winner and he our know to part in the demonstration alongside it's organizer opposition leader john marshall, who runs in hard. natalie, deb george miller saw him addressing the crowd or not load behind me. he called for this protest and he will hope that it will help revitalize the phone lines that in recent months has been played by by. oh. 6 other goodness, not dog, o d, with what we are achieving here today with workers and political organizations, we are creating a new popular front that will one day take power in this country. when the time comes, not cost would show the political left has been somewhat eclipsed in recent weeks by france is trade unions which have led a number of strikes, including the recent oil refinery walk out at a time when pressure on the government is mounting north shore wants to regain the spotlight and is sure his left we alliance remains a significant opposition force. natasha butler auto 0 paris. now the u. s. president is being accused of inciting chaos, terror and destruction and iran. the comments from iran's president abraham racy follow joe biden prais

long sighted organizer opposition leader john marshall, who brought in hard natalie, deb, george miller saw him addressing the crowd or not load behind me. he called for this protest, and he will hope that it will help revitalize the left on lines. that in recent months has been played by by oh, other your goodness. not ga. gov bay o. d with what we are achieving here today with workers and political organizations, we are creating a new popular front that will one day take power in this country when the time comes, not cost. so the political left has been somewhat eclipsed in recent weeks by france. his trade unions, which have led a number of strikes, including the recent oil refinery walk out at a time when pressure on the government is mounting marshal wants to regain the spotlight and is sure his left wing alliance remains a significant opposition force. natasha butler, al jazeera paris, while ticket is expanding its investigation into the coal mine explosion that killed 41 whackers and thought that the blast was caused by a build up of flammable gases in the state own facility. but

rests on the fact that it satisfies the requirements of the statute and the constitution needs, as john marshall it, somebody to say what the law is. that is the cool -- goal of the supreme court. that doesn't change because disagree -- people disagree with the opinion or disagree with the jurisprudence. obviously, people can say what they want. they are free to criticize the supreme court. if they want to say it's legitimacy is in question, they are free to do so. i don't see the connection between rpms -- opinions that people agree with and the legitimacy of the court. if the court doesn't retain its legitimate function of interpreting the constitution, i am not sure who would take up that mantle. you don't want the political branches telling you what the law is. you don't want public opinion to be the guide of what the appropriate decision is. yes, all of our opinions are open to criticism. our members do a great job criticizing sometimes. [laughter] simply because people disagree with an opinion is not a basis for questioning the legitimacy of the court. host: chief justice john roberts, las

that is the case of andrew jackson, president of the united states and john marshall, the chief justice has made his decision and i will let him enforce it. he sent troops to northern georgia. to enforce his decision, he evicted the indians who went on the trail of tears. to oklahoma, where they live to this day. stories, marshall exchange, letters and stories of i give up. say you are worried about 20%, what about --fine. but, the chief of that indian tribe, he was a great man. he led them on that march, his wife died on the way. it was called the trail of tears. his wife is buried. the only discovery i have made in my life is that she is buried one mile from central high school in little rock. that is, to me, those little rock nine. that is a symbol of something, that is a symbol of a country making a great effort, not just the lawyers, not just the judges . they tried to close the schools. too late. that was the time of art in luther king, the freedom -- martin luther king, the freedom riders, the country had begun to understand what jim crow was about. it took time. those little roc

jackson sat in a chair that had previously belonged to the longest serving former chief justice, john marshallhere in an official capacity, dressed in a traditional morning coat, and john roberts administered the oath. ben jackson took a seat at the far right of the bench, that's the seat reserved for the associate justice of the court. speaking at the library of congress after the ceremony, jackson acknowledged her groundbreaking ascent to the high court. >> people from all walks of life have approached me, they are calling on the ancestors, harking back to history, and claiming their stake at last. they are saying to me, in essence, you go, girl! [applause] >> justice jackson is now part of a three-member liberal minority that is governed by -- oral arguments initial rulings on crucial matters like voting rights, lgbtq rights, and affirmative action. and with justice ketanji brown jackson on the bench, monday also marks the first day of a supreme court that looks a little more like the rest of america. that does it for us tonight, rachel will be here on monday, and i will see you tuesday. no

