acting, at the a congress, if you look at marbury versus madison that many are familiar with where john marshall established with judicial action the concept of judicial review with regard to the supreme court. that arose from a situation where a federalist majority in congress which had just been voted out by the voters created a whole new branch of the judiciary, a new level of circuit courts. then president adams who had also been voted out still was on the circuit court. this kind of thing has happened in the past but we have to go a long way back to get there. host: let's talk a little about the process and the history about the process. then senate majority leader harry reid employed what was called the nuclear option back in 2013. let's see what he said back then. [video clip] >> the american people believe congress is broken. the american people believe the senate is broken. i believe the american people are right. the 113ths congress, congress, the united states has wasted an unprecedented amount of time a procedural and partisan obstruction. as a result, the work of this country goes u

it really came into being out of john marshall's great opinion in the famous case of mcculloch versus -- not mcculloch --marbury versus madison from 1803. i think that is bunk. i think marbury is an interesting case but not a significant one. it figures prominently in legal education, but that is for reasons other than the ones that historians or political scientists ought to respect. marbury is a case worth studying, but was it consequential? i don't think so. i think the origins of judicial review lie elsewhere, and i will try to give a short account of how that was the case. those are the three myths we are going to talk about today. let's bring a few characters online so you know who they are. this is alexander hamilton. you know, along with madison and jefferson, franklin, maybe john adams, though adams i think was a bit of a streak hitter, the five most powerful minds of this remarkable generation. hamilton, of course, is famous in the convention for giving his speech of june 18, which is a famous speech because it is so partial and favorable of the british institution and kind

in the united states, the pattern was set by john marshall , judges in the united states should not wear royal robes. they should not wear red robes or maroon robes. they should wear plain black. but every once in a while, not in this court, but when i was in law school, i wore this robe. one -- this one was a gift to me by the supreme people's court in china. china, i think it their95, i was aghast of -- a guest of their highest court and visited several courts in major cities. when i was in beijing, i admired the robes that the judges were wearing. by the time i got to shanghai, they had made up a robe for me and presented it to me as a gift. so this is my chinese robe. in canada, both the lawyers and the judges wear robes. you canthe standard -- see it on lawyers. the women jurors thought that there's -- enhance theirs with a lovely lace collar. traditionsabout the around the robing room before an oral argument begins. justice ginsburg: as we enter the robing room, or if we are on the late side, the conference room, the first thing we do is go around the room, each justice shaking han

but john marshall made it explicit in the great case of marbury against madison. >> let me ask you acouple more questions about the conference itself. explain to us that room and what happens in that conference, and who is in their? justice ginsburg: our conference room has a table where we all have a particular seat. head,ief justice at one the most senior associate justice at the other. when wessed cases -- discuss cases, we go around the room in seniority order. will give hisice review and then we will save what we think, how it should come out, and why. >> is there an argument? justice ginsburg: generally, there is limited argument. initially, we go around the table and eat justice speaks -- each justice speaks. there will be some, but not a lot. of course, conversations. one justice or another will say after we have talked for several "it will all come out in the writing. ."t's leave this for now and it will come out in the writing. what this court produces is an opinion of the court. you are not writing just for yourself. you are writing hopefully for and you have to take accou

and john marshall asked, whether you could comment on public municipal ownership of platforms and businessesike rideshare. and maybe also talk to us a little bit more about what that might look like in comparison to co-op models. what are sort of the possibilities in this realm? and what are the things we need to do to make one or either of those things possible? >> guest: that is a great question. that is one that is not been talked about enough. let me say a word or two about the three that i talked about in the last chapter you raise. the first one which is sort of the corporate, dominant platforms. one of my co-authors and friends a dutch scholar named kuhn franken wrote a really interesting peace in which he made a point it's obvious now we can see it, we can sit with what's happening with hoover. the likely trajectory we just kind of let the platform do with they want, the big corporate one as there would be a couple of super platforms that have all the different services. they will come to dominate, coke and pepsi, hoover lift, that sort of model in which so many industries he basical

