when i think of marcus brown and john marshall acreage i feel very tone in this it's week 5 if i had the chance i would definitely ask him in just a why. should it and i just want to know the truth and who knows. i deserve to be asked only this time and dedication not devoted to one account. should if i had cut. i was sitting out there in the coordinates and i thought it's all over. this is construct having the rug pulled out for money you fall into a deep hole mentally you don't even know when it will end with just keep your forward you don't know how you'll manage to get out again to all. men come to the are and then i have the lucky idea of asking the shipping company again armed with a new the boss of the company said heiko i'm sorry but i have a real problem i'm broke and i need a job can you get me wrong i'm from a fellow my face with wild caught i'm lost 70000 euros and i have nothing left of his next no. by a compass and finance scum why a card is a financial scandal that must be investigated a dream but appropriate action also needs to be taken as a canal. if nothing changes

as justice john marshall harlan pointed out in his stunning descent the supreme court chose to ignore reality. they ignored the violence the paralyzing effects of racism on both the victims and american democracy that separate is never equal and the fact that the constitution is color blind. there was a more subtle yet equally devastating form of inequality exclusion. pretending that women blacks chinese hispanics jews at all were never part of american history is a deeply harmful form of inequality for century after the civil war historians ignored these groups and wrote almost entirely about white men for instance 270,000 black troops fought for the union during a civil war. i just finished a search of dozens of history textbooks published between 1880 and 1950 and cannot find a single one that mentions this essential fact. my own high school textbook the growth of the american republic written by the prominent historians samuel morrison and henry calmenter had a two-page section out of 830 pages on slavery that began and i am quoting it as for sambo who's wrongs moved the abolition

so let's start with john marshall john talk to us about the battle of midway. very well. thank you if you could put my first slide up for me in in following with rob's sort of skepticism or guarded usage around the words turning point. my title is midway turning point in the pacific and as you can see, i've got a question mark at the end of that statement, which should be your clue that you know, i think we have to use the word turning point in a very careful manner within the context of a large war like world war ii and it's near cousin decisive battle. that's another phrase that gets trotted out with respect to midway on a pretty frequent basis. you know, what are those really mean within the context of a war like the second world war which just isn't a contest between two countries but is actually a contest between two nation, you know larger lions blocks composed of dozens of nations, you know, can you really have a turning point or a decisive battle within that context and is what i'd like to explore for the next 10 minutes or so next slide, please. i think the way t

if you read -- by john marshall in that case but the job of all attacks is all to resolve disputes but to resolve this agreement. laws and politics are both about disagreement and the way through resolve disagreements if we are not distracted by questions of what rights do we have, our burden is what's happening and how urgent is that? can we resolve that word in and is there something we can work with to try to figure out how to solve this problem and narrow the range? if you are having a negotiation politically those are the kinds of problems you would normally have. in an ordinary disagreement you have a right and that's a very legalistic frame. and i don't think there is any reason in the constitution why disagreements about rights should take any different form. in the case like take a race-based affirmative action, well applicants who haven't gotten into a particular institution claiming because that institution uses race that violates their right to equality. the school is claiming something very similar that if you don't use race and i say they are claiming this is the sentence

john marshall was 20 years old, younger than me. ehrenberg, 20. alexander hamilton, 21. james madison was only 25 and thomas jefferson who wrote the whole gosh darn thing was only 33 years old in 1776. america has always depended on young patriots, young conservatives, young people are proud of the country getting involved in the process. now in 2021 it's not that hard, you don't have to write the declaration of independence because that's already been done and it'snot rocket science . i've never taken a rocket science class but i have taken a lot of other classes and i argue organic chemistry is more difficult than some rocket science classes and having been there as a student like you got doing what i do professional i can tell you all of this review at turning point usa even at the highest levels of what we do here at hq boils down to one thing. tell the truth. in what ever way you possibly can to yourcommunity . 80 it's as easy as raising your hand and telling your professor or teacher know that's wrong and here's the fact behind it, here's the statistic i can back t