i'm john marshall. i'm pleased to serve as moderator of our 2022 form tonight. this broadcast is made possible with the cheap -- grand junction daily sentinel, and care cc. to our live video stream where -- southern utah tribal radio, four corners radio and we have kb ut. and kb and k. bulger on katie and you. and pay oni and kb nf. and on k ffr in winter park. we welcome listeners a public radio. unlike other forms. tonight's event is completely produced by sea and new factly in students. and unlike other debates it is intended to give candidates ample time to discuss their thoughts on policy matters and our state. i would like to welcome democrat and jared policy and heidi to grand junction. thank you for joining us. both campaigns agree to the rules and each will respond to a series of questions from our panelists who i will introduce. colorado public radio's and ek. from the david central -- sentinel gretchen rice. from our student body jason hunter. each question will be posed to both candidates, and each candidate will have 90 seconds to respond. whoever g

ultimately, this failed john marshall, one of the envoys. this was before he was the chief justice. he sent back to the united states when they were released. there was widespread outrage. americans were horrified and it became the national chant to say millions for defense not $0.01 for tribute. so no bribes, lots of defense. the envoys came back and the next over the next year is a period that we think of as a quasi war. congress did not actually declare war, but they did spend a lot of money to build up the new. there was now a navy department. so now we have four departments and an attorney general. there is a provisional, which alexander hamilton was nominally in charge of and had a great deal of fun designing the uniforms for and. they spent a lot of money on the national defenses no war actually happened. the ongoing stuff on the high seas the of ships did continue but when france realized the united states was quite willing to defend itself, it really backed off and tolerated started sending signals behind the scenes to john adams through some of his friends and his son, joh

he received accommodations from the late john marshall, secretary of the army, and president ronald reagan's. he is the recipient of the 2008 joseph el harsh history award for the northern virginia association of historians. and the cover supplement of the 2016 t michael mueller alexandria history award from the alexandria historical society. his father served in the u.s. army. this was as a medical officer during the second world war. and he took care of many d-day wounds on the return to england. later he served under president dwight eisenhower's medical staff. we were fortunate to have the doctor join us as a lecturer last year and in 2019. tonight he will speak on patents. he will speak on the missing generals of d-day. we will have time for a q and a afterwards. then we will invite everyone to join us afterwards for reception. and now, ladies and gentlemen, madam and mr., doctor kim. >> thank you very much. when i was called earlier this year about doing tonight's program hole i asked, what do you want the program to be? they said they wanted something different and something short and

professional historian with the us army for 34 years where he received commendations from the late john marshall secretary of the army and president ronald reagan. he is the recipient of the 2008 joseph l harsh history award for the northern virginia association of historians and the clover recipient of the 2016 t michael miller alexandria history award from the alexandria historical society. his father served in the us army medical as a medical officer during the second world war and took care of many d-day wounded on their return to england later serving under president dwight eisenhower's medical staff. we were fortunate to have dr. holian. join us as a lecturer last year and in 2019. tonight dr. holian will speak on patton and rummel? the missing generals of d-day we'll have time for q&a afterwards and then we'll invite everyone to join us downstairs for a reception. and now ladies and gentlemen, madam and messiah dr. kim holian. thank you very much. when i was called earlier this year about doing tonight's program. i asked. what do you want? the program to be and they said something differe

john. marshall tried to incorporate the bill of rights as early as the 1830s and couldn't pull it off so these are debates that have gone on from the beginning, and yeah, bristol having them, obviously. and that's why people run from me in the grocery store. [laughter] >> yeah and, i would add, i don't view citizenship -- i don't view citizenship, because i'm basically on looking at module of communities. i look at notions of belonging. because people couldn't be belong to an area but not seen as citizens of the state. so but their notions of belonging and feeling attachment to a place and leads to activism to include have the state include them. so i usually try to do that but usually citizenship, belonging, and always, my students return of constitutional amendments and also supreme court decisions, more so [inaudible] classes in here too because i think there's also flash point for understanding how these [inaudible] were fixed and, that idea, that constant negotiation back and forth, communities who really are not citizens, but the law and other things, to still advocate in the sense becau

i think it's also interesting, john marshall try to incorporate the bill of rights as early as 1830s, could not pull it off. so these are debates that have gone on from the beginning, and yeah, we are still having them, obviously. and that's why people run from me in the grocery store. >> yeah, and i would act. i don't view citizenship -- i don't view citizenship basically like if you look at marginalized communities, i note notions of belonging, because people good belong to an area, but not be citizens of the state. but their notions of belonging and feeling of attachment to a place, it leads to activism to include them. so i usually try to do that by usually citizenship belonging, and always, my students return retain enough constitutional amendments, and also, supreme court decisions. so, i'm glad they are here too because they understand how these debates were never fixed. and that idea, that constant negotiation, that back and forth, that allows for some communities who really are not citizens. by the law and other states to still advocate in the sense because they believe thems