rbg, the greatest dissenter of her time in the same way there have been previous justices like john marshaldissenter. and it all began in 2013 where she denounced the court for having misconstrued the voting rights act. and her dissent was so powerful that a young nyu student made it a viral icon on the internet and turned her into an international celebrity. but for her, what makes the dissent so powerful, and i hope viewers will read the dissents today. the majority and the dissents. >> yeah. >> just to get a sense of the power of her voice. she's combining the crusading passion of her advocacy days with the careful constitutionalism of her -- of her judicial days and that shelby county dissent, there were some amazing lines in there just because you're not getting wet doesn't mean you throw away an umbrella in a rainstorm. it was the perfect description of why you still need the voting rights act. and her dissenting opinion in the partial birth of abortion case, the car heahart case, whet assumed that women needed to be given advice before they exercised their reproductive choice. or her

and here for the first time chief justice john marshall explicitly said the discovery doctrine that european crowns used in earlier centuries it still the doctrine that holds today. and he described the piankashaws as perpetual inhabitants with rights and justified that description by saying they were an inferior race of people without the privileges of citizens and under the perpetual protection and pupillage of the government. so in order to justify the per petuation of this discovery doctrine, he also needs to characterize them as racially distinct and inferior in american law. and the same kind of ideas further articulates in the famous cherokee nation v virginia case in 1831 where marshall claimed the phrase domestic dependent nations to describe the legal status of indians. which is a weird phrase. domestic, dependent. it is unclear how you could be a nation but also dependent. because nation implies sovereignty but domestic independent imply no sovereignty. and in fact, that kind of contradiction inherent in that phrase is at the heart of the legal status of the modern reservation sys

sales between pack and shaw indians who decided in 1823, and for the first time chief justice john marshall says the discovery doctrine that european crowds used in earlier centuries still the doctrine that holds today. and he described the piano shaw 's in this opinion has perpetual inhabitants with the menu diminutive rights and goes on to say to describe him as an inferior race of people without the privileges of citizens and under the perpetual protection into tillage of the government. in order to justify the perpetuation of the discovery doctrine, he also needs to characterize them as racially distinct an inferior in american law. the same kind of idea as further articulated in the same as cherokee nation case in 1831, where marshall coined the phrase domestic dependent nations to describe the legal status of indians, which is a weird phrase. domestic dependent. it's unclear how you could be a nation but also dependent. a nation implies sovereignty, but domestically dependence implies no sovereignty. and in fact that's the kind of contradiction inherent in that phrase, it is really at

so the first one that comes to mind is john marshall. he essentially volunteers to the family that he's going to write the first major biography about george washington. they are willing -- bushrod washington is willing to hand over the papers. and, every time that happens, when a new biographer gets involved and the family essentially says, here, have at it, depending on who you're dealing with, some of them will just take papers. some of them will cut them up, like jared sparks. it's part of the reason why the letters of washington and at this point the papers product is up to about 150,000 different bits and pieces of letters. these letters become scattered. so the family holds onto the core collection, but george -- who would that does get confiscated. after the war there's a family --orth lead back-and-forth between the lead family to get them back which they do eventually get some of the items back. but in terms of where they're buried, and how does it relate to sort of the modern -- it's interesting because those properties were e

election day, and another eight out of nine after election day in the lame duck period including john marshall. take the separate scenario in which the party in control in the senate is a different party than the president. there are ten such vacancies. only one out of ten was filled before election day. and you have to go back to the 1880s to find that example under grover cleveland's presidency. when you have a party in power in the senate whose job it is to advise and consent and confirm the president's nominee, it continually has shown historically that that is the job of the president. and history shows it's the president's obligation to make a nomination. when you have a party in a different power in the united states senate, those nominations have not moved know. that's what leader mcconnell did in 2016. >> a lot of republicans weren't talking about that in 2016. they were talking about the principle of we're close to an election, let's let the voters decide. it isn't just president trump changing his tune. it's virtually every senate republican. take a listen to the man who is now the

john marshall, the supreme court justice said the supreme court had the ultimate authority to decide whether something or not was constitutional. south carolina in 1832 said we don't like what's going on, we're getting out. they took a look behind them, and no one was following. so they decided to back off. they got some concessions. the same thinged happened again in 1850. south carolina said we can't stand this, we're getting out. they took a look behind them and once again there was no support. and states where they hoped there might be support, 1820 ipthis so-called '50s style won the elections so georgia and alabama and mississippi would not join south carolina until 1850. that's one of the reasons at least many republicans in 1860 said we've seen this before, it's a charade. south carolina so often south carolina goes off the deep end. it'll probably do it again. it's not a cause for concern. well, folks, it was a cause for concern. december and january of 1861 suddenly the other states in the deep south fell into line behind south carolina, and suddenly you have a situation th

