i would say this john marshall, as a father story. john, john marshall. i mean, you know, chief justice who basically transformed ed the supreme court, which was pretty much nothing before he was there in a little power. and they start out they don't even have an office and there you know nobody wants to be it there trying to get somebody to be chief justice and he doesn't want it. you know, jay does want to come back to do that. i think jay was a founder, too. but from marshall, i live in new york now. so that no john marshall, i mean, who, as i said, sort of is kind of held on to the was that held on to the federalist redoubt in the supreme court in the united states, who transformed the american economy set, a notion of judicial review, triumph who made nationalism an important thing through his construction up there. mcculloch v, maryland and so i would definitely say he's a person who's a founder. he wasn't in the revolutionary war. he did fight and he was a politician and so forth. but he's not thought of. i don't think that most people think of him

john marshall indicated the constitution intended to endure for agents to come and consequently to beo the various crisis of human affairs. this is a living document to try to relate to the day-to-day affairs that are occurring. i don't know if our founding fathers would have expected this country to be designed this large but have any concept of coming across the border land borders. but here we are. i believe that this constitution should not be taken lightly and it should be addressing human crisis. we should be working together democrats and republicansto or w best to screw the sport of what we're doing today is not in any way come up to the front door of that problem or solving the problem of working together on securing this nation. i have no doubt that secretary mayorkas wanted to screw this nation, , wants to secure this nation and will continuena to wk with this administration and all of us to ensure the safety and security of the american people. please support the amendment. with that i yield back. >> the question occurs in the amendment offered by ms. sheila jackson lee. a

he quoted a former chief justice, john marshals, saying, quote, a king is born to power and can do noident, by contrast, is of the people and subject to the law. joining me now is the vans from trump v. vance, for manhattan district attorney cy vance, is now a partner at the law firm baker mckenzie. let me start here, the case anyone is cited here in this request from the trump team where they actually quote from the dissenting opinion. i'm interested in your thought on that. but they quote, criminal prosecution can come only after the senate's judgment, not during or prior to the senate trial. we've heard this argument before, but what do you make of it and the ways in which you are referenced in this filing tonight? you are in there quite a few times. >> good evening, jen, thank you for having me on. my general reaction is we have been here before. in our case, after several years of litigation started by former president trump, the supreme court ruled, just as you indicated, that a sitting president can be investigated, but that is not the first time the supreme court has said that

in congress start using impeachment to threaten federalists, they didn't like they threatened john marshall. they they they're looking for judges initially i think who were who they thought could be vulnerable to the impeachment process and they hit upon two one was samuel chase and was very much an outsider. chase was a supreme court justice by george washington, but he was also a really fervent partizan. and he gave lots of of inflammatory speeches, particularly in enforcing the alien and sedition act against jeffersonian jefferson's partizans. so the reward for that was jefferson and the party go after chase in an impeachment. he is ultimately acquitted that two thirds threshold again poses a real problem. a majority actually votes to convict him, but don't need a majority. you need more than that, you know, supermajority to convict removal. so chase becomes an example to some to other people at the time. this is what's going to happen to you if? you are overly partizan or not one of us, but the fact that he's acquitted is construed by many, including chief justice william rehnquist. in

john kirby briefly addressing that matter. i'm sure you've all seen reports about the ronnie's a parent seizure of a merchant vessel called the saint nicholas of marshall islands flagged in greek on oil tanker. while it was lawfully navigating waters in the gulf of oman, we condemn this parent seizure, running government, and immediately released the ship and its crew is provocative an unacceptable actions me to stop. now some say this oil was actually stolen to begin with. can you give us any insight into those claims? and if this was indeed retaliation for the us seizure of an iranian vessel last year. yes, this was retaliation. the americans acting like pirates, being pirates, they stole a tank or carrying you're running oil. and then they auction the oil. so the iranians found the tank or they americans in the company, they changed the name of the tanker they were carrying oil from iraq and the ryans seized the tanker in retaliation. and the iranians want to make sure that the wealth that was stolen from you wrong by the americans, that wealth is return to iran. and also robin also teach the americans a lesson that piracy will not go without punish

bosak mp is a deputy marshal, or speaker, of the sejm, and is co—leader of the right—wing confederation party. applause let's go straight to ourfirst question, and it comes from johnn police officers, dozens of them, went in. how do you justify such drastic measures and how is that democratic? a little bit of background. late december last year, police went into the state broadcaster, tvp, after the government dismissed the head of the station, along with the heads of polish radio and the polish press agency. civic platform — the main party in the governing coalition — had long complained that the previous government had turned tvp into a propaganda channel. agnieszka pomaska, from civic platform, how do you justify such drastic measures? how is it democratic? first of all, thank you for the invitation and thank you for your question. to answer it, we have to look back and describe the situation that we had during the last eight years in the polish public media, financed from the state budget. it was not public media, in a sense, we got used to it, like bbc, for example. the media during the last eight years were used to spread propaganda, to accuse the opposition