they have chief justice john marshall's bladder stones if you ever have a hanker in to see that they got a piece of the brain of charles gatto. who was the guy who assassinated garfield and they have in a small glass jar. they have the tumor that was removed from grover cleveland's mouth. in 1893 and this operation on a boat and so that really triggered my interest in the story the fact that the tumor was still around and that somebody had thought maybe this is a good thing to keep an interesting keepsake. and and so i talked to the museum and it turns out that one of the doctors who performed the operation had donated the tumor had donated the tumor to the museum back in 1917, and not only that well, i guess you would know he was a bit of a saver since he saved the tumor, but he also saved all his correspondence and clippings and lots of lots of information about the operation which of course was intended to be secret. so i realized that there was the possibility of doing something about about this story and then as i as i dug deeper into it, i found it wasn't just the story of this

marshall. plus wisconsin congresswoman mike gallagher. >> john: but we begin this monday with shocking details from a "wall street journal" report on the origins of the coronavirus pandemic and an apparent 180 from dr. anthony fauci. hello and welcome to "america reports." i'm john roberts. >> gillian: good to be with everybody at home and i'm gillian turner in for sandra smith today. according to "the wall street journal," previously undisclosed u.s. intelligence report is now claiming that three researchers at that wuhan lab were hospitalized with covid like symptoms way back in 2019. that is a full four months before china reported its cases. this is also revealed after it

justice john marshall harlan who had been a slave owner before the civil war.he is the voice of civil rights. he understands racism, he understands that creation, he understands african americans are just as entitled to constitutional rights as everybody else. but he is a lone voice, sometimes he gets to read three justices to join him for this entire period. and it will only be after the beginning of world war i that we begin to get what will become, by the 19 forties, and fifties, the second reconstruction and constitutional law. thank you very much. [applause] >> thank you very much, i am very pleased to be here. and i would like to express my gratitude. it is wonderful gathering. a wonderful contribution to public education. i'm going to focus our attention for a few minutes on the long reach of the civil rights cases. first, civil rights cases were a set of cases decided in 1883 in which the supreme court of the united states invalidated very important parts of the civil rights act of 1875. in a minutes i will turn to the case and we will walk through the

the lone dissenter, john marshall harlan.sy, like ferguson, was in the dark about his ancestors. >> i never knew that i was related to him. >> you don't read about it in elementary school? >> one paragraph in the history book. >> phoebe, how did you find out about this? >> well, i just got a call one day. this gentleman had purchased my great, great grandfather's house on henry clay. and he wanted to restore it. he's saying, you know,ouatat gr house, the judge in sy fe. i did not know that. >> knowing, she says, got her and plessy on a mission tontrodr keith weldon medley, they created the plessy and ferguson foundation. >> we want to tell the truth about history and bring out all the facts that were hidden. >> i think it's our responsibility. that's how we look at it. we want people to understand what legacy is and not to wait until the end of your life to understand legacy, but to understand legacy at an early age. >> do you ever think what if the ruling had been different? >> well, i think america had a chance to mend itse

our first supreme court justice john marshall said the power to tax involves the power to destroy. we're not reinventing the wheel here. when you increase taxes and increase government control you destroy investment and job numbers suffer. now, again, we have some case studies here before covid, republican-led tax cuts spurred the greatest economy of our lifetime. record show unemployment for every demographic that is able, the high school drop-out, for african-americans for hispanics, women, veterans, you name it, record low unemployment, record high employment driven by investments from the private sector. we have wage growth disproportionate in the lower income strata. now, this may be inconvenient truths for some on the other side of the aisles, but truths nonetheless, but it works. let's have a thought experience. let's contrast the outcome of the visions of the two sides. those who would like to raise taxes on the wealthy as kind of a principal would like us to think that the disinterested bureau kkratt-- bureaucrat to make a decision, if it fails it's on the dime of the comp

their first supreme court justice john marshall said the power to tax involves the power to destroy. we are not reinventing the wheel. when you decrease taxes to encourage investment and jobs follow following when you increase taxes and you increase government control you destroy investment and job numbers suffer. again we have case studies here. the for covid republican-led tax cuts spurred the greatest economy of our lifetime. record low unemployment for every democrat, the disable the high school dropout, african-americans spanish women are veterans you name it record low unemployment, record high employment driven by investments in the private sector. we have wage growth disproportionate in the lower income strata. this may be inconvenient truths for some on the other side of the aisle but truths nonetheless. we know works. let's contrast the logical outcome of the two visions of the two sides. those who would like to raise taxes on the wealthiest principle would like us to think that disinterested bureaucrat is able to make a wiser decision as to where to avoid capital capitol t