john marshall, the chief justice of the supreme court, said the supreme court had the ultimate repository to decide whether or not something was constitutional. south carolina went to the precipice in 1832 and said we don't like what's going on. we are getting out. they took a look behind them, and no one was following, and they decided to back off. they got some concessions. the same thing happened again in 1850. south carolina, once again, said we cannot stand this. we are getting out. here we go. they took a look behind them and, once again, there was no support. in the states where they hoped there might be support, so called unionists, 18 fifties style, won the elections. so georgia and alabama and mississippi would not join south carolina in 1850. partly, for that reason, that's at least one of the reasons that many republicans in 1860, said we have seen this before. it's a charade. every so often, south carolina goes off the deep end. they will probably do it again. it's not a cause for concern. well, folks. it was a cause for concern. in november 1860 and december and january 1861

john marshall is the fourth chief justice.e land. the 14th amendment has a clause that you all should know about. it says, "and nor shall any state deny to any person the equal protection of the laws." so if congress passes a law or the president issues an executive order that is in conflict with the constitution, the constitution must prevail. ♪ >> vmi was a 150-year-old all-male military college. it had a tremendous endowment, well-connected alumni, four star generals. when you came out of vmi, that was something. >> the virginia military institute was the last all-male state-supported school in the country. 157 years of school tradition as an all-male military academy. >> boys can be troublesome, full of hormones and so forth. i don't mean to make general gender characteristics or generalizations here, but for some young men at that time of their life they need discipline and vmi provided that. >> look at the men that stand before you. they represent the essence of vmi! >> a female high school student wanted to attend vmi,

. >> john daniel marshall. >> shelley a. marshall. >> james martello. >> michael a.>> teresa m. martin. >> william j. martin, jr. >> brian e. martineau. >> betsy martinez. >> edward j. martinez. >> jose angel martinez, jr. >> robert gabriel martinez. >> waleska martinez. >> lizie d. martinez-calderon. >> paul richard martini. >> anne marie martino-cramer. >> joseph a. mascali. >> bernard mascarenhas. >> stephen frank masi. >> ada l. mason-acker. >> nicholas george massa. >> michael massaroli. >> philip william mastrandrea, jr. >> rudy mastrocinque. >> joseph mathai. >> charles william mathers. >> william a. mathesen. >> marcello matricciano. >> margaret elaine mattic. >> dean e. mattson. >> robert d. mattson. >> walter a. matuza, jr. >> timothy j. maude. >> jill maurer-campbell. >> charles a. mauro, jr. >> charles j. mauro. >> dorothy mauro. >> nancy t. mauro. >> robert j. maxwell. >> renee a. may and her unborn child. >> tyrone may. >> keithroy marcellus maynard. >> robert j. mayo. >> kathy n. mazza. >> edward mazzella, jr. >> jennifer lynn mazzotta. >> kaaria mbaya

and, in the united states, i think the pattern was set by john marshall, who said that judges in the united states should not wear royal robes or they should wear plain black. [end video clip] host: talking about justice ginsburg's position on the supreme court, we will be joined by kimberly robertson, who is bloomberg law's supreme court reporter. first, let us talk about what her legacy will be as a justice on the supreme court, what will we remember her for? most people now, know her as a pop icon, the notorious rpg. .he -- rbg she was a handful of justices who were noteworthy before the bench because of her work with the aclu where she cofounded the women's rights project and brought a number of cases before justices and set out gender equality as we know it today. host: what was her major impact and major decisions in the supreme court, and with justice ginsburg you cannot just talk about her majority opinions, she dissent.known for her what were some of the cases that will be remembered? guest: most people do not know that when she was reporting for the court, she was seen as a

marlo jose juan marrero john daniel marshall shelley a. marshall james martello michael a.ren ann martin peter c. martin teresa m. martin william j. martin, jr. brian e. martineau betsy martinez edward j. martinez jose angel martinez, jr. robert gabriel martinez waleska martinez lizie d. martinez-calderon paul richard martini anne marie martino-cramer joseph a. mascali bernard mascarenhas stephen frank masi ada l. mason-acker nicholas george massa michael massaroli philip william mastrandrea, jr. rudy mastrocinque joseph mathai charles william mathers william a. mathesen marcello matricciano margaret elaine mattic dean e. mattson robert d. mattson walter a. matuza, jr. timothy j. maude jill maurer-campbell charles a. mauro, jr. charles j. mauro dorothy mauro nancy t. mauro robert j. maxwell rene a. may and her unborn child tyrone may keithroy marcellus maynard robert j. mayo kathy n. mazza edward mazzella, jr. jennifer lynn mazzotta kaaria mbaya james joseph mcalary, jr. brian gerard mcaleese patricia ann mcaneney colin r. mcarthur john kevin mcavoy kenneth m. mcbrayer bren