john. ken coughlin, the fire marshal. it says batteries 2.0 and should be 2.7 or something. the times we have gone through this. i will cover highlights more of the changes happened over it. again, i will reuse some of the slides and hopefully this will lead to a discussion among comments that come forward. i want to say, what we tootle mower mobility devices. they are not just e-bikes they are skateboards, scooters-it is about the scooters. we know those start fires as much as anything else and we know what happen years ago with the hover boards that came out there. hazards. again, what are hazards? it is about mischarging more then anything else and thermal runway when one cell fails and ignites the next one. lithium ion batteries [indiscernible] the firefighters we are snding in there have to put up with toxic fume s and explosion risk. what is this legislation? what does it do for us? it will establish the standards. charging and storage, two different things. establishing safety certifications. not just [indiscernible] standards and [indiscernible] prohibiting the use o

john. >> this morning, cnn is learning new details about a decorated us sailor now accused of espionage and facing course marshal, the us navy says, a chief petty officer took classified documents and transfer them to a foreign government, at least six different times. cnn's oren liebermann at the pentagon following this for us, again, or an explain this case >> so this revolves around bryce pet, a senior chief petty officer in the navy, who had a fairly long career. that from the looks of his navy record had gone well, he enlisted back in 2008, serving on three different us destroyers, three different us navy warships. most recently, the uss higgins >> in fact >> navy prosecutors say that back in november 2022, bryce pet acini had begun transferring classified information to a foreign government's something as you point out, he did a number of times over the course of the next several months, according to prosecutors, in november 2022. and then again in december, january, and february, it was in may 2023 when pet a cine was serving in japan, that navy prosecutors say he took a picture of a classified screen and

marshalls. >> it is 7.13, on a tuesday morning and we're still >> holding no rain yet. yeah. holding for now. tomorrow may be a different story. how john? yeah. tomorrow for valentine's day. and fortunately you might get a little wet out there towards the evening, especially as we do see some rainfall pushing its way back into the forecast where were sitting this morning? nice view of the sunrise in san jose right here. but looking for a good sunrise be for you. and this is about the clear is that we're getting on the map right now. a lot of us are sitting under partly cloudy skies for your morning. and that is going to be something that holds true into the afternoon as well. not quite as clear as yesterday, but we are staying dry today tomorrow. not so much as this next storm system makes its way on in resulting in that return of rainfall. and once the storm door opens tomorrow, it remains for the most part, pretty pen all the way into the weekend and into next week to where we're sitting in future cast. you can see those passing clouds today while you're sleeping tonight, a few brief sprinkles for the north bay. nothing that we're go

marshalls. >> 7.28 right now and we want to check out the weather for you. it started off great o'donnell and maybe a little hopefully. let's find out. john. good morning. yeah, we're definitely in some great this morning. very right about that, especially for the north bay where that fog is on the denser side of things. but once we see that fog burning off, it's going to be another bright and comfortable afternoon. looking outside from mount tam. you can see that the lincoln of low-grade hanging out above the bay. we do have enough of it to be resulting in dense fog advisories up in marine sonoma and napa counties. those mike gray up there and then also a frost advisory up in the mountains east of san jose. really only for those upper elevations, though, current visibility still not so great up in santa rosa. most of us are starting to see some improvements, though. temperature wise, we're off to a cold start double and you're at 35 degrees at 39 santa rosa, surprisingly mild. that's 42, but also because of the fog that's formed there has sheltered a little bit of the heat loss overnight. why you're starting in the 40's rather than the 30's later on to

marshal in the front row and city attorney sitting here, maybe we can answer these now. is there issue of state preemption deputy city attorney the land use committee want informed about? >> johns to form which indicate the ordinance is defensible inchallenged. questions came up recently before this meeting about the interplay between the ordinance and state law which we are looking into. don't have a complete analysis of that question or those questions at this meeting. certainly will by next meeting whether you continue the item today or pass it first reading today. >> this raises process things and as president of the board and long-term member of this body, generally if there are some after the fact legal infirmties or questions president of the board knows about it and may suggest a continuance, but this is catching me totally by surprise. generally somebody tells me like this item is continued--mr. fire marshal, are you-my understanding of state law is that the state uniform building code, we -relative to the local conditions regulate more stringently if it is in the best interest of life safety and you made a presentation to the land use committee where you talked about