. >> leading off our discussion tonight, our gloria browne-marshall, civil rights attorney and constitutional law professor john jay college, msnbc legal analyst. good evening to both of you. gloria, i want to read to you an article that was published in "the new york times," which reads as follows. federal prosecutors have hesitated to bring the civil rights charge in high-profile police killings because it is harder to meet the laws willfulness standard, which would mean proving that an officer intended to use excessive force in order to violate someone's civil rights. the split-second nature many police shootings, including those at the center of several of those cases, make them particularly difficult to prosecute. your thoughts on the decision to charge the four former police officers in minneapolis? >> well, i think the operative word here is "hesitant" to bring these charges. why don't we let the courts decide? let a grand jury determine whether or not there's enough evidence to indict them even if the standard is high as willfulness under -- of course, you have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. it's e

marshall. plus wisconsin congresswoman mike gallagher. >> john: but we begin this monday with shocking details from a "wall street journal" report on the origins of the coronavirus pandemic and an apparent 180 from dr. anthony fauci. hello and welcome to "america reports." i'm john roberts. >> gillian: good to be with everybody at home and i'm gillian turner in for sandra smith today. according to "the wall street journal," previously undisclosed u.s. intelligence report is now claiming that three researchers at that wuhan lab were hospitalized with covid like symptoms way back in 2019. that is a full four months before china reported its cases. this is also revealed after it is revealed that dr. fauci appears to be changing his tune after the virus may be developed in china. >> are you so confident that it developed naturally? >> no. i'm not convinced about that. i think that we should continue to investigate what went on in china until we find out, to the best of our ability, exactly what happened. >> john: wisconsin congressman mike gallagher is one of several republican congressman demandi

david marshall and craig gordon were always going to be in there along with the epl stars, kieran tierney, andrew robertson and johnand scott mctominay as well as regulars like kyle mcgregor and stuart armstrong. there were a few places up for grabs and three of those have gone to the uncapped trio of david turnbull of celtic and also billy gilmore of chelsea and nathan pattison of rangers. turnbull has played a number of games and been one of the best celtic performers and a disappointing season for them. but patterson and gill more have played only a few games for their respective clubs, but that said they are talented young players and they will be few complaints about their inclusion. as for those who have not made it, the aberdeen defender andrew considine might feel a bit hard done by having been involved in the qualifiers and also upfront, leigh griffiths of celtic and shankland of dundee united, both very capable of getting goals but there is no place for them. but for there is no place for them. but for the lucky 26 who have made it, they will be meeting up next week and leaving for a training camp in spai

shameless self promoter like my friend chris mackowski anton henry john or andre jonanee is going to serve as a staff officer under marshall nay nay served under napoleon. so what jon is going to do is learn from the best nay is known as the bravest of the brave to napoleon for a exploit on the russian for an exploit during the russian campaign as as napoleon is making a retreat back towards what is today poland and back towards prussia, which is today germany, but germany is going to be one of the great military thinkers of the 19th century. he's gonna write books. he's going to write theories. he's going to give us a lot of our modern military. jargon when we talk about concentration of force interior lines decisive points those all are going to come from germany who learned from marshall nay who learned from napoleon himself the man on the right hand side is the the man. i don't think it's enough credit for robert e. lee's career, and that is winfield scott now the picture that you see here of winfield scott legitimately. he has to be put on a horse at this point using what we would consider an engine winch. so a lot of