before hamilton took office, adams appointed john marshall as chief justice of the u.s.ut it, but he realized under the constitution adams and the senate are allowed to do it. and, of course, marshall went on to become the longest serving chief justice, and historians say the most powerful and. and influential. and hamilton later confessed it was a brilliant move by adams. stuart: 20 seconds left, do you have any doubt that judge barrett will be confirmed before the election? >> well, i suspect it will be before the election. she's uncredibly qualified -- incredibly qualified, and democrats will be fools if they decide to attack her on such things as her religion. that's unconstitutional, article vi of the constitution, religion is not a test. but that probably won't stop them. they'll attack her nonetheless. and it will backfire on them. stuart: all right, gregg, thanks for being with us this morning. i'm sure we'll be seeing you a lot before the election. gregg jarrett. thank you, sir. the news from the market, the rally holds. up 470 points on the dow and 150 on the n

and, in the united states, i think the pattern was set by john marshall, who said that judges in the united states should not wear royal robes or they should wear plain black. [end video clip] host: talking about justice ginsburg's position on the supreme court, we will be joined by kimberly robertson, who is bloomberg law's supreme court reporter. first, let us talk about what her legacy will be as a justice on the supreme court, what will we remember her for? most people now, know her as a pop icon, the notorious rpg. .he -- rbg she was a handful of justices who were noteworthy before the bench because of her work with the aclu where she cofounded the women's rights project and brought a number of cases before justices and set out gender equality as we know it today. host: what was her major impact and major decisions in the supreme court, and with justice ginsburg you cannot just talk about her majority opinions, she dissent.known for her what were some of the cases that will be remembered? guest: most people do not know that when she was reporting for the court, she was seen as a

acting, at the a congress, if you look at marbury versus madison that many are familiar with where john marshallstablished with judicial action the concept of judicial review with regard to the supreme court. that arose from a situation where a federalist majority in congress which had just been voted out by the voters created a whole new branch of the judiciary, a new level of circuit courts. then president adams who had also been voted out still was on the circuit court. this kind of thing has happened in the past but we have to go a long way back to get there. host: let's talk a little about the process and the history about the process. then senate majority leader harry reid employed what was called the nuclear option back in 2013. let's see what he said back then. [video clip] >> the american people believe congress is broken. the american people believe the senate is broken. i believe the american people are right. the 113ths congress, congress, the united states has wasted an unprecedented amount of time a procedural and partisan obstruction. as a result, the work of this country goes und

virginia, he asked that someone go to richmond, virginia, and bring the robe of chief justice john marshalle great chief justice of the united states. bring that to washington for the new chief justice to wear. he cares about the court is an institution. that is one of the reasons that he voted to uphold the aca. you are right. he will have qualms but he will also be torn because he is a very conservative catholic. he and his wiff adoptee two children. they feel very strongly about the rights of a baby, an unborn baby, the rights of a fetus. he will be toward between his religion and wanting to uphold the institution of the court. and part of that institution is upholding precedent. create legitimacy and the authority of the court but the other element is it helps to create stability in the law. an justiced o'connor, though a , she is toervative say you have generations of americans living a life knowing there is access to abortion. david: we are 10 minutes away from this debate to begin. give us perspective. why do we care about these debates? what is the role in this process? barbara: sur

alexander hamilton and john marshall said yes jefferson said no. thank god he lost that fight. that when he was president he liked the union quite well. he bought louisiana and sent out lewis and clark and then had the embargo on the states. but once we resolve that we had political stability until 1840 when the country was faced with another challenge. what about slavery? when people got mad about containing slavery they threatened to withdraw from the union. abraham lincoln was elected on a promise to preserve the union and not abolish slavery. people have forgotten that but to contain it. then the war came and slavery was abolished enemy of the 14th and 15th amendment. it was tough one illinois newspaper nothing new about this. and then president grant was elected and between 1868. 50 percent chance to be president if you are from ohio. [laughter] there is no ticket to the white house like that today. grover cleveland served two terms. and the consensus that the debate occurred. we survived the second big challenge. and all the new immigrants coming to us at least economical