thomas jefferson and, john marshall were cousins. they despised each other, which was what a lot of the supreme court animosities were about for the first decade, in particular. but they were able to draw a distinction partizan judges and super partizan judges. and so they knew the partizanship was there. they just were to sort of like accept it until they were so ridiculously partizan that tried to get them kicked off supreme court like savages. so i don't that the early republicans necessarily a good supreme court model for what we should aspire but i think that there is a space for partizanship that's accepted and acknowledged. and i actually wonder if our supreme court, our relationship with the supreme court would be better if we stopped pretending like they weren't partizan. it functioned, they weren't partizan and said like, yes, these are the spoils come from the presidency. like go and approach it that way. mm hmm. yeah. i saw a hand over on this side of the room earlier. yes, i think this is on. okay. and rob baker, i'm fro

i think it's also interesting john marshall tried to incorporate. the bill of rights as early as the 1830s. and couldn't pull it off. so these are debates that have gone on. from the beginning and yeah, we're still having them obviously and that's why. people run from me in the grocery store. i'll use citizenship. really? i'm using look at marginalized. community to belong in because people couldn't be belong to a area but not seen a citizen of the state. so but their notions will be logging and feeling attached to a place and leads to activism to include had the state include them. so i usually try to do that but usually citizenship belong in and i always my students read enough constitutional amendments and also supreme court decisions more so that our classes in here too because i think those are also flash points are understanding how these debates were never fixed and that idea that's that constant negotiation back and forth, but it allows for some communities who really are not citizens. by the law and other things to still advocate instance b

seeing her in the courtroom, sit down below the dais initially in the chair that chief justice john marshallom the bench. they had gotten it out of the display case. she sat there, the chief justice called her up to see her a son to the dais, it was just an emotional time. just an amazing experience. >> as you said, that ceremony was very quick. she did not really get to speak at all, what were the only where she was able to say? >> other than repeating the oval office the only thing she said was thank you to the chief justice when she welcomed her. i bring that up because i've done saw you on the library of congress celebration a few hours later. talk about the significance of what happened player. >> it was a wonderful celebration. there was music. there was a discussion about justice jenkins hero, justice baker motley the first black female federal judge in this country's history. her speech was just remarkable. it showed the kind of inspiration that not just her nomination has become but that she has become. millions of young people, and particularly women of color in this country it was

court has made in that tradition goes back to the beginning of the public and the leadership of john marshall that has not changed. the court has maintained its position of respect in the country throughout its existence. at the end of the day, i would say i hope there were fewer things that changed about the court. host: a recent story about the court, the supreme court says it will not intervene in a lawsuit in which dominion voting systems accuse the chief executive officer of breaking the election against donald trump. the high court did not say anything monday on the case. the former president's allies have been accused. that's another story about the supreme court. do you think the supreme court is in touch with the american people or not? from patrick in florida on our disagree line. caller: i disagree. i think the court is in touch with the american people. it's diverse in many ways both gender wise and color wise. i think it is bought on with the american people. the only people it is not in conjunction with is the democratic national party. a lot of the mainstream media as well and

court rests on the fact it satisfies the requirements of the statute and that the constitution, as john marshallds somebody to say what the law is. the role does not change just because people disagree with this or that opinion or the mode of jurisprudence. people can say what they want and feel free to criticize the supreme court. if they want to say legitimacy is in question, they are free to do so. but i do not understand the connection between the disagreement and the legitimacy of the court. i am not sure who would take up the mantle. you do not want the political branches telling you what the law is and you don't want public opinion to be the guide of what the appropriate decision is. yes, all of our opinions are open to criticism. our members do a great job of criticizing. [laughter] but simply because people disagree with the is not a basis for questioning the legitimacy of the court. host: we are talking about the supreme court and we have our guest, host of the podcast "court watch." last month justice elena kagan spoke about the proper role of the supreme court. [video clip] >> the co

court rests on the fact it satisfies the requirements of the statute and that the constitution, as john marshall say what the law is. the role does not change just because people disagree with this or that opinion or the mode of jurisprudence. people can say what they want and feel free to criticize the supreme court. if they want to say legitimacy is in question, they are free to do so. but i do not understand the connection between the disagreement and the legitimacy of the court. i am not sure who would take up the mantle. you do not want the political branches telling you what the law is and you don't want public opinion to be the guide of what the appropriate decision is. yes, all of our opinions are open to criticism. our members do a great job of criticizing. [laughter] but simply because people disagree with the is not a basis for questioning the legitimacy of the court. host: we are talking about the supreme court and we have our guest, host of the podcast "court watch." last month justice elena kagan spoke about the proper role of the supreme court. [video clip] >> the court protects t