marshalls. new dove men deodorant is different. it has 48 hour protection. and a plant-based moisturizer... that cares for your skin. odor protection that works new dove men plant-based care. johne is raised with no antibiotics ever. every nugget, strip and drumstick. keep it real. keep it tyson. (brother) hi sis! (sister) you're late! (brother) fashionably late. (sister) we can not be late. (brother) there's a road right there. (brother) that's a cat. wait, just hold madi's headpiece. (sister) no. seriously? (brother) his name is whiskers. (bride) what happened to you? whose cat is that? (brother) it's a long story. (sister) oh my gosh. (farmer) whiskers! there you are! (avo) the subaru crosstrek. the adventurous s-u-v for adventurous people. love. it's what makes subaru, subaru. look ma, no cavities! oh debbie, that's great! you'll always need a healthy smile... because in 60 years, you'll be taking tons of selfies and sharing them on something called the internet. moms know best. that's why they trust crest. the #1 toothpaste brand in america. i don't like veggies... what?! ♪ whatever you have at home, knorr sides can turn nutritious veggies into mouthwatering meals. ♪ veggi

marshals arrested him in the death of kevin jang. he was found with multiple gunshot wounds outside of his car back in february. >> john: and forecasterscould be anywhere between 4-6 hurricanes this year. the season starts the 1st of june but they did not expect the 2021 season to be as active as last season. from all of these and other stories download fox news app. to scan the qr code there or go to fox news.com. >> john: stomach >> gillian: the battle of her face mask on the floor is slamming nancy pelosi's masks over in the chamber but at the same time nowhere else. they are accusing her of engaging in political theater. in just a moment, we are going to speak with former president trump chief of staff mark meadows but first up joining from capitol hill. it sounds like nancy pelosi just wants people to be wearing masks when they're going to be seen on tv come is that right question works because she's taking a lot of heat from republicans right now. the capital attending physician, brian bonham says that the chamber policy aligns with cdc guidelines. the g.o.p. members are not sold. >> they don't care. whether true science, whether

marshals for ms. waters trip were assigned and then removed from those missions and assigned to ms. waters mission on top of her already armed security detail from the capitol police. >> johnughout the transportation system to include airports and a board air traffic including members of congress." so lawmakers make is that new? but congressional fights are not the air marshals primary mission. "facing federal air marshals on aircraft simply because a member of congress request it is my agree just misuse." what is clear, sandra, applied to congressional request or simply being approved and pumped to the front of the land bypass and commercial flights? we asked capitol hill police who did not respond to multiple requests for comment. >> sandra: william la jeunesse, thank you, john. >> john: sandra some republicans questioning at the cdc shipped on mask guidance, an arizona congressman anti-big said the new mask guidance is encouraging but the cdc and by far left radical to distract from the consequences of policy decisions that have been heard around the world. with spring in the panel, let's take a look at the timing of all of this. the science has not changed in weeks but

marshall, scottish family party, 334. ryan smart, scottish— family party, 334. ryan smart, scottish labour party, 2324. john for the tories in hartlepool today, not so much for the other parties. i am willing to put a five quid bet not that we might get bodice and the inflatable on some front pages tomorrow, i think that is a possibility. —— boris in the inflatable. abs, think that is a possibility. -- boris in the inflatable. a classic olitical boris in the inflatable. a classic political scene, _ boris in the inflatable. a classic political scene, but _ boris in the inflatable. a classic political scene, but classically, | political scene, but classically, the person that won the famous victory at hartlepool, john mortimer, is silenced, which is always the way. she is the woman that won the by—election, but no word for her —— from her because the stage belongs to borisjohnson. the idea that it is he who is deliberately victory ralph and john mortimer. i deliberately victory ralph and john mortimer. ~' ., . mortimer. i think we noticed earlier, and _ mortimer. i think we noticed earlier, and i— mortimer. i

john marshall harlan and the johnson democrat appointee was samuel.should we know about this court? >> as a whole and civil rights cases, the court was fairly consistent that congress lacked the power to provide initial protection for the friedman. that case was one dissenter john -- he said that lost discriminating and private businesses discriminating against the friedman -- he thought the 13th and 14th amendment prohibited this form of racial segregation against african americans. notice justice harlan did not dissent, i'm sorry he did not write it in separately in yick wo. a few years later plessy ferguson, he dissented arguing that exclusionary laws separate but equal is unconstitutional and a very famous part of his opinion saying while we're able to give protection for the friedman, there is a race different than ours. that is chinese people. heartland, who is very much progressive with respect to equality for african americans did not seem to feel quite the same way about chinese people. on this court, there was not much of a friend for racial