thurgood marshall said, john, you're just a fool. we'll take it to the naacp. i said mr. marshall, we're still young. 21, talking to thurgood marshall? i said mr. marshall? i appreciate all your work. appreciate your contribution. but we need a mass movement. my first major responsibility was to represent to help organize the march on washington. >> i wrote congressman lewis's introduction speech for barack obama when he was being nominated in 2008. i said to him, congressman, have you ever spoken before a crowd this large? and he looked at me and said, brenda, i spoke at the march on washington. and i thought, right, of course! >> to this nonvile kooviolent, nonviolent committee. >> in the beginning, president kennedy was not supportive of my idea of a march. he thought there would be violence and chaos. maybe we wouldn't get a civil rights group through congress. i learned to listen to people like dr. king, roy wilkins, james farmer, brittney young. >> sensitive and aware that he wanted things to go smoothly. when i asked him to ch

marshall nice solution. or not has been achieved so much more needs to be john and i think people have to be accountable solutions my name is on the top she's on and i what could she tell me. please leave me alone so get a good leave the issues above this was a bad day be a good. be a submissive the b.m.v. . presumably show some respect for the bold move shuffle slug good good good luck to play some islamists the bold mum mum and dad. the mother son the suburban mom the. love and respect. the be. playing. blame the boy. lote. business news line from a chaotic and combative clash of the 1st televised u.s. presidential debate back to the art director said we're going to you know we're going to go we're just we're done shergill we're going to decide i'm going to be sure there is very sure there's an idea there donald trump and joe biden go head to head in an angry showdown touching on white supremacy.

john thompson. >> dana: indeed. i loved him in the thurgood marshall movie, for sure. switch up a little bit.es and kittens can sometimes get along. look at this interior, he was surprised when his family brought in two new little kittens and he is like, what in the world has happened? maybe, eventually, they will all get along. of those cats seem like they're going to rule the roost. i also want to congratulate kelsey and james come all that we call him bud, for their wedding over the weekend. the newlyweds had to change their plans because of coronavirus but were still able to have a beautiful wedding on the jersey shore. for anyone who remembers aaron landers, who works for me at the dash white house, my goodness -- at fox news pier this is his sister. so congratulations to them. wishing you a lifetime of happiness together. greg, euronext >> greg: all right. ♪ animals are great ♪ animals are great ♪ animals are great >> greg: i'm not going to lie, i have a fetish. you know what that is? i like to watch earthlings bathe, especially if they are french. look at my pal here, enjoying a sensuo

america, 200,000 americans almost dead from a coronavirus, losing heroes, john lewis and now a woman to what thur good marshall was for civil rights he was a champion for women's rights in our country. and then on the court as a -- as a law student, as a lawyer i mean, so many of the things that she did inspired. and even when she was writing in the dissent, i still remember in her shelby decision, this decision that gutted the voting rights act that john lewis fought so nobly for. right now is like getting rid of an umbrella during a rainstorm because you don't think you're getting wet anymore. she was just truly one of the giants of our nation and our nation's ideals. and this is just a deeply, deeply sad night and i just grieve for not just her family but i really do grieve for our nation and the loss that we see now in her. >> yeah. it really has been a freaking hard year for everyone, i think. and obviously this is another -- another thing to mourn and to grieve what happens in your life on a night like tonight as a u.s. senator? like, is there a text chain of the judiciary stems that you are talking abou

marshall nice solution. or not has been achieved so much more needs to be john and i think people have to be at the heart of solutions my name is on the top she's on and i work at g.w. . not every neighborhood in the city of mumbai looks this be my neighborhood has plenty of trees and plots look by charles but by design decades ago a few people should individuals championed the need for green spaces show up and be as a community now make sure that it stays this week how come. just. that's what we talk about to be. alone welcome to india. now this problem but if. in fact plenty of studies have been conducted try and get local governments in many cases best practices communities to adopt so that can be segregated and. also on the outskirts of had a better idea. their breaking move when it comes to community waste management. surrounded by sprawling villas and luxurious gated communities one a for ages 108 acre property country in. the complex is home to 900 independent bungalows and gardens but things have not always been rosy. the fact that living in a beautiful haven like. still was. indifferent. and would