. >> john: florida's fire marshal is calling hurricane ian the worst natural disaster in the state'sflorida are left to pick up the pieces of their shattered lives. some like our next guest are still dealing with flooding five days later. let's bring in rob holingsworth, he owns a business 40 miles east of sarasota. the hurricane went over you and your business which has been in business since 1956. in the 66 years the company has been around, have you ever seen not guilty like this? >> no, this was worse than hurricane charley, which was in 2004, and just a much bigger storm. and from a flooding perspective, i'm not sure that anything on record has gotten close to what we are seeing. >> you know, we are -- we are looking at some of the pictures you provided to us, a storage facility with the roof collapsed there, from the outside, and the inside, seeing greenhouses where you are growing a lot of your plants and things you ship to texas and here up to washington, d.c. how much damage did you suffer in terms of the overall facility? >> we are still assessing. i would say somewhere, it

more ahead for this court, this term, cnn correspondent jessica schneider and gloria brown marshall from john, the black woman law and power." thank you very much. and you go into this term with a precipitous decline from the american public in trust for the institution. down 20 points from where the trust was just two years ago. you've got a still unsettled leak of the dobbs decision. you've got an internal debate among the justices over whether the institution is considered legitimate in the eyes of the public. and so many critical cases ahead. >> yogot it. the tensions between the justs are simmering going into a term that may not be as tumultuous as the end of last term with the over turning of roe v. wade. right now the justices are hearing a case about the scope of the clean water act, how the epa could restrict development or land that is adjacent to wet lands and interestingly ketanji brown jackson has been quite vocal already in the 40 plus minutes of oral argument for the start of the term. but for rest of the term we'll see voting rights act and power of state legislatures versus c

marshall. he is not john pershing. so you have more receptive ideas.but also you have a totally focused organist move it with the w campaign that is going to push for, and also an ally with eleanor roosevelt to get black officers, black soldiers to fly. but eugene bowler is going to be the first african american to fly combative missions for the french are world war i. he is the only one. ? it >> think. you know problem. >> ladies and gentlemen, if you don't want my time and thinking doctor latrice donaldson. -american history museum is being built in charleston, south carolina. >> mayor, do you want to

them together, it presented its own challenges as michael recounts in his book , the fire marshal at camp f john wouldn't let them move into the building because it didn't have enough regular heads we had to put them in tents in the summer heat of kuwait in a motor pool next to my headquarters and backup vans to push enough cold air into those things but you know how may sprinkler heads are intense by the way? >> we put them together and that was important because come command and control into countries had to be balanced against the fact that we had two different sets of authoritiesfor use of force. one in syria, one in iraq . we had forces distributed in turkey and jordan and kuwait and cotter and of course in iraq.really 29 contributing nations out of the coalition of i think almost 60 countries and we had you know, kind of strike groups operating and there was a lot of activity going on. and then the other thing to keep in mind is in iraq title 22 authority we had a chief emission, and operating embassy. and balancing all those equities , we had two murders happening, not just one, we were f

. >> it's unique sandra john because this investigation has been running by the marshall of the supremefice not you'd to deal with a leaker. the justice department more likely to handle this not involved in this investigation. >> live at the justice department. >> thanks. >> despite the part stan complaints about voter suppression early voting off to a record start in battleground georgia, democratic warnock and stacy abrams trailing in polling as she tries to flip the governor's mansion. jonathan is live in union city, georgia, south of atlanta. >> who would have thought, georgia for a long time a red state is now a competitive battleground. you have republicans controling the governor's mansion and democrats controlling both u.s. senate seats one warnock hopes to increase conservative report. >> when foreign countries tried to block us from selling our crop we needed someone to fight back. >> that's why i partnered with a senator from alabama to stand up for farmers. >> stacy abrams in her second bid for governor is rallying the conservative base, if elected abrams agenda would face c

