonel in less than three years. this is also a part of his -- the reason why he moved up so fast in

security's inspector general slammed the air marshals service and said its contribution to aviation transportation security is questionable. ohio state professor johne efficiencies of security measures says nearly $1 billion agency is almost worthless. >> federal air marshals simply don't pass muster in terms of cost/benefit analysis. they deliver about 5 cents or maybe 10 cents of benefit for every dollar that's spent on them. >> now, the revelation that at least 200 cases where agents made dangerous mistakes is yet another strike against the federal air marshals program. the tsa tells us the air marshals are trained to the highest levels. the problem, poppy and jim, is the air marshals we have been talking to say that's just not true. and in 2016, the government accountability office said the record keeping is so bad that it's really hard to tell if these agents are trained and retrained to proper specifications. tsa insists that's all fixed now. >> air marshals themselves are identifying this is a problem. i'm curious, just to be clear, did any of this mishaps happen in the air with passengers onboard? were passengers put in danger? >> several c

john kennedy's plane is missing. i was beside myself, like all his friends, like all his family. >> search and rescue units marshalleder a five-day search, navy divers recover three bodies amongst the wreckage off the coast of martha's vineyard. the ashes of john, carolyn and lauren are scattered at sea. a private memorial mass is held in new york. >> it seems to fall to ted kennedy that he must eulogize everyone who's taken too soon. >> i think the most difficult moment of that funeral service was teddy's final eulogy when, at the end, he said john had every gift but length of years. that single line incapsulated both the tragedy on a personal level but also what tragedy it could have been for the country. ! higher! higher! parents aren't perfect, but then they make us kraft mac & cheese and everything's good again. >>> at the dawn of the new millennium ted continues to carry the hopes and ambitions of the kennedys. >> i yield to no one in that area. >> some call him king of the hill with a hand in every big issue, child care, health care, civil rights, minimum wage, arms control. >> his legislative record is legend

marshall nicely since. i'm not has can achieve that so much more needs to be john and i feel people have to be at the hoc solutions my name is a massage and i work at g.w. . and live in the open. on. hope i can. do little more not give commuters. up and live someone is getting richer and there are someone below him boys and leaders who have needs to kill i don't the rich people help those who are suffering in poverty my software on my walk walk walk. me to. the rich don't care about inequality. there is different too. if this continues there will be major disruptions was a political as a social with military but ecological but in terms of health. inequality undermines social cohesion and a sense of a shared society if that's the undermines people's willingness to protect the environment. but. i do know my name is godwin or cheering when i am twenty eight years old. i mean i work in waste management. news and my day is always very busy. i don't even have time to rest i start working at the dump site at five o'clock in the morning sometimes i wish i could give myself a day off on these but it's not possible to the w

marshalls are necessary. last year, they said it's contribution to aviation security is questionable. ohio state professor johnwho studies the efficiencies of security measures says the nearly $1 billion agency is almost worthily. >> federal air marshalls don't pass muster in terms of cost benefit analysis. they deliver five cents or ten cents of benefit for every dollar that's spent on them. >> now the revolution of 200 cases where agents made dangerous mistakes is yet another strike against the program. the tsa tells us air marshalls are trained to the highest standard. the problem is many air marshalls disagree with that. and even the government's own accountability office reported that in 2016, the tsa was not doing enough recordkeeping to even tell that it's air marshalls were being trained properly. tsa insists that's all fixed now. >>> just what you want to hear when you are getting ready for thanksgiving travel. >>> a federal judge blocked a presidential executive order on asylum. what the ruling means next. >>> a federal judge temporarily barring the trump administration from preventing some migrants

general john jay raymond, commander air force space command, general timothy ray, global strike command, lieutenant general marshall webb, special operations command. the rules of engagement are as follows. each speaker will make a presentation and then we'll take questions from the audience if there's time. believe it or not, we'll be 21st century here and you can text your questions in to a number that should be up on the screen at some point. with that, let me give the floor to general walters. let him start. >> we want to thank you for your service as our secretary, from our undersecretary, and for all you have done for our nation. it's great to be back in your company. albeit, it is in washington, d.c. and i must say to this crowd, i much prefer being 4700 mile said away in the central portion of europe. first of all, i want to pass a shout out to all our wing commanders and all our command chiefs that represent the wings. as all of you know, where the rubber meets the road is where those commanders and those command chiefs exist. it's also a privilege to be on the panel with my brothers in arms. for all of yo

security's inspector general slammed the air marshal service and said its "contribution to aviation transportation security is questionable"ohio state professor johnency is almost worthless.john mueller/political science professor"federal air marshals simply don't pass muster in terms of cost benefit analysis. they deliver about 5 cents, or maybe 10 cents of benefit for every dollar that's spent on them."and now the revelation that at least 200 cases where agents made dangerous mistakes is yet another strike against the federal air marshals program. drew griffin/cnn"the tsa tells us air marshals are trained to the highest standards. the problem is, many air marshals we've been talking with disagree with that. and even the government's own accountability office reported that in 2016, the tsa was not doing enough record keeping to even tell that it's air marshals were being trained properly. tsa insists that's all fixed now. drew griffin, cnn, atlanta." (james) james adlib big board. ( james ) and we will be right back on the kron 4 morning news... here's a live look outside... at the bay bridge toll plaza. (ácommercialá) ( robin ) as you get ready

senator john donnelly of indiana lost their seats to republican challengers even though they had run saying. you know on donald trump's trade war harming farmers in the midwest right. as marshall on a frequent guest on this show points out in great economist and he looked at the trade warning looked at what's happening in china and america and concluded even though he's a progressive that trumps trade war is effectively genius and this is led to a remarkable spurt in employment in the us and put china defensive. as we enter what i call this era of neo mercantilist so it's going to be everyone against everyone without the coordinated efforts of central banks keeping the dollar artificially low you know i expect that we're going to see a lot more currency chaos going forward yes so they said the races were a test of whether or not trump kept telling voters in the midwest that it would be short term pain for a long term gain and they seem to have lost that in fact the new york times says themselves mr trump's overall popularity in rural america seems to be growing and it seems to have been stoked by the tactic employed by china and other trading partners of targeting the taliban

john wesley snyder, the secretary of the treasury. he was truman's first appointment to high office two days after fdr's death. snyder had a unique friendship with george marshal, which served as an anchor of these early years in the administration. snyder held the reigns of the u.s. economy. he also by authority of congress had ultimate authority for all u.s. international as well as domestic transitions which meant he had ultimate authority over the marshall plan. and truman allowed snyder to be involved in everything. they had been best friends since 1928. snyder was put on the community for palestine. he'd be put on the national security counsel. he'd be put on the nato counsel. he's be responsible for persuading truman to hire dean atkinson as secretary of state in 1949. and he would have the final word in 1951, alone in the white house residence with his friend truman to fire general mcarthur. it's among the people who are overlooked by the historians. 1948 was a defining steple and it's the berlin block aid. that is when the u.s. realized it needs the british empire. the u.s. asserted that we were spread so thin, we had 12 tanks in europe, capable of co