all the way through the john burch society, the goldwater supporters in 1964, who believed that both george marshaller were, and i quote, conscious agents of the communist conspiracy. so the paranoid style has been there. what is different is i would say it was probably 10% to 15% of the country for much of our history, just ballpark. it is now closer to 40%, and my own estimate about why that is, is that globalization -- and we're seeing so much evidence of the terrible -- both the positive parts of globalization, but also the really terrifying costs of it. we see it in the fires. we see it in climate change. we see it in the flow of manufacturing jobs and the rise of information jobs for which not enough people are educated. globalization has presented this existential challenge to the way so many people live that instead of reacting to it rationally and trying to figure out a way forward through this new world, they have instead looked back. they have romanticized the 1950s, which the 1950s were great if you looked like me. if you were a boring white male episcopalian from the south, you know, th

the idea that john steinbeck would write about bob hope as one of the heroes of the war. there are other people that just popped up, one of the things that marshall does, before pearl isbor he realized that film going to be a great motivator for his own troops. he recruits frank cap are the greatest filmmaker in hollywood and recruit him to make movies to show to the recruits for the draftees, for the men going into the war. harbor, before pearl -- marshalling the does, he basically purges the army. he gets rid of about 200 senior officers who are either alcoholic, unable to get along with her men, unable to make firm decisions and good decisions, he purges them. many of them he puts in a place where they are harmless. it is a great moment and in their place, i am the same things over and over, eisenhower, patton, etc. this is the magic i found in the book, even that moment of the purge really took courage. he almost had to quit the army, there was such pressure on him. he knew he could not do it and where the war was going, hg wells, the famous writer said one of the things the americans did that was brilliant was purging the officers that did n

john. >> shannon: all right. the first showdown is in the books, highlights and the low lights of this very fiery debate with our panel, leslie marshall, deroy murdock, steve hilton, live in cass caffeinated, ready to go next. all of these things that i found through ancestry. i discovered my great aunt ruth signed up as a nursing cadet for world war ii. you see this scanned-in, handwritten document. the most striking detail is her age. she was only 17. knowing that she saw this thing happening and was brave enough to get involved and do something- that was eye opening. bring your family history to life like never before. get started for free at ancestry.com >> there has never been administration or president who has done more than i've done in a period of three and a half years, and that is despite the impeachment hoax. >> under this president, we have become weaker, sicker, poorer, more divided, and more violent. when i was vice president, we inherited a recession. i was asked to fix it. i did. we left him a booming economy, and he caused a recession. >> shannon: the president and joe biden in the first head-to-head debate, book lay

marshalls, and homegoods. >>welcome back everyone the time now is 5.29 good morning and thanks for staying with us. yes so we've johntrouble with the all important forecast and at the half hour mark we definitely want to stick in or with that theme as you're heading out the door and john. a little bit. i can't see cooler i don't want to say cooler either because i feel like that gives everyone fall so we are looking at cooler days ahead of us though i have no problem saying that. >>today just not as hot and definitely going to be windy too which is the downside to today. if you look closely here at your tower cam you see those 2 blinking lights to the very top of the golden gate bridge. we do have some low clouds that are pushing their way through the bay a sign of cool coastal air that is very welcome this morning cooling us into the 50's and 60's right now. unlike yesterday when it was such a warm start for areas like berkeley in the 80's today, you're only at 60. fortunately that's not all of us fairfield you're at 82 right now so a lot like we were yesterday across the bay fairfield you're off to another warm st

john roberts. we haven't seen aappointment to the court that moved the court so sharply to the right as joan mentioned justice thomas was appointed to replace thurgood marshally everybody's dander is up. it's not just that the election is two months away. it's that everyone understands the stakes of filling this particular seat at this moment in american history. >> it the a fascinating and because that have controversial moment and we will continue the conversation. joan and steve, grateful for your time and important insights. again. we'll continue this conversation. still ahead to us. back to the coronavirus. the british health minister warning the uk now at another tipping point. ♪ here? nah. ♪ here? nope. ♪ here. ♪ when the middle of nowhere... is somewhere. the all-new chevy trailblazer. ♪ >>> there are new global concerns about the rise of the coronavirus, including lebanon which reported its highest daily number of new infections in just the last 24 hours. let's check in with our cnn correspondents around the world for global headlines. >> here in the uk british health officials say that the coronavirus panning democratic has turned the coroner a bad