john mentioned the child's confidence. somebody what a lot of other comments join the job in marshall fund of the united states atlanta . he needs that you've got the me for the child's political love to look at what are the means to to the organs of sean? haven't of because fully to log in and flock among these organizations, the one that stands out the most is the atlantic bridge. it was founded in 1952. its official aim is to promote german american understanding. you guys can sort of get a mining willie trinidad there again, as i said, the now on the market. that means that the ocean group and politic of for the government group, now you missed a mission company? sure. globally of the confusion. yes. because that's and you know, it's just it's you know, when you must boucher for the dr. booth on affordable of the federal not 20 school must have him give you a blue cross. you more log in, you know you probably list the soonest. you don't put a concert on the spring going to give you. so you would say it's not going to let you know medical counseling, formal complaint by the more of your still not be on the bill. you'

the marshal was not drained through the peace, where the body of arna john still lay in the coffin from the morning in russia, power changed under the baby emperor, his mother, 21-year-old anna leopolda, who did not even shine with the mind of the deceased , became regent the empress admitted to be extremely stupid. she had been unconscious for several years, in love. the saxon envoy, count linar, was now seen as a new hero. preparing to take up the post of oberth chamberlain at the russian court, linar briefly left the saxon to settle his affairs there, but while he was traveling in russia, power again changed. the russian throne was occupied by the daughter of peter i , princess elizabeth, that a coup in favor or the testaments was being prepared, very many knew. yes, not leopold in it came daily with reports on conspiracy, but she did not pay attention to us with amazing frivolity. finally, she nevertheless decided to seriously talk about 10 years older and she had two young aunts, this conversation played the role of a catalyst, elizabeth realized that she had nowhere to retreat, an

john minute canes, in 1944 called permanent reconstruction. so that's what it is. what is at stake here? nothing less than creating a new marshal plan for the 21st century, a generational node task that must begin. now. the recovery, reconstruction of modernization of ukraine will indeed be a challenge for generations. one that will require the combined strength of the entire international community. but it is also an opportunity for generations to come if we get it right. so let us not just focus on reconstruct ting. what was as important as this is at present. but let us also think about what can be a more advanced, sustainable and resilient ukraine, a ukraine, that would be an important producer of green energy, an exporter of high and industrial, and agricultural products. a digital power house with some of the boards best i t experts and e u. member, with infrastructure and a legal framework to match for me. the pin unions commitment to ukraine as a future member as one of the most consequential geopolitical decisions of all types. are global endeavor to both reconstruct ukraine and pursue the u. s. success and process wou

marshal zhukov, their national hero, russian women are still dangerous. russia was planning a massive shelling of ukraine . security of the white house, john kirby, probably this massive missile strike was something they had been planning for a long time, it's not that the fire on the crimean bridge could accelerate some of their plans, kirby said , let me remind you that the attack on the bridge took place on october 8 of this year, that is, last week, yes. well, there is information about the fact that the european union has started preparing a new package of anti-russian sanctions , our colleague yuriy fizar wrote about it, he runs an international program here, and i think that in his column there will be a detailed review of all the reactions on russia's terror in ukraine and about decisions at different levels, well, we hope that this new package of sanctions will be even more effective and will be able to somehow influence these incomprehensible decisions in russia. well, the residents of dnipropetrovsk region are being warned about a missile attack from the outside in the caspian sea , the launch of rockets was recorded in the direction of dniprop

marshall, radio talk show host. ben, what do you make of the coverage of john fetterman's efforts to talk to journalists in general and interview in particular? >> first off, i think our sympathies can go out john fetterman and his family, everything that you have to deal with after a stroke is very challenging. but these are critical questions about whether you belong in the u.s. senate or not, and they are absolutely up for debate in terms of his mental condition and whether he's able to understand what's going on around him. this nbc reporter, dasha burns, has done, i think, a phenomenal service in terms of both her treatment of this, her transparency with viewers, being very up front about the challenges that he seems to be going through and not engaging in this in some kind of fanciful or unserious way, but being very serious with viewers and not debating whether he has the whats i to understand, but whether he has the capacity to communicate, to respond would want this type of assistance. and the reaction to her is so telling about how much of our media is dedicated not to trying to get to the truth here, but ju

john siri fox news. former arizona congresswoman, gabby giffords was announced today as the next grand marshal of the rose parade in pasadena in january, giffords has been an outspoken advocate for gun safety after being shot. during a public appearance in arizona. back in 2011. the theme for the parade is turning the corner representing the world emerging from the pandemic. little turn bucket is a delightful place to visit. but even folks here say right now, crockett stinks. also ahead tonight at 6 30, a bus driver who was attacked and seriously injured by a passenger tells his story exclusively to ktvu. why, he says he knew something was going t ha ♪ ♪ ♪ get exclusive offers on select new volvo models. contact your volvo retailer to learn more. what's it like having xfinity internet with supersonic wifi? it's fast... like beyond-gig-speed fast. get exclusive offers on select new volvo models. yeaaaaaaaaay!!! with three times the bandwidth, and the power to connect hundreds of devices at once. get the xfinity supersonic bundle with unlimited gig speed internet, wifi equipment included and a free 4k strea

host: we will get into john adams and jack ruby and just a few minutes. let's hear from marshall down in houston. caller: morning, gentlemen. a quick word about due process. do you research as you write or before you write? and advice to would-be writers. thank you very much. dan: the process for these books is a little different, because david and i are co-authors on the book. absolutely there is research to start. and the place we start is with the transcript. we start with a transcript. we both get a copy of the transcript and highlight the transcript and figure out what are the key points in the trial, because that allows us to kind of move out from there. once we know what's in the transcript we want to use, it helps tell us where we are going to want to go in the storytelling around the trial. unlike a typical book in history or other kind of book where you might start at kind of the beginning of a story, we start with the transcript and then determine what aspects of the story we think are the most important to tell from their. in regard to advice to a would-be writer, the

marshal cohen. >> the trial against the primary source continues monday with closing arguments and likely jury deliberations. this case has been brought by special counsel john durham who for the past 3 1/2 years has been looking for government misconduct in the trump-russia investigation. he hasn't brought many indictments on that front, but he did charge the primary source of the dossier, a russian expat and former think tank analyst named igor. now, durham originally charged him with five counts of lying to the fbi during interviews in 2017 when fbi agents were trying to corroborate that infamous and explosive trump-russia dossier, which was put together by a former british spy in christopher steele. durham alleges he lied during those interviews which formed the basis of his prosecution today. they threw out one of the five counts saying durham had not presented enough evidence to convict and it would be wrong to let that part of the case move forward to the jury. what that means there are four charges left. the jury will likely begin its deliberations on monday. the stakes are very high. there have only been three prosecutions to come out of the three-y

two branches of the service, a third guy, john fremont, they are gonna bicker over who is really in charge in california. there is gonna be court marshalsbig mess over that. there is a lot going on. militarily speaking, it has pretty much come down by the end of the summer by 1846. that's the first phase. the second is really this overland invasion, which goes from april to september, just a few months in 1847. but the americans don't depart until the summer of 1848. there is a long period of occupation and military government in mexico cities by american military governors, trying to use local civilians to govern, and mayors, and that sort of thing. that is part of the war, we don't have time in this class to go into. scott's plan is this. he is going to take the national highway on into mexico, on into mexico city. his first meeting with santa ana is the kind of battle that would normally end any other war. that is the battle of cerro gordo, at the passive cerro gordo on april 18th in 1847. it's been about a year since the war started. but despite not having high ground, despite fighting in another country's territory, scott's army is

. >> we will get into john adams and jack ruby in just a few minutes. let's hear fromad our callers marshall in houston, go ahead. >> good morning gentlemen, thank you. how do you write your books and do your research before you write? do you write every day and what is your advice to would-be writers? thank you very much. >> the process for these books is a little different because david and i are co-authors of the books. absolutely there's research. and the place we start is with the transcript. we start with the transcript and we both get a copy of of the transcript. we both highlight thesc transcrt and figure out what are the key points in the trial. s that allows us to move from there. once we know what transcript we want to use it tells us where we want to go in storytelling around the trial. unlike a typical book in history or any other kind of look where you might start at the beginning ofwe the story we start with the transcript and determine what aspect of the story we think is the most important to tell. with regards to advice to would-be writer the most important advice i can giv

. >> host: and will get into john adams and jack ruby in just a few minutes. but let's hear from our callers. marshaln in houston. go ahead, marshall. >> caller: good morning gentlemen. thank you. a quick word about your process, mr. abrams. i you write your books. do your research as you write or before you write? do you write every day, that kind of thing. the last one, advice to would be writers. thank you very much, both of you. >> guest: so the process for these books is a little different because david and i are co-authors on the book. absolutely there's research to start. and the place we start is with the transcript. we start with the transcript. we both get a copy of the transcript. we both highlight the transcript and figure out what our the key points in the trial? because that allows us to kind of move out from there. once we know what in the transcript we want to use, it helps tell us where we're going to want to go in the storytelling around the trial. and so unlike a typical book in history or any other kind of book where you might start at kind of the beginning of a story, we start wi