been marshals with ruth bader ginsburg who helped this nation, recognizing the humanity, the dignity, the quality of it all, and her leaving, her death, not only in a year we lost c.c. vivian, john lewis, that we've seen so many of our heros and champions fall by the side, but it's an era of people who have advanced our rights and liberty and equality. >> it's pretty hard to become a rock star in your 80s, but she did with her famous name, the notorious rbg and her famous work of being one of the first women to take on sex discrimination and with landmark decisions because she argued before the supreme court. and then she herself became the second woman to be appointed to the supreme court where she, of course, continued her fight for justice. and she's someone that made justice cool for so many young people in this country, and we all mourn her loss. >> joining us now to dive a little deeper now, danny, let's start with you. we're talking about someone who served for 27 years, almost three decades. we just heard senator klobuchar say she argued before the supreme court prior to that. what can you tell us about her legal legacy and the monumental ruling she'll be remembered for?

marshalls, and homegoods. an extra 15% credit on car and motorcycle policies? that's great! that's 15% on top of what geico could already save you. so what are you waiting for? johnnit you a scarf? all finished, jean. enjoy! thank you. i give. the stitch work is impeccable. it's just a double fleck pattern with a reverse garter stitch. no big deal. is your hair this soft? softer. geico. save an extra 15% when you switch by october 7th. ...it was absolutely terrifying. this is a free video curriculum that can teach anyone basic digital skills. when you lift up one person, you lift up the entire community. ♪ ♪ i try so hard, i can't rise above it ♪ ♪ don't know what it is ♪ ♪ get a dozen double crunch shrimp for one dollar ♪ here's the very model ♪ ♪ of a modern daily family meal ♪ ♪ when food ideas are scarce ♪ and everything becomes a big ordeal ♪ ♪ you want something nutritious ♪ ♪ that your family will devour ♪ but add one thing that's healthy... ugh ♪ ♪ the taste will overpower so... ♪ ♪ only lightlife can return the balance ♪ ♪ to your every dish ♪ our food is always made of plants ♪ ♪ and it is totally delish ♪ 'cause nobody's ingredients ♪ ♪ are quite as si

marshall scholar. he is an associate fellow at yale university where he received his undergraduate and masters degree i got to know david his interning on hillary clinton's presidential campaign. johnrennan is a distinguished fellow he is a former scholar the university of texas in austin. his director of the central intelligence agency where he spent many hours in the situation room and previously served as assistant to the president, homeland security and counterterrorism. specialists in middle eastern affairs and counterterrorism, john has received cell several awards for his contributions include the national security federal, national distinguished sub public service medal and the fbi director medallion but please join me in welcoming david shiner and john brennan. select david like to go riding today congratulations on the release of the book for before you disseminate specific aspects can you give us an overview of what the book is about? and importantly why you wanted to write about this topic? >> guest: absolutely. first i doing to say thank you both for being here. i'm really, really excited to talk about these issues in my book with you. i would say that i wrote this boo

i would put her up with john marshall, the first great chief justice of the court who really had to form so many of the doctrines that we now sort of take for granted about our american jurisprudence and thurgood marshall, who in many ways carried the same fight for equality to make us realize that it applied to people regardless of the color of their skin, and then served on the supreme court. these are the two lawyers that i think of when i think of ruth bader ginsburg. and i'm not sure that anyone else is in the same class with her other than those two. it's a sad time when someone passes of such magnitude, but i can tell from the 37,000 pieces of correspondence that my office received in the first four days after she left that if you measure a life not by the day that it ends but by the influence that it has and the example that it sets, it's also a time where we can just justly admire, be in awe of and celebrate the accomplishments of a wonderful american. and with that, mr. president, i yield the floor and i note the absence of a quorum. the presiding officer: the clerk will call t

alexander hamilton and john marshall said yes, thomas jefferson said no. thank god thomas jefferson lost. when he got to be president jefferson like the whole national union quite well. he spent the equivalent of the year's budget by louisiana doubling the size of america, st. louis and clark, imposed an embargo with vastly unequal impacts on the states but once we resolved that we had a period of remarkable political stability. until 1840 when the country was faced with another challenge to the union. what do we do about slavery, let it expand or not and when people got mad about people trying to contain slavery they threatened to withdraw from the union. abraham lincoln was elected on a promise to preserve the union and not to abolish slavery. a lot of people have forgotten this, but to contain it. then the war came and slavery was abolished in the southern states and "after words" we had reconstruction. we thought about this from 1840-1868 and it was tough. one illinois newspaper when abraham one is elected said we would be better off if he